journal article·2023-08-25Open access

Prediction of Temperature of Liquid Steel in Ladle Using Machine Learning Techniques

Łukasz Sztangret, Krzysztof Regulski, Monika Pernach, Łukasz Rauch

Coatings· Volume 13· Issue 9

Abstract

Maintaining the temperature of liquid steel in the ladle in the required range affects the quality of casted billets, reduces energy consumption, and guarantees smooth control of the melting sequence. Measuring its temperature is a challenging task in industrial settings, often hindered by safety concerns and the expensive nature of equipment. This paper presents models which enable the prediction of the cooling rate of liquid steel for variable production parameters, i.e., steel grade and weight of melt. The models were based on the FEM solution of the Fourier equation, and machine learning approaches such as decision trees, linear regression, and artificial neural networks are utilized. The parameters of the model were identified using data from the monitoring system and inverse analysis. The results of simulations were verified with measurements performed in the production line.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics · Iron and Steelmaking Processes · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Metals Engineering and Industrial Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, Al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland

Funding

Intelligent Development Operational Program

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Hay, T., Visuri, V.-V., Aula, M., and Echterhof, T. (2020). A Review of Mathematical Process Models for the Electric Arc Furnace Process. Steel Res. Int., 3.10.1002/srin.202000395 ↗
2. You, D., Michelic, S.C., and Bernhard, C. (2020). Modeling of Ladle Refining Process Considering Mixing and Chemical Reaction. Steel Res. Int., 91.10.1002/srin.202000045 ↗
3. Zappulla, M.L.S., Cho, S.-M., Koric, S., Lee, H.-J., Kim, S.H., and Thomas, B.G. (2020). Multiphysics modeling of continuous casting of stainless steel. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 278.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116469 ↗
4. Enhanced numerical tool to evaluate steel ladle thermal losses10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.04.092 ↗
5. Effective strategies of metamodelling of industrial metallurgical processes10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.02.002 ↗
6. Tan, P.-N., Steinbach, M., and Kumar, V. (2005). Introduction to Data Mining, Addison-Wesley.
7. Top-Down Induction of Decision Trees Classifiers—A Survey10.1109/TSMCC.2004.843247 ↗
8. Barros, R.C., de Carvalho, A., and Freitas, A.A. (2015). Automatic Design of Decision-Tree Induction Algorithms, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-14231-9 ↗
9. Multistage discretization and clustering in multivariable classification of the impact of alloying elements on properties of hypoeutectic silumin10.1016/j.acme.2018.08.003 ↗
10. Balamurugan, M., and Kannan, S. (2016, January 24–24). Performance analysis of cart and C5.0 using sampling techniques. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advances in Computer Applications (ICACA), Coimbatore, India.10.1109/ICACA.2016.7887926 ↗
11. Bishop, C.M. (1995). Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition, Oxford University Press.10.1201/9781420050646.ptb6 ↗
12. Hagan, M.T., Demuth, H.B., and Beale, M.H. (1996). Neural Network Design, PWS Pub. Co., Ltd.
13. Haykin, S. (1999). Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation, Prentice Hall.
14. Seber, G.A.F., and Lee, A.J. (2003). Linear Regression Analysis, Wiley-InterScience.10.1002/9780471722199 ↗
15. Kung, S.Y. (2014). Kernel Methods and Machine Learning, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139176224 ↗
16. Joshi, A.V. (2020). Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-030-26622-6 ↗
17. Hajder, P., Opaliński, A., Pernach, M., Sztangret, Ł., Regulski, K., Bzowski, K., Piwowarczyk, M., and Rauch, Ł. (2023). Computational Science–ICCS 2023, Springer.
18. Gajdzik, B., and Wolniak, R. (2022). Framework for activities in the steel industry in popularizing the idea of industry 4.0. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 8.10.3390/joitmc8030133 ↗
19. Zhang, C.J., Zhang, Y.C., and Han, Y. (2022). Industrial cyber-physical system driven intelligent prediction model for converter end carbon content in steelmaking plants. J. Ind. Inf. Integr., 28.10.1016/j.jii.2022.100356 ↗
20. Designing the technological transformation toward sustainable steelmaking: A framework to provide decision support to industrial practitioners10.1016/j.procir.2022.02.118 ↗