Machine Learning Based Prediction of Nanoscale Ice Adhesion on Rough Surfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
It is widely recognized that surface roughness plays an important role in ice adhesion strength, although the correlation between the two is far from understood. In this paper, two approaches, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and machine learning (ML), were utilized to study the nanoscale intrinsic ice adhesion strength on rough surfaces. A systematic algorithm for making random rough surfaces was developed and the surfaces were tested for their ice adhesion strength, with varying interatomic potentials. Using MD simulations, the intrinsic ice adhesion strength was found to be significantly lower on rougher surfaces, which was attributed to the lubricating effect of a thin quasi-liquid layer. An increase in the substrate–ice interatomic potential increased the thickness of the quasi-liquid layer on rough surfaces. Two different ML algorithms, regression and classification, were trained using the results from the MD simulations, with support vector machines (SVM) emerging as the best for classifying. The ML approach showed an encouraging prediction accuracy, and for the first time shed light on using ML for anti-icing surface design. The findings provide a better understanding of the role of nanoscale roughness in intrinsic ice adhesion and suggest that ML can be a powerful tool in finding materials with a low ice adhesion strength.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Icing and De-icing Technologies · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Structural Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway
Funding
Norges Forskningsråd
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. A significant reduction of ice adhesion on nanostructured surfaces that consist of an array of single-walled carbon nanotubes: A molecular dynamics simulation study10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.096 ↗
2. Nanotextured Aluminum-Based Surfaces with Icephobic Properties10.1080/01457632.2019.1640461 ↗
3. Green, S. (2006, January 9–12). A Study of U.S. Inflight Icing Accidents and Incidents, 1978 to 2002. Proceedings of the 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), Reno, NV, USA.10.2514/6.2006-82 ↗
4. Wind turbine performance under icing conditions10.1002/we.258 ↗
5. Linear and nonlinear features and machine learning for wind turbine blade ice detection and diagnosis10.1016/j.renene.2018.08.050 ↗
6. Icephobic materials: Fundamentals, performance evaluation, and applications10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.03.004 ↗
7. Damage accumulation model of ice detach behavior in ultrasonic de-icing technology10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.069 ↗
8. Relationships between Water Wettability and Ice Adhesion10.1021/am1006035 ↗
9. Thermodynamics of sustaining liquid water within rough icephobic surfaces to achieve ultra-low ice adhesion10.1038/s41598-018-36268-5 ↗
10. State-of-the-art on power line de-icing10.1016/S0169-8095(97)00057-4 ↗
11. Durable and scalable icephobic surfaces: Similarities and distinctions from superhydrophobic surfaces10.1039/C5SM02295A ↗
12. Zhuo, Y., Xiao, S., Amirfazli, A., He, J., and Zhang, Z. (2020). Polysiloxane as icephobic materials—The past, present and the future. Chem. Eng. J., 127088.10.1016/j.cej.2020.127088 ↗
13. Verification of Icephobic/Anti-icing Properties of a Superhydrophobic Surface10.1021/am400429q ↗
14. Effects of nano-fluorocarbon coating on icing10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.04.043 ↗
15. Fabrication of superhydrophobic surface on aluminum by continuous chemical etching and its anti-icing property10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.08.187 ↗
16. Design of Ice-free Nanostructured Surfaces Based on Repulsion of Impacting Water Droplets10.1021/nn102557p ↗
17. Self-Deicing Electrolyte Hydrogel Surfaces with Pa-level Ice Adhesion and Durable Antifreezing/Antifrost Per-formance10.1021/acsami.0c06912 ↗
18. Ice-phobic Coatings Based on Silicon-Oil-Infused Polydimethylsiloxane10.1021/am400704z ↗
19. Linker-free grafting of fluorinated polymeric cross-linked network bilayers for durable reduction of ice adhesion10.1039/C4MH00162A ↗
20. Evaluation of icephobic coatings—Screening of different coatings and influence of roughness10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.06.073 ↗
21. Multiscale crack initiator promoted super-low ice adhesion surfaces10.1039/C7SM01511A ↗
22. Shen, Q., Qiu, J., Liu, G., Lv, K., and Zhang, Y. (2016, January 19–21). Rough surface simulation and electrical contact transient performance. Proceedings of the 2016 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-Chengdu), Chengdu, China.10.1109/PHM.2016.7819933 ↗
23. Nanoscale deicing by molecular dynamics simulation10.1039/C6NR02398C ↗
24. Enabling sequential rupture for lowering atomistic ice adhesion10.1039/C9NR00104B ↗
25. Modeling nanoscale ice adhesion10.1016/j.camss.2017.05.001 ↗
26. On the characterization of crystallization and ice adhesion on smooth and rough surfaces using molecular dynamics10.1063/1.4862257 ↗
27. Ice adhesion mechanism on lubricant-impregnated surfaces using molecular dynamics simula-tions10.1080/08927022.2018.1513649 ↗
28. Effect of wettability and surface roughness on ice-adhesion strength of hydrophilic, hydrophobic and superhydrophobic surfaces10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.101 ↗
29. Water- and ice-repellent coatings10.1007/BF02692637 ↗
30. Condensation, frost formation, and frost melt-water retention characteristics on micro-grooved brass surfaces under natural convection10.1080/01457632.2013.776453 ↗
31. Ghalmi, Z., Menini, R., and Farzaneh, M. (2009, January 8–11). Theoritical studies and quantification of ice adhesion mechanisms. Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Atmospheric Icing of Structures, IWAIS, Andermatt, Switzerland.
32. Icephobic Surfaces Induced by Interfacial Nonfrozen Water10.1021/acsami.6b13773 ↗
33. Rational nanostructuring of surfaces for extraordinary icephobicity10.1039/C3NR06644D ↗
34. Room Temperature Characteristics of Polymer-Based Low Ice Adhesion Surfaces10.1038/srep42181 ↗
35. Anti-Icing Superhydrophobic Coatings10.1021/la902882b ↗
36. On ice-releasing properties of rough hydrophobic coatings10.1016/j.coldregions.2010.01.001 ↗
37. Adsorption, intrusion and freezing in porous silica: The view from the nanoscale10.1039/c2cs35384a ↗
38. Freezing, melting and structure of ice in a hydrophilic nanopore10.1039/b919724a ↗
39. Molecular dynamics at the interface between ice and poly (vinyl alcohol) and ice recrys-tallization inhibition10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b03243 ↗
40. Effects of confinement on freezing and melting10.1088/0953-8984/18/6/R01 ↗
41. Hiemenz, P.C., and Hiemenz, P.C. (1986). Principles of Colloid and Surface Chemistry, M. Dekker.
42. Callister, W.D., and Rethwisch, D.G. (2010). Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, John Wiley and Sons. [8th ed.].
43. Studies of nano-structured liquids in confined geometries and at surfaces10.1016/j.pnmrs.2009.09.001 ↗
44. Liquid layer generators for excellent icephobicity at extremely low temperatures10.1039/C9MH00859D ↗
45. Ultrafast self-healing and highly transparent coating with mechanically durable icephobicity10.1016/j.apmt.2019.100542 ↗
46. Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells10.1126/science.347575 ↗
47. Zednik, C. (2019). Solving the Black Box Problem: A Normative Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Philos. Technol., 1–24.10.1007/s13347-019-00382-7 ↗
48. Some Studies in Machine Learning Using the Game of Checkers. II—Recent Progress10.1147/rd.116.0601 ↗
49. The effect of ice type on ice adhesion10.1063/1.5086242 ↗
50. Melting and Crystallization of Ice in Partially Filled Nanopores10.1021/jp205008w ↗
51. Water Modeled as an Intermediate Element between Carbon and Silicon†10.1021/jp805227c ↗
52. Computer simulation of local order in condensed phases of silicon10.1103/PhysRevB.31.5262 ↗
53. Embedded-atom method: Derivation and application to impurities, surfaces, and other defects in metals10.1103/PhysRevB.29.6443 ↗
54. A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods10.1063/1.447334 ↗
55. Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions10.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695 ↗
56. Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular Dynamics10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
57. Harrington, P. (2012). Machine Learning in Action, Manning Publications Co.
58. (2010). Matlab, V. 7.10. 0 (R2010a), The MathWorks Inc.
59. Friedman, J., Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R. (2001). The Elements of Statistical Learning, Springer Series in Statistics.10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 ↗
60. The many faces of heterogeneous ice nucleation: Interplay between surface morphology and hydrophobi-city10.1021/jacs.5b08748 ↗
61. Self-lubricating organogels (SLUGs) with exceptional syneresis-induced anti-sticking properties against vis-cous emulsions and ices10.1039/C5TA02690C ↗
62. Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO—The Open Visualization Tool10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
63. Frost formation and ice adhesion on superhydrophobic surfaces10.1063/1.3524513 ↗
64. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?—Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014 ↗
65. Itaoka, K. (2012, January 12–13). Regression and interpretation low R-Squares. Proceedings of the Presentation at Social Research Network 3rd Meeting, Tokyo, Japan.