Show source-provided references
2. Murr, L.E., Gaytan, S.M., Martinez, E., Medina, F., and Wicker, R.B. (2012). Next generation orthopaedic implants by additive manufacturing using electron beam melting. Int. J. Biomater., 2012.
10.1155/2012/245727 ↗6. Design and fabrication of CoCrMo alloy based novel structures for load bearing implants using laser engineered net shaping
10.1016/j.msec.2009.08.006 ↗8. Improving the osteointegration and bone–implant interface by incorporation of bioactive particles in sol–gel coatings of stainless-steel implants
10.1016/j.actbio.2009.10.015 ↗13. Fabrication of metallic biomedical scaffolds with the space holder method: A review
10.3390/ma7053588 ↗15. Processing, characterization and biological testing of porous titanium obtained by space-holder technique
10.1007/s10853-012-6586-9 ↗16. Antibacterial metals and alloys for potential biomedical implants
17. Chen, L.-Y., Cui, Y.-W., and Zhang, L.-C. (2020). Recent Development in Beta Titanium Alloys for Biomedical Applications. Metals, 10.
10.3390/met10091139 ↗22. Gibson, L.J., and Ashby, M.F. (1999). Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, Cambridge University Press. [2nd ed.].
25. Comparison of titanium-tantalum and titanium-niobium alloys for application as dental implants
28. Highly porous titanium scaffolds for orthopaedic applications
29. Wang, C.A., Le, H., and Huang, Y. (2010). Biomimetics: Learning from Nature, Books on Demand.
34. Dependence of intertrabecular permeability on flow direction and anatomic site
10.1114/1.195 ↗35. Empirical rule for predicting mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V bone implants with radial-gradient porosity bionic structures
10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102346 ↗36. Additively manufactured gradient porous Ti–6Al–4V hip replacement implants embedded with cell-laden gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels
10.1021/acsami.0c20751 ↗37. Koju, N., Niraula, S., and Fotovvati, B. (2022). Additively Manufactured Porous Ti6Al4V for Bone Implants: A Review. Metals, 12.
10.3390/met12040687 ↗40. Xiong, Y.Z., Gao, R.N., Zhang, H., Dong, L.L., Li, J.T., and Li, X. (2020). Rationally designed functionally graded porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds with high strength and toughness built via selective laser melting for load-bearing orthopedic applications. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 104.
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103673 ↗41. The select of internal architecture for porous Ti alloy scaffold: A compromise between mechanical properties and permeability
10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108754 ↗46. (2002). Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Plastics (Standard No. ASTM D695-02).
47. Determination of the size of representative volume element for viscous sintering
52. Direct-ink writing of strong and biocompatible titanium scaffolds with bimodal interconnected porosity
53. Pore diameter of more than 100 μm is not requisite for bone ingrowth in rabbits
10.1002/jbm.1069 ↗54. Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: An in vivo experiment
10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.069 ↗55. Characterization and distribution of mechanically competent mineralized tissue in micropores of β-tricalcium phosphate bone substitutes
58. Development of porous titanium for biomedical applications: A comparison between loose sintering and space-holder techniques
10.1016/j.msec.2013.11.036 ↗59. Gryko, A., Prochor, P., and Sajewicz, E. (2022). Finite element analysis of the influence of porosity and pore geometry on mechanical properties of orthopaedic scaffolds. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 132.
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105275 ↗