Nanochannelar Topography Positively Modulates Osteoblast Differentiation and Inhibits Osteoclastogenesis
Source abstract
Abstract
Based on previously reported findings showing reduced foreign body reactions on nanochannelar topography formed on TiZr alloy, this study explores the in vitro effects of such a nanostructured surface on cells relevant for implant osseointegration, namely osteoblasts and osteoclasts. We show that such nanochannelar surfaces sustain adhesion and proliferation of mouse pre-osteoblast MC3T3-E1 cells and enhance their osteogenic differentiation. Moreover, this specific nanotopography inhibits nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL)-mediated osteoclastogenesis. The nanochannels’ dual mode of action on the bone-derived cells could contribute to an enhanced bone formation around the bone implants. Therefore, these results warrant further investigation for nanochannels’ use as surface coatings of medical implant materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Bucharest, 91-95 Splial Independentei, 050095 Bucharest, Romania
Department of Materials Science, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, WW-4, LKO, Matersstr 7, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
Faculty of Applied Chemistry and Materials Science, University Politehnica of Bucharest, Str. Gheorghe Polizu 1-7, 011061 Bucharest, Romania
Funding
Ministerul Educației și Cercetării Științifice
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. The role of well-defined nanotopography of titanium implants on osseointegration: Cellular and molecular events in vivo
2. Protein interactions with layers of TiO2 nanotube and nanopore arrays: Morphology and surface charge influence10.1016/j.actbio.2016.08.050 ↗
3. Osteoblast behaviors on titania nanotube and mesopore layers
4. The nanoscale geometry of TiO2 nanotubes influences the osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells by modulating h3k4 trimethylation10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.11.002 ↗
5. In vivo histological response to anodized and anodized/hydrothermally treated titanium implants10.1002/jbm.b.10042 ↗
6. TiO2 nanotube surfaces: 15 nm—An optimal length scale of surface topography for cell adhesion and differentiation10.1002/smll.200801476 ↗
7. Nanosize and vitality: TiO2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate10.1021/nl070678d ↗
8. Effects of titanium nanotubes on the osseointegration, cell differentiation, mineralisation and antibacterial properties of orthopaedic implant surfaces10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0551.R1 ↗
9. Macrophage inflammatory response to TiO2 nanotube surfaces10.4236/jbnb.2011.23036 ↗
10. Improved implant osseointegration of a nanostructured titanium surface via mediation of macrophage polarization10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.08.025 ↗
11. Reduced inflammatory activity of RAW 264.7 macrophages on titania nanotube modified Ti surface10.1016/j.biocel.2014.09.006 ↗
12. Regulation of RAW 264.7 macrophages behavior on anodic TiO2 nanotubular arrays10.1007/s11706-017-0402-z ↗
13. Diameter of titanium nanotubes influences anti-bacterial efficacy10.1088/0957-4484/22/29/295102 ↗
14. Fast growth of TiO2 nanotube arrays with controlled tube spacing based on a self-ordering process at two different scales10.1016/j.elecom.2017.03.007 ↗
15. Formation and morphology evolution of anodic TiO2 nanotubes under negative pressure10.1016/j.electacta.2016.08.128 ↗
16. Effects of anodizing potential and temperature on the growth of anodic TiO2 and its photoelectrochemical properties10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.097 ↗
17. TiO2 nanotubes, nanochannels and mesosponge: Self-organized formation and applications10.1016/j.nantod.2013.04.010 ↗
18. Nanochannels formed on TiZr alloy improve biological response10.1016/j.actbio.2015.06.016 ↗
19. Surface plasma functionalization influences macrophage behavior on carbon nanowalls10.1016/j.msec.2014.11.064 ↗
20. Ion, R., Drob, S.I., Ijaz, M.F., Vasilescu, C., Osiceanu, P., Gordin, D.M., Cimpean, A., and Gloriant, T. (2016). Surface characterization, corrosion resistance and in vitro biocompatibility of a new Ti-Hf-Mo-Sn alloy. Materials, 9.10.3390/ma9100818 ↗
21. Neacsu, P., Staras, A.I., Voicu, S.I., Ionascu, I., Soare, T., Uzun, S., Cojocaru, V.D., Pandele, A.M., Croitoru, S.M., and Miculescu, F. (2017). Characterization and in vitro and in vivo assessment of a novel cellulose acetate-coated Mg-based alloy for orthopedic applications. Materials, 10.10.3390/ma10070686 ↗
22. Graphene nanoplatelets-sericin surface-modified gum alloy for improved biological response10.1039/C8RA01784K ↗
23. In vitro bio-functional performances of the novel superelastic beta-type Ti–23Nb–0.7Ta–2Zr–0.5N alloy10.1016/j.msec.2013.11.018 ↗
24. Progressive development of the rat osteoblast phenotype in vitro: Reciprocal relationships in expression of genes associated with osteoblast proliferation and differentiation during formation of the bone extracellular matrix10.1002/jcp.1041430304 ↗
25. Interactions with nanoscale topography: Adhesion quantification and signal transduction in cells of osteogenic and multipotent lineage
26. Focal adhesions in osteoneogenesis10.1243/09544119JEIM775 ↗
27. Nanotopography-induced changes in focal adhesions, cytoskeletal organization, and mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.10.037 ↗
28. Matrix nanotopography as a regulator of cell function10.1083/jcb.201108062 ↗
29. Materials as stem cell regulators10.1038/nmat3937 ↗
30. Surface topography enhances differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells towards osteogenic and adipogenic lineages10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.030 ↗
31. Recent progress in stem cell differentiation directed by material and mechanical cues10.1088/1748-6041/11/1/014109 ↗
32. Relationship between nanotopographical alignment and stem cell fate with live imaging and shape analysis10.1038/srep37909 ↗
33. Bioengineered titanium surfaces affect the gene-expression and phenotypic response of osteoprogenitor cells derived from mouse calvarial bones10.22203/eCM.v020a15 ↗
34. Proliferation, behavior, and differentiation of osteoblasts on surfaces of different microroughness10.1016/j.dental.2016.08.217 ↗
35. Osteoblast differentiation onto different biometals with an endoprosthetic surface topography in vitro
36. Relevant aspects in the surface properties in titanium dental implants for the cellular viability10.1016/j.msec.2016.03.049 ↗
37. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder10.1038/nmat2013 ↗
38. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension10.1073/pnas.0813200106 ↗
39. Behaviour of mesenchymal stem cells, fibroblasts and osteoblasts on smooth surfaces10.1016/j.actbio.2010.12.033 ↗
40. Cell shape provides global control of focal adhesion assembly10.1016/S0006-291X(03)01165-3 ↗
41. Actin, a central player in cell shape and movement10.1126/science.1175862 ↗
42. Vimentin induces changes in cell shape, motility, and adhesion during the epithelial to mesenchymal transition10.1096/fj.09-151639 ↗
43. Role of cytoskeleton in controlling the disorder strength of cellular nanoscale architecture10.1016/j.bpj.2010.05.023 ↗
44. Hexavalent chromium disrupts the actin cytoskeleton and induces mitochondria-dependent apoptosis in human dermal fibroblasts10.1016/j.tiv.2005.03.015 ↗
45. Binding of par-4 to the actin cytoskeleton is essential for Par-4/Dlk-mediated apoptosis10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.01.012 ↗
46. Transient dynamic actin cytoskeletal change stimulates the osteoblastic differentiation10.1007/s00774-009-0037-y ↗
47. Secretion of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase by osteoclasts correlates with resorptive behavior10.1002/jcb.20835 ↗
48. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b: A novel serum marker of bone resorption10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.7.1337 ↗
49. Regulation of osteoclast multinucleation by the actin cytoskeleton signaling network10.1002/jcp.24723 ↗
50. The dimension of titania nanotubes influences implant success for osteoclastogenesis and osteogenesis patients10.1166/jnn.2015.9602 ↗
51. Analysis of osteoclastogenesis/osteoblastogenesis on nanotopographicaltitania surfaces10.1002/adhm.201500664 ↗
52. Wear particles and surface topographies are modulators of osteoclastogenesis in vitro
53. Response of osteoclasts to titanium surfaces with increasing surface roughness: An in vitro study10.1007/s13758-012-0034-x ↗