journal article·2007-01

Nickel-catalyzed autothermal reforming of jet fuel surrogates: n-Dodecane, tetralin, and their mixture

Benjamin D. Gould, Andrew R. Tadd, Johannes W. Schwank

Journal of Power Sources· Volume 164· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

The potential of a nickel-ceria-zirconia based catalyst was examined for autothermal reforming of n-dodecane, tetralin and their mixture into a hydrogen-rich product stream suitable for high-temperature fuel cells. n-Dodecane and tetralin were chosen as representative compounds for alkanes and bicyclic compounds in jet fuel. It was possible to reach conversions greater than 90% for both components, as long as sufficiently high oxygen concentrations were maintained in the feed. Tetralin gave larger yields of reforming products than n-dodecane. During the transient start-up phase of the reactor, large temperature excursions were observed, suggesting that the reaction starts with complete combustion of fuel, giving way to autothermal reforming after a few minutes on stream. These high-temperature excursions during reactor start-up are large enough to change the catalyst surface areas. Interestingly, the mixture of tetralin and n-dodecane did not behave as a linear combination of the two pure components, but showed reforming characteristics similar to pure tetralin. The non-linear behavior of the mixture provides a caveat that investigations of single component model compounds may not be able to capture the reforming behavior of more complex fuel mixtures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies · Catalysts for Methane Reforming · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Energy Information Administration, URL: http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_cons_prim_dcu_nus_a.htm.
2. Tadd · Catal. Today · 2005 · 110 · 6810.1016/j.cattod.2005.09.018 ↗
3. Krumpelt · Catal. Today · 2002 · 77 · 310.1016/S0920-5861(02)00230-4 ↗
4. On-Board Fuel Processing Go/No-Go Decision, DOE Decision Team Committee Report, August 2004. U.S. Department of Energy, www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/pdfs/committee_report.pdf.
5. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos · Energy Progress · 1981 · 1 · 53
6. Hu · J. Chem. Eng. · 2002 · 4049 · 1
7. Ming · Catal. Today · 2002 · 77 · 5110.1016/S0920-5861(02)00232-8 ↗
8. Cheekatamarla · J. Power Sources · 2006 · 153 · 15710.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.176 ↗
9. Kaila · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2006 · 31 · 193410.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.04.004 ↗
10. Pasel · J. Power Sources · 2004 · 126 · 11210.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.09.037 ↗
11. Shekhawat · Appl. Catal. A · 2006 · 311 · 810.1016/j.apcata.2006.05.042 ↗
12. Borup · Catal. Today · 2005 · 99 · 26310.1016/j.cattod.2004.10.014 ↗
13. Krummenacher · J. Catal. · 2003 · 215 · 33210.1016/S0021-9517(03)00011-3 ↗
14. Palm · J. Power Sources · 2002 · 106 · 23110.1016/S0378-7753(01)01018-7 ↗
15. R. Salavani, A.H. Shaaban, T. Campbell, M. Sawyer, R. Trotta, R. Hallett, Logistics Fuel Processor Development, AFRL-ML-TY-TR-2004-4506, 2004.
16. Lenz · J. Power Sources · 2005 · 149 · 4410.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.02.010 ↗
17. Wang · Appl. Catal. A · 2002 · 224 · 20910.1016/S0926-860X(01)00783-9 ↗
18. Rostrup-Nielsen · 1984 · vol. 5
19. J. Lind, J. Maybury, J. Morris, Chevron Technical Review: Aviation Fuels, 2000. URL: http://www.chevron.com/prodserv/fuels/bulletin/aviationfuel/toc.shtm.