Shear Bond Strength of Nanohybrid Composite to Biodentine with Three Different Adhesives
Source abstract
Abstract
Biodentine® is a bioactive dentin coating widely used for dental restoration; however, its adhesion to the substrate could limit its clinical success. The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) between Biodentine® and a composite resin, using different types of adhesive. In total, 120 acrylic blocks with a central hole were prepared. They were fully filled with Biodentine®, and divided into two time groups: 12 min (n = 60) and 24 h (n = 60); each group was subdivided into four groups according to the adhesive: three-step etch and rinse (3-E&R) (n = 15), two-step etch and rinse (n = 15), and a universal adhesive subdivided into two groups, two-step etch and rinse (n = 15) and one-step self-etch adhesive system (n = 15). After adhesive application, the composite was applied and stored at 100% humidity, at 37 °C, for 24 h, before the SBS test. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA, Fisher post hoc test, and Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The 12-min group showed statistically significant differences (p = 0.009), with the highest values of adhesion for 3-E&R. No statistically significant differences were observed for the 24-h group (p = 0.813) and between adhesive systems (p = 0.071) regardless of adhesion time. Higher adhesion values were found at 24 h. It is essential to consider the longest setting time for Biodentine®. In terms of adhesive, 3-E&R had the highest adhesion values.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental Erosion and Treatment
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, 08195 Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain
Department of Restorative Dentistry, and Department of Patients with Special Needs and Geriatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, 08195 Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Looking for ideal adhesive—A review
2. Dental adhesion review: Aging and stability of the bonded interface10.1016/j.dental.2007.02.009 ↗
3. Testing Adhesion of Direct Restoratives to Dental Hard Tissue—A Review
4. A Critical Review of the Durability of Adhesion to Tooth Tissue: Methods and Results10.1177/154405910508400204 ↗
5. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges
6. Treatment of deep caries lesions in adults: Randomized clinical trials comparing stepwise vs direct complete excavation, and direct pulp capping vs partial pulpotomy10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00731.x ↗
7. Current status of pulp capping with dentin adhesive systems: A review10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00008-7 ↗
8. Outcomes of vital pulp therapy in permanent teeth with different medicaments based on review of the literature10.4103/1735-3327.166187 ↗
9. Comparison of CaOH with MTA for direct pulp capping10.1177/0022034513484336 ↗
10. Direct pulp capping: What is the most effective therapy? Systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.jebdp.2018.02.002 ↗
11. Shear Bond Strength of a Self- adhering Flowable Composite and a Flowable Base Composite to Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Calcium-enriched Mixture Cement, and Biodentine10.1016/j.joen.2015.06.013 ↗
12. Different materials for direct pulp capping: Systematic review and meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis10.1007/s00784-016-1802-7 ↗
13. Capping carious exposures in adults: A randomized controlled trial investigating mineral trioxide aggregate versus calcium hydroxide10.1111/iej.12719 ↗
14. Tran, X.V., Salehi, H., Truong, M.T., Sandra, M., Sadoine, J., Jacquot, B., Cuisinier, F., Chaussain, C., and Boukpessi, T. (2019). Reparative mineralized tissue characterization after direct pulp capping with calcium-silicate-based cements. Materials., 12.10.3390/ma12132102 ↗
15. Effect of a calcium-silicate-based restorative cement on pulp repair10.1177/0022034512460833 ↗
16. Response of Human Dental Pulp Capped with Biodentine and mineral trioxide aggregate10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.005 ↗
17. Investigation of biodentine as dentine replacement material10.1016/j.jdent.2013.05.003 ↗
18. Evaluation of shear bond strength of two resin-based composites and glass ionomer cement to pure tricalcium silicate-based cement (Biodentine®)10.1590/1678-775720130660 ↗
19. Shear Bond Strengths of Different Adhesive Systems to Biodentine
20. Malkondu, Ö., Kazandag, M.K., and Kazazoglu, E. (2014). A Review on Biodentine, a Contemporary Dentine Replacement and Repair Material. BioMed Res. Int., 160951.10.1155/2014/160951 ↗
21. Shear bond Strength of lining materials to calcium-silicate cements at different time intervals
22. Clinical evaluation of the performance and safety of a new dentine substitute, Biodentine, in the restoration of posterior teeth—A prospective study10.1007/s00784-012-0701-9 ↗
23. Biodentine(TM) induces TGF-beta1 release from human pulp cells and early dental pulp mineralization10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01995.x ↗
24. Shear Bond strength of different restorative materials to mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine10.4103/JCD.JCD_97_17 ↗
25. MTA versus Biodentine: Review of literature with a comparative analysis
26. Partial pulpotomy with two bioactive cements in permanent teeth of 6- to 18-year-old patients with signs and symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis: A noninferiority randomized controlled trial10.1111/iej.13071 ↗
27. Effect of reducing acid-etching duration time on compressive strength and bonding of a universal adhesive to calcium silicate cements10.1111/iej.13026 ↗
28. Clinical and molecular perspectives of reparative dentin formation: Lessons learned from pulp-capping materials and the emerging roles of calcium10.1016/j.cden.2016.08.008 ↗
29. Vital pulp therapy with mineral trioxide aggregate10.1111/j.1600-9657.2005.00306.x ↗
30. Mineral trioxide aggregate: A comprehensive literature review-part1 1: Chemical, physical and antibacterial properties10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.006 ↗
31. Uptake of calcium and silicon released from calcium silicate-based endodontic materials into root canal dentine10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01924.x ↗
32. The effect of different adhesives and setting times on bond strength between Biodentine and composite
33. Bonding over dentin replacement materials10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.025 ↗
34. The physical characteristics of resin composite-calcium silicate interface as part of layered/laminate adhesive restoration10.1016/j.dental.2013.12.010 ↗
35. Shear bond strength evaluation of resin composite bonded to three different liners: TheraCal LC, Biodentine, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement using universal adhesive: An in vitro study10.4103/0972-0707.178696 ↗
36. In vitro biocompatibility of a dentine substitute cement on human MG63 osteoblasts cells: Biodentine™ versus MTA®10.1111/iej.12261 ↗
37. Surface and vertical dimensional changes of mineral trioxide aggregate and biodentine in different environmental conditions
38. Microshear bond strength of tri-calcium silicate-based cement to different restorative materials