journal article·2024-01-15Open access

The Effect of Laser Shock Peening (LSP) on the Surface Roughness and Fatigue Behavior of Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Alloy

Krista Dyer, Samira Ghadar, Sanin Zulić, Danijela Rostohar, Ebrahim Asadi, Reza Molaei

Coatings· Volume 14· Issue 1

Abstract

Laser shock peening (LSP) uses plasma shock waves to induce compressive residual stress at the surface of a component which has the potential to improve its fatigue properties. For AM parts, the existence of internal defects, surface roughness, and tensile residual stresses leads to noticeably lower fatigue strength compared to materials produced through conventional processes. Furthermore, there is a tendency for greater scatter in the fatigue behavior of these parts when compared to traditionally manufactured components. In this study, the effect of LSP on the roughness and fatigue behavior of Ti-6Al-4V alloy constructed through Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) technique was investigated. Two types of samples were designed and tested: as-built surface air foil samples for four-point bending tests and machined surface straight gage samples for uniaxial fatigue testing. Two sets of process parameters, optimized and non-optimized, were also used for the fabrication of each sample type. It was found that LSP had negative effects on the smooth (i.e., machined) surface samples, whereas for as-built surfaces the roughness was enhanced by decreasing the sharpness of the deep valleys and partially remelting the loosely bonded particles on the peaks. It was found that the scatter of the fatigue data decreased for optimized machined samples, while no clear improvement was observed in their lives. However, all non-optimized samples showed improvements in fatigue lives after the LSP process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Erosion and Abrasive Machining

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA

HiLASE Centre, Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 25241 Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic

Institute for Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering, Coventry University, Coventry CV6 5LZ, UK

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Multiaxial fatigue behavior of wrought and additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V including surface finish effect10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.03.044 ↗
2. Fatigue behaviour of additive manufactured materials: An overview of some recent experimental studies on Ti-6Al-4V considering various processing and loading direction effects10.1111/ffe.13000 ↗
3. The role of additive manufacturing for biomedical applications: A critical review10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.022 ↗
4. Torsional fatigue behavior of wrought and additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V by powder bed fusion including surface finish effect10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.03.002 ↗
5. Fatigue of additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V, Part I: The effects of powder feedstock, manufacturing, and post-process conditions on the resulting microstructure and defects10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105358 ↗
6. Defect characteristics and analysis of their variability in metal L-PBF additive manufacturing10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108091 ↗
7. Processing parameters in laser powder bed fusion metal additive manufacturing10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108762 ↗
8. Surface roughness effect on multiaxial fatigue behavior of additively manufactured Ti6Al4V alloy10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107022 ↗
9. Role of build orientation in layered manufacturing: A review10.1504/IJMTM.2013.058637 ↗
10. The utilization of selective laser melting technology on heat transfer devices for thermal energy conversion applications: A review10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.109 ↗
11. Ulbricht, A., Altenburg, S.J., Sprengel, M., Sommer, K., Mohr, G., Fritsch, T., Mishurova, T., Serrano-Munoz, I., Evans, A., and Hofmann, M. (2020). Separation of the formation mechanisms of residual stresses in lpbf 316l. Metals, 10.10.3390/met10091234 ↗
12. Stephens, R.I., Fatemi, A., Stephens, R.R., and Fuchs, H.O. (2001). Metal Fatigue in Engineering, Wiley.
13. Laser peening process and its impact on materials properties in comparison with shot peening and ultrasonic impact peening10.3390/ma7127925 ↗
14. Effect of Laser Shock Processing and Aluminizing on Microstructure and High-Temperature Creep Properties of 321 Stainless Steel for Solar Thermal Power Generation10.1155/2020/6532820 ↗
15. Post-processing of selective laser melting manufactured SS-304L by laser shock peening10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.014 ↗
16. Effect of laser shock peening on tensile properties and microstructure of selective laser melted 316L stainless steel with different build directions10.1016/j.msea.2022.143567 ↗
17. Fatigue behaviour of PBF additive manufactured TI6AL4V alloy after shot and laser peening10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106536 ↗
18. Regain the fatigue strength of laser additive manufactured Ti alloy via laser shock peening10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.029 ↗
19. Enhanced extra-long life fatigue resistance of a bimodal titanium alloy by laser shock peening10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105868 ↗
20. On the mechanical behaviour of titanium alloy TiAl6V4 manufactured by selective laser melting: Fatigue resistance and crack growth performance10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.11.011 ↗
21. Surface roughness effect on multiaxial fatigue behavior of additive manufactured metals and its modeling10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102260 ↗
22. Multiaxial fatigue of LB-PBF additive manufactured 17-4 PH stainless steel including the effects of surface roughness and HIP treatment and comparisons with the wrought alloy10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105646 ↗
23. (2021). Standard Practice for Conducting Force Controlled Constant Amplitude Axial Fatigue Tests of Metallic Materials (Standard No. ASTM standard E466).
24. Bjerregaard, L. (2000). Metalog Guide, Struers.
25. Surface post-treatments for metal additive manufacturing: Progress, challenges, and opportunities
26. Directional and notch effects on the fatigue behavior of as-built DMLS Ti6Al4V10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.10.004 ↗
27. A diagram for capturing and predicting failure locations in notch geometries produced by additive manufacturing10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105428 ↗
28. Temperatures, pressures and stresses during laser shock processing10.1016/S0143-8166(02)00040-4 ↗
29. Physics and Applications of Laser Shock Processing of Materials10.1117/12.377012 ↗
30. Laser Shock Peening and its Applications: A Review10.1007/s40516-019-00098-8 ↗
31. Laser Shock Processing: Process Physics, Parameters, and Applications10.1016/j.matpr.2017.07.128 ↗
32. Improvement in mechanical properties of titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-7Nb) subject to multiple laser shock peening10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.08.009 ↗
33. Correlations of fatigue strength of additively manufactured metals with hardness and defect size10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106920 ↗
34. Stress-strain function for the fatigue of metals
35. An investigation on the fatigue behavior of additively manufactured laser shock peened AlSi7Mg alloy surfaces10.1016/j.matchar.2023.112907 ↗
36. Yamashita, Y., Murakami, T., Mihara, R., Okada, M., and Murakami, Y. (2017). Procedia Structural Integrity, Elsevier B.V.
37. Quantitative evaluation of effects of non-metallic inclusions on fatigue strength of high strength steels. I: Basic fatigue mechanism and evaluation of correlation between the fatigue fracture stress and the size and location of non-metallic inclusions10.1016/0142-1123(89)90054-6 ↗
38. Multiaxial fatigue of additive manufactured metals: Performance, analysis, and applications10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105479 ↗
39. A critical plane approach to multiaxial fatigue damage including out-of-phase loading10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01169.x ↗
40. On the consideration of normal and shear stress interaction in multiaxial fatigue damage analysis10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.03.042 ↗
41. On the transition from shear to tensile failure mode in multiaxial fatigue10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.108076 ↗