journal article·2021-01-15Open access

Developing New Marine Antifouling Surfaces: Learning from Single-Strain Laboratory Tests

Sara I. Faria, Luciana C. Gomes, Rita Teixeira-Santos, João Morais, Vítor Vasconcelos, Filipe J. M. Mergulhão

Coatings· Volume 11· Issue 1

Abstract

The development of antifouling (AF) technology for marine environments is an area of intense research given the severe economic and ecological effects of marine biofouling. Preliminary data from in vitro assays is frequently used to screen the performance of AF coatings. It is intuitive that microbial composition plays a major role in surface colonization. The rationale behind this study is to investigate whether using a mixed population for the in vitro tests yields substantially different results than using single strains during initial screening. A polymeric coating was tested against single- and dual-species cultures of two common microfouler organisms for 49 days. A bacterium (Pseudoaltermonas tunicata) and a cyanobacterium (Cyanobium sp. LEGE 10375) were used in this study. Linear regression analysis revealed that Cyanobium sp. biofilms were significantly associated with a higher number of cells, wet weight, thickness, and biovolume compared to dual-species biofilms. P. tunicata alone had a biofilm growth kinetics similar to dual-species biofilms, although the P. tunicata–Cyanobium sp. mixture developed less dense and thinner biofilms compared to both single-species biofilms. Cyanobium sp. LEGE 10375 biofilms provided the worst-case scenario, i.e., the conditions that caused higher biofilm amounts on the surface material under test. Therefore, it is likely that assessing the AF performance of new coatings using the most stringent conditions may yield more robust results than using a mixed population, as competition between microfouler organisms may reduce the biofilm formation capacity of the consortium.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution · Marine Ecology and Invasive Species

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

LEPABE—Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal

CIIMAR—Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto de Leixões, Avenida General Norton de Matos, S/N, 4450-208 Matosinhos, Portugal

FCUP—Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, 4069-007 Porto, Portugal

Funding

FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC) · INTERREG V Espanha Portugal (POCTEP) · FCT · FEDER funds through COMPETE2020 - Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI) and FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC)

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Caruso, G. (2020). Microbial Colonization in Marine Environments: Overview of Current Knowledge and Emerging Research Topics. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8.10.3390/jmse8020078 ↗
2. Marine biofilms: A successful microbial strategy with economic implications10.3389/fmars.2018.00126 ↗
3. Novel marine antifouling coatings inspired by corals10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100294 ↗
4. Hellio, C., and Yebra, D. (2009). The use of copper as a biocide in marine antifouling paints. Advances in Marine Antifouling Coatings and Technologies, Woodhead Publishing.10.1533/9781845696313 ↗
5. Effect of shipping traffic on biofouling invasion success at population and community levels10.1007/s10530-016-1258-3 ↗
6. Nano and traditional copper and zinc antifouling coatings: Metal release and impact on marine sessile invertebrate communities10.1007/s11051-020-04875-x ↗
7. Eco-friendly non-biocide-release coatings for marine biofouling prevention10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.010 ↗
8. Antifouling processes and toxicity effects of antifouling paints on marine environment. A review10.1016/j.etap.2017.12.001 ↗
9. Faria, S.I., Teixeira-Santos, R., Gomes, L.C., Silva, E.R., Morais, J., Vasconcelos, V., and Mergulhão, F.J.M. (2020). Experimental assessment of the performance of two marine coatings to curb biofilm formation of microfoulers. Coatings, 10.10.3390/coatings10090893 ↗
10. Bioinspired surfaces with wettability for antifouling application10.1039/C9NR05870B ↗
11. Designing biomimetic antifouling surfaces
12. A multi-step approach for testing non-toxic amphiphilic antifouling coatings against marine microfouling at different levels of biological complexity10.1016/j.mimet.2018.02.009 ↗
13. Biofilm formation behaviour of marine filamentous cyanobacterial strains in controlled hydrodynamic conditions10.1111/1462-2920.14807 ↗
14. Photoautotrophic-heterotrophic biofilm communities: A laboratory incubator designed for growing axenic diatoms and bacteria in defined mixed-species biofilms10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00315.x ↗
15. Magana, M., Sereti, C., Ioannidis, A., Mitchell, C.A., Ball, A.R., Magiorkinis, E., Chatzipanagiotou, S., Hamblin, M.R., Hadjifrangiskou, M., and Tegos, G.P. (2018). Options and limitations in clinical Investigation of bacterial biofilms. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 31.10.1128/CMR.00084-16 ↗
16. Interactions in multispecies biofilms: Do they actually matter?10.1016/j.tim.2013.12.004 ↗
17. Studying Bacterial Multispecies Biofilms: Where to Start?10.1016/j.tim.2016.02.019 ↗
18. Interactions in self-assembled microbial communities saturate with diversity10.1038/s41396-019-0356-5 ↗
19. Azevedo, A.S., Gerola, G.P., Baptista, J., Almeida, C., Peres, J., Mergulhão, F.J.M., and Azevedo, N.F. (2020). Increased Intraspecies diversity in Escherichia coli biofilms promotes cellular growth at the expense of matrix production. Antibiotics, 9.10.3390/antibiotics9110818 ↗
20. Faria, S.I., Teixeira-Santos, R., Romeu, M.J., Morais, J., Vasconcelos, V., and Mergulhão, F.J.M. (2020). The Relative Importance of Shear Forces and Surface Hydrophobicity on Biofilm Formation by Coccoid Cyanobacteria. Polymers, 12.10.5194/biofilms9-33 ↗
21. Taylor, D.A. (1996). Chapter 16—Engineering materials. Introduction to Marine Engineering, Butterworth-Heinemann. [2nd ed.].10.1016/B978-075062530-2/50017-9 ↗
22. High frequency monitoring of the coastal marine environment using the MAREL buoy10.1039/B314073C ↗
23. Epoxy resin infused boat hulls10.1016/j.repl.2016.01.002 ↗
24. Pseudoalteromonas tunicata sp. nov., a bacterium that produces antifouling agents10.1099/00207713-48-4-1205 ↗
25. Cyanobacterial diversity held in microbial biological resource centers as a biotechnological asset: The case study of the newly established LEGE culture collection10.1007/s10811-017-1369-y ↗
26. Economic impact of biofouling on a naval surface ship10.1080/08927014.2010.542809 ↗
27. Comparison of velocity profiles for different flow chamber designs used in studies of microbial adhesion to surfaces10.1128/AEM.69.10.6280-6287.2003 ↗
28. Impact of modified diamond-like carbon coatings on the spatial organization and disinfection of mixed-biofilms composed of Escherichia coli and Pantoea agglomerans industrial isolates10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.04.017 ↗
29. Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program COMSTAT10.1099/00221287-146-10-2395 ↗
30. Ecofriendly Antifouling Marine Coatings10.1021/sc500845n ↗
31. Biofouling communities on test panels coated with TBT and TBT-free copper based antifouling paints10.1080/08927010600912291 ↗
32. Institution, W.H.O. (1952). The Testing of Antifouling Paints. Marine Fouling and Its Prevention, United States Naval Institute.
33. Thomas, T., Evans, F.F., Schleheck, D., Mai-Prochnow, A., Burke, C., Penesyan, A., Dalisay, D.S., Stelzer-Braid, S., Saunders, N., and Johnson, J. (2008). Analysis of the Pseudoalteromonas tunicata Genome Reveals Properties of a Surface-Associated Life Style in the Marine Environment. PLoS ONE, 3.10.1371/journal.pone.0003252 ↗
34. Competitive interactions in mixed-species biofilms containing the marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas tunicata10.1128/AEM.71.4.1729-1736.2005 ↗
35. Enhanced biofilm formation and increased resistance to antimicrobial agents and bacterial invasion are caused by synergistic interactions in multispecies biofilms10.1128/AEM.03022-05 ↗
36. High prevalence of biofilm synergy among bacterial soil isolates in cocultures indicates bacterial interspecific cooperation10.1038/ismej.2014.96 ↗
37. Biofilm development and enhanced stress resistance of a model, mixed-species community biofilm10.1038/ismej.2013.194 ↗
38. Coexistence facilitates interspecific biofilm formation in complex microbial communities10.1111/1462-2920.13335 ↗
39. All together now: Experimental multispecies biofilm model systems10.1111/1462-2920.13594 ↗
40. An in vitro model of catheter-associated urinary tract infections to investigate the role of uncommon bacteria on the Escherichia coli microbial consortium10.1016/j.bej.2016.11.013 ↗
41. Martín-Rodríguez, A.J., González-Orive, A., Hernández-Creus, A., Morales, A., Dorta-Guerra, R., Norte, M., Martín, V.S., and Fernández, J.J. (2014). On the influence of the culture conditions in bacterial antifouling bioassays and biofilm properties: Shewanella algae, a case study. BMC Microb., 14.10.1186/1471-2180-14-102 ↗
42. Marine antifouling laboratory bioassays: An overview of their diversity10.1080/08927010902745316 ↗
43. Dobretsov, S., and Rittschof, D. (2020). Love at first taste: Induction of larval settlement by marine microbes. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 21.10.3390/ijms21030731 ↗