A Unified Framework for Asphalt Pavement Distress Evaluations Based on an Extreme Gradient Boosting Approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Flexible pavements are susceptible to distress when subjected to long-term vehicle loads and environmental factors, thereby reqsuiring appropriate maintenance. To overcome the hectic field data collection and traffic congestion problems, this paper presents an intelligent prediction system framework utilizing Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGboost) to predict two relevant functional indices: rutting deformation and cracks damage. The model framework considers multiple essential factors, such as traffic load, material characteristics, and climate data conditions, to predict rutting behavior and employs image data to classify cracks behavior. The Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGboost) algorithm exhibited good performance, achieving an R2 value of 0.9 for rutting behavior and an accuracy of 0.91, precision of 0.92, recall of 0.9, and F1-score of 0.91 for cracks. Moreover, a comparative assessment of the framework model with prominent AI methodologies reveals that the XGboost model outperforms support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) methods in terms of quality of the result. For rutting behavior, a SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) analysis was performed on the XGboost model to interpret results and analyze the importance of individual features. The analysis revealed that parameters related to load and environmental conditions significantly influence the model’s predictions. Finally, the proposed model provides more precise estimates of pavement performance, which can assist in optimizing budget allocations for road authorities and providing dependable guidance for pavement maintenance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Shandong Hi-Speed Hubei Development Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430010, China
Intelligent Transportation System Research Center, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
Funding
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Intelligent Assessment of Pavement Structural Conditions: A Novel FeMViT Classification Network for GPR Images10.1109/TITS.2024.3403144 ↗
2. Multiple-type distress detection in asphalt concrete pavement using infrared thermography and deep learning10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105355 ↗
3. E17 Committee (2024). Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys, ASTM.
4. Ma, R., Li, Y., Cheng, P., Chen, X., and Cheng, A. (2024). Low-Temperature Cracking and Improvement Methods for Asphalt Pavement in Cold Regions: A Review. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14123802 ↗
5. Calibrating the Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide Rutting Models using Accelerated Pavement Testing10.1177/0361198118788426 ↗
6. Development of a rutting prediction model for asphalt pavements with the use of an accelerated loading facility10.1080/14680629.2015.1055337 ↗
7. (2025, January 22). Development and Calibration of Shear-Based Rutting Model for Asphalt Concrete Layers: International Journal of Pavement Engineering: Vol 18, No 10—Get Access. Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10298436.2016.1138111.
8. Yang, J.D., Lu, J.J., Gunaratne, M., and Xiang, Q.J. (2003). Forecasting overall pavement condition with neural networks—Application on Florida highway network . Pavement Management and Rigid and Flexible Pavement Design 2003: Pavement Design, Management, And Performance, Transportation Research Board Natl Research Council. Available online: https://webofscience.clarivate.cn/wos/alldb/full-record/WOS:000189432800001.10.3141/1853-01 ↗
9. Matsuo, T., Fukuta, N., Mori, M., Hashimoto, K., and Hirokawa, S. (2017, January 9–13). Proposal and Evaluation of prediction of pavement rutting depth by recurrent neural network. Proceedings of the 2017 6th Iiai International Congress On Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI), Shizuoka, Japan.
10. Choi, S., and Do, M. (2020). Development of the Road Pavement Deterioration Model Based on the Deep Learning Method. Electronics, 9.10.3390/electronics9010003 ↗
11. An ensemble learning model for asphalt pavement performance prediction based on gradient boosting decision tree10.1080/10298436.2021.1910825 ↗
12. The use of deep neural networks for developing generic pavement rutting predictive models10.1080/10298436.2021.1942466 ↗
13. XGBoost-SHAP framework for asphalt pavement condition evaluation10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136182 ↗
14. Deep learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
15. Pavement distress detection using convolutional neural networks with images captured via UAV10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103991 ↗
16. Multiple crack evaluation on concrete using a line laser thermography scanning system
17. A potential crack region method to detect crack using image processing of multiple thresholding10.1007/s11760-021-02123-w ↗
18. A new mobile convolutional neural network-based approach for pixel-wise road surface crack detection10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111119 ↗
19. (2024, December 27). Support Vector Machines Approach to HMA Stiffness Prediction | Journal of Engineering Mechanics | Vol 137, No 2. Available online: https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29EM.1943-7889.0000214.
20. (2024, December 27). Full Article: Prediction of Remaining Service Life of Pavement Using an Optimized Support Vector Machine (Case Study of Semnan–Firuzkuh Road). Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19942060.2018.1563829.
21. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Sigkdd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.
22. Traffic prediction using multivariate nonparametric regression10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:2(161) ↗
23. Spatiotemporal Traffic Flow Prediction with KNN and LSTM10.1155/2019/4145353 ↗
24. (2024, December 27). Performance Prediction of Asphalt Pavement Based on Random Forest-All Databases. Available online: https://webofscience.clarivate.cn/wos/alldb/full-record/CSCD:7090014.
25. Lundberg, S.M., and Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 30.
26. A novel approach to explain the black-box nature of machine learning in compressive strength predictions of concrete using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP)
27. An ensemble tree-based prediction of Marshall mix design parameters and resilient modulus in stabilized base materials10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132833 ↗
28. Salman, M., Mathavan, S., Kamal, K., and Rahman, M. (2013, January 6–9). Pavement Crack Detection Using the Gabor Filter. Proceedings of the 2013 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems—(ITSC), The Hague, The Netherlands. Available online: https://webofscience.clarivate.cn/wos/alldb/full-record/WOS:000346481000327.10.1109/ITSC.2013.6728529 ↗
29. Sedgwick, P. (2012). Pearson’s correlation coefficient. BMJ, 345.10.1136/bmj.e4483 ↗
30. Assessment of artificial neural network and genetic programming as predictive tools10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.05.007 ↗
31. Predicting Marshall parameters of flexible pavement using support vector machine and genetic programming10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124924 ↗
32. Ensemble methods and semi-supervised learning for information fusion: A review and future research directions10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102310 ↗