Anti-Graffiti Behavior of Oleo/Hydrophobic Nano-Filled Coatings Applied on Natural Stone Materials
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent years, graffiti writings are increasingly regarded as a form of art. However, their presence on historic building remains a vandalism and different strategies have been developed to clean or, preferably, protect the surfaces. In this study, an experimental nano-filled coating, based on fluorine resin containing SiO2 nano-particles, and two commercial products have been applied on compact and porous calcareous stones, representative of building materials used in the Mediterranean basin, and their anti-graffiti ability has been analyzed. All the tested experimental and commercial coatings exhibited high hydrophobicity and oleophobicity, thus meeting one of the basic requirements for anti-graffiti systems. The effects of staining by acrylic blu-colored spray paint and felt-tip marker were, then, assessed; the properties of the treated stone surfaces after cleaning by acetone were also investigated. Visual observations, contact angle measurements and color evaluations were performed to this aim. It was found that the protective coatings facilitated the spray paint removal; however high oleophobicity or paint repellence did not guarantee a complete cleaning. The stain from the felt-tip marker was confirmed to be extremely difficult to remove. The cleaning with a neat unconfined solvent promoted the movement of the applied polymers (and likely of the paint, as well) in the porous structure of the stone substrate.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Building materials and conservation · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Istituto di Scienze del Patrimonio Culturale, CNR-ISPC, Prov.le Lecce-Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy
Department of Engineering for Innovation, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy
References (83)
Show source-provided references
1. (2019, September 26). GRAFFOLUTION, Awareness and Prevention Solutions against Graffiti Vandalism in Public Areas and Transport. SSP (Policy Oriented Research) of the Seventh European Programme of the European Commission. FP7-SEC-2013-1. Available online: http://project.graffolution.eu/po/.
2. Macchia, A., Ruffolo, S.A., Rivaroli, L., Malagodi, M., Licchelli, M., Rovella, N., Randazzo, L., and La Russa, M.F. (2019). Comparative study of protective coatings for the conservation of Urban Art. J. Cult. Herit., in press.10.1016/j.culher.2019.05.001 ↗
3. Street art graffiti: Discovering their composition and alteration by FTIR and micro-Raman spectroscopy10.1016/j.saa.2019.117474 ↗
4. Sanmartín, P., and Cappitelli, F. (2017). Evaluation of accelerated ageing tests for metallic and non-metallic graffiti paints applied to stone. Coatings, 7.10.3390/coatings7110180 ↗
5. Dionísio, A., and Ribeiro, T. (2013). When graffiti is not art: The damage of alkyd sprays on calcareous stones employed in Cultural Heritage. Cultural Heritage: Protection, Developments and International Perspectives (Focus on Civilizations and Cultures), Nova Science Publishers.
6. Conservation strategies against graffiti vandalism on Cultural Heritage stones: Protective coatings and cleaning methods10.1016/j.porgcoat.2017.08.010 ↗
7. Current methods of graffiti removal: A review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.093 ↗
8. Nd: YVO4 laser removal of graffiti from granite. Influence of paint and rock properties on cleaning efficacy10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.09.110 ↗
9. Investigation into the removal of graffiti on mineral supports: Comparison of nanosecond Nd: YAG laser cleaning with traditional mechanical and chemical methods10.1179/0039363015Z.000000000208 ↗
10. Behaviour of different removers on permanent anti-graffiti organic coatings10.1016/j.jobe.2015.12.004 ↗
11. Effectiveness and harmfulness evaluation of graffiti cleaning by mechanical, chemical and laser procedures on granite10.1016/j.microc.2015.10.040 ↗
12. Sanmartín, P., and Bosch-Roig, P. (2019). Biocleaning to remove graffiti: A real possibility? Advances towards a complete protocol of action. Coatings, 9.10.3390/coatings9020104 ↗
13. Bioremoval of marker pen inks by exploiting lipase hydrolysis10.1016/j.porgcoat.2017.02.019 ↗
14. Definition of the procedure to determine the suitability and durability of an anti-graffiti product for application on cultural heritage porous materials10.1016/j.culher.2011.07.004 ↗
15. Crosslinked fluorinated polyurethanes for the protection of stone surfaces from graffiti10.1016/j.culher.2010.07.002 ↗
16. Preparation and characterization of polyurethane clearcoats and investigation into their antigraffiti property10.1007/s11998-013-9507-1 ↗
17. Surface analysis and anti-graffiti behavior of a weathered polyurethane-based coating embedded with hydrophobic nano silica10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.12.123 ↗
18. Isocyanurate based fluorinated polyurethane dispersion for anti-graffiti coatings10.1016/j.porgcoat.2012.04.007 ↗
19. Surface dispersive energy determined with IGC-ID in anti-graffiti-coated building materials10.1016/j.porgcoat.2011.02.014 ↗
20. Comparative study of the variation of the hydric properties and aspect of natural stone and brick after the application of 4 types of anti-graffiti
21. Carmona-Quiroga, P.M., Jacobs, R.M.J., Martínez-Ramírez, S., and Viles, H.A. (2017). Durability of anti-graffiti coatings on stone: Natural vs accelerated weathering. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0172347 ↗
22. Enhanced anti-graffiti or adhesion properties of polymers using versatile combination of fluorination and polymer grafting10.1016/j.porgcoat.2015.06.021 ↗
23. Protective properties and durability characteristics of experimental and commercial organic coatings for the preservation of porous stone10.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.10.037 ↗
24. Innovative industrial technologies for preventive anti-graffiti coating10.1051/matecconf/201712103009 ↗
25. Anti-Graffiti nanocomposite materials for surface protection of a very porous stone10.1007/s00339-014-8356-9 ↗
26. Study of the effect of three anti-graffiti products on the physical properties of different substrates10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.181 ↗
27. Polymethyl (hydro)/polydimethylsilazane-derived coatings applied on AA1050: Effect of the dilution in butyl acetate on the structural and electrochemical properties10.1007/s11998-018-00176-0 ↗
28. Non-Destructive analytical techniques for the evaluation of cleaning and protection processes on white marble surfaces10.1016/j.culher.2018.10.013 ↗
29. Frigione, M., and Lettieri, M. (2018). Novel attribute of organic–inorganic hybrid coatings for protection and preservation of materials (stone and wood) belonging to cultural heritage. Coatings, 8.10.3390/coatings8090319 ↗
30. A sprayable protective coating for marble with water-repellent and anti-graffiti properties10.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.07.022 ↗
31. Bayer, S.I. (2017). On the durability and wear resistance of transparent superhydrophobic coatings. Coatings, 7.10.3390/coatings7010012 ↗
32. Physics of solid–liquid interfaces: From the Young equation to the superhydrophobicity10.1063/1.4960495 ↗
33. Superhydrophobic materials and coatings: A review10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086501 ↗
34. Recent advances in the mechanical durability of superhydrophobic materials10.1016/j.cis.2015.12.007 ↗
35. Superhydrophobic coatings and their durability10.1080/10426914.2015.1090600 ↗
36. Fabrication of super-hydrophobic surfaces for enhanced stone protection10.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.10.041 ↗
37. Recent advances in oil-repellent surfaces10.1080/09506608.2015.1116492 ↗
38. Hosseini, M., and Karapanagiotis, I. (2018). Advanced Materials for the Conservation of Stone, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-72260-3 ↗
39. Godeau, G., Guittard, F., and Darmanin, T. (2017). Surfaces bearing fluorinated nucleoperfluorolipids for potential anti-graffiti surface properties. Coatings, 7.10.3390/coatings7120220 ↗
40. Functionalized coating materials based on inorganic-organic polymers10.1016/S0040-6090(99)00203-5 ↗
41. Improving the cleanability of melamine-formaldehyde-based decorative laminates10.1002/app.40964 ↗
42. Oil-repellent antifogging films with water-enabled functional and structural healing ability10.1021/acsami.7b08996 ↗
43. Effectiveness of antigraffiti treatments in connection with penetration depth determined by different techniques10.1016/j.culher.2009.09.006 ↗
44. A novel dual-layer approach towards omniphobic polyurethane coatings10.1039/C9RA04923A ↗
45. Relevance of hydrophobic and oleophobic properties of antigraffiti systems on their cleaning efficiency on concrete and stone surfaces10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000557 ↗
46. Novel, water-based fluorinated polymers with excellent antigraffiti properties10.1007/BF02774591 ↗
47. Lettieri, M., Masieri, M., Morelli, A., Pipoli, M., and Frigione, M. (2018). Oleo/hydrophobic coatings containing nano-particles for the protection of stone materials having different porosity. Coatings, 8.10.3390/coatings8120429 ↗
48. Investigation on porosity changes of Lecce stone due to conservation treatments by means of X-ray nano- and improved micro-computed tomography: Preliminary results10.1002/xrs.976 ↗
49. Miocene phosphate-rich sediments in Salento (southern Italy)10.1016/j.sedgeo.2015.07.009 ↗
50. Phototrophic biodeteriogens on lithoid surfaces: An ecological study10.1007/BF00164892 ↗
51. Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional textures
52. (1980). NORMAL Rec. 4/80 Distribuzione del Volume dei Pori in Funzione del Loro Diametro, CNR/ICR.
53. (2001). UNI 10921. Beni Culturali Materiali Lapidei Naturali ed Artificiali—Prodotti Idrorepellenti—Applicazione su Provini e Determinazione in Laboratorio Delle Loro Caratteristiche, Ente Italiano di normazione.
54. (2000). ASTM D 6578. Standard Practice for Determination of Graffiti Resistance, ASTM International.
55. Nanostructured fluids for the removal of graffiti—A survey on 17 commercial spray-can paints10.1016/j.culher.2018.04.016 ↗
56. EN 15802 (2010). Conservation of Cultural Property—Test Methods—Determination of Static Contact Angle, CEN (European Committee for Standardization).
57. Tuning the wetting properties of siloxane-nanoparticle coatings to induce superhydrophobicity and superoleophobicity for stone protection10.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.014 ↗
58. Producing lasting amphiphobic building surfaces with self-cleaning properties10.1088/1361-6528/aa73a3 ↗
59. Aslanidou, D., Karapanagiotis, I., and Lampakis, D. (2018). Waterborne superhydrophobic and superoleophobic coatings for the protection of marble and sandstone. Materials, 11.10.3390/ma11040585 ↗
60. (2010). EN 15886. Conservation of Cultural Property–Test Methods—Colour Measurement of Surfaces, CEN (European Committee for Standardization).
61. Density, viscosity, and surface tension of five vegetable oils at elevated temperatures: Measurement and modeling
62. Investigating the surface properties of polyurethane based anti-graffiti coatings against UV exposure10.1002/app.35344 ↗
63. One-step synthesis of statically amphiphilic/dynamically amphiphobic fluoride-free transparent coatings10.1021/acsami.8b16485 ↗
64. Robust hyperbranched polyester-based anti-smudge coatings for self-cleaning, anti-graffiti, and chemical shielding10.1021/acsami.8b22447 ↗
65. Evaluation of mechanical soft-abrasive blasting and chemical cleaning methods on alkyd-paint graffiti made on calcareous stones10.1016/j.culher.2014.10.004 ↗
66. Efficient self-cleaning treatments for built heritage based on highly photo-active and well-dispersible TiO2 nanocrystals10.1016/j.microc.2015.11.043 ↗
67. The influence of the SO2 ageing on the graffiti cleaning effectiveness with chemical procedures on a granite substrate10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.291 ↗
68. Masieri, M., and Lettieri, M. (2017). Influence of the distribution of a spray paint on the efficacy of anti-graffiti coatings on a highly porous natural stone material. Coatings, 7.10.3390/coatings7020018 ↗
69. Biodeterioration and performance of anti-graffiti coatings on sandstone and marble
70. Effectiveness of commercial anti-graffiti treatments in two granites of different texture and mineralogy10.1016/j.porgcoat.2017.12.014 ↗
71. Kourkoulis, S.K. (2006). The challenge of protecting monuments from atmospheric attack. Fracture and Failure of Natural Building Stones: Applications in the Restoration of Ancient Monuments, Springer Netherlands.10.1007/978-1-4020-5077-0 ↗
72. Selwitz, C. (1992). Epoxy Resins in Stone Conservation, Getty Publications.
73. TEOS-based consolidants for carbonate stones: The role of N1-(3-trimethoxysilylpropyl)diethylenetriamine10.1039/C6NJ03808E ↗
74. Effect of solvent on nanolime transport within limestone: How to improve in-depth deposition10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.03.007 ↗
75. The mechanism of polymer migration in porous stones
76. Consolidation of porous paint in a vapor-saturated atmosphere a technique for minimizing changes in the appearance of powdering, matte paint
77. Polyethylene glycol oligomers as siloxane modificators in consolidation of carbonate stones10.1515/pac-2016-0803 ↗
78. Painting cracks: A way to investigate the pictorial matter10.1063/1.4960438 ↗
79. Mechanism of craquelure pattern formation on panel paintings10.1080/00393630.2016.1140428 ↗
80. Mechanical stability of sol-gel films10.1007/BF01184984 ↗
81. Moura, A.R., Flores-Colen, I., and de Brito, J. (2014, January 11–12). Anti-Graffiti products for porous surfaces. An overview. Proceedings of the Hydrophobe VII 7th International Conference on Water Repellent Treatment and Protective Surface Technology for Building Materials, LNEC (Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil), Lisbon, Portugal.
82. Disclosing the composition of historical commercial felt-tip pens used in art by integrated vibrational spectroscopy and pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry10.1016/j.culher.2018.03.018 ↗
83. Surface characterization and effectiveness evaluation of anti-graffiti coatings on highly porous stone materials10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.10.056 ↗