journal article·2014-06-12Open access

A Study of the Abrasion of Squeegees Used in Screen Printing and Its Effect on Performance with Application in Printed Electronics

Christopher Phillips, David Beynon, Simon Hamblyn, Glyn Davies, David Gethin, Timothy Claypole

Coatings· Volume 4· Issue 2

Abstract

This article presents a novel method for accelerated wear of squeegees used in screen printing and describes the development of mechanical tests which allow more in-depth measurement of squeegee properties. In this study, squeegees were abraded on the screen press so that they could be used for subsequent print tests to evaluate the effect of wear on the printed product. Squeegee wear was found to vary between different squeegee types and caused increases in ink transfer and wider printed features. In production this will lead to greater ink consumption, cost per unit and a likelihood of product failure. This also has consequences for the production of functional layers, etc., used in the construction of printed electronics. While more wear generally gave greater increases in ink deposition, the effect of wear differed, depending on the squeegee. There was a correlation between the angle of the squeegee wear and ink film thickness from a worn squeegee. An ability to resist flexing gave a high wear angle and presented a sharper edge at the squeegee/screen interface thus mitigating the effect of wear. There was also a good correlation between resistance to flexing and ink film thickness for unworn squeegees, which was more effective than a comparison based on Shore A hardness. Squeegee indentation at different force levels gave more information than a standard Shore A hardness test and the apparatus used was able to reliably measure reductions in surface hardness due to solvent absorption. Increases in ink deposition gave lower resistance in printed silver lines; however, the correlation between the amount of ink deposited and the resistance, remained the same for all levels of wear, suggesting that the wear regime designed for this study did not induce detrimental print defects such as line breakages.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Welsh Centre for Printing and Coating, College of Engineering, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. A complete process for production of flexible large area polymer solar cells entirely using screen printing—First public demonstration10.1016/j.solmat.2008.12.001 ↗
2. Development of a planar SOFC device using screen-printing technology10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.03.115 ↗
3. Large area screen-printing cathode of CNT for FED10.1016/S0925-9635(03)00170-5 ↗
4. Application of screen printing in the fabrication of organic light-emitting devices10.1002/1521-4095(200009)12:17<1249::AID-ADMA1249>3.0.CO;2-Y ↗
5. A printing technology combining screen-printing with a wet-etching process for the gate electrodes of organic thin film transistors on a plastic substrate10.1016/j.mee.2009.11.073 ↗
6. Optimization of SnO2 screen-printing inks for gas sensor applications10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.03.020 ↗
7. Properties of humidity sensing ZnO nanorods-base sensor fabricated by screen-printing10.1016/j.snb.2008.03.035 ↗
8. Amperometric, screen-printed, glucose biosensor for analysis of human plasma samples using a biocomposite water-based carbon ink incorporating glucose oxidase10.1016/j.ab.2005.08.011 ↗
9. A model for the screen-printing of Newtonian fluids10.1007/s10665-005-9000-7 ↗
10. Film thickness prediction in halftone screen-printing10.1243/095440803322611705 ↗
11. A study of the off-contact screen printing process. II. Analysis of the model of the printing process10.1109/33.56170 ↗
12. Screen printing process design of experiments for fine line printing of thick film ceramic substrates10.1142/S096031319900012X ↗
13. (2011). BS ISO 1817:2011 Rubber, vulcanized or thermoplastic—Determination of the effect of liquids, British Standards Institution.
14. The effect of exposure to inks and solvents on squeegee performance10.1007/BF02699673 ↗
15. (2010). BS ISO 7619–1:2010 Rubber, vulcanized or thermoplastic—Determination of indentation hardness. Part 1: Durometer method (Shore hardness), British Standards Institution.
16. (2011). BS ISO 37:2011 Rubber, vulcanized or thermoplastic—Determination of tensile stress-strain properties, British Standards Institution.
17. (2010). BS ISO 4649:2010 Rubber, vulcanized or thermoplastic—Determination of abrasion resistance using a rotating cylindrical drum device, British Standards Institution.