journal article·2021-10-26Open access

Cross-Scale Biological Models of Species for Future Biomimetic Composite Design: A Review

Wenda Song, Zhengzhi Mu, Zhiyan Zhang, Yufei Wang, Handong Hu, Zhe Ma, Liewei Huang, Ze Wang, Binjie Zhang, Yujiao Li, Shuang Zhang, Bo Li, Junqiu Zhang, Shichao Niu, Zhiwu Han, Luquan Ren

Coatings· Volume 11· Issue 11

Abstract

The rise in structural performance requirements in engineering is driving the research and development of stronger, stiffer, and lighter materials. However, most traditional artificial materials are unable to meet the needs of modern industrial and technological development. In fact, multifarious creatures in nature are further ahead in their use of structural materials. There is a fairly limited selection of natural structural materials at ambient temperatures. They usually consist of hard and soft phases arranged in a complex hierarchy with characteristic dimensions ranging from nanoscale to macroscale. The resulting materials usually show a nearly perfect combination of strength and toughness integrated with lightweight characteristics. This is exactly what is required of engineering materials. In this review, different biological materials were divided into the following types in terms of structural elements: 1D fibrous structures, 2D layered structures, 3D cellular structures and heterogeneous interface structures. For each structural element, corresponding structure components and mechanical properties of typical organisms were well described. Abundant sophisticated models of natural biological structures were discussed contrastively. The purpose of this review was to summarize the excellent properties of multi-dimensional biological models with cross-scale features and to reveal the relationship between structure characteristics and function mechanism, which could provide valuable references for the design and optimization of a future biomimetic composite with high mechanical performance. This review is anticipated to not only inspire novel biomimetic design but also offer a window for the deep understanding of existing outstanding structural composites in diversified species, which could provide continuous innovative power for composite renovation in many engineering fields.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Cephalopods and Marine Biology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Bionic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China

X Lab, Second Academy of CASIC, Beijing 100854, China

School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China · Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Architectured materials in engineering and biology: Fabrication, structure, mechanics and performance10.1179/1743280415Y.0000000008 ↗
2. Underwater writable and heat-insulated paper with robust fluorine-free superhydrophobic coatings10.1039/C9NR10612J ↗
3. Angle-dependent discoloration structures in wing scales of Morpho menelaus butterfly10.1007/s11431-016-6007-4 ↗
4. Bioinspired omnidirectional self-stable reflectors with multiscale hierarchical structures10.1021/acsami.7b08768 ↗
5. The conflicts between strength and toughness10.1038/nmat3115 ↗
6. Additive manufacturing as a method to design and optimize bioinspired structures10.1002/adma.201800940 ↗
7. Biomimetic structural materials: Inspiration from design and assembly10.1146/annurev-physchem-040215-112621 ↗
8. Bioinspired structural materials10.1038/nmat4089 ↗
9. Biological composites—Complex structures for functional diversity10.1126/science.aat8297 ↗
10. Synthetic nacre by predesigned matrix-directed mineralization10.1126/science.aaf8991 ↗
11. Biological materials: Structure and mechanical properties10.1016/j.pmatsci.2007.05.002 ↗
12. Biological materials: Functional adaptations and bioinspired designs10.1016/j.pmatsci.2012.03.001 ↗
13. Keratin: Structure, mechanical properties, occurrence in biological organisms, and efforts at bioinspiration10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.06.001 ↗
14. Functional gradients and heterogeneities in biological materials: Design principles, functions, and bioinspired applications10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.013 ↗
15. Structural architectures with toughening mechanisms in Nature: A review of the materials science of Type-I collagenous materials10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.01.002 ↗
16. Structural design elements in biological materials: Application to bioinspiration10.1002/adma.201502403 ↗
17. Layered nanocomposites inspired by the structure and mechanical properties of nacre10.1039/C1CS15106A ↗
18. Natural composite systems for bioinspired materials10.1007/978-3-319-39196-0_7 ↗
19. Bioinspired Bouligand cellulose nanocrystal composites: A review of mechanical properties10.1098/rsta.2017.0050 ↗
20. Nacre-inspired composites with different macroscopic dimensions: Strategies for improved mechanical performance and applications10.1038/s41427-018-0009-6 ↗
21. Structure and mechanics of interfaces in biological materials10.1038/natrevmats.2016.7 ↗
22. Biological material interfaces as inspiration for mechanical and optical material designs10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00416 ↗
23. Plants and architecture: The role of biology and biomimetics in materials development for buildings10.1080/17508975.2019.1669134 ↗
24. Advanced bio-inspired structural materials: Local properties determine overall performance10.1016/j.mattod.2020.04.009 ↗
25. Mallick, P.K. (2007). Fiber-Reinforced Composites: Materials, Manufacturing, and Design, CRC Press.10.1201/9781420005981 ↗
26. Bio-inspired lotus-fiber-like spiral hydrogel bacterial cellulose fibers10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03707 ↗
27. Silken toolkits: Biomechanics of silk fibers spun by the orb web spider Argiope argentata (Fabricius 1775)10.1242/jeb.02275 ↗
28. Mechanical properties of spider dragline silk: Humidity, hysteresis, and relaxation10.1529/biophysj.106.099309 ↗
29. Composition and mechanical properties of a protein/silica hybrid material forming the micron-thick axial filament in the spicules of marine sponges10.1002/adem.201300485 ↗
30. Interfacial mechanics of cellulose nanocrystals10.1557/mrs.2015.67 ↗
31. In situ observations of fracture mechanisms for radial cracks in wood10.1023/A:1026778622156 ↗
32. On the mechanistic origins of toughness in bone10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104427 ↗
33. Nanoscale deformation mechanisms in bone10.1021/nl051584b ↗
34. Sacrificial bonds and hidden length dissipate energy as mineralized fibrils separate during bone fracture10.1038/nmat1428 ↗
35. Influence of microstructure on deformation anisotropy of mineralized cuticle from the lobster Homarus americanus10.1016/j.jsb.2007.09.022 ↗
36. Mechanical properties and the laminate structure of Arapaima gigas scales10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.03.024 ↗
37. Biomechanics: Deadly strike mechanism of a mantis shrimp—This shrimp packs a punch powerful enough to smash its prey’s shell underwater10.1038/428819a ↗
38. A sinusoidally architected helicoidal biocomposite10.1002/adma.201600786 ↗
39. Structure and mechanical behavior of a toucan beak10.1016/j.actamat.2005.04.048 ↗
40. Laminar bone as an adaptation to torsional loads in flapping flight10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00118.x ↗
41. Bioinspirational understanding of flexural performance in hedgehog spines10.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.036 ↗
42. Reversible dendritic-crystal-reinforced polymer gel for bioinspired adaptable adhesive10.1002/adma.202103174 ↗
43. Xu, X., Li, L., Seraji, S.M., Liu, L., Jiang, Z., Xu, Z., Li, X., Zhao, S., Wang, H., and Song, P. (2021). Bioinspired, strong, and tough nanostructured poly(vinyl alcohol)/inositol composites: How hydrogen-bond cross-linking works?. Macromolecules, 1c01725.10.1021/acs.macromol.1c01725 ↗
44. Multicomponent nature underlies the extraordinary mechanical properties of spider dragline silk10.1073/pnas.2107065118 ↗
45. A biomimetic conductive super-foldable material10.1016/j.matt.2021.07.021 ↗
46. 3D printable and fringe electric field adhesion enabled variable stiffness artificial muscles for semi-active vibration attenuation10.1039/D1SM00618E ↗
47. Nanofibrils in nature and materials engineering10.1038/natrevmats.2018.16 ↗
48. Molecular and nanostructural mechanisms of deformation, strength and toughness of spider silk fibrils10.1021/nl101341w ↗
49. Hierarchical structures made of proteins. The complex architecture of spider webs and their constituent silk proteins10.1039/B813273A ↗
50. Foelix, R. (2011). Biology of Spiders, OUP.
51. Nanoconfinement controls stiffness, strength and mechanical toughness of β-sheet crystals in silk10.1038/nmat2704 ↗
52. Nanostructure and molecular mechanics of spider dragline silk protein assemblies10.1098/rsif.2010.0149 ↗
53. Elucidating silk structure using solid-state NMR10.1039/c3sm52187g ↗
54. “Nano-fishnet” structure making silk fibers tougher10.1002/adfm.201600813 ↗
55. Tendon injury: From biology to tendon repair10.1038/nrrheum.2015.26 ↗
56. Tendinopathy: Injury, repair, and current exploration10.2147/DDDT.S154660 ↗
57. Graded arrangement of collagen fibrils in the equine superficial digital flexor tendon10.1080/03008200701692800 ↗
58. Local strain measurement within tendon10.1111/j.1475-1305.2004.00164.x ↗
59. Mechanics of tendon, from an engineering perspective
60. Biochemistry and cell biology of silica formation in sponges10.1002/jemt.10402 ↗
61. Mechanical energy dissipation in natural ceramic composites10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.019 ↗
62. Structure and physico-chemical properties of organosilicon crystal-like composite spicules of the glass sponge Hyalonema sieboldi10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.05.011 ↗
63. Skeleton of Euplectella sp.: Structural hierarchy from the nanoscale to the macroscale10.1126/science.1112255 ↗
64. Biological glass fibers: Correlation between optical and structural properties10.1073/pnas.0307843101 ↗
65. Biomimetic synthesis of ordered silica structures mediated by block copolypeptides10.1038/35002038 ↗
66. Mechanisms of toughening of a natural rigid composite10.1016/j.msec.2006.05.020 ↗
67. Effects of laminate architecture on fracture resistance of sponge biosilica: Lessons from nature10.1002/adfm.200701135 ↗
68. Biomimetic lamellar chitosan scaffold for soft gingival tissue regeneration10.1002/adfm.202105348 ↗
69. Study on impact resistance behaviors of a novel composite laminate with basalt fiber for helical-sinusoidal bionic structure of dactyl club of mantis shrimp10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107976 ↗
70. Bioinspired functionally graded composite assembled using cellulose nanocrystals and genetically engineered proteins with controlled biomineralization10.1002/adma.202102658 ↗
71. Toughening mechanism of coelacanth-fish-inspired double-helicoidal composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108650 ↗
72. Wang, Y., Liao, W., Sun, J., Nandi, R., and Yang, Z. (2021). Bioinspired construction of artificial cardiac muscles based on liquid crystal elastomer fibers. Adv. Mater. Technol., online, 2100934.80.10.1002/admt.202100934 ↗
73. Variation of cellulose microfibril angles in softwoods and hardwoods—A possible strategy of mechanical optimization10.1006/jsbi.1999.4194 ↗
74. Exploring design principles of biological and living building envelopes: What can we learn from plant cell walls?10.1080/17508975.2017.1394808 ↗
75. Mechanical model for the deformation of the wood cell wall10.3139/146.017991 ↗
76. Cell-wall recovery after irreversible deformation of wood10.1038/nmat1019 ↗
77. Mechanical behaviour of plant tissues: Composite materials or structures?10.1242/jeb.202.23.3269 ↗
78. Modelling polymer interactions of the ‘molecular Velcro’ type in wood under mechanical stress10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.03.010 ↗
79. Assessment of compressive failure process of cortical bone materials using damage-based model10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.10.014 ↗
80. Micro-CT finite element model and experimental validation of trabecular bone damage and fracture10.1016/j.bone.2013.06.028 ↗
81. High-Performance Nanocomposites Inspired by Nature10.1002/adma.201702959 ↗
82. Antler stiffness in moose (Alces alces): Correlated evolution of bone function and material properties?10.1002/jmor.10461 ↗
83. Nanogranular origins of the strength of bone10.1021/nl061877k ↗
84. Cement lines of secondary osteons in human bone are not mineral-deficient: New data in a historical perspective
85. Twisted fibrous arrangements in biological materials and cholesteric mesophases10.1016/S0040-8166(72)80042-9 ↗
86. Structure and mechanical properties of crab exoskeletons10.1016/j.actbio.2007.12.010 ↗
87. Mineral fine structure of the American lobster cuticle10.2983/035.031.0211 ↗
88. Revealing the design principles of high-performance biological composites using ab initio and multiscale simulations: The example of lobster cuticle10.1002/adma.200902019 ↗
89. Mechanical adaptability of the Bouligand-type structure in natural dermal armour10.1038/ncomms3634 ↗
90. Protective role of Arapaima gigas fish scales: Structure and mechanical behavior10.1016/j.actbio.2014.04.009 ↗
91. The stomatopod dactyl club: A formidable damage-tolerant biological hammer10.1126/science.1218764 ↗
92. Extreme impact and cavitation forces of a biological hammer: Strike forces of the peacock mantis shrimp Odontodactylus scyllarus10.1242/jeb.01831 ↗
93. The role of quasi-plasticity in the extreme contact damage tolerance of the stomatopod dactyl club10.1038/nmat4309 ↗
94. The exoskeleton of scorpions’ pincers: Structure and micro-mechanical properties10.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.036 ↗
95. Nested helicoids in biological microstructures10.1038/s41467-019-13978-6 ↗
96. Failure analysis of bio-inspired corrugated sandwich structures fabricated by laser powder bed fusion under three-point bending10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113724 ↗
97. Dragonfly wing-inspired architecture makes a stiff yet tough healable material10.1016/j.matt.2021.05.001 ↗
98. The toucan beak: Structure and mechanical response10.1016/j.msec.2005.08.025 ↗
99. Toucan and hornbill beaks: A comparative study10.1016/j.actbio.2009.08.026 ↗
100. Gibson, L.J., and Ashby, M.F. (1997). Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗