journal article·2021-01-18Open access

Ion Release from Dental Implants, Prosthetic Abutments and Crowns under Physiological and Acidic Conditions

María Arregui, Florian Latour, Francisco Javier Gil, Román A. Pérez, Luis Giner-Tarrida, Luis M. Delgado

Coatings· Volume 11· Issue 1

Abstract

Ion release from dental implants and prosthetic restoration can affect osteointegration and implant viability over a long period of time. Therefore, the aim of this study was to study the ion release from implants and crowns, with and without intermediate anodized abutments, in two different media, simulating clinical conditions. The implants, intermediate prosthetic abutments and Cr–Co crowns were divided into two groups depending on the media: Hanks’ solution and 1% lactic acid, simulating body fluids and microbiologically conditioned fluids, respectively. The study followed the ISO 10271:2011 and 10993-15:2000 standards modified to simulate the replacement of fluids in the oral environment. The ions’ release was measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-EOS), and only aluminum, chromium, cobalt, titanium and vanadium were identified. Ion concentration was higher in lactic acid than in Hanks’ solution at all time points (p < 0.05). Only vanadium showed a very low ion release in lactic acid, with no statistically significant differences from the ion release in Hanks’ solution (p = 0.524). Both anodized abutments and the immersion medium influenced the release of ions and affected the corrosion of these structures. The presence of an intermediate anodized abutment also affected ion release, as the level of ions was lower in groups with this component.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental materials and restorations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, 08195 Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain

Bioengineering Institute of Technology, Universitat Internacional de Catalunnya, 08195 Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Biocompatibility of dental alloys used in dental fixed prosthodontics10.1016/j.tdj.2014.07.005 ↗
2. Predicting clinical biological responses to dental materials10.1016/j.dental.2011.08.595 ↗
3. Williams, D. (2019). Chapter IV—Biocompatibility and immune responses to biomaterials. Definitions of Biomaterials for the Twenty-First Century, Elsevier. Materials Today.
4. Biocompatibility pathways: Biomaterials-induced sterile inflammation, mechanotransduction, and principles of biocompatibility control10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00607 ↗
5. Residual contaminations of silicon-based glass, alumina and aluminium grits on a titanium surface ater sandblasting
6. Suito, H., Iwawaki, Y., Goto, T., Tomotake, Y., and Ichikawa, T. (2013). Oral factors affecting titanium elution and corrosion: An in vitro study using simulated body fluid. PLoS ONE, 8.10.1371/journal.pone.0066052 ↗
7. Ultra-structural evaluation of an anodic oxidated titanium dental implant10.4012/dmj.2014-121 ↗
8. Titanium alloy miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage: An in vivo study of metal ion release10.1590/S1980-65232011000300003 ↗
9. The effect of pH and temperature on corrosion rate stainless steel 316L used as biomaterial
10. The effect of platform switching on the levels of metal ion release from different implant-abutment couples10.1038/ijos.2016.5 ↗
11. Biocompatibility of dental casting alloys: A review10.1016/S0022-3913(00)80016-5 ↗
12. Mellado-Valero, A., Igual Muñoz, A., Guiñón Pina, V., and Sola-Ruiz, M.F. (2018). Electrochemical behaviour and galvanic effects of titanium implants coupled to metallic suprastructures in artificial saliva. Materials., 11.10.3390/ma11010171 ↗
13. Analysis of metal ion release from biomedical implants
14. Comparison of metal release from various metallic biomaterials in vitro10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.005 ↗
15. Biological effects of resin monomers on oral cell populations: Descriptive analysis of literature
16. Synergistic interactions between corrosion and wear at titanium-based dental implant connections: A scoping review10.1111/jre.12469 ↗
17. Effect of thermocycling on the surface texture and release of titanium particles from titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) plates and dental implants: An in vitro study10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.013 ↗
18. Study of corrosion of combinations of titanium/Ti–6Al–4V implants and dental alloys10.4012/dmj.2010-005 ↗
19. In vitro assessment of corrosive properties of titanium as a biomaterial10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00690.x ↗
20. The corrosion resistance of pure titanium in organic acids10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00040-0 ↗
21. ISO 5832-2:2018 (2018). Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 2: Unalloyed Titanium, International Organization for Standardization.
22. ISO 5832-3:2016 (2016). Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 3: Wrought Titanium 6-Aluminium 4-Vanadium Alloy, International Organization for Standardization.
23. ISO 22674:2006 (2006). Dentistry—Metallic Materials for Fixed and Removable Restorations and Appliances, International Organization for Standardization.
24. ISO10993-15:2000 (2000). Biomedical Evaluation of Medical Devices-Part 15: Identification and Quantification of Degradation Products from Metals and Alloys, International Organization for Standardization.
25. ISO 10271:2011 (2011). Dentistry—Corrosion Test Methods for Metallic Materials, International Organization for Standardization.
26. Cobalt–chromium alloys fabricated with four different techniques: Ion release, toxicity of released elements and surface roughness10.1016/j.dental.2020.08.012 ↗
27. Effect of sandblasting conditions on alumina retention in representative dental alloys10.4012/dmj.2011-210 ↗
28. Corrosion behaviour of commercially pure titanium shot blasted with different materials and sizes of shot particles for dental implant applications10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00314-9 ↗
29. Assessment of the genetic risks of a metallic alloy used in medical implants10.1590/S1415-47572010005000118 ↗
30. A comparative evaluation between aluminium and titanium dioxide microparticles for blasting the surface titanium dental implants: An experimental study in rabbits10.1111/clr.12973 ↗
31. High concentration of residual aluminum oxide on titanium surface inhibits extracellular matrix mineralization10.1002/jbm.a.31810 ↗
32. Residual aluminum oxide on the surface of titanium implants has no effect on osseointegration10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00300-4 ↗
33. Pharmacokinetics of vanadium in humans after intravenous administration of a vanadium containing albumin solution10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01711.x ↗
34. Delgado-Ruiz, R., and Romanos, G. (2018). Potential causes of titanium particle and ion release in implant dentistry: A systematic review. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 19.10.3390/ijms19113585 ↗
35. Ion release from Ni–Cr–Mo and Co–Cr–Mo casting alloys
36. Physicochemical and microscopic characterization of implant-abutment joints
37. Variations in tooth surface temperature in the oral cavity during fluid intake10.1016/0142-9612(87)90016-0 ↗
38. Intra-oral temperature variation over 24 hours10.1093/ejo/21.3.249 ↗