Greener Approaches to Combat Biofilm’s Antimicrobial Resistance on 3D-Printed Materials: A Systematic Review
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent years, Additive Manufacturing (AM), commonly referred to as 3D printing, has garnered the attention of the scientific community due to its capacity to transform ordinary and traditional items into customized materials at an affordable cost through various AM processes. Antimicrobial/antibiofilm 3D printed materials are one of the most trending research topics, owing to the growing concerns over the emergence of complex microbial structures called “biofilms” on various surfaces. The review provides an overview of the evolution of additive manufacturing (AM) technologies and their various derivatives, along with a brief description of their materials and applications. It also introduces how biofilms can represent an advantageous lifestyle for microbial populations. The primary objective of this research was to conduct a systematic review of the development of planctonic or biofilm forms of microorganisms on 3D-printed materials. The article summarizes commonly studied microorganisms on these materials and presents their 3D printing process, materials, as well as the fields covered by each of the analyzed papers. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first all-inclusive systematic review that amalgamates research conducted in diverse fields to assess the development of biofilms on surfaces produced through three-dimensional printing. Most notably, this review presents a comprehensive account of sustainable approaches for producing antimicrobial materials through 3D printing. Additionally, we assess their advancements in various fields such as medicine, environment, agri-food, and other relevant sectors. The findings of our literature review can be used to recommend appropriate microorganisms, 3D printing materials, and technologies for academic and industrial research purposes, focusing on the development of microbial biofilms on 3D-printed surfaces. Furthermore, it highlights the potential of environmentally friendly modified AM technologies to combat biofilms in clinical and non-clinical areas. Our goal with this review is to help readers gain a better understanding of fundamental concepts, inspire new researchers, and provide valuable insights for future empirical studies focused on eradicating biofilms from 3D-printed materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Biotechnology and Bioactive Molecules Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences and Technologies, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez 30000, Morocco
Center for Nanotechnology & Biomaterials Application and Research, Marmara University, Istanbul 34722, Turkey
Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Marmara University, Istanbul 34722, Turkey
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Gibson, I., and Rosen, D. (2015). Additive Manufacturing Technologies: 3D Printing, Rapid Prototyping, and Direct Digital Manufacturing, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3 ↗
2. A Review of 3D Printing Technology for Medical Applications10.1016/j.eng.2018.07.021 ↗
3. Materials Science & Engineering C Biomimicry of oil infused layer on 3D printed poly (dimethylsiloxane): Non-fouling, antibacterial and promoting infected wound healing10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.058 ↗
4. Additive Manufacturing as a Disruptive Technology: Implications of Three-Dimensional Printing10.3727/194982413X13608676060655 ↗
5. 3D printing to enable multifunctionality in polymer-based composites: A review10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107540 ↗
6. Zuniga, J.M. (2018). 3D Printed Antibacterial Prostheses. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8091651 ↗
7. Computer-aided multiple-head 3D printing system for printing of heterogeneous organ/tissue constructs
8. Hot-melt extruded fi laments based on pharmaceutical grade polymers for 3D printing by fused deposition modeling10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.05.036 ↗
9. Additive manufacturing: Scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001 ↗
10. Chua, C.K., Wong, C.H., and Yeong, W.Y. (2017). Standards, Quality Control, and Measurement Sciences in 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, Elsevier Ltd.. Brian Guer. Matthew Deans.10.1016/B978-0-12-813489-4.00008-8 ↗
11. Hall, D.C., Palmer, P., Ji, H.F., Ehrlich, G.D., and Król, J.E. (2021). Bacterial Biofilm Growth on 3D-Printed Materials. Front. Microbiol., 12.10.3389/fmicb.2021.646303 ↗
12. Hawas, S., Verderosa, A.D., and Totsika, M. (2022). Combination Therapies for Biofilm Inhibition and Eradication: A Comparative Review of Laboratory and Preclinical Studies. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 12.10.3389/fcimb.2022.850030 ↗
13. Bacterial biofilm and associated infections10.1016/j.jcma.2017.07.012 ↗
14. Towards fabrication of 3D printed medical devices to prevent biofilm formation10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.11.001 ↗
15. In vitro anti-biofilm activity of 14-deoxy-11,12-didehydroandrographolide from Andrographis paniculata against Pseudomonas aeruginosa10.1007/s42770-019-00169-0 ↗
16. Antimicrobial effects of positively charged surfaces on adhering Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria10.1093/jac/48.1.7 ↗
17. A comprehensive review on techniques to create the anti-microbial surface of biomaterials to intervene in biofouling10.1016/j.colcom.2021.100464 ↗
18. Progress in Materials Science Multifunctional antimicrobial materials: From rational design to biomedical applications10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100887 ↗
19. An overview of rapid prototyping technologies using subtractive, additive and formative processes10.5937/fmet2001246Z ↗
20. A Review of Additive Manufacturing
21. Fundamentals and applications of 3D printing for novel materials10.1016/j.apmt.2017.02.004 ↗
22. Imširović, A., and Kumnova, G. (2021). Utilizing 3D Printing to Provide Customized Joysticks Designed to Function Universally across Volvo’ s Bachelor Thesis within the Program Design and Product Development, Chalmers University of Technology.
23. Review: Polymeric-Based 3D Printing for Tissue Engineering10.1007/s40846-015-0038-3 ↗
24. Aspar, G. (2019). L’ Impression 3D Polymère Appliquée au Packaging en Microélectronique tel-02148205, Université Grenoble Alpes.
25. Barnatt, C. (2013). 3D Printing: The Next Industrial Revolution, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
26. 3D printing of carbon-based materials: A review10.1016/j.carbon.2021.07.036 ↗
27. (2022, May 22). Centre d’etude et de Prospective Industrielle, Note Sur L’ Impression 3D. Available online: https://www.tunisieindustrie.nat.tn/fr/home.asp.
28. Chastand, V. (2022, May 22). Etude du Comportement Mécanique et des Mécanismes d’Endommagement de Pièces Métalliques Réalisées par Fabrication Additive. Available online: https://theses.hal.science/tel-01484725.
29. High performance polymer nanocomposites for additive manufacturing applications10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2016.04.010 ↗
30. Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers
31. Gebhardt, A., and Fateri, M. (2013). 3D Printing and Its Applications. Lizenznehmer RTejournal., 1–12.
32. Processing of a Polyamide-12/carbon nanofibre composite by laser sintering10.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.10.011 ↗
33. Jacques-hulin, M. (2019). Développement d’une Méthode de Conception de Moules Hybrides en Fonderie, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne—Ecole Supérieure d'ingénieurs de Reims.
34. A benchmark study on rapid prototyping processes and machines: Quantitative comparisons of mechanical properties, accuracy, roughness, speed, and material cost10.1243/09544054JEM724 ↗
35. 3D Printing of Polymer Nanocomposites via Stereolithography10.1002/mame.201600553 ↗
36. 3D Bioprinting for Tissue and Organ Fabrication10.1007/s10439-016-1612-8 ↗
37. Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016 ↗
38. Fused deposition modelling: A review10.1108/RPJ-04-2019-0106 ↗
39. 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 ↗
40. Polymers for 3D Printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074 ↗
41. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
42. Review, Analysis, and Classification of 3D Printing Literature: Types of Research and Technology Benefits10.22161/ijaers.6.6.18 ↗
43. ScienceDirect ScienceDirect ScienceDirect An Overview on 3D Printing Technology: Technological, Materials, and Technology: Applications Technological, Materials, An Overview on 3D Printing and Applications10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.089 ↗
44. 3Dnatives (2022, June 15). All about 3D Metal Printing. Available online: https://www.3dnatives.com/impression-3d-metal/.
45. Everett Hayley (2022, April 30). 3D Printing Industry Year in Review: December 2021. Available online: https://3dprintingindustry.com/news/3dprinting-industry-year-in-review-december-2021-201491/.
46. Formlabs (2022, June 09). Guide to 3D Printing Materials: Types, Applications, and Properties. Available online: https://formlabs.com/fr/blog/materiaux-impression-3d/.
47. (2022, April 20). Gaget Lucie, 2017. Archive 2017 Sculpteo Blog on 3D Printing. Available online: https://www.sculpteo.com/blog/fr/2017/.
48. (2022, April 17). Sculpteo Resin 3D Printing: The Complete Guide. Available online: https://www.sculpteo.com/en/3d-learning-hub/3d-printing-materials-guide/3d-printing-resin/.
49. Sculpteo (2022, April 21). The Ultimate Guide: What is 3D Printing?. Available online: https://www.sculpteo.com/en/3d-learning-hub/basics-of-3d-printing/what-is-3d-printing/.
50. Improving Mechanical Performance of Injection Molded PLA by Controlling Crystallinity10.1002/app.27261 ↗
51. Improving the Impact Strength and Heat Resistance of 3D Printed Models: Structure, Property, and Processing Correlationships during Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) of Poly(Lactic Acid)10.1021/acsomega.8b00129 ↗
52. Plastic biodegradation: Frontline microbes and their enzymes10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143536 ↗
53. Exposure to polylactic acid induces oxidative stress and reduces the ceramide levels in larvae of greater wax moth (Galleria mellonella)10.1016/j.envres.2022.115137 ↗
54. The effects of PLA color on material properties of 3-D printed components
55. Yang, T. (2018). Effect of Extrusion Temperature on the Fiber-Reinforced Polylactic Acid Composite (WFRPC). Polymers, 10.10.3390/polym10090976 ↗
56. Poly (lactic acid) production for tissue engineering applications10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.534 ↗
57. PE and PET oligomers’ interplay with membrane bilayers10.1038/s41598-022-06217-4 ↗
58. Foresti, R., Ghezzi, B., Vettori, M., Bergonzi, L., Attolino, S., Rossi, S., Tarabella, G., Vurro, D., Von Zeppelin, D., and Iannotta, S. (2021). 3D Printed Masks for Powders and Viruses Safety Protection Using Food Grade Polymers: Empirical Tests. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13040617 ↗
59. 3D printed antimicrobial PLA constructs functionalised with zinc-coated halloysite nanotubes-Ag-chitosan oligosaccharide lactate ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY
60. Antibiofilm coatings through atmospheric pressure plasma for 3D printed surgical instruments10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126163 ↗
61. Beniak, J., Krizan, P., and Matus, M. (2019). Mechanical properties of biodegradable pla plastic parts produced by 3d printing. MM Sci. J., 2746–2750.10.17973/MMSJ.2019_03_201806 ↗
62. Caminero, M.Á., Chacón, J.M., García-Plaza, E., Núñez, P.J., Reverte, J.M., and Becar, J.P. (2019). Additive Manufacturing of PLA-Based Composites Using Fused Filament Fabrication: Effect of Graphene Nanoplatelet Reinforcement on Mechanical Properties, Dimensional Accuracy and Texture. Polymers, 11.10.3390/polym11050799 ↗
63. Dominguez-Robles, J., Martin, N.K., Fong, M.L., Stewart, S.A., Irwin, N.J., Donnelly, R.F., and Larrañeta, E. (2019). Antioxidant PLA Composites Containing Lignin for 3D Printing Applications: A Potential Material for Healthcare Applications. Pharmaceutics, 11.10.3390/pharmaceutics11040165 ↗
64. Sato, T., Wakabayashi, T., and Saitoh, K. (2021, January 14–18). Evaluation of Antibacterial and Mechanical Properties of 3D Shaped Metal-containing PLA resin. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Leading Edge Manufacturing in 21st Century (LEM21), Kitakyushu, Japan. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10112/00025656.10.1299/jsmelem.2021.10.020-007 ↗
65. Reduction of biofilm formation on 3D printing materials treated with essential oils major compounds10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114864 ↗
66. Ryley, M., Carve, M., Piola, R., Scardino, A.J., and Shimeta, J. (2021). Comparison of biofouling on 3D-printing materials in the marine environment. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 164.10.1016/j.ibiod.2021.105293 ↗
67. Al-Taie, A., Han, X., Williams, C.M., Abdulwhhab, M., Abbott, A.P., Goddard, A., Wegrzyn, M., Garton, N.J., Barer, M.R., and Pan, J. (2020). 3-D printed polyvinyl alcohol matrix for detection of airborne pathogens in respiratory bacterial infections. Microbiol. Res., 241.10.1016/j.micres.2020.126587 ↗
68. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces AgNPs-decorated 3D printed PEEK implant for infection control and bone repair10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.09.061 ↗
69. Kiel, A., Kaltschmidt, B.P., Asghari, E., Hütten, A., Kaltschmidt, B., and Kaltschmidt, C. (2022). Bacterial Biofilm Formation on Nano-Copper Added PLA Suited for 3D Printed Face Masks. Microorganisms, 10.10.3390/microorganisms10020439 ↗
70. Stereolithography (SLA) 3D printing of a bladder device for intravesical drug delivery10.1016/j.msec.2020.111773 ↗
71. Comparison of material properties and biofilm formation in interim single crowns obtained by 3D printing and conventional methods10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.026 ↗
72. Customizable 3D printed di ff usion chambers for studies of bacterial pathogen phenotypes in complex environments10.1016/j.mimet.2019.05.002 ↗
73. Highly tunable bioadhesion and optics of 3D printable PNIPAm/cellulose nano fi brils hydrogels10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115898 ↗
74. Printing accuracy, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, and microbial adhesion of 3D-printed resins with various printing orientations10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.034 ↗
75. Personalized, 3D-printed fracture fixation plates versus commonly used orthopedic implant materials- biomaterials characteristics and bacterial biofilm formation
76. Linden, M., Bachynski, N., Oblak, M., James, F., and Weese, J.S. (2019). Manual polishing of 3D printed metals produced by laser powder bed fusion reduces biofilm formation. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0212995 ↗
77. Rational design of additively manufactured Ti6Al4V implants to control Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation10.1016/j.mtla.2019.100250 ↗
78. 3D-printed individual labware in biosciences by rapid prototyping: In vitro biocompatibility and applications for eukaryotic cell cultures10.1002/elsc.201400094 ↗
79. Single-Step 3D Printing of Silver-Patterned Polymeric Devices for Bacteria Proliferation Control10.1002/mame.202100596 ↗
80. Mangal, U., Min, Y.J., Seo, J., Kim, D., Cha, J., Kwon, J., and Choi, S. (2020). Changes in tribological and antibacterial properties of poly(methyl methacrylate)-based 3D-printed intra-oral appliances by incorporating nanodiamonds. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 110.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103992 ↗
81. Anti-biofilm multi drug-loaded 3D printed hearing aids
82. Digital light processing (DLP) 3D-printing technology and photoreactive polymers in fabrication of modified-release tablets10.1016/j.ejps.2019.05.008 ↗
83. He, Y., Luckett, J., Begines, B., Dubern, J.F., Hook, A.L., Prina, E., Rose, F.R.A.J., Tuck, C.J., Hague, R.J.M., and Irvine, D.J. (2022). Ink-jet 3D printing as a strategy for developing bespoke non-eluting biofilm resistant medical devices. Biomaterials, 281.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121350 ↗
84. Exploiting Generative Design for 3D Printing of Bacterial Biofilm Resistant Composite Devices10.1002/advs.202100249 ↗
85. 3D printed bioceramics for dual antibiotic delivery to treat implant-associated bone infection10.22203/eCM.v030a16 ↗
86. Additive manufactured graphene-based electrodes exhibit beneficial performances in Pseudomonas aeruginosa microbial fuel cells10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229938 ↗
87. Tzounis, L., Bangeas, P.I., Exadaktylos, A., and Petousis, M. (2020). Three-Dimensional Printed Polylactic Acid (PLA) Surgical Retractors with Sonochemically Immobilized Silver Nanoparticles: The Next Generation of Low-Cost Antimicrobial Surgery Equipment. Nanomaterials, 10.10.3390/nano10050985 ↗
88. 3D printed antibacterial silver nanowire/polylactide nanocomposites10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.059 ↗
89. Engineering a multifunctional 3D-printed PLA-collagen-minocycline-nanoHydroxyapatite scaffold with combined antimicrobial and osteogenic effects for bone regeneration10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.056 ↗
90. Three-dimensional printing of drug-eluting implants: Preparation of an antimicrobial polylactide feedstock material
91. Domínguez-Robles, J., Diaz-Gomez, L., Utomo, E., Shen, T., Picco, C.J., Alvarez-Lorenzo, C., Concheiro, A., Donnelly, R.F., and Larrañeta, E. (2021). Use of 3D Printing for the Development of Biodegradable Antiplatelet Materials for Cardiovascular Applications. Pharmaceuticals, 14.10.3390/ph14090921 ↗
92. Studies on the cytocompatibility, mechanical and antimicrobial properties of 3D printed poly(methyl methacrylate) beads
93. Dual-functional 3D-printed composite scaffold for inhibiting bacterial infection and promoting bone regeneration in infected bone defect models10.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.015 ↗
94. Tse, I., Jay, A., Na, I., Murphy, S., Niño-mart, N., Alejandro, G., Magrill, J., and Bach, H. (2021). Antimicrobial Activity of 3D-Printed Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) Polymer-Coated with Silver Nanoparticles. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14247681 ↗
95. Atmospheric pressure cold plasma anti-biofilm coatings for 3D printed food tools
96. Explorative study on the antibacterial effects of 3D-printed PMMA/nitrides composites10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109788 ↗
97. Bacterial attachment and bio film formation on surfaces are reduced by small-diameter nanoscale pores: How small is small enough?
98. Antibacterial efficacy of quaternized chitosan coating on 3D printed titanium cage in rat intervertebral disc space10.1016/j.spinee.2021.02.016 ↗
99. Use of silver-based additives for the development of antibacterial functionality in Laser Sintered polyamide 12 parts10.1038/s41598-020-57686-4 ↗
100. Digital light processing (DLP) 3D-fabricated antimicrobial hydrogel with a sustainable resin of methacrylated woody polysaccharides and hybrid silver-lignin nanospheres10.1039/D1GC03841A ↗