Developing New Cleaning Strategies of Cultural Heritage Stones: Are Synergistic Combinations of a Low-Toxic Solvent Ternary Mixtures Followed by Laser the Solution?
Source abstract
Abstract
As the UN Agenda 2030 recognizes heritage protection in several goals, this research was focused on the improvement of the graffiti removal from stones. The cleaning of two graffiti paints with different composition (an alkyd- and an acrylic–based paints) from two stones (gneiss and travertine) was performed considering a synergistic approach based on the combination of a low-toxic solvent ternary mixture, followed by an Nd:YAG laser. The different concentrations of the low-toxic solvents were based on the triangular Teas graph, keeping similar Hansen solubility of the products commonly used in conservation of cultural heritage: methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) and n-butyl acetate. The n-butyl acetate was replaced by mixture A (51% ethyl alcohol/11% acetone/38% isooctane) and MEK by mixture B (7%/13%/80%). Regardless of the graffiti composition, the gneiss was satisfactorily cleaned with the mixture A, while for the travertine, the best results were achieved by the mixture B. Then, surfaces treated with the mixtures were irradiated with a QS Nd:YAG laser working at 532 nm. The cleaning evaluation was performed by stereomicroscopy, color spectrophotometry, roughness measurements, reflectance measurements, and scanning electron microscopy. As result, regardless on the stone and the graffiti paints, it was confirmed the enhancement of cleaning of the mixtures followed by the Nd:YAG laser. However, it is crucial to identify previously the concentrations of the chemical products that allow the best performance considering the graffiti-stone interaction, on the one hand, and the optimal laser’s parameters, on the other hand.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Building materials and conservation · Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis · Glass properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Fondazione Centro Conservazione e Restauro “La Venaria Reale”, 10078 Venaria Reale (TO), Italy
Dpto. Enxeñaría dos Recursos Naturais e Medio Ambiente, Escola de Enxeñaría de Minas e Enerxía, Universidade de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. United Nations (2020, March 20). About the Sustainable Development Goals (Agenda 2030). Available online: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/.
2. ICOMOS (2020, March 20). Concept Note for the United Nations Agenda 2030 and the Third United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (HABITAT). Available online: http://www.usicomos.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Final-Concept-Note.pdf.
3. GRAFFITAGE Project (2020, March 20). Development of a New Anti-graffiti System, Based on Traditional Concepts, Preventing Damage of Architectural Heritage Materials. Final Report of the SSP (Policy Oriented Research) of the Sixth European Programme of the European Commission. European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2008; FP6-2003-SSP 3–513718. Available online: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/513718/reporting.
4. GRAFFOLUTION Project (2020, March 20). Awareness and Prevention Solutions against Graffiti Vandalism in Public Areas and Transport. Final Report of the SSP (Policy Oriented Research) of the Seventh European Programme of the European Commission. European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2016; FP7-SEC-2013-1. Available online: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/608152.
5. Current methods of graffiti removal: A review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.093 ↗
6. Effectiveness of granite cleaning procedures in cultural heritage: A review10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.090 ↗
7. Conservation strategies against graffiti vandalism on Cultural Heritage stones: Protective coatings and cleaning methods10.1016/j.porgcoat.2017.08.010 ↗
8. Nd:YVO4 laser removal of graffiti from granite Influence of paint and rock properties on cleaning efficacy10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.09.110 ↗
9. (2020, March 20). Venice Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites, ICOMOS. Available online: http://www.icomos.org/venicecharter2004/index.html.
10. Grimmer, A.E. (1988). Keeping It Clean: Removing Exterior Dirt, Paint, Stains and Graffiti from Historic Masonry Buildings. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data, Diane Pub Co.
11. Historic England (2020, March 20). Graffiti on Historic Buildings and Monuments. Methods of Removal and Prevention. Available online: https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/graffiti-on-historic-buildings-and-monuments/.
12. Urquhart, D. (1999). The treatment of graffiti on historic surfaces. Advice on graffiti removal procedures, anti-graffiti coatings and alternative strategies. Historic Scotland Technical Advice Note, TCRE Division/Scottish Conservation Bureau. no.18.
13. Investigation into the removal of graffiti on mineral supports: Comparison of nano-second Nd:YAG laser cleaning with traditional mechanical and chemical methods10.1179/0039363015Z.000000000208 ↗
14. An investigation on the efficiency of water-jet technology for graffiti cleaning10.1016/j.culher.2015.11.009 ↗
15. The influence of the SO2 aging on the graffiti cleaning effectiveness with chemical procedures on a granite substrate10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.291 ↗
16. Mechanical and laser cleaning of spray graffiti paints on a granite subjected to a SO2-rich atmosphere10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.130 ↗
17. Pozo-Antonio, J.S., López, L., Dionísio, A., and Rivas, T. (2018). A Study on the Suitability of Mechanical Soft-Abrasive Blasting Methods to Extract Graffiti Paints on Ornamental Stones. Coatings, 8.10.3390/coatings8100335 ↗
18. Fotakis, C., Anglos, D., Zafiropulos, V., Georgiou, S., and Tornari, V. (2006). Lasers in the Preservation of Cultural Heritage: Principles and Applications, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.10.1201/9780367800857 ↗
19. Effectiveness and harmfulness evaluation of graffiti cleaning by mechanical, chemical and laser procedures on granite10.1016/j.microc.2015.10.040 ↗
20. Giusti, C., Colombini, M.P., Lluveras-Tenorio, A., La Nasa, J., Striova, J., and Salvadori, B. (2020). Graphic vandalism: Multi-analytical evaluation of laser and chemical methods for the removal of spray paints. J. Cult. Herit., in press.10.1016/j.culher.2020.01.007 ↗
21. Comparative study of pulsed laser cleaning applied to weathered marble surfaces10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.06.081 ↗
22. Cleaning graffitis on urban buildings by use of second and third harmonic wavelength of a Nd:YAG laser: A comparative study10.1016/S0169-4332(02)01241-2 ↗
23. Comparative study between IR and UV laser radiation applied to the removal of graffitis on urban buildings10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.04.051 ↗
24. Pozo-Antonio, J.S., Papanikolaou, A., Melessanaki, K., Rivas, T., and Pouli, P. (2018). Laser-Assisted Removal of Graffiti from Granite: Advantages of the Simultaneous Use of Two Wavelengths. Coatings, 8.10.3390/coatings8040124 ↗
25. Laser technology for graffiti removal10.1016/S1296-2074(00)00153-9 ↗
26. Acute health effects common during graffiti removal10.1007/s004200000211 ↗
27. TriSolv Software, ISCR (2018, January 31). Triangolo interattivo dei solventi e delle solubilità®. Available online: http://icr.beniculturali.it/flash/progetti/TriSolv/TriSolv.html.
28. Coladonato, M., and Scarpitti, P. (2018, January 31). Note sul Triangolo interattivo dei solvent e delle solubilità©. Available online: http://www.icr.beniculturali.it/flash/progetti/TriSolv/dati/IT/TriSolv_IT.pdf.
29. Hansen, C.M. (2007). Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User’s Handbook, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.10.1201/9781420006834 ↗
30. Kanegsberg, B., and Kanegsberg, E. (2011). Handbook for Critical Cleaning: Cleaning Agents and Systems, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.10.1201/b10897 ↗
31. TOURinSTONES: A free mobile application for promoting geological heritage in the city of Turin (NW Italy)10.1007/s12371-017-0277-5 ↗
32. Contemporary natural stones from the Italian western Alps (Piedmont and Aosta Valley Regions)
33. ASTM-D4404-10 (2010). Standard Test Method for Determination of Pore Volume and Pore Volume Distribution of Soil and Rock by Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry, ASTM International.
34. (2017, January 31). Montana Colors. Available online: www.montanacolors.com.
35. U.S. National Library of Medicine (2018, January 31). National Center for Biotechnology Information, Available online: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.
36. (2007). CIE0144 S–S/E:2007 Colorimetry Part 4: CIE 1976 L*a*b* Color Space, CIE Central Bureau.
37. Measuring the color of granite rocks. A proposed procedure10.1002/col.20579 ↗
38. (1996). UNI-EN ISO 4288:1996 Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface Texture: Profile Method—Rules and Procedures for the Assessment of Surface Texture, International Organization for Standardization.
39. Cremonesi, P. (2004). L’uso dei Solventi Organici nella Pulitura di Opere Policrome, IL PRATO PUBLISHING HOUSE SRL.
40. Color difference DE—A survey
41. Indicators and ratings for the compatibility assessment of conservation actions10.1016/j.culher.2006.04.007 ↗
42. Review of the anatase to rutile phase transformation10.1007/s10853-010-5113-0 ↗
43. Lambourne, R., and Strivens, T.A. (1999). Pigments for paints. Paints in Surface Coatings: Theory and Practice, Woodhead Publishing.10.1533/9781855737006 ↗
44. Optimizing the benefits of TiO2 in paints10.1007/s11998-019-00295-2 ↗
45. Influence of material properties on TiO2 nanoparticle agglomeration
46. Laser ablation of iron-rich black films from exposed granite surfaces10.1007/s00339-014-8470-8 ↗
47. Detection of the optimal laser fluence ranges to clean graffiti on silicates10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.035 ↗
48. A reassignment of the optical absorption bands in biotites10.1007/BF00308360 ↗