Effects of Two-Level Surface Roughness on Superhydrophobicity
Source abstract
Abstract
Biomimetic superhydrophobic surfaces have become a focal point of recent research, driven by their promise in diverse applications. Among these, the lotus and rose effects are of particular interest due to their contrasting adhesion characteristics. Given that superhydrophobicity is closely related to the hierarchical structures of these surfaces, investigating the effects of two-level roughness on superhydrophobicity is crucial. In our previous work, we introduced a wetting parameter (WRoughness), strongly correlated with the geometric characteristics of surface roughness, to elucidate the superhydrophobic behavior of solid surfaces. This parameter predicts the existence of a critical wetting parameter (WRoughness,c) during the Wenzel–Cassie transition. For two-level surface roughness composed of primary and secondary roughness, the WRoughness of the two-level surface is influenced by the geometric characteristics of both primary and secondary roughness. Furthermore, when secondary roughness is added to a primary roughness surface in the Wenzel state, the resulting two-level roughness can exhibit various superhydrophobic states, such as the Wenzel state, Wenzel–Cassie transition, or Cassie state, depending on the characteristics of the secondary roughness. To further investigate the influence of two-level roughness on superhydrophobicity, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were also conducted.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Orogenic Belts and Crustal Evolution, Ministry of Education, The School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. An essay on the cohesion of fluids
2. Scalable fabrication of superhydrophobic coating with rough coral reef-like structures for efficient self-cleaning and oil-water separation: An experimental and molecular dynamics simulation study10.1002/smll.202207118 ↗
3. Recent advances in superhydrophobic surfaces for practical applications: A review10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111481 ↗
4. Corrosion of one-step superhydrophobic stainless-steel thermal spray coatings10.1021/acsami.9b17836 ↗
5. Robust superhydrophobic graphene-based composite coatings with self-cleaning and corrosion barrier properties10.1021/acsami.5b09611 ↗
6. Freezing-induced wetting transitions on superhydrophobic surfaces
7. Hussain, S., Muangnapoh, T., Traipattanakul, B., and Lekmuenwai, M. (2023). Anti-icing property of superhydrophobic nanostructured brass via deposition of silica nanoparticles and nanolaser treatment. Nanomaterials, 13.10.3390/nano13071139 ↗
8. Dynamic behavior of water droplets and flashover characteristics on a superhydrophobic silicone rubber surface10.1063/1.4983714 ↗
9. Super-hydrophobic silicone rubber for outdoor electrical insulation10.1016/j.nantod.2024.102406 ↗
10. Superhydrophobic sand: A hope for desert water storage and transportation projects10.1039/C7TA00962C ↗
11. A simple way to achieve bioinspired hybrid wettability surface with micro/nanopatterns for efficient fog collection10.1039/C7NR05683D ↗
12. Hygro-responsive membranes for effective oil–water separation10.1038/ncomms2027 ↗
13. Robust superhydrophobic foam: A graphdiyne-based hierarchical architecture for oil/water separation10.1002/adma.201504407 ↗
14. Degradable dual superlyophobic lignocellulosic fibers for high-efficiency oil/water separation10.1039/C9GC03861B ↗
15. Superhydrophobic polyurethane sponge based on sepiolite for efficient oil/water separation10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128833 ↗
16. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water10.1021/ie50320a024 ↗
17. Surface roughness and contact angle10.1021/j150474a015 ↗
18. Wettability of porous surfaces10.1039/tf9444000546 ↗
19. Coexistence and transition between Cassie and Wenzel state on pillared hydrophobic surface10.1073/pnas.0902027106 ↗
20. Dynamic behavior of water droplets on solid surfaces with pillar-type nanostructures10.1021/la205106v ↗
21. Biomimetics: Lessons from nature-An overview10.1098/rsta.2009.0011 ↗
22. Super-hydrophobic, highly adhesive, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) surfaces10.1016/j.jcis.2011.07.053 ↗
23. A facile and cost-effective approach to engineer surface roughness for preparation of large-scale superhydrophobic substrate with high adhesive force10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.167 ↗
24. Biomimetic superhydrophobic and highly oleophobic cotton textiles10.1021/la702174x ↗
25. Thermal imprint techniques for preparation of superhydrophobic polymer coatings10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.01.015 ↗
26. Superhydrophobic surfaces: From natural to biomimetic to functional10.1016/j.jcis.2010.08.047 ↗
27. Robust superhydrophobic carbon nanotube film with lotus leaf mimetic multiscale hierarchical structures10.1021/acsnano.7b06371 ↗
28. Efficient separation of immiscible oil/water mixtures using a perforated lotus leaf10.1039/C9GC03254A ↗
29. The petal effect of parahydrophobic surfaces offers low receding contact angles that promote effective boiling10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.02.002 ↗
30. Triboelectrification on natural rose petal for harvesting environmental mechanical energy10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.05.021 ↗
31. Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces10.1007/s004250050096 ↗
32. Petal Effect: A superhydrophobic state with high adhesive force10.1021/la703821h ↗
33. Fabrication of superhydrophobic surfaces with high and low adhesion inspired from rose petal10.1021/la904585j ↗
34. Connection of intrinsic wettability and surface topography with the apparent wetting behavior and adhesion properties10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b00718 ↗
35. Excellent hydrophobicity and high mobility of condensate droplets on hierarchical nanostructured surfaces: Insights from MD simulations10.1016/j.molliq.2024.125139 ↗
36. Wetting of nanoscale water films on hierarchically structured surfaces10.1063/5.0205294 ↗
37. Contrasting water adhesion strengths of hydrophobic surfaces engraved with hierarchical grooves: Lotus leaf and rose petal effects10.1039/C7NR05713J ↗
38. Molecular dynamics study on the hydrophobicity of a surface patterned with hierarchical nanotextures10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.09.056 ↗
39. Wettability behavior of nanodroplets on copper surfaces with hierarchical nanostructures10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125291 ↗
40. Importance of moderate size of pillars and dual-scale structures for stable superhydrophobic surfaces: A molecular dynamics simulation study10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109613 ↗
41. How to make the cassie wetting state stable?10.1021/la2011869 ↗
42. Definition of superhydrophobic states10.1002/adma.200700934 ↗
43. Sun, Q., Chen, Y.N., and Liu, Y.Z. (2025). Wetting transition from Wenzel to Cassie states: Thermodynamic analysis. Materials, 18.10.3390/ma18030543 ↗
44. GROMACS: A message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation10.1016/0010-4655(95)00042-E ↗
45. GROMACS: Fast, flexible and free10.1002/jcc.20291 ↗
46. Rasband, W.S. (2023, July 06). ImageJ Image Analysis Software, Available online: https://imagej.net/ij/download.html.
47. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
48. Understanding the intrinsic water wettability of graphite10.1016/j.carbon.2014.03.025 ↗
49. The Raman OH stretching bands of liquid water10.1016/j.vibspec.2009.05.002 ↗
50. Local statistical interpretation for water structure10.1016/j.cplett.2013.03.065 ↗
51. Sun, Q. (2022). The hydrophobic effects: Our current understanding. Molecules, 27.10.3390/molecules27207009 ↗
52. Ions in water: Characterizing the forces that control chemical processes and biological structure10.1016/j.bpc.2007.03.009 ↗
53. Effects of cations on the hydrogen bond network of liquid water: New results from X-ray absorption spectroscopy of liquid microjets10.1021/jp054699c ↗
54. Negligible effect of ions on the hydrogen-bond structure in liquid water10.1126/science.1084801 ↗
55. Ion–water hydrogen-bond switching observed with 2D IR vibrational echo chemical exchange spectroscopy10.1073/pnas.0811489106 ↗
56. Glasslike behavior in aqueous electrolyte solutions10.1063/1.2906132 ↗
57. The three–dimensional structure of water confined in nanoporous vycor glass10.1021/jp0677905 ↗
58. Structure and kinetics of water in highly confined conditions: A molecular dynamics simulation study10.1016/j.molliq.2018.07.083 ↗
59. Controllable dewetting transition on graphene-based nanotextured surfaces10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146374 ↗
60. Static and dynamic behavior of water droplet on solid surfaces with pillar–type microstructures from molecular dynamics simulation10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.08.047 ↗
61. Interpretation of the unusual behavior of H2O and D2O at low temperatures: Tests of a percolation model10.1063/1.440538 ↗
62. Perspective on the structure of liquid water10.1016/j.chemphys.2011.07.021 ↗
63. Vibrational sum frequency generation spectroscopy of the air/water interface10.1016/j.molliq.2015.11.004 ↗
64. The single donor-single acceptor hydrogen bonding structure in water probed by Raman spectroscopy10.1063/1.3308496 ↗
65. The physical origin of hydrophobic effects10.1016/j.cplett.2017.01.057 ↗
66. Nature-inspired superwettability systems10.1038/natrevmats.2017.36 ↗
67. Hierarchical structures for superhydrophobic and superoleophobic surfaces10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03088 ↗
68. Mimicking the Lotus effect: Influence of double roughness structures and slender pillars10.1021/la048629t ↗
69. Multiscale roughness and stability of superhydrophobic biomimetic interfaces10.1021/la062301d ↗
70. Principles of design of superhydrophobic coatings by deposition from dispersions10.1021/la803806w ↗
71. The role of multiscale roughness in the Lotus effect: Is it essential for super-hydrophobicity?10.1021/la3029512 ↗