journal article·2018-09-24Open access

A Study on the Suitability of Mechanical Soft-Abrasive Blasting Methods to Extract Graffiti Paints on Ornamental Stones

Jose Santiago Pozo-Antonio, Laura López, Amelia Dionísio, Teresa Rivas

Coatings· Volume 8· Issue 10

Abstract

Mechanical methods to extract undesired graffiti paints on ornamental stones are efficient cleaning methods from an economical point of view. However, effort on the optimization of mechanical cleaning procedures to avoid any damage to the substrate is required for large areas. In this study, two ornamental stones with different composition and texture, and which are commonly used in Spain and Portugal were selected: Granite Vilachán and Limestone Lioz. Moreover, the most common surface finishes were selected-disc-cutting and bush-hammering to simulate the stones found in buildings. Two graffiti spray paints were selected: Blue Ultramarine and Silver Chrome. As cleaning methods, three soft-abrasive blasting procedures: Hydrogommage (mixture of air–water–micro grained silicon abrasive), IBIX (mixture of air–micro grained silicon abrasive), and dry-ice procedure (carbon dioxide ice pellets), were tested at pressure below 0.4 MPa. The methodology for evaluating the effectiveness and harmfulness of each cleaning method was based on stereomicroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, color spectrophotometry, and confocal microscopy. As result, IBIX achieved the highest level of graffiti paint extraction although this method increased the surface roughness. Conversely, cleaning based on dry-ice projection did not achieve a satisfactory extraction of the graffiti, mainly of the blue paint. Dry-ice blasting can induce acid environments and IBIX causes dust emission during the projection. Hydrogommage was the most efficient cleaning method amongst the tested procedures, because it induced the lowest roughness change and although the graffiti extraction was not complete, it achieved the highest removal level. Therefore, the most satisfactory cleaning method was that achieving a satisfactory extraction level, minimal modifications of the surface roughness, an economic suitability, an environmental integration, and lower human health risks.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Building materials and conservation · Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis · Glass properties and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Departamento de Enxeñaría de Recursos Naturais e Medio Ambiente, Escola de Enxeñaría de Minas e Enerxía, Universidade de Vigo, Campus Lagoas-Marcosende, 36310 Vigo, Spain

CERENA, DECIVIL, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal

Funding

Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España · Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia · Xunta de Galicia

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. (2008). Illustrated Glossary on Stone Deterioration Patterns, ICOMOS.
2. Current methods of graffiti removal: A review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.093 ↗
3. Brimblecombe, P. (2016). Evaluation of cleaning methods for graffiti removal. Urban Pollution and Changes to Materials and Building Surfaces, World Scientific.10.1142/p1062 ↗
4. The influence of the SO2 aging on the graffiti cleaning effectiveness with chemical procedures on a granite substrate10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.291 ↗
5. Doehne, C.A., and Price, E. (2010). Stone Conservation: An Overview of Current Research, The Getty Conservation Institute. [2nd ed.].
6. Effectiveness of granite cleaning procedures in cultural heritage: A review10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.090 ↗
7. Conservation strategies against graffiti vandalism on Cultural Heritage stones: Protective coatings and cleaning methods10.1016/j.porgcoat.2017.08.010 ↗
8. (1999). TAN 18-The Treatment of Graffiti on Historic Surfaces—Advice on Graffiti Removal Procedures, Anti-Graffiti Coatings and Alternative Strategies, Historic Scotland.
9. Comparative study of pulsed laser cleaning applied to weathered marble surfaces10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.06.081 ↗
10. Weaver, M.E. (1995). Preservation Briefs 38: Removing Graffiti from Historic Masonry, National Park Service.
11. Evaluation of mechanical soft-abrasive blasting and chemical cleaning methods on alkyd-paint graffiti made on calcareous stones10.1016/j.culher.2014.10.004 ↗
12. An investigation on the efficiency of water-jet technology for graffiti cleaning10.1016/j.culher.2015.11.009 ↗
13. Effectiveness and harmfulness evaluation of graffiti cleaning by mechanical, chemical and laser procedures on granite10.1016/j.microc.2015.10.040 ↗
14. Blasting with solid carbon dioxide—Investigation of thermal and mechanical removal mechanisms10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.064 ↗
15. Investigation into the removal of graffiti on mineral supports: Comparison of nano-second Nd:YAG laser cleaning with traditional mechanical and chemical methods10.1179/0039363015Z.000000000208 ↗
16. Surface treatment of ornamental stones by high-pressure, water-jet technology
17. (1981). IGME-Mapa Geológico de España, E.1:50000-Hoja 261 (TUY), Segunda Edición, Ministerio de Industria y Energía.
18. Commission 25-pem protection et érosion des monuments
19. Figueiredo, P., and Aires-Barros, L. (Proc II Congreso Int. de la Piedra, Madrid, Spain, 1998). The Lioz: The natural stone of Lisbon, Proc II Congreso Int. de la Piedra, Madrid, Spain, [CD-ROM].
20. Silva, Z.C.G. (2017). Lioz—A Royal Stone in Portugal and a Monumental Stone in Colonial Brazil. Geoheritage.10.1007/s12371-017-0267-7 ↗
21. Effectiveness of commercial anti-graffiti treatments in two granites of different texture and mineralogy10.1016/j.porgcoat.2017.12.014 ↗
22. Clinarte, S.L. (2018, September 20). Limpieza de Graffitis, Autonomía Rapidez Y Eficacia. Available online: www.clinarte.com.
23. Kaercher, S.L. (2018, September 20). Whatever the Cleaning Task, We Have The Solution. Available online: www.kaercher.com.
24. Definition of the procedure to determine the suitability and durability of an anti-graffiti product for application on cultural heritage porous materials10.1016/j.culher.2011.07.004 ↗
25. (2007). CIE0144 S–S/E:2007 Colorimetry Part 4: CIE 1976 L*a*b* Colour Space, CIE Central Bureau.
26. Measuring the color of granite rocks. A proposed procedure10.1002/col.20579 ↗
27. Colour difference ΔE—A survey
28. (1996). UNE-EN ISO 4288:1996 Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface Texture: Profile Method—Rules and Procedures for the Assessment of Surface Texture, International Organization for Standardization.
29. Roughness parameters10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00060-2 ↗
30. A topographical assessment and comparison of conservation cleaning treatments10.1016/S1296-2074(02)01211-6 ↗
31. Nd:YVO4 laser removal of graffiti from granite. Influence of paint and rock properties on cleaning efficacy10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.09.110 ↗
32. Sanmartín, P., and Cappitelli, F. (2017). Evaluation of accelerated ageing tests for metallic and non-metallic graffiti paints applied to stone. Coatings, 7.10.3390/coatings7110180 ↗
33. Berns, R.S. (2000). Billmeyer and Saltzman’s Principles of Color Technology, Wiley-Interscience.