Characterization of Argon/Hydrogen Inductively Coupled Plasma for Carbon Removal over Multilayer Thin Films
Source abstract
Abstract
Inductively coupled plasma with an argon/hydrogen (Ar/H2) mixture is a potential solution to many surface treatment problems, especially when encountering carbon contamination in optical X-ray and extreme ultraviolet instruments. Removing carbon contamination on multilayer thin films with Ar/H2 plasma extends the lifetime of the above devices. To further investigate the reaction between plasma and carbon, both optical emission spectroscopy and finite element method with multiphysics fields were employed. The results demonstrated that the intensities of the Balmer lines were in good agreement with the densities of the radical hydrogen atoms from the simulation model, showing a dependence on the mixing ratio. At an electrical input power of 165 W and a total pressure of 5 Pa, an optimum mixing ratio of about 35 ± 5 % hydrogen produced the highest density of hydrogen radicals, coinciding with the highest carbon removal rate. This shows that the carbon removal with Ar/H2 plasma was mainly controlled by the density of hydrogen radicals, and the mixing ratio showed a significant impact on the removal rates.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Plasma Diagnostics and Applications · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Light Technology Institute, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
State Key Laboratory of Applied Optics, Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130033, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Ionization in inductively coupled argon plasmas studied by optical emission spectroscopy10.1063/1.3530578 ↗
2. Numerical simulation of unsteady ArH2 plasma spray impact on a moving substrate10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.08.058 ↗
3. Zhang, T., Mariaux, G., Vardelle, A., and Li, C.-J. (2021). Numerical Simulation of Plasma Jet Characteristics under Very Low-Pressure Plasma Spray Conditions. Coatings, 11.10.3390/coatings11060726 ↗
4. Ion chemistry in H2-Ar low temperature plasmas10.1063/1.4817526 ↗
5. Vacuum ultraviolet emission from microwave Ar-H2 plasmas10.1063/1.4796134 ↗
6. Emission spectroscopy of Ar–H2 plasma10.1016/S0042-207X(01)00137-3 ↗
7. Ultraviolet laser photolysis of hydrocarbons for nondiamond carbon suppression in chemical vapor deposition of diamond films10.1038/lsa.2017.177 ↗
8. Optically monitoring and controlling nanoscale topography during semiconductor etching10.1038/lsa.2012.30 ↗
9. X-ray focusing with efficient high-NA multilayer Laue lenses10.1038/lsa.2017.162 ↗
10. Detection and characterization of carbon contamination on EUV multilayer mirrors10.1364/OE.17.016969 ↗
11. Kerkhof, M., Liu, F., Meeuwissen, M., Zhang, X., de Kruif, R., Davydova, N., Schiffelers, G., Wählisch, F., van Setten, E., and Varenkamp, W. (2020, January 23–27). Spectral purity performance of high-power EUV systems. Proceedings of the Advanced Lithography, San Jose, CA, USA.
12. Factors influencing surface carbon contamination in ambient-pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy experiments10.1116/6.0001013 ↗
13. Characterization, optimization and surface physics aspects of in situ plasma mirror cleaning10.1107/S1600577513032402 ↗
14. Enhanced removal of X-ray-induced carbon contamination using radio-frequency Ar/H2 plasma10.1007/s41365-019-0547-9 ↗
15. COMSOL (2022, August 05). AB Stockholm Sweden. Available online: www.comsol.com.
16. Optical emission spectroscopy of atmospheric-pressure non-equilibrium plasma with mist injection10.1063/1.5011076 ↗
17. Characterization of carbon contamination under ion and hot atom bombardment in a tin-plasma extreme ultraviolet light source10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.06.079 ↗
18. Plasma cleaning of multilayer mirrors in EUV lithography from amorphous carbon contaminations10.3103/S0027134911020111 ↗
19. SiC-Based Resonant Converters with ZVS Operated in MHz Range Driving Rapidly Variable Loads: Inductively Coupled Plasmas as a Case of Study10.1109/TPEL.2022.3147947 ↗
20. (2022, August 05). COMSOL Plasma Module User’s Guide. Available online: https://doc.comsol.com/5.3/doc/com.comsol.help.plasma/PlasmaModuleUsersGuide.pdf.
21. Optical Emission Spectroscopy Study of Ar–H2 Plasma at Atmospheric Pressure10.1109/TPS.2018.2850855 ↗
22. Single-step-fabricated disordered metasurfaces for enhanced light extraction from LEDs10.1038/s41377-021-00621-7 ↗
23. Hydrogen Degree of Dissociation in a low-pressure tandem plasma source10.1080/00387010903386540 ↗
24. How Hydrogen Admixture Changes Plasma Jet Characteristics in Spray Processes at Low Pressure10.1007/s11090-020-10143-6 ↗
25. (2022, August 22). Biagi Database. Available online: www.lxcat.net/Biagi.
26. (2022, August 22). TRINITI Database. Available online: www.lxcat.net/TRINITI.
27. (2022, August 22). NGFSRDW Database. Available online: www.lxcat.net/NGFSRDW.
28. (2022, August 22). IST-Lisbon Database. Available online: www.lxcat.net/IST-Lisbon.
29. Electronic excitation of the 750- and 811-nm lines of argon10.1103/PhysRevE.47.3566 ↗
30. Time-dependent gas density and temperature measurements in pulsed helicon discharges in argon10.1088/0963-0252/12/3/307 ↗
31. (2022, August 22). NIST Database, Available online: www.physics.nist.gov.
32. Methodology for identifying gaseous constituents of the atmosphere10.1088/1742-6596/2091/1/012015 ↗
33. Spectroscopic measurements of the electron temperature in low pressure radiofrequency Ar/H2/C2H2 and Ar/H2/CH4 plasmas used for the synthesis of nanocarbon structures10.1088/0963-0252/15/1/007 ↗
34. Conductivity effects during the transition from collisionless to collisional regimes in cylindrical inductively coupled plasmas10.1088/2058-6272/ac56ce ↗
35. Spectroscopic study of H2 microwave plasmas with small admixtures of CH4 and B2H6 used for doped diamond deposition10.1088/0963-0252/23/4/045015 ↗
36. Comparison of Langmuir probe and multipole resonance probe measurements in argon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and oxygen mixtures in a double ICP discharge10.1063/1.4991493 ↗