Aluminum Foil Surface Etching and Anodization Processes for Polymer 3D-Printing Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Extrusion-based polymer three-dimensional (3D) printing, specifically fused deposition modeling (FDM), has been garnering increasing interest from industry, as well as from the research and academic communities, due to its low cost, high speed, and process simplicity. However, bed adhesion failure remains an obstacle to diversifying the materials and expanding the industrial applications of the FDM 3D-printing process. Therefore, this study focused on an investigation of the surface treatment methods for aluminum (Al) foil and their applications to 3D printer beds to enhance the bed adhesion of a 3D-printed polymer filament. Two methods of etching with sodium hydroxide and anodization with phosphoric acid were individually used for the surface treatment of the Al foil beds and then compared with an untreated foil. The etching process removed the oxide layer from the Al foil and increased its surface roughness, while the anodizing process enhanced the amount of hydroxide functional groups and contributed to the formation of nano-holes. As a result, the surface-anodized aluminum foil exhibited a higher affinity and bonding strength with the 3D-printed polymers compared with the etched and pristine foils. Through the increase in the success rate in 3D printing with various polymers, it became evident that utilizing surface-treated Al foil as a 3D printer bed presents an economical solution to addressing bed adhesion failure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Advanced Materials Engineering for Information and Electronics, Integrated Education Institute for Frontier Science and Technology (BK21 Four), Kyung Hee University, 1732 Deogyeong-daero, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si 17104, Republic of Korea
Center for C1 Gas & Carbon Convergent Research, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology (KRICT), Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
Funding
Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program-Advanced Technology Center Association+
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. 3D printing, a maturing technology10.3182/20130522-3-BR-4036.00112 ↗
2. 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 ↗
3. Liu, R., Wang, Z., Sparks, T., Liou, F., and Newkirk, J. (2017). Aerospace applications of laser additive manufacturing. Laser Additive Manufacturing, Woodhead Publishing.10.1016/B978-0-08-100433-3.00013-0 ↗
4. Photopolymer materials and processes for advanced technologies10.1021/cm402262g ↗
5. Fundamentals and applications of 3D printing for novel materials10.1016/j.apmt.2017.02.004 ↗
6. Applications of 3D printing technologies in oceanography10.1016/j.mio.2016.08.001 ↗
7. Fast, precise, safe prototypes with FDM
8. A short review on 3D printing methods, process parameters and materials10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.225 ↗
9. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
10. FDM 3D printing technology in manufacturing composite elements10.2478/amm-2013-0186 ↗
11. Wickramasinghe, S., Do, T., and Tran, P. (2020). FDM-based 3D printing of polymer and associated composite: A review on mechanical properties, defects and treatments. Polymers, 12.10.3390/polym12071529 ↗
12. Effect of chemical treatment on tensile strength and surface roughness of 3D-printed ABS using the FDM process10.1080/17452759.2018.1449565 ↗
13. Laser polishing of thermoplastics fabricated using fused deposition modelling10.1007/s00170-018-1901-5 ↗
14. Increased fracture toughness of additively manufactured amorphous thermoplastics via thermal annealing10.1016/j.polymer.2018.04.024 ↗
15. Effect of multiple piezoelectric transducer on fused deposition modeling to improve parts surface finish
16. Warping deformation of desktop 3D printed parts manufactured by open source fused deposition modeling (FDM) system
17. Baechle-Clayton, M., Loos, E., Taheri, M., and Taheri, H. (2022). Failures and flaws in fused deposition modeling (FDM) additively manufactured polymers and composites. J. Compos. Sci., 6.10.3390/jcs6070202 ↗
18. An exploration of polymer adhesion on 3D printer bed10.1088/1757-899X/210/1/012062 ↗
19. Experimental study to prevent the warping of 3D models in fused deposition modeling10.1007/s12588-018-9206-y ↗
20. Günaydin, K., and Türkmen, H.S. (2018, January 19–21). Common FDM 3D printing defects. Proceedings of the International Congress on 3D Printing (Additive Manufacturing) Technologies and Digital Industry, Antalya, Türkiye.
21. (2024, August 14). Available online: http://www.3dcubicon.com/shop/item.php?it_id=1592533596.
22. NaOH etching and resin pre-coating treatments for stronger adhesive bonding between CFRP and aluminium alloy10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107478 ↗
23. Influence of fluidity improver on metal-polymer direct joining via injection molding10.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.07.001 ↗
24. Super-high bonding strength of polyphenylene sulfide-aluminum alloy composite structure achieved by facile molding methods10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109204 ↗
25. Chemical interaction at the interface of metal–plastic direct joints fabricated via injection molded direct joining10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148339 ↗
26. XPS analysis of the interface between AA2024-T3/CF-PPS friction spot joints10.1002/sia.5816 ↗
27. An Auger and XPS survey of cerium active corrosion protection for AA2024-T3 aluminum alloy10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.08.170 ↗
28. Aluminum (oxy) hydroxide nanosticks synthesized in bicontinuous reverse microemulsion have potent vaccine adjuvant activity10.1021/acsami.7b03965 ↗
29. Analysis of surface roughness of cold-rolled aluminium foil10.1016/S0043-1648(00)00441-5 ↗
30. Reaction of Aluminum with Dilute Aqueous NaOH Solutions10.1023/A:1026114331597 ↗
31. Potentiodynamic anodizing of aluminum alloys in Cr (VI)-free electrolytes10.1002/sia.5919 ↗
32. Interface strength and degradation of adhesively bonded porous aluminum oxides10.1038/s41529-017-0007-0 ↗
33. Effect of interfacial nanostructures on shear strength of Al-PPS joints fabricated via injection moulding method combined with anodising10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127896 ↗
34. Surface roughness in bubble attachment and flotation of highly hydrophobic solids in presence of frother–experiment and simulations
35. The influence of surface treatment on the tensile properties of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composites-bonded joints10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.095 ↗
36. Numerical modeling of uneven thermoplastic polymers behaviour using experimental stress-strain data and pressure dependent von Mises yield criteria to improve design practices10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.311 ↗
37. Porous anodic aluminum oxide: Anodization and templated synthesis of functional nanostructures10.1021/cr500002z ↗
38. Fluoride-induced interfacial adhesion loss of nanoporous anodic aluminum oxide templates in aerospace structures10.1021/acsanm.8b01361 ↗
39. Investigation of contact angles and surface morphology of 3D-printed materials10.1021/acs.iecr.0c00430 ↗
40. Water and oil wettability of anodized 6016 aluminum alloy surface10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.204 ↗
41. Effects of two-step anodization on surface wettability in surface treatment of aluminum alloy10.3365/KJMM.2021.59.2.73 ↗
42. Surface nanostructure and wettability inducing high bonding strength of polyphenylene sulfide-aluminum composite structure10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145996 ↗
43. Direct joining of PP-Al5052 hybrid with high bonding strength by two-step anodization treatment and polymer modification10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.04.020 ↗
44. Enhanced mechanical properties of anti-corrosive concrete coated by milled carbon nanofiber-reinforced composite paint10.1007/s42823-023-00528-w ↗
45. Optimization for testing conditions of inverse gas chromatography and surface energies of various carbon fiber bundles10.1007/s42823-023-00472-9 ↗
46. Optimized interfacial compatibility of carbon fiber and epoxy resin via controllable thickness and activated ingredients of polydopamine layer10.1007/s42823-023-00638-5 ↗
47. Relationship between the tensile modulus and the thermal conductivity perpendicular and in the fiber direction of PAN-based carbon fibers10.1007/s42823-023-00568-2 ↗
48. Development of cement nanocomposites reinforced by carbon nanotube dispersion using superplasticizers10.1007/s42823-024-00714-4 ↗