Mechanical Behaviour of Hard Chromium Deposited from a Trivalent Chromium Bath
Source abstract
Abstract
In view of new environmental directives, hexavalent chromium baths can no longer be used to electroplate thick hard chromium deposits. To meet these industrial and environmental challenges, deposits are developed from trivalent chromium electrolytes. Cr(III) coatings are usually studied from the point of view of the use properties and hardness, but their intrinsic properties remain widely unknown. The novelty of this work consists in the mechanical characterisation of these coatings. Properties such as hardness, stiffness, yield strength, and toughness of trivalent chromium deposits are determined by combining instrumented hardness tests, in situ FEG–SEM observations, and finite element simulations. These are explained according to the microstructure of the deposits, which is determined by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction. Their composition was characterised by glow discharge spectrometry. The structure characterisation deposits showed a more severely fractured coating of trivalent chromium than in the case of hexavalent chromium. Non-post-treated trivalent chromium deposits have a higher hardness (13 ± 1.7 GPa) and yield strength (5 GPa) than hexavalent chromium deposits. However, their stiffness (191 ± 13 GPa) and toughness (1.37 ± 0.13 MPa√m) are lower. Its mechanical behaviour is elastofragile. These differences in mechanical properties can be explained by the amorphous structure of the deposits and their high carbon content.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced materials and composites · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratoire Génie de Production, Ecole Nationale d’Ingénieurs de Tarbes, INPT, Université de Toulouse, 47 Av. d’Azereix, 65016 Tarbes, France
Mecaprotec Industries, 34 Boulevard de Joffrery, 31600 Muret, France
Funding
BPI France and Région Occitanie Pyrénées-Méditerranée
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Alternative Tribological Coatings to Electrodeposited Hard Chromium: A Critical Review10.1080/00202967.2020.1776962 ↗
2. The Significance and Determination by Image Analysis of Microcrack Density in Hard Chromium Plating
3. Benaben, P. (2022, January 30). Chromage. Technique de l’Ingénieur. 10 June 1997, M1625 v2. Available online: https://www.techniques-ingenieur.fr/.
4. Tribological and Electrochemical Behavior of Thick Cr–C Alloy Coatings Electrodeposited in Trivalent Chromium Bath as an Alternative to Conventional Cr Coatings10.1016/j.electacta.2006.07.038 ↗
5. Regulations for chromium emissions to the aquatic environment in Europe and elsewhere10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126876 ↗
6. Comparison of Chromium Coatings and Electrochemical Behaviour with Direct Current and Pulse Current Deposition in Trivalent Chromium Formate Urea Bath as Alternative to Conventional Cr Coatings10.1179/174329408X326335 ↗
7. Chromium Electroplating from Trivalent Chromium Baths as an Environmentally Friendly Alternative to Hazardous Hexavalent Chromium Baths: Comparative Study on Advantages and Disadvantages10.1007/s10098-014-0711-1 ↗
8. Nanocrystalline Hard Chromium Electrodeposition from Trivalent Chromium Bath Containing Carbamide and Formic Acid: Structure, Composition, Electrochemical Corrosion Behavior, Hardness and Wear Characteristics of Deposits10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.04.095 ↗
9. Electrodeposition of Chromium Coatings from Sulfate–Carbamide Electrolytes Based on Cr(III) Compounds10.1007/s11003-011-9336-2 ↗
10. Influence of CH3SO3H and AlCl3 in Direct and Pulse Current Electrodeposition of Trivalent Chromium10.1179/026708409X364957 ↗
11. Kinetics and Mechanism of Chromium Electrodeposition from Formate and Oxalate Solutions of Cr (III) Compounds10.1016/j.electacta.2009.04.072 ↗
12. On the Mechanisms of Chromium Electrodeposition10.1149/1.2129004 ↗
13. A Voltammetric Study of the Reduction of Chromic Acid on Bright Platinum10.1149/1.2120013 ↗
14. The Effect of Formic Acid Concentration on the Conductivity and Corrosion Resistance of Chromium Carbide Coatings Electroplated with Trivalent Chromium10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.06.008 ↗
15. The Electrochemical Reduction Mechanism of Trivalent Chromium in the Presence of Formic Acid10.1016/j.elecom.2008.11.055 ↗
16. Determination of the Chromium(III) Reduction Mechanism during Chromium Electroplating10.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.114 ↗
17. Modeling, Optimization, and Comparative Analysis of Trivalent Chromium Electrodeposition from Aqueous Glycine and Formic Acid Baths10.1149/1.1933688 ↗
18. Dry Sliding Tribological Behavior of Cr Coatings Electrodeposited Intrivalent Chromium Sulphate Baths10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.01.076 ↗
19. The Hardness and Corrosion Properties of Trivalent Chromium Hard Chromium
20. Effect of Hydrazine and Hydroxylaminophosphate on Chrome Plating from Trivalent Electrolytes10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.01.122 ↗
21. Chromium Electrodeposition from Cr(III) Aqueous Solutions10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.02.027 ↗
22. Improving Hardness and Tribological Characteristics of Nanocrystalline Cr–C Films Obtained from Cr(III) Plating Bath Using Pulsed Electrodeposition10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2011.10.006 ↗
23. A Favorable Chromium Coating Electrodeposited from Cr(III) Electrolyte Reveals Anti-Wear Performance Similar to Conventional Hard Chromium10.1016/j.matlet.2016.12.022 ↗
24. A Comparison of the Galling Wear Behaviour of PVD Cr and Electroplated Hard Cr Thin Films10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.06.070 ↗
25. Characterization and Corrosion Resistance Study of the Fe–Cr Films Electrodeposited from Trivalent Chromium Sulfate Electrolyte10.1088/2053-1591/ab5538 ↗
26. Electroplating of Thick Hard Chromium Coating from a Trivalent Chromium Bath Containing a Ternary Complexing Agent: A Methodological and Mechanistic Study10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c04529 ↗
27. Characteristics and Properties of Cr Coatings Electrodeposited from Cr(III) Baths10.1088/2053-1591/aaeb4f ↗
28. Comparative Tribological Study of Chromium Coatings with Different Specific Hardness
29. Statistical Evaluation of the Strength of Wear-Resistant Hard Coatings10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.07.088 ↗
30. Small-Scale Fracture Toughness of Ceramic Thin Films: The Effects of Specimen Geometry, Ion Beam Notching and High Temperature on Chromium Nitride Toughness Evaluation10.1080/14786435.2016.1223891 ↗
31. Measurement of Fracture Toughness by Nanoindentation Methods: Recent Advances and Future Challenges10.1016/j.cossms.2015.04.003 ↗
32. A Novel Approach for Determining Fracture Toughness of Hard Coatings on the Micrometer Scale10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.06.034 ↗
33. Measuring Fracture Toughness of Coatings Using Focused-Ion-Beam-Machined Microbeams10.1557/JMR.2005.0048 ↗
34. Measuring the Fracture Resistance of Hard Coatings10.1063/1.4803928 ↗
35. A Novel Pillar Indentation Splitting Test for Measuring Fracture Toughness of Thin Ceramic Coatings10.1080/14786435.2014.913110 ↗
36. Measurement of Mechanical Properties by Ultra-Low Load Indentation10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00724-2 ↗
37. Brandes, E.A., and Brook, G.B. (1992). Smithells Metals Reference Book, Elsevier. [7th ed.].
38. Residual Stress Measurement at the Micrometer Scale: Focused Ion Beam (FIB) Milling and Nanoindentation Testing10.1080/14786431003800883 ↗
39. Structure of Chromium Deposits from Plating Solutions Containing Trivalent and Hexavalent Chromium10.1179/mst.1986.2.6.630 ↗
40. Ultrasonic Investigation of Pd39Ni10Cu30P21 Bulk Metallic Glass upon Crystallization10.1063/1.1289801 ↗
41. Nanocrystal Evolution in Bulk Amorphous Zr57Cu20Al10Ni8Ti5 Alloy and Its Mechanical Properties10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00489-9 ↗
42. Structure, Morphology and Mechanical Properties of Electrodeposited Composite Coatings Ni–P/SiC10.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.12.013 ↗
43. Standard X-ray Diffraction Powder Patterns
44. Serrated Flow Behavior in a Pd-Based Bulk Metallic Glass under Nanoindentation10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.01.010 ↗
45. Investigation of Nanomechanical Deformation Behavior in Plasma Sprayed Fe-Based Amorphous/ Nanocrystalline Composite Coating via Multi-Scale Indentation and Nanotribology10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.120244 ↗
46. Pop-in Behavior and Elastic-to-Plastic Transition of Polycrystalline Pure Iron during Sharp Nanoindentation10.1038/s41598-019-51644-5 ↗
47. Durut, F. (1999). Recherche des Mécanismes Microstructuraux qui Régissent les Propriétés Macroscopiques de Dépôts de Chrome: Influence des Paramètres d’Elaboration. [Ph.D. Thesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Etienne].
48. Influence of the Laser Pre-Quenched Substrate on an Electroplated Chromium Coating/Steel Substrate10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.022 ↗
49. The Mechanical Properties of High Purity Chromium10.1016/S0263-4368(99)00031-1 ↗