Resolving Selected Problems in Surface Topography Analysis by Application of the Autocorrelation Function
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, the validity of the application of an autocorrelation function for resolving some surface topography measurement problems was presented. Various types of surfaces were considered: plateau-honed, honed with burnished dimples, ground, turned, milled, laser-textured, or isotropic. They were measured with stylus and non-contact (optical) methods. Extraction of selected features, such as form and waviness (defined as an L-surface) and high-frequency measurement noise (S-surface) from raw measured data, was supported with an autocorrelation function. It was proposed to select the analysis procedures with an application of the autocorrelation function for both profile (2D) and areal (3D) analysis. Moreover, applications of various types of regular (available in the commercial software) analysis methods, such as least-square-fitted polynomial planes, selected Gaussian (regression and robust) functions, median filter, spline approach, and fast Fourier transform scheme, were proposed for the evaluation of surface topography parameters from ISO 25178 standards.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow University of Technology, Powstancow Warszawy 8 Street, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Panjan, P., and Drnovšek, A. (2022). Special Issue: Surface Topography Effects on the Functional Properties of PVD Coatings. Coatings, 12.10.3390/coatings12121796 ↗
2. Analysis and prediction of surface wear resistance of ball-end milling topography10.1088/2051-672X/ab9d70 ↗
3. The significance of Surface topography in engineering10.1016/0141-6359(86)90090-5 ↗
4. Description of surface topography of sealing rings10.1016/j.wear.2010.04.036 ↗
5. Shi, R., Wang, B., Yan, Z., Wang, Z., and Dong, L. (2019). Effect of Surface Topography Parameters on Friction and Wear of Random Rough Surface. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12172762 ↗
6. Selective surface modification on lubricant retention10.1142/S0218625X15500973 ↗
7. Global energy consumption due to friction in passenger cars10.1016/j.triboint.2011.11.022 ↗
8. Application of eco-friendly lubricants in sustainable grinding of die steel10.1080/10426914.2020.1866187 ↗
9. Parametric and nonparametric description of the surface topography in the dry and MQCL cutting conditions10.1016/j.measurement.2018.02.052 ↗
10. Królczyk, G., Kacalak, W., and Wieczorowski, M. (2021). 3D Parametric and Nonparametric Description of Surface Topography in Manufacturing Processes. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14081987 ↗
11. A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants10.1067/mpr.2000.111966 ↗
12. Podulka, P. (2021). Reduction of Influence of the High-Frequency Noise on the Results of Surface Topography Measurements. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14020333 ↗
13. Micro machining for control of wettability with surface topography10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.05.021 ↗
14. The accuracy of fast 3D topography measurements10.1016/S0890-6955(01)00054-2 ↗
15. Modern measurement techniques in surface metrology: Part I; stylus instruments, electron microscopy and non-optical comparators10.1016/0043-1648(88)90118-4 ↗
16. Leach, R. (2011). Optical Measurement of Surface Topography, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-12012-1 ↗
17. Surface roughness evaluation method based on roughness parameters in ISO 13565-3 using the least-squares method for running-in wear process analysis of plateau surface10.1016/j.triboint.2021.107151 ↗
18. Comparison of optical and stylus methods for measurement of surface texture10.1007/s00170-007-0953-8 ↗
19. Comparison of fractal and profilometric methods for surface topography characterization10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.11.040 ↗
20. Topography of selectively laser melted surfaces: A comparison of different measurement methods10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.075 ↗
21. Comparisons of envelope morphological filtering methods and various regular algorithms for surface texture analysis10.24425/mms.2020.132772 ↗
22. Characterizing topography of EDM generated surface by time series and autocorrelation function10.1016/j.triboint.2017.02.016 ↗
23. Comprehensive study of parameters for characterising three-dimensional surface topography: III: Parameters for characterising amplitude and some functional properties10.1016/0043-1648(94)90127-9 ↗
24. Analysis of roughness of Cs surfaces via evaluation of the autocorrelation function10.1016/j.susc.2007.01.040 ↗
25. A numerical approach to predict the machined surface topography of abrasive belt flexible grinding10.1007/s00170-019-04032-2 ↗
26. Roughness of pigment coatings and its influence on gloss10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.03.043 ↗
27. Surface orientation from projective foreshortening of isotropic texture autocorrelation10.1109/34.56194 ↗
28. An improved rough surface modeling method based on linear transformation technique10.1016/j.triboint.2017.12.008 ↗
29. Invariant feature extraction for 3D texture analysis using the autocorrelation function10.1016/S0167-8655(01)00015-0 ↗
30. Zhou, W., Cao, Y., Zhao, H., Li, Z., Feng, P., and Feng, F. (2022). Fractal Analysis on Surface Topography of Thin Films: A Review. Fractal Fract., 6.10.3390/fractalfract6030135 ↗
31. A comparative study of correlation methods for determination of fractal parameters in surface characterization10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.12.132 ↗
32. Surface roughness and surface-induced resistivity of gold films on mica: Influence of roughness modelling10.1088/0953-8984/12/13/302 ↗
33. Podulka, P. (2021). Improved Procedures for Feature-Based Suppression of Surface Texture High-Frequency Measurement Errors in the Wear Analysis of Cylinder Liner Topographies. Metals, 11.10.3390/met11010143 ↗
34. The autocorrelation function: An image processing tool for fabric analysis10.1016/0040-1951(92)90300-U ↗
35. Evaluation of surface roughness based on monochromatic speckle correlation using image processing10.1016/j.precisioneng.2007.08.005 ↗
36. Soil surface roughness modelling with the bidirectional autocorrelation function10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2022.05.012 ↗
37. Effect of surface roughness parameters on mixed lubrication characteristics10.1016/j.triboint.2005.03.018 ↗
38. Generation of reference data of 3D surface texture using the non-causal 2D AR model10.1016/j.wear.2004.05.019 ↗
39. Bi-Gaussian surface identification and reconstruction with revised autocorrelation functions10.1016/j.triboint.2017.01.029 ↗
40. Modeling and simulation of surface roughness10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.01.010 ↗
41. Experimental Analysis of Surface Roughness and Surface Texture of Machined and Fused Deposition Modelled Parts
42. Gharechelou, S., Tateishi, R., and Johnson, B.A. (2018). A Simple Method for the Parameterization of Surface Roughness from Microwave Remote Sensing. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10111711 ↗
43. (2012). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface Texture: Areal—Part 3: Specification Operators. Standard No. ISO 25178-3:2012.
44. Fast Fourier Transform detection and reduction of high-frequency errors from the results of surface topography profile measurements of honed textures10.17531/ein.2021.1.9 ↗
45. Podulka, P. (2022). Selection of Methods of Surface Texture Characterisation for Reduction of the Frequency-Based Errors in the Measurement and Data Analysis Processes. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22030791 ↗
46. A Comparative Study on the Three-Dimensional Surface Topography for the Polished Surface of Femoral Head10.1007/s001700070046 ↗
47. Podulka, P. (2021). Suppression of the High-Frequency Errors in Surface Topography Measurements Based on Comparison of Various Spline Filtering Methods. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14175096 ↗
48. Definition and evaluation of topography measurement noise in optical instruments
49. Surface topography prediction in peripheral milling of thin-walled parts considering cutting vibration and material removal effect10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106797 ↗
50. Podulka, P. (2022). Advances in Measurement and Data Analysis of Surfaces with Functionalized Coatings. Coatings, 12.10.3390/coatings12091331 ↗
51. Peta, K., Mendak, M., and Bartkowiak, T. (2021). Discharge Energy as a Key Contributing Factor Determining Microgeometry of Aluminum Samples Created by Electrical Discharge Machining. Crystals, 11.10.3390/cryst11111371 ↗
52. The effect of valley depth on areal form removal in surface topography measurements
53. Bisquare robust polynomial fitting method for dimple distortion minimisation in surface quality analysis10.1002/sia.6793 ↗
54. (2016). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS). Filtration—Part 28: Profile Filters: End Effects. Standard No. ISO 16610-28:2016.
55. Edge effect elimination in the recursive implementation of Gaussian filters10.1016/j.precisioneng.2011.08.001 ↗
56. The effect of valley location in two-process surface topography analysis10.12913/22998624/100343 ↗
57. Gaussian filters with profile extrapolation10.1016/j.precisioneng.2011.04.003 ↗
58. Proposal of frequency-based decomposition approach for minimization of errors in surface texture parameter calculation10.1002/sia.6840 ↗
59. Calibration of the scales of areal surface topography measuring instruments: Part 3. Resolution10.1088/0957-0233/24/10/105010 ↗
60. Podulka, P. (2021). The Effect of Surface Topography Feature Size Density and Distribution on the Results of a Data Processing and Parameters Calculation with a Comparison of Regular Methods. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14154077 ↗
61. Numerical simulation of the geometrical factors affecting surface roughness measurements by AFM10.1088/0957-0233/15/10/010 ↗
62. Mixed elastohydrodynamic lubrication analysis of line contact with Non-Gaussian surface roughness10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106449 ↗
63. Interdependence of Amplitude Roughness Parameters on Rough Gaussian Surfaces10.1007/s11249-020-1282-4 ↗
64. Quantitative characterization of surface topography using spectral analysis10.1088/2051-672X/aa51f8 ↗
65. Surface morphology analysis of Duplex Stainless Steel (DSS) in Clean Production using the Power Spectral Density10.1016/j.measurement.2016.08.023 ↗
66. Podulka, P. (2022). Proposals of Frequency-Based and Direction Methods to Reduce the Influence of Surface Topography Measurement Errors. Coatings, 12.10.3390/coatings12060726 ↗
67. Modelling of machined surface topography and anisotropic texture direction considering stochastic tool grinding error and wear in peripheral milling10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117065 ↗
68. Effect of milling surface topography and texture direction on fatigue behavior of ZK61M magnesium alloy10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106669 ↗
69. Podulka, P. (2022). Thresholding Methods for Reduction in Data Processing Errors in the Laser-Textured Surface Topography Measurements. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15155137 ↗
70. Residual flatness and scale calibration for a point autofocus surface topography measuring instrument10.1088/1361-6501/ab188f ↗
71. (2012). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface Texture: Areal—Part 2: Terms, Definitions and Surface Texture Parameters. Standard No. ISO 25178-2:2012.
72. 3D surface parameters (ISO 25178-2): Actual meaning of Spk and its relationship to Vmp10.1016/j.precisioneng.2014.10.011 ↗
73. Prediction of the Functional Performance of Machined Components Based on Surface Topography: State of the Art10.1007/s11665-016-2293-z ↗
74. Surface measurement errors using commercial scanning white light interferometers10.1088/0957-0233/19/1/015303 ↗
75. Application of Clustering Filter for Noise and Outlier Suppression in Optical Measurement of Structured Surfaces10.1109/TIM.2020.2967571 ↗
76. Spikes removal in surface measurement10.1088/1742-6596/483/1/012025 ↗
77. (1998). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface Texture: Profile Method; Surfaces Having Stratified Functional Properties—Part 3: Height characterization using the Material Probability Curve. Standard No. ISO 13565-3:1998.
78. Acceleration of surface roughness evaluation using RANSAC and least squares method for Running-in wear process analysis of plateau surface10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111912 ↗
79. Reference planes for the assessment of surface roughness in three dimensions10.1016/0890-6955(94)P2382-P ↗
80. Linear relation between surface roughness and work function of light alloys10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.102 ↗
81. Forbes, A.B. (1989). Least Squares Best Fit Geometric Elements, National Physical Laboratory. NLP Report DITC 140/89.
82. A unified approach to form error evaluation10.1016/S0141-6359(02)00105-8 ↗
83. Application of improved fireworks algorithm in grinding surface roughness online monitoring10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.046 ↗
84. (2011). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Filtration—Part 21: Linear Profile Filters: Gaussian Filters. Standard No. ISO 16610-21:2011.
85. Verification of Characteristics of Gaussian Filter Series for Surface Roughness in ISO and Proposal of Filter Selection Guidelines10.1007/s41871-021-00096-5 ↗
86. Quantitative evaluation of surface roughness for granular materials using Gaussian filter method10.1016/j.powtec.2021.04.068 ↗
87. (2016). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Filtration—Part 31: Robust Profile Filters: Gaussian Regression Filters. Standard No. ISO 16610-31:2016.
88. A novel robust Gaussian filtering method for the characterization of surface generation in ultra-precision machining10.1016/j.precisioneng.2006.01.005 ↗
89. A universal spline filter for surface metrology10.1016/j.measurement.2010.09.008 ↗
90. A two-dimensional isotropic spline filter10.1016/j.precisioneng.2013.05.005 ↗
91. review of digital filtering in evaluation of surface roughness10.24425/mms.2021.136606 ↗
92. Evaluation of three-dimensional surface roughness parameters based on digital image processing10.1007/s00170-007-1357-5 ↗
93. Development of a surface roughness measurement system using reflected laser beam10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00731-8 ↗
94. Pool boiling heat transfer of saturated water on rough surfaces with the effect of roughening techniques10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120054 ↗
95. Nanoscale measurement of the power spectral density of surface roughness: How to solve a difficult experimental challenge10.1186/1556-276X-7-174 ↗
96. Surface Roughness Measurements Using Power Spectrum Density Analysis with Enhanced Spatial Correlation Length10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b06635 ↗
97. Simulation of pavement roughness and IRI based on power spectral density10.1016/S0378-4754(01)00386-X ↗
98. Surface roughness and power spectral density study of SHI irradiated ultra-thin gold films10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.08.046 ↗
99. Specification of Optical Components Using the Power Spectral Density Function
100. Zhang, Q., and Zhang, S. (2020). Effects of Feed per Tooth and Radial Depth of Cut on Amplitude Parameters and Power Spectral Density of a Machined Surface. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13061323 ↗