Development of a Road Pavement Structure Diagnostic Procedure Based on the Virtual Inertial Point Method
Source abstract
Abstract
Falling weight deflectometers (FWD) are utilised worldwide to analyse the condition and the load-bearing capacity of road pavement structures. One of the FWD measurement results, the deflection bowl, may provide surplus information that is suitable for better road pavement structure diagnostics, based on the novel approach presented in this paper. This study presents a computational method that can calculate the layer thicknesses from the deflection data recorded by the non-destructive FWD device. The motivation for this research is that FWD and GPR equipment are often not available at the same time. However, the back-calculation of the pavement layer moduli from the deflections requires knowledge of the exact thicknesses. The developed method is based on the inertia point principle and provides not only the total pavement thickness but also the total asphalt thickness at each FWD drop point. From 25,200 linear elastic layered pavement models, 350 virtual inertia points could be identified. To describe the relationship between the structural model characteristics of the pavement (thickness and subgrade modulus) and the virtual inertia points, we chose the Gaussian process regression, a widely used method in machine learning. In addition to the thicknesses, the point of inertia can also be used to calculate the bearing modulus of the subgrade with high accuracy. Based on the data from the experimental road section, the radius value of the inertia point rc is not sensitive to the stiffness of the layers that compose the pavement structure, depending only on the total pavement thickness and the bearing capacity of the subgrade. The calculation was compared with the AASHTO (1993) procedure, and very similar values for the subgrade-bearing capacity were obtained. Moreover, in the near future, the method can be further developed to provide an estimation of layer thicknesses, together with a deflection measurement, especially adapted to continuous deflection measurement devices (Curviameter and Rolling Wheel Deflectometer).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geophysical Methods and Applications · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Highway and Railway Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, 1111 Budapest, Hungary
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Nondestructive Testing of Asphalt Pavements for Structural Condition Evaluation: A State of the Art10.1080/10589750701848697 ↗
2. Ahmed, M., Tarefder, R., and Maji, A. (July, January 30). Variation of FWD Modulus Due to Incorporation of GPR Predicted Layer Thicknesses. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Brussels, Belgium.
3. Concrete Pavement Thickness Variation Assessment with Cores and Nondestructive Testing Measurements10.3141/2347-07 ↗
4. Pożarycki, A., Górnaś, P., and Sztukiewicz, R. (2017). Application of Mechanical and Electromagnetic Waves in an Integrated Determination of Pavement Bearing Capacity. Roads Bridg. Drog. I Mosty, 101–114.10.7409/rabdim.017.007 ↗
5. Tosti, F. (2014). Experimental and Theoretical Investigation on Road Pavements and Materials Through Ground-Penetrating Radar. [Ph.D. Thesis, Roma Tre University].
6. Analysis of GPR and FWD Data Dependency Based on Road Test Field Surveys
7. An Experimental-Based Model for the Assessment of the Mechanical Properties of Road Pavements Using Ground-Penetrating Radar10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.179 ↗
8. A Probabilistic Approach to Detect Structural Problems in Flexible Pavement Sections at Network Level Assessment10.1080/10298436.2020.1828586 ↗
9. Automated Pavement Subsurface Profiling Using Radar: Case Studies of Four Experimental Field Sites
10. Approach to Determining In Situ Dielectric Constant of Pavements: Development and Implementation at Interstate 81 in Virginia10.3141/1806-09 ↗
11. New Scenario for Backcakulation of Layer Moduli of Flexible Pavements
12. Noureldin, A.S., Zhu, K., Harris, D., and Li, S. (2005). Non-Destructive Estimation of Pavement Thickness, Structural Number and Subgrade Resilience along INDOT Highways, Purdue University. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2004/35.10.5703/1288284313281 ↗
13. Deflections in Flexible Pavements
14. Transportation Research Record, and National Research Council (U.S.) (1992). A Simplified Mechanistic Algorithm for Pavement Analysis. Traffic Operations, Transportation Research Board.
15. Burmister, D.M. (1943, January 27–30). The Theory of Stresses and Displacements in Layered Systems and Applications to the Design of Airport Runways. Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the Highway Research Board, Chicago, IL, USA.
16. Odemark, N. (1949). Investigations as to the Elastic Properties of Soils and Design of Pavements According to the Theory of Elasticity (Undersökning av Elasticitesegenskaperna Hos Olika Jordarter Samt Teori för Beräkning av Beläggningar Enligt Elasticitetsteorin), Statens Väginstitut. Meddelande 77.
17. Barber, E.S. (1940, January 3–6). Discussion on Flexible Surfaces. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Highway Research Board, Washington, DC, USA.
18. Rada, G.R., Witczak, M.W., and Rabinow, S.D. (1988). Comparison of AASHTO Structural Evaluation Techniques Using Nondestructive Deflection Testing. Transp. Res. Rec., 134–144.
19. AASHTO (1993). AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures, AASHTO.
20. Concrete Pavement Layer Moduli Based on Stable Deflection10.2208/jscej.1995.526_143 ↗
21. Li, S., Liu, F., and Li, H. (2017, January 25–26). Pavement Inertial Point Existence Analysis under Load Diversity. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Mechanical, Electronic, Control and Automation Engineering (MECAE 2017), Beijing, China.10.2991/mecae-17.2017.4 ↗
22. Li, S., Liu, F., Xu, X., and Li, H. (2017). Inertial Point Influencing Factors Analysis of the Flexible Pavement Structure Under the Moving Load. AIP Conference Proceedings 1834, AIP Publishing LLC.10.1063/1.4981570 ↗
23. Novel Method for Backcalculation of Asphalt Pavement Moduli10.3141/1869-08 ↗
24. Back-Calculating Method for Subgrade Modulus Based on Virtual Inertial Points
25. Integration of Non-Destructive Testing Methods to Assess Asphalt Pavement Thickness10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102292 ↗
26. Backcalculation of Pavement Layer Parameters Using Artificial Neural Networks
27. Backcalculation of Pavement Layer Thickness Using Data Mining10.1007/s00521-012-1083-2 ↗
28. Neural Network–Based Thickness Determination Model to Improve Backcalculation of Layer Moduli without Coring10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000407 ↗
29. ALVA: An Adaptive MATLAB Package for Layered Viscoelastic Analysis10.21105/joss.02548 ↗
30. Effect of Pavement Stiffness on the Shape of Deflection Bowl10.1515/aslh-2015-0003 ↗
31. Rasmussen, C.E., and Williams, C.K.I. (2006). Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, MIT Press. Adaptive computation and machine learning.10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 ↗
32. A Tutorial on Gaussian Process Regression: Modelling, Exploring, and Exploiting Functions10.1016/j.jmp.2018.03.001 ↗
33. Direct Estimation of Vertical Strain at the Top of the Subgrade Soil from Interpretation of Falling Weight Deflectometer Deflection Basins10.1139/cjce-2013-0128 ↗
34. Rohde, G.T. (1994). Determining Pavement Structural Number from Fwd Testing. Strength and Deformation Characteristics of Pavement Sections, Transportation Research Board. Transportation Research Record.