journal article·2016-11-13Open access

Performances and Coating Morphology of a Siloxane-Based Hydrophobic Product Applied in Different Concentrations on a Highly Porous Stone

Mariateresa Lettieri, Maurizio Masieri

Coatings· Volume 6· Issue 4

Abstract

Many polymers, able to confer a hydrophobicity to treated surfaces, have been proposed for the restoration and conservation of civil and monumental buildings. Polysiloxanes, and their precursors, the silanes, have been frequently employed for stone protection. To avoid decay of the treated surfaces, the effectiveness and harmlessness of the treatment need to be carefully evaluated before application in the field. In this study, a commercial alkyl-siloxane was tested as a protective treatment on a highly porous stone, starting from water solutions with different contents of the product. The treatments have been devised to try to balance the requirements and the sustainability of the conservative actions. Sustainability, in terms of costs and environmental impact, is regarded as a key factor in the 21st century. Morphological observations of the stone surface, static contact angle and colour measurements, water vapour transmission test, and tests of water absorption were carried out to characterize the untreated and treated stones. A concentration below the minimum level suggested by the manufacturer was still able to act as a good barrier against water. More concentrated solutions produced polymer accumulation and coatings with extended cracks. The properties of the treated stone were affected by the presence of cracks in the coating.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Building materials and conservation · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Dental materials and restorations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Archaeological Heritage-Monuments and Sites, CNR–IBAM, Prov.le Lecce-Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Amoroso, G.G., and Fassina, V. (1983). Stone Decay and Conservation, Elsevier.
2. Salts in the deterioration of porous materials: An overview10.1179/019713600806113176 ↗
3. Horie, C.V. (2010). Butterworth-Heinemann. [2nd ed.].
4. Doehne, E., and Price, C.A. (2010). Stone Conservation: An Overview of Current Research, Getty Conservation Institute. [2nd ed.].
5. Polymeric coatings for protection of historic monuments: Opportunities and challenges10.1002/app.29801 ↗
6. Wheeler, G. (2005). Alkoxysilanes and the Consolidation of Stone, Getty Conservation Institute. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10020/gci_pubs/consolidation_of_stone.
7. A comparative study of porous limestones treated with silicon-based strengthening agents10.1016/j.porgcoat.2007.09.020 ↗
8. Silicone-containing polymer matrices as protective coatings: Properties and applications10.1016/j.porgcoat.2005.09.012 ↗
9. Siloxane-based polymers as protective coatings against SO2 dry deposition10.1177/0954008310397635 ↗
10. UV-cured siloxane-modified methacrylic system containing hydroxyapatite as potential protective coating for carbonate stones10.1016/j.porgcoat.2013.03.024 ↗
11. Superhydrophobic composite films produced on various substrates10.1021/la801817e ↗
12. Study of silica nanoparticles—Polysiloxane hydrophobic treatments for stone-based monument protection10.1016/j.culher.2011.02.006 ↗
13. Simple strategy for producing superhydrophobic nanocomposite coatings in situ on a building substrate10.1021/am401826g ↗
14. Monitoring the polymerization process of Si-based superhydrophobic coatings using Raman spectroscopy10.1016/j.porgcoat.2012.11.002 ↗
15. Pino, F., Fermo, P., La Russa, M., Ruffolo, S., Comite, V., Baghdachi, J., Pecchioni, E., Fratini, F., and Cappelletti, G. (2016). Advanced mortar coatings for cultural heritage protection. Durability towards prolonged UV and outdoor exposure. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.10.1007/s11356-016-7611-3 ↗
16. The Influence of Past Protective Treatments on the Deterioration of Historic Stone Façades A Case Study10.1179/sic.2007.52.2.110 ↗
17. Calia, A., Lettieri, M., Quarta, G., Laurenzi Tabasso, M., and Mecchi, A.M. (July, January 27). Documentation and Assessment of the Most Important Conservation Treatments Carried out on Lecce Stone Monuments in the Last Two Decades. Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Deterioration and Conservation of Stone, Stockholm, Sweden.
18. A practical approach to in-situ evaluation of surface-treated structures10.1016/S0950-0618(01)00003-4 ↗
19. Monitoring the performance of innovative and traditional biocides mixed with consolidants and water-repellents for the prevention of biological growth on stone10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.012 ↗
20. Effects of conservation interventions on the archaeological Roman site of Merida (Spain). Advance of research10.1016/j.proche.2013.03.033 ↗
21. Basic methodology for the assessment and selection of water-repellent treatments applied on carbonatic materials10.1016/S0300-9440(01)00204-1 ↗
22. Contributions of scanning electron microscopy to the assessment of the effectiveness of stone conservation treatments10.1002/sca.4950260107 ↗
23. Calia, A., Mecchi, A.M., Luprano, V.A.M., Rubino, G., and Rota, P. (1999, January 17–20). Microseismic tests in the analysis and characterization of high porosity stone materials. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Non-Destructive Testing and Microanalysis for the Diagnostics and Conservation of the Cultural and Environmental Heritage, Rome, Italy.
24. Investigating morphological changes in treated vs. untreated stone building materials by X-ray micro-CT10.1007/s00216-008-1946-7 ↗
25. Biscontin, G., and Driussi, G. (2012). Proceedings of La Conservazione del Patrimonio Architettonico All’aperto: Superfici, Strutture, Finiture e Contesti, Edizioni Arcadia Ricerche. (In Italian).
26. Photocatalytic TiO2 coatings on limestone10.1007/s10971-011-2574-9 ↗
27. Water-repellent properties of fluoroelastomers on a very porous stone: Effect of the application procedure10.1016/j.porgcoat.2012.11.005 ↗
28. Lettieri, M., Calia, A., Licciulli, A., Marquardt, A.E., and Phaneuf, R.J. (2015). Nanostructured TiO2 for stone coating: Assessing compatibility with basic stone’s properties and photocatalytic effectiveness. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ.10.1007/s10064-015-0820-z ↗
29. (2001). UNI 10921 Beni Culturali—Materiali Lapidei Naturali ed Artificiali—Prodotti Idrorepellenti—Applicazione su Provini e Determinazione in Laboratorio delle Loro Caratteristiche, Ente Italiano di Normazione. (In Italian).
30. (2010). EN 15886 Conservation of Cultural Property—Test Methods—Colour Measurement of Surfaces, CEN (European Committee for Standardization).
31. (2010). EN 15802 Conservation of Cultural Property—Test Methods—Determination of Static Contact Angle, CEN (European Committee for Standardization).
32. Surface characterization and effectiveness evaluation of anti-graffiti coatings on highly porous stone materials10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.10.056 ↗
33. (1985). NORMAL Rec. 21/85 Permeabilità al Vapor D’acqua, CNR/ICR. (In Italian).
34. Water repellent ORMOSIL films for the protection of stone and other materials10.1016/j.matlet.2014.05.163 ↗
35. (2009). EN 15801 Conservation of Cultural Property—Test Methods—Determination of Water Absorption by Capillarity, CEN (European Committee for Standardization).
36. (2011). UNI 11432 Cultural Heritage—Natural and Artificial Stone—Determination of the Water Absorption by Contact Sponge, Ente Italiano di Normazione.
37. Contact sponge method: Performance of a promising tool for measuring the initial water absorption10.1016/j.culher.2008.10.002 ↗
38. Evaluation of silicon-based strengthening agents on porous limestones10.1016/j.porgcoat.2006.08.007 ↗
39. Tuning the wetting properties of siloxane-nanoparticle coatings to induce superhydrophobicity and superoleophobicity for stone protection10.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.014 ↗
40. New nanomaterials for protecting and consolidating stone10.4028/www.scientific.net/JNanoR.8.1 ↗
41. Stress during drying of two stone consolidants applied in monumental conservation10.1023/A:1020776622689 ↗
42. Study of the stability of siloxane stone strengthening agents10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.08.022 ↗
43. TEOS–colloidal silica–PDMS-OH hybrid formulation used for stone consolidation10.1002/aoc.1646 ↗
44. Effect of the addition of hydroxyl-terminated polydimethylsiloxane to TEOS-based stone consolidants10.1016/j.culher.2009.07.002 ↗
45. Ksinopoulou, E., Bakolas, A., and Moropoulou, A. (2016). Modifying Si-based consolidants through the addition of colloidal nano-particles. Appl. Phys. A, 122.10.1007/s00339-016-9772-9 ↗
46. Prikryl, R., Torok, A., Gomez-Heras, M., Miskovsky, K., and Theodoridou, M. (2015). Sustainable Use of Traditional Geomaterials in Construction Practice, Geological Society. Special Publications 416.10.1144/SP416.21 ↗
47. Superhydrophobic films for the protection of outdoor cultural heritage assets10.1007/s00339-009-5233-z ↗
48. TiO2–SiO2–PDMS nano-composite hydrophobic coating with self-cleaning properties for marble protection10.1016/j.porgcoat.2012.10.006 ↗
49. Assessment of synthetic polymeric coatings for the protection and preservation of stone monuments10.1016/j.culher.2006.06.007 ↗
50. Siegesmund, S., and Snethlage, R. (2014). Stone in Architecture, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-45155-3 ↗
51. A polydimethylsiloxane coating to minimize weathering effects on granite10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.146 ↗
52. Evaluation of the application conditions of artificial protection treatments on salt-laden limestones and marble10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.12.023 ↗