journal article·2021-10-15Open access

Relationship between Friction Coefficient and Surface Roughness of Stone and Ceramic Floors

Samsiya Khaday, Kai-Way Li, Lu Peng, Ching-Chung Chen

Coatings· Volume 11· Issue 10

Abstract

Slips and falls are common occupational incidents worldwide. The friction on a floor surface is one of the critical environmental factors affecting the risk of a slip. In this research, we conducted friction measurements on stone and ceramic floor tiles under dry, wet, and water–detergent (WD) solution covered conditions using a horizontal pull slip meter (HPS). Our purposes were to quantify the slip resistance of commonly used stone and ceramic floors under different surface conditions and to validate the curvilinear relationship between the coefficient of friction (COF) and surface roughness of the floors proposed in the literature. The COF data were analyzed together with a surface profile parameter (Ra) of the floor samples. The results showed that the COFs of the stone floors were significantly (p < 0.0001) higher than those of the ceramic floors. All the floors under the dry conditions were slip resistant when adopting the ANSI 1264.2 criterion. Two and five ceramic floors were not slip resistant under the wet and WD solution covered conditions, respectively. Three polynomial regression equations were established to describe the relationship between the COF and Ra. The curvilinear functions of these models indicate that the three-zone (initial growth, steady-growth, and plateau) concept concerning the COF–Ra relationship in the literature was valid when static COF values measured using an HPS were adopted. In addition, the three-zone concept was valid not only on WD solution covered surfaces but also on dry and wet surfaces.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention · Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Ph.D. Program of Technology Management, Chung Hua University, Hsin-Chu 30012, Taiwan

College of Information Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China

Department of Information Management, Hsing Wu University, New Taipei 24452, Taiwan

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology Taiwan · General project of philosophy and social science research in universities Jiangsu China

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. State of science: Occupational slips, trips and falls on the same level10.1080/00140139.2016.1157214 ↗
2. Li, J., Goerlandt, F., and Li, K.W. (2019). Slip and fall incidents at work: A visual analytics analysis of the research domain. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16.10.3390/ijerph16244972 ↗
3. Ministry of Labor (MOL) (2021, February 17). Labor Inspection Annual Report, Taipei, Taiwan, (In Chinese).
4. Ministry of Manpower (MOM) (2021, January 17). Workplace Safety and Health Report 2019: National Statistics. Singapore, Available online: http://mom.gov.sg.
5. Labour Department (2021, January 22). Occupational Safety and Health Statistics, The Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Available online: https://www.labour.gov.hk/eng/osh/pdf/archive/statistics/OSH_Statistics_2018_eng.pdf.
6. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) (2018). Employer-Reported Workplace Injures and Illnesses—2017.
7. Health and Safety Executive (HSE) (2021, March 10). Health and Safety at Work Summary Statistics for Great Britain 2020, Available online: https://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/overall/hssh1920.pdf.
8. Occupational slip, trip, and fall-related injuries can the contribution of slipperiness be isolated?10.1080/00140130110085538 ↗
9. The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 2: Survey of friction measurement devices10.1080/00140130110085583 ↗
10. Predicting slips and falls considering required and available friction10.1080/001401399184712 ↗
11. Measurement of slipperiness: Fundamental concepts and definitions10.1080/00140130110085529 ↗
12. Required coefficient of friction during level walking is predictive of slipping10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.06.003 ↗
13. Influence of averaging time-interval on shoe-floor-contaminant available coefficient of friction measurements10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102959 ↗
14. Predicting slips based on the STM 603 whole-footwear tribometer under different coefficient of friction testing conditions10.1080/00140139.2019.1567828 ↗
15. Subjective assessments of floor slipperiness before and after walk under two lighting conditions10.1080/10803548.2017.1279436 ↗
16. Biomechanics of slips10.1080/00140130110085547 ↗
17. Field evaluation of two commonly used slipmeters10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00074-1 ↗
18. The effect of shoe soling tread groove width on the coefficient of friction with different sole materials, floors, and contaminants10.1016/j.apergo.2004.06.010 ↗
19. A field assessment of floor slipperiness in a student cafeteria10.1080/17457300.2012.686920 ↗
20. Occupational factors related to slips, trips and falls among home healthcare workers10.1016/j.ssci.2017.07.002 ↗
21. Analysis of slip safety risk by portable floor slipperiness tester in state institutions10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100953 ↗
22. Johnson, K.P. (2017). Assessing Floor Slipperiness in Campus Dining Halls Using Objective and Subjective Measures. [Master’s Thesis, East Carolina University]. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10342/6544.
23. Mechanisms of friction and assessment of slip resistance of new and used footwear soles on contaminated floors10.1080/00140139508925100 ↗
24. Friction measurements on ramps using the Brungraber Mark II slip meter10.1016/j.ssci.2005.11.003 ↗
25. Analysis of factors influencing the friction coefficients of shoe sole materials10.1016/j.ssci.2007.01.010 ↗
26. Functional levels of floor surface roughness for the prevention of slips and falls: Clean-and-dry and soapsuds-covered wet surfaces10.1016/j.apergo.2012.04.010 ↗
27. Wear observation of shoe surfaces: Application for slip and fall safety assessments10.1080/10402004.2014.980593 ↗
28. A study on wear development of floor surfaces: Impact on pedestrian walkway slip-resistance performance10.1016/j.triboint.2015.11.039 ↗
29. Classification of parameters affecting slip safety of limestones10.1080/23311916.2016.1217821 ↗
30. Performance testing of work shoes labeled as slip resistant10.1016/j.apergo.2017.12.008 ↗
31. Prediction of coefficient of friction based on footwear outsole features10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102963 ↗
32. Fekr, A.R., Li, Y., Gauvin, C., Wong, G., Cheng, W., Fernie, G., and Dutta, T. (2021). Evaluation of winter footwear: Comparison of test methods to determine footwear slip resistance on ice surfaces. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18020405 ↗
33. Slip safety analysis of differently surface processed dimension marbles10.1520/JTE103702 ↗
34. Coefficient of friction testing parameters influence the prediction of human slips10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.017 ↗
35. Coefficients of static and dynamic friction of ceramic floor tiles: Proposal of new method of surface roughness determination10.1051/ijmqe/2019002 ↗
36. The slip-resistance effect evaluation of floor roughness under different liquid viscosity10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.665 ↗
37. The effect of surface roughness on the measurement of slip resistance10.1016/S0169-8141(98)00038-9 ↗
38. Roughness and slipperiness of floor surface: Tactile sensation and perception10.1016/j.ssci.2010.11.010 ↗
39. Slip resistance versus surface roughness of deck and other underfoot surfaces in ships10.1016/0376-6349(90)90035-T ↗
40. ASTM F609-05 (2013). Standard Test Method for Using a Horizontal Pull Slipmeter (HPS), ASTM International. Available online: http://www.astm.org.
41. Experimental and numerical study on surface roughness of magnetorheological elastomer for controllable friction10.1007/s40544-017-0309-0 ↗
42. (2021, March 10). Mitutoyo, Portable Surface Roughness Tester SURFTEST SJ301 Series User Menu. Available online: https://www2.mitutoyo.co.jp/eng/support/service/catalog/03/E15013.pdf.
43. Multiscale analyses and characterizations of surface topographies10.1016/j.cirp.2018.06.001 ↗
44. Montgomery, D.C. (1984). Design and Analysis of Experiment, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. [2nd ed.].
45. Factors influencing the slip index measurements with the horizontal pull slipmeter
46. Friction measurement on common floor using a horizontal pull slip meter10.18178/ijesd.2019.10.9.1187 ↗
47. AS/NZS 4663 (2021, March 10). Australian Standards: Slip Resistance Measurement of Existing Pedestrian Surfaces. Available online: https://www.saiglobal.com/pdftemp/previews/osh/as/as4000/4600/4663-2004.pdf.
48. Health and Safety Executive (HSE) (2021, February 17). Assessing the Slip Resistance of Flooring, Available online: http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/geis2.htm.
49. American National Standards Institute (ANSI) (2012). Provision of Slip Resistance on Walking/Working Surfaces, American Society of Safety Engineers.
50. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (2021, March 10). Static Coefficients of Friction for Walking/Working Surfaces, Available online: http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=FEDERAL_REGISTER&p_id=17819.
51. Daukus, S. (2021, February 18). Understanding Floor Slip Resistance Standards. Available online: http://www.florock.net/2018/06/floor-slip-resistance-standards.
52. Ahmad, N.A., Tap, M.M., Syahrom, A., and Rohani, J.M. (2016). The Relationship Between Coefficient of Friction (COF) with Floor Slipperiness and Roughness. Quantitative and Qualitative Factors that Leads to Slip and Fall Incidents. Springer Briefs in Applied Sciences and Technology, Springer.10.1007/978-981-10-3286-8_3 ↗
53. Milled die steel surface roughness correlation with steel sheet friction10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.140 ↗
54. Wiklund, D., Liljebgren, M., Berglund, J., Bay, N., Kjellsson, K., and Rosén, B.G. (2010, January 13–15). Friction in sheet metal forming: A Comparison between milled and manually polished surfaces. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Tribology in Manufacturing Processes, Nice, France.