journal article·2023-04-23Open access

Influence of Drop Viscosity and Surface Wettability on Impact Outcomes

Ghokulla Haran Krishnan, Kevin Fletcher, Eric Loth

Coatings· Volume 13· Issue 5

Abstract

To understand the effects of liquid viscosity and surface wettability on the outcomes for a drop impacting perpendicularly on a dry, clean surface at a normal temperature and pressure, experiments were conducted for a wide variety of droplets and substrate surfaces. These experiments included a range of receding contact angles (from ~18° to ~150°) and liquid viscosities (from 1 cp to 45 cp); the broadest such combination is yet published. The surface wettabilities were quantitatively characterized using a new set of definitions: superphillic (θrec < 30°), phillic (30° < θrec < 90°), phobic (90° < θrec < 150°), and superphobic (θrec > 150°). Six different outcome regimes were found (including a new beaded deposition outcome) as a function of Ohnesorge number, Weber number, and the cosine of the receding contact angle. The beaded deposition is a hybrid of the well-known splash and deposition outcomes. The critical Weber number that separates the outcome boundaries was found to be significantly influenced by both the Ohnesorge numbers and the receding contact angle. In particular, there is a consistent reduction in the critical Weber number from superphilic to philic to neutral wettability conditions. Interestingly, this same decreasing trend line continues from neutral to phobic to superphobic conditions, but instead, it separates the regimes of deposition and bouncing. At higher Weber numbers, an additional boundary regime was found between splashing and bounce, which also decreased as the surface wettability decreased. This same type of trend was seen for several Ohnesorge numbers, indicating that wetting characterization should be based on the contact angles for the combination of the droplet liquid and the surface. In addition, a new regime map for droplet rebound on superphobic surfaces was obtained from the present and previous results indicating (for the first time) that the total rebound generally occurs for Weber numbers between 2.2 and 32 with Ohnesorge numbers less than 0.17. Additional studies are recommended to explore an even broader range of test conditions (especially intermediate wettability conditions), the separate influence of advancing and/or hysteresis contact angles, and to include the effects of the inclination angle, gas pressure, and heat transfer.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Plant Surface Properties and Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Virginia, 324 MEC, 122 Engineer’s Way, P.O. Box 400746, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Drop Impact Dynamics: Splashing, Spreading, Receding, Bouncing10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092144 ↗
2. Spray impact onto flat and rigid walls: Empirical characterization and modelling10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2006.09.008 ↗
3. Drop Impact on a Solid Surface10.1146/annurev-fluid-122414-034401 ↗
4. Zerteilgrenze beim Tropfenprall10.1002/cite.330520412 ↗
5. Droplet-wall collisions: Experimental studies of the deformation and break-up process10.1016/0301-9322(94)00069-V ↗
6. The impact of a single drop on a wetted solid surface10.1007/s003480050073 ↗
7. Outcomes from a drop impact on solid surfaces
8. The splash/non-splash boundary upon a dry surface and thin fluid film10.1007/s00348-005-0045-1 ↗
9. Palacios, J., Gomez, P., Zanzi, C., Lopez, J., and Hernandez, J. (2010, January 6–8). Experimental study on the splash/deposition limit in drop impact onto solid surfaces. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Brno, Czech Republic.
10. Superoleophobic Surfaces through Control of Sprayed-on Stochastic Topography10.1021/la301480s ↗
11. Drop Impact upon Micro- and Nanostructured Suerhydrophobic Surfaces10.1021/la900330q ↗
12. Is a Knowledge of Surface Topology and Contact Angles Enough to Define the Drop Impact Outcome10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01117 ↗
13. Imparting Icephobicity with Substrate Flexibility10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b01412 ↗
14. Phenomena of liquid drop impact on solid and liquid surfaces10.1016/0169-5983(93)90106-K ↗
15. The impact of compressible liquids10.1146/annurev.fl.15.010183.000525 ↗
16. Drop impacts onto cold and heated rigid surfaces: Morphological comparisons, disintegration limits and secondary atomization10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2006.10.004 ↗
17. Temperature and humidity effects on superhydrophobicity of nanocomposite coatings10.1063/1.3680567 ↗
18. The liquid deposition fraction of sprays impinging vertical walls and flowing films10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2004.08.004 ↗
19. Drop impact and rebound dynamics on an inclined superhydrophobic surface10.1021/la502500z ↗
20. Splash Threshold of a Droplet impacting a moving surface10.1063/1.4972976 ↗
21. Regimes of coalescence and separation in droplet collision10.1017/S0022112096003722 ↗
22. Effects of gas and droplet characterization on drop-drop collision outcome regimes10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2015.08.003 ↗
23. Towards a deterministic composite collision model for surface-tension dominated droplets10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2018.08.007 ↗
24. Droplet impact: Viscosity and wettability effects on splashing10.1016/j.jcis.2019.05.101 ↗
25. Prallzerstaubung von Flussigkeiten bei Nichtbenetzung10.1002/cite.330480724 ↗
26. Drop Rebound after Impact: The Role of the Receding Contact Angle10.1021/la4012372 ↗
27. Experiments of drops impacting a smooth solid surface: A model of the critical impact speed for drop splashing10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.189901 ↗
28. Data-driven splashing threshold model for drop impact on dry smooth surfaces10.1063/5.0076427 ↗
29. Development and application of a drop-wall interaction model at high ambient pressure conditions10.1615/AtomizSpr.2022038549 ↗
30. A comparative study of the immiscibility effect on liquid drop impacting onto very thin films10.1007/s00348-021-03232-5 ↗
31. SPH-ASR study of drop impact on a heated surface with consideration of inclined angle and evaporation10.1016/j.enganabound.2022.05.016 ↗
32. Effect of superamphiphobic macrotextures on dynamics of viscous liquid droplets10.1038/s41598-018-33656-9 ↗
33. Shape and instability of free-falling liquid globules10.1209/0295-5075/80/34005 ↗
34. Clift, R., Grace, J.R., and Weber, M.E. (1978). Bubbles, Drops, and Particles, Academic Press.
35. Quasi-steady shape and drag of deformable bubbles and drops10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2007.08.010 ↗
36. Glycerin Producers’ Association (1963). Glycerin Producers’ Association Physical Properties of Glycerin And its Solutions, Glycerin Producers’ Association.
37. Superhydrophobic Nanocomposite Surface Topology and Ice Adhesion10.1021/am501640h ↗
38. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water10.1021/ie50320a024 ↗
39. Surface Roughness and Contact Angle10.1021/j150474a015 ↗
40. Wetting of porous surfaces10.1039/tf9444000546 ↗
41. Analysis of Impact of Droplets on Horizontal Surfaces10.1016/S0894-1777(01)00109-1 ↗
42. Maximal deformation of an Impacting Drop10.1017/S0022112004000904 ↗
43. Drop dynamics after impact on a solid wall: Theory and simulations10.1063/1.3432498 ↗