journal article·2021-03-10Open access

Titanium Meshes in Guided Bone Regeneration: A Systematic Review

Ricard Aceves-Argemí, Elisabet Roca-Millan, Beatriz González-Navarro, Antonio Marí-Roig, Eugenio Velasco-Ortega, José López-López

Coatings· Volume 11· Issue 3

Abstract

The presence of satisfactory bone volume is fundamental for the achievement of osseointegration. This systematic review aims to analyse the use of titanium meshes in guided bone regeneration in terms of bone gain, survival and success rates of implants, and percentages of exposure. An electronic search was conducted Articles were selected from databases in MEDLINE (PubMed), SCOPUS, Scielo, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies in which bone regeneration was performed through particulate bone and the use of titanium meshes. Twenty-one studies were included in the review. In total, 382 patients, 416 titanium meshes, and 709 implants were evaluated. The average bone gain was 4.3 mm in horizontal width and 4.11 mm in vertical height. The mesh exposure was highly prevalent (28%). The survival rate of 145 simultaneous implants was 99.5%; the survival rate of 507 delayed implants was 99%. The success rate of 105 simultaneous implants was 97%; the success rate of 285 delayed implants was 95.1%. The clinical studies currently available in the literature have shown the predictability of this technique. It has a high risk of soft tissue dehiscence and membrane exposure although the optimal management of membrane exposition permits obtaining a sufficient bone regeneration volume and prevents compromising the final treatment outcome.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Barcelona, 08907 Barcelona, Spain

Oral Health and Masticatory System Group-IDIBELL, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, Odontological Hospital University of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, 08907 Barcelona, Spain

Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Bellvitge, 08907 Barcelona, Spain

Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, 41013 Seville, Spain

Department of Odontostomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Dentistry), Odontological Hospital University of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, 08907 Barcelona, Spain

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Guided bone regeneration: Materials and biological mechanisms revisited10.1111/eos.12364 ↗
2. Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry
3. “PASS” principles for predictable bone regeneration10.1097/01.id.0000204762.39826.0f ↗
4. Healing of bone defects by guided tissue regeneration10.1097/00006534-198805000-00004 ↗
5. A systematic review of the survival of implants in bone sites augmented with barrier membranes (guided bone regeneration) in partially edentulous patients10.1034/j.1600-051X.29.s3.14.x ↗
6. Scantlebury, T.V. (1993). 1982–1992: A decade of technology development for guided tissue regeneration. J. Periodontol., 1129–1137.10.1902/jop.1993.64.11s.1129 ↗
7. Biological properties of an anti-bacterial membrane for guided bone regeneration: An experimental study in rats10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01838.x ↗
8. Bone augmentation by means of barrier membranes10.1046/j.0906-6713.2003.03304.x ↗
9. Current barrier membranes: Titanium mesh and other membranes for guided bone regeneration in dental applications10.1016/j.jpor.2012.12.001 ↗
10. Rehabilitation of deficient alveolar ridges using titanium grids before and simultaneously with implant placement: A systematic review10.1902/jop.2012.120314 ↗
11. Alveolar ridge reconstruction with titanium meshes: A systematic review of the literature
12. The Use of Titanium Mesh in Guided Bone Regeneration: A Systematic Review10.1155/2019/9065423 ↗
13. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., and Altman, D.G. (2009). PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting ítems for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med., 6.10.2427/5768 ↗
14. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success
15. RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials10.1136/bmj.l4898 ↗
16. ROBINS-1: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions10.1136/bmj.i4919 ↗
17. Alveolar ridge reconstruction with titanium mesh and autogenous particulate bone graft: Computed tomography-based evaluations of augmented bone quality and quantity10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00257.x ↗
18. Regeneration of the alveolar crest using titanium micromesh with autologous bone and a resorbable membrane10.1563/1548-1336(2003)029<0086:ROTACU>2.3.CO;2 ↗
19. Use of titanium mesh for staged localized alveolar ridge augmentation: Clinical and histologic-histomorphometric evaluation10.1563/1548-1336(2006)32[237:UOTMFS]2.0.CO;2 ↗
20. Titanium membranes in prevention of alveolar collapse after tooth extraction10.1097/01.id.0000202596.18254.e1 ↗
21. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of alveolar ridge augmentation using bone grafts and titanium micromesh in humans10.1902/jop.2007.070001 ↗
22. Alveolar ridge augmentation with titanium mesh and a combination of autogenous bone and anorganic bovine bone: A 2-year prospective study10.1902/jop.2008.080061 ↗
23. Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants placed at the time of or after alveolar ridge augmentation with an autogenous mandibular bone graft and titanium mesh: A 3- to 8-year retrospective study
24. Platelet-rich plasma may prevent titanium-mesh exposure in alveolar ridge augmentation with anorganic bovine bone10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01615.x ↗
25. Titanium mesh as an alternative to a membrane for ridge augmentation10.1016/j.joms.2011.11.017 ↗
26. Lizio, G., Corinaldesi, G., and Marchetti, C. (2014). Alveolar ridge reconstruction with titanium mesh: A three-dimensional evaluation of factors affecting bone augmentation. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant., 1354–1363.10.11607/jomi.3417 ↗
27. Alveolar ridge augmentation with titanium mesh. A retrospective clinical study10.2174/1874210601408010148 ↗
28. Custom-made titanium devices as membranes for bone augmentation in implant treatment: Clinical application and the comparison with conventional titanium mesh10.1016/j.jcms.2015.10.020 ↗
29. Predictability of staged localized alveolar ridge augmentation using a micro titanium mesh10.1007/s10006-015-0513-6 ↗
30. Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction with Titanium Meshes and Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Retrospective, Multicenter Clinical Study
31. Guided bone regeneration via a preformed titanium foil: Clinical, histological and histomorphometric outcome of a case series
32. Prosthetically CAD-CAM-Guided Bone Augmentation of Atrophic Jaws Using Customized Titanium Mesh: Preliminary Results of an Open Prospective Study10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00125 ↗
33. Histological and histomorphometric analysis of bone tissue after guided bone regeneration with non-resorbable membranes vs. resorbable membranes and titanium mesh10.1111/cid.12814 ↗
34. The application of a newly designed L-shaped titanium mesh for GBR with simultaneous implant placement in the esthetic zone: A retrospective case series study10.1111/cid.12726 ↗
35. Horizontal ridge augmentation using native collagen membrane vs. titanium mesh in atrophic maxillary ridges: Randomized clinical trial10.1111/cid.12892 ↗
36. Evaluation of Alveolar Ridge Height Gained by Vertical Ridge Augmentation Using Titanium Mesh and Novabone Putty in Posterior Mandible10.1007/s12663-019-01250-9 ↗
37. Cucchi, A., Bianchi, A., Calamai, P., Rinaldi, L., Mangano, F., Vignudelli, E., and Corinaldesi, G. (2020). Clinical and volumetric outcomes after vertical ridge augmentation using computer-aided-design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) customized titanium meshes: A pilot study. BMC Oral Health, 20.10.1186/s12903-020-01205-4 ↗
38. Guided tissue regeneration around dental implants in immediate extraction sockets: Comparison of e-PTFE and a new titanium membrane
39. Evaluation of complication rates and vertical bone gain after guided bone regeneration with non-resorbable membranes versus titanium meshes and resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial10.1111/cid.12520 ↗
40. Clinical outcome of alveolar ridge augmentation with individualized CAD-CAM-produced titanium mesh10.1186/s40729-017-0097-z ↗
41. Guided Bone Regeneration with Collagen Membranes and Particulate Graft Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.11607/jomi.5461 ↗
42. Roca-Millan, E., Jané-Salas, E., Estrugo-Devesa, A., and López-López, J. (2020). Evaluation of Bone Gain and Complication Rates after Guided Bone Regeneration with Titanium Foils: A Systematic Review. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13235346 ↗
43. Wound Healing Complications Following Guided Bone Regeneration for Ridge Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.11607/jomi.5581 ↗
44. Onlay and inlay bone grafts with platelet-rich plasma: Histologic evaluations from human biopsies10.1016/j.joms.2010.11.027 ↗
45. Effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1111/clr.13121 ↗
46. Clinical and radiographic intra-subject comparison of implants placed with or without guided bone regeneration: 15-year results10.1111/jcpe.12665 ↗
47. Success rate of dental implants inserted in horizontal and vertical guided bone regenerated areas: A systematic review10.1016/j.ijom.2012.03.016 ↗