journal article·2019-10-03Open access

A Micropitting Study Considering Rough Sliding and Mild Wear

Ye Zhou, Caichao Zhu, Huaiju Liu

Coatings· Volume 9· Issue 10

Abstract

Micropitting is a typical surface contact fatigue in rolling–sliding contact. The kinematic sliding is of great significance in the initiation and progression of micropitting. A numerical surface fatigue model considering rolling–sliding contact and surface evolution is developed based on mixed-EHL (elastohydrodynamic lubrication) theory, rainflow cycle counting method and Archard’s law. Surface evolution is evaluated using Archard’s wear law based on measured teeth surface topography. Surface damage is determined via the Palmgren–Miner line rule and Goodman diagrams. The effect of rolling speed and surface roughness are discussed in detail. Results show that stress micro-cycles are introduced by rough sliding in the rolling–sliding contact. The mild wear reduces the height of asperities, the maximum pressure and alleviates subsurface stress concentration. For rolling–sliding contact, the faster moving surface dominates the composite height of asperities, then decides the fluctuations of pressure, as well as stress ranges. The combination of surface topography should be considered in the surface design.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmissions, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Rycerz, P., and Kadiric, A. (2019). The Influence of Slide–Roll Ratio on the Extent of Micropitting Damage in Rolling–Sliding Contacts Pertinent to Gear Applications. Tribol. Lett., 67.10.1007/s11249-019-1174-7 ↗
2. Stress history in Rolling–Sliding contact of rough surfaces10.1016/S0301-679X(98)00085-1 ↗
3. Liu, H., Liu, H., Zhu, C., and Zhou, Y. (2019). A review on micropitting studies of steel gears. Coatings, 9.10.3390/coatings9010042 ↗
4. The Mechanism of Rolling Contact Fatigue: An Update10.1243/135065005X9808 ↗
5. Effect of lubricants on micropitting and wear10.1016/j.triboint.2008.03.016 ↗
6. Micropitting modelling in Rolling–Sliding contacts: Application to rolling bearings10.1080/10402004.2011.587633 ↗
7. Prediction of micropitting damage in gear teeth contacts considering the concurrent effects of surface fatigue and mild wear
8. Roughness evolution in mixed lubrication condition due to mild wear10.1177/1350650115577404 ↗
9. An approach to the simulation of concurrent gear micropitting and mild wear
10. The effect of contact severity on micropitting: Simulation and experiments10.1016/j.triboint.2019.06.020 ↗
11. In-Situ observations of the effect of the ZDDP tribofilm growth on micropitting10.1016/j.triboint.2019.06.007 ↗
12. Deterministic mixed lubrication modelling using roughness measurements in gear applications10.1016/j.triboint.2009.05.025 ↗
13. A Versatile Method of Discrete Convolution and FFT (DC-FFT) for contact analyses10.1016/S0043-1648(00)00427-0 ↗
14. Elastohydrodynamic lubrication: A gateway to interfacial mechanics—Review and prospect10.1115/1.4004457 ↗
15. Pitting Life Prediction Based on a 3D Line Contact Mixed EHL Analysis and Subsurface von Mises Stress Calculation10.1115/1.3195040 ↗
16. A numerical study on the contact fatigue life of a coated gear pair under EHL10.1108/ILT-10-2016-0256 ↗
17. Liu, H., Liu, H., Zhu, C., Sun, Z., and Bai, H. (2019). Study on contact fatigue of a wind turbine gear pair considering surface roughness. Friction.10.1007/s40544-019-0277-3 ↗
18. A Micro-Pitting model for spur gear contacts10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.08.015 ↗
19. Modelling of elastohydrodynamic lubrication and fatigue of rough surfaces: The effect of lambda ratio10.1177/1350650112458220 ↗
20. Rolling–Sliding contact fatigue of surfaces with sinusoidal roughness10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.04.007 ↗
21. Investigation of Contact Performance of a Case-hardened Gears under Plasto-Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication10.1016/j.triboint.2019.06.020 ↗
22. A comparative study of tribological performance of helical gear pair with various types of tooth surface finishing10.1108/ILT-01-2017-0013 ↗
23. A Generalized Reynolds Equation for Non-Newtonian Thermal Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication10.1115/1.2920308 ↗
24. Elasto-Hydrodynamic lubrication: A survey of isothermal solutions10.1243/JMES_JOUR_1962_004_018_02 ↗
25. The Viscosity-Temperature-Pressure relationship of lubricating oils and its correlation with chemical constitution10.1115/1.3656919 ↗
26. Studying Contact Stress Fields Caused by Surface Tractions with a Discrete Convolution and Fast Fourier Transform Algorithm10.1115/1.1401017 ↗
27. Johnson, K.L. (1987). Contact mechanics, Cambridge university press.
28. Multiaxial cycle counting for critical plane methods10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00148-2 ↗
29. A new definition of the rainflow cycle counting method10.1016/0142-1123(87)90054-5 ↗
30. Standard, A. (2011). E1049-85. Standard Practices for Cycle Counting in Fatigue Analysis, ASTM.
31. Sutherland, H.J. (1999). On the Fatigue Analysis of Wind Turbines, Sandia National Labs.10.2172/9460 ↗
32. Modeling of contact fatigue damage behavior of a wind turbine carburized gear considering its mechanical properties and microstructure gradients10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.04.004 ↗
33. Boller, C., and Seeger, T. (2013). Materials Data for Cyclic Loading: Low-Alloy Steels, Elsevier.
34. Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces10.1063/1.1721448 ↗
35. Mixed lubricated line contact analysis for spur gears using a deterministic model10.1115/1.4005771 ↗
36. A fatigue model for spur gear contacts operating under mixed elastohydrodynamic lubrication conditions10.1115/1.4005655 ↗
37. Correlation between evolution of surface roughness parameters and micropitting of carburized steel under boundary lubrication condition10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.05.083 ↗