Surface Properties of Retrieved Cementless Femoral Hip Endoprostheses Produced from a Ti6Al7Nb Alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
We have investigated new and retrieved cementless hip endoprostheses that prematurely failed due to (i) aseptic loosening, (ii) infection and (iii) latent infection. The aim was to better understand the physico-chemical phenomena on the surfaces and sub-surfaces of the Ti6Al7Nb alloy implant. The results of our studies should enable us to distinguish the causes of premature failure, optimize the surface modification, achieve optimal osseointegration and extend the useful lifetime of the implants. The surface properties of the Ti6Al7Nb alloys of the hip-stem endoprostheses (30 retrieved and 2 new) were determined by contact-angle measurements and the average surface roughness. The surface chemistry and microstructure were analysed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for morphology, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) for the chemistry, and electron back-scatter diffraction (EBSD) for the phase analysis; Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) for the surface chemistry; and electrochemical measurements for the corrosion. The improved wettability of the grit-blasted surface of the Ti6Al7Nb stems after autoclaving was measured, as was the super wettability after oxygen-plasma sterilization. The secondary-electron images showed that the morphology and microstructure of the new and retrieved stems (prematurely failed due to aseptic loosening, infection and latent infection) differ slightly, while the EDS analysis revealed corundum contamination of the grit-blasted surface. We found corundum-contaminated Ti6Al7Nb stem surfaces and sub-surfaces for all the investigated new and retrieved implants. These residues are a potential problem, i.e., third-body wear particles, and probably induce the osteolysis and aseptic loosening.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Advanced materials and composites · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Centre, Zaloška 9, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
MD-RI Institute for Materials Research in Medicine, Bohoričeva 5, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Institute of Metals and Technology, Lepi pot 11, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
MD Medicina, Bohoričeva 5, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 203010.2106/00004623-200704000-00012 ↗
2. Merola, M., and Affatato, S. (2019). Materials for Hip Prostheses: A Review of Wear and Loading Considerations. Matererials, 12.10.3390/ma12030495 ↗
3. Grimm, M.J. (2004). Standard Handbook of Biomedical Engineering, McGraw-Hill.
4. Yaszemski, M.J., Trantolo, D.J., Levandrowski, K.U., Hasirci, V., and Altobelli, D.E. (2003). Biomaterials in Orthopedics, CRC Press.10.1201/9780203913086 ↗
5. Surface chemistry and microstructure of metallic biomaterials for hip and knee endoprostheses10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.007 ↗
6. Surface characterization of implant materials, cp Ti, Ti-6Al-7Nb and Ti-6Al-4 V with different pretreatments10.1023/A:1008840026907 ↗
7. Characterisation of bioactive films on Ti-6Al-4V alloy10.1016/j.electacta.2012.12.081 ↗
8. Aseptic loosening, not only a question of wear: a review of different theories10.1080/17453670610045902 ↗
9. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 ↗
10. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases10.1038/nrmicro821 ↗
11. The significance of infection related to orthopedic devices and issues of antibiotic resistance10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.044 ↗
12. Does endotoxin contribute to aseptic loosening of orthopedic implants?10.1002/jbm.b.30150 ↗
13. Biology of implant osseointegration
14. Effect of cleaning and sterilization on titanium implant surface properties and cellular response10.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.026 ↗
15. Potential of chemically modified hydrophilic surface characteristics to support tissue integration of titanium dental implants10.1002/jbm.b.31233 ↗
16. Underlying mechanisms at the bone–biomaterial interface10.1002/jcb.240560310 ↗
17. Current methods of preventing aseptic loosening and improving osseointegration of titanium implants in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a review10.1177/0300060517732697 ↗
18. Biomaterial and implant surface – on the role of cleanliness, contamination, and preparation procedures10.1002/jbm.820221307 ↗
19. Effect of passivation and dry heat-sterilization on surface energy and topography of unalloyed titanium implants10.1016/S0927-7757(97)00237-9 ↗
20. Grit-Blasted Titanium Femoral Stem in Cementless Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: a study 5- to 10-year multicenter study10.1054/arth.2001.17940 ↗
21. Surface Characterization of Corundum Blasted Implants in Hip Arthroplasty
22. Surface Roughness of Implants: A Review
23. Guo, C.Y., Matinlinna, J.P., and Tsoi, J.K.H. (2015). Residual Contaminations of Silicon-Based Glass, Alumina and Aluminum Grits on a Titanium Surface After Sandblasting. Silicon, 1–8.10.1007/s12633-015-9287-6 ↗
24. Biological response to prosthetic debris10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.172 ↗
25. Multifunctional coatings to simultaneously promote osseointegration and prevent infection of orthopaedic implants10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.016 ↗
26. Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration10.1126/science.3629258 ↗
27. Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: materials, chemistry and topography10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.12.003 ↗
28. Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants—a review10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.004 ↗
29. Hodnik, M. (2016, January 28). Biomaterials for Hip and Knee Endoprosthesis. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Materials and Technology, Slovenj Gradec, Slovenia.
30. (2017, June 10). ASTM F1295-05 Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium-6 Aluminum-7 Niobium Alloy for Surgical Implant Applications (UNS R56700). Available online: https://infostore.saiglobal.com/store/details.aspx/details.aspx?ProductID=249286.
31. Briggs, D., and Grant, T.J. (2003). Surface Analysis by Auger and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Surface Spectra, IM Publications.
32. Kenton, W.D., Childs, B.A., Carlson, A., Lori, A., La Vannier, J.F., and Moulder, D.F. (1995). Handbook of Auger Electron Spectroscopy, Physical Electronics.
33. Moulder, J.F., and Sobol, P.E. (1995). Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Physical Electronics.
34. (2019, May 10). ASTM G102 – 89 (2015) Standard Practice for Calculation of Corrosion Rates and Related Information from Electrochemical Measurements. Available online: https://www.astm.org/Standards/G102.
35. Avsec, K., Jenko, M., Godec, M., Vesel, A., Mozetič, M., Gorenšek, M., Kocjančič, B., and Dolinar, D. (2019, January 16–17). Effect of autoclave or plasma oxygen gaseous sterilization on surface properties of Ti6Al7Nb alloy femoral stems. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Biomaterials, Portoroz, Slovenia.
36. Dolinar, D., Jenko, M., Črtalič, B., Andolšek Črtalič, M., Godec, M., Kocjančič, B., Gorenšek, M., and Oblak, Č. (2019, January 16–17). Grit-blasted surfaces of Ti6Al7Nb alloy cementless hip endoprosthesis. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Biomaterials, Portoroz, Slovenia.
37. The removal of Al2O3 particles from grit-blasted titanium implant surfaces: Effects on biocompatibility, osseointegration and interface strength in vivo
38. Cör, A. (2019, January 16–17). Wear particles and lymphocytes in tissue around failed joint prostheses. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Biomaterials, Portoroz, Slovenia.