journal article·2021-11-14Open access

Prediction of Coating Adhesion on Laser-Cleaned Metal Surfaces of Battery Cells Using Hyperspectral Imaging and Machine Learning

Johannes Maximilian Vater, Florian Gruber, Wulf Grählert, Sebastian Schneider, Alois Christian Knoll

Coatings· Volume 11· Issue 11

Abstract

Electric vehicles are shaping the future of the automotive industry. The traction battery is one of the most important components of electric cars. To ensure that the battery operates safely, it is essential to physically and electrically separate the cells facing each other. Coating a cell with varnish helps achieve this goal. Current studies use a destructive method on a sampling basis, the cross-cut test, to investigate the coating quality. In this paper, we present a fast, nondestructive and inline alternative based on hyperspectral imaging and artificial intelligence. Therefore, battery cells are measured with hyperspectral cameras in the visible and near-infrared (VNIR and NIR) parts of the electromagnetic spectrum before and after cleaning then coated and finally subjected to cross-cut test to estimate coating adhesion. During the cross-cut test, the cell coating is destroyed. This work aims to replace cross-cut tests with hyperspectral imaging (HSI) and machine learning to achieve continuous quality control, protect the environment, and save costs. Therefore, machine learning models (logistic regression, random forest, and support vector machines) are used to predict cross-cut test results based on hyperspectral data. We show that it is possible to predict with an accuracy of ~75% whether problems with coating adhesion will occur. Hyperspectral measurements in the near-infrared part of the spectrum yielded the best results. The results show that the method is suitable for automated quality control and process control in battery cell coating, but still needs to be improved to achieve higher accuracies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

BMW Group, 80809 Munich, Germany

Fraunhofer IWS, 01127 Dresden, Germany

Artificial Intelligence and Real-Time Systems, Technical University of Munich, 85748 Garching b. Munich, Germany

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Kampker, A. (2014). Elektromobilproduktion, Springer Vieweg.10.1007/978-3-642-42022-1 ↗
2. Huber, W. (2016). Produktion der Zukunft. Industrie 4.0 in der Automobilproduktion, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.10.1007/978-3-658-12732-9 ↗
3. Arai, K., and Kapoor, S. (2020). Deep learning vs. traditional computer vision. Advances in Computer Vision, Springer International Publishing. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing.10.1007/978-3-030-17795-9 ↗
4. Huber, J. (2017). Verfahren zur Klassifikation von Ungänzen bei der Optischen Prüfung von Batterieseparatoren. [Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Munich].
5. Deutsche Norm (2013). Paints and Varnishes-Cross-Cut Test, Beuth GmbH. (ISO 2409:2013)
6. German version EN ISO 2409:2013, 2013 (2409).
7. Borengasser, M., Hungate, W.S., and Watkins, R.L. (2008). Hyperspectral Remote Sensing: Principles and Applications, CRC Press.10.1201/9781420012606 ↗
8. Hyperspectral imaging applications in agriculture and agro-food product quality and safety control: A review10.1080/05704928.2012.705800 ↗
9. Hyperspectral imaging in the medical field: Present and future10.1080/05704928.2013.838678 ↗
10. Pharmaceutical applications of vibrational chemical imaging and chemometrics: A review10.1016/j.jpba.2008.08.014 ↗
11. Gruber, F., Grählert, W., Wollmann, P., and Kaskel, S. (2019). Classification of black plastics waste using fluorescence imaging and machine learning. Recycling, 4.10.3390/recycling4040040 ↗
12. Conceptual design of an intelligent ultrasonic crimping process using machine learning algorithms10.1016/j.promfg.2018.10.015 ↗
13. Maimon, O., and Rokach, L. (2005). Support Vector Machines. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook, Springer-Verlag.10.1007/b107408 ↗
14. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
15. Ioannidis, Y., Novikov, B., and Rachev, B. (2007). Adaptive k-nearest-neighbor classification using a dynamic number of nearest neighbors. Advances in Databases and Information Systems, Springer. Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
16. State-of-the-art in artificial neural network applications: A survey10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00938 ↗
17. Mayr, A., Lutz, B., Weigelt, M., Glabel, T., Kibkalt, D., Masuch, M., Riedel, A., and Franke, J. (2018, January 4–5). Evaluation of machine learning for quality monitoring of laser welding using the example of the contacting of hairpin windings. Proceedings of the 2018 8th International Electric Drives Production Conference (EDPC), Schweinfurt, Germany.10.1109/EDPC.2018.8658346 ↗
18. Vater, J., Schamberger, P., Knoll, A., and Winkle, D. (2019, January 3–4). Fault classification and correction based on convolutional neural networks exemplified by laser welding of hairpin windings. Proceedings of the 2019 9th International Electric Drives Production Conference (EDPC), Esslingen, Germany.10.1109/EDPC48408.2019.9012044 ↗
19. Mayr, A., Seefried, J., Ziegler, M., Masuch, M., Mahr, A., Lindenfels, J.V., Meiners, M., Kisskalt, D., Metzner, M., and Franke, J. (2019, January 3–4). Machine learning in electric motor production—potentials, challenges and exemplary applications. Proceedings of the 2019 9th International Electric Drives Production Conference (EDPC), Esslingen, Germany.10.1109/EDPC48408.2019.9011861 ↗
20. Wirth, R., and Hipp, J. (2000, January 18–20). CRISP-DM: Towards a standard process model for data mining. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on the Practical Applications of Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Kyoto, Japan.
21. The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02137.x ↗
22. Pereira, F., Burges, C.J.C., Bottou, L., and Weinberger, K.Q. (2012). Practical bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Curran Associates, Inc.
23. Random search for hyper-parameter optimization
24. Guyon, I., Bennett, K., Cawley, G., Escalante, H.J., Escalera, S., Ho, T.K., Macia, N., Ray, B., Saeed, M., and Statnikov, A. (2015, January 12–16). Design of the 2015 chalearn automl challenge. Proceedings of the 2015 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Killarney, Ireland.10.1109/IJCNN.2015.7280767 ↗
25. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python
26. (2021, April 01). Sklearn.Linear_Model.LogisticRegression: Scikit-Learn 0.24.0 Documentation. Available online: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.linear_model.LogisticRegression.html.
27. (2021, April 01). Sklearn.Ensemble.RandomForestClassifier: Scikit-Learn 0.24.0 Documentation. Available online: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.ensemble.RandomForestClassifier.html?highlight=random%20forest.
28. (2021, April 01). Sklearn.Svm.SVC: Scikit-Learn 0.24.0 Documentation. Available online: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.svm.SVC.html.