journal article·2019-10-18Open access

On the Icephobic Behavior of Organosilicon-Based Surface Structures Developed Through Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Deposition in Nitrogen Plasma

Siavash Asadollahi, Masoud Farzaneh, Luc Stafford

Coatings· Volume 9· Issue 10

Abstract

In many regions around the world, atmospheric icing during freezing rains and ice storms can cause severe damage to exposed infrastructure. Subsequently, protective coatings capable of ice accumulation prevention or ice adhesion reduction, often referred to as icephobic coatings, have gained a significant amount of interest. In this study, we examine an atmospheric-pressure plasma jet technique for the development of organosilicon-based icephobic coatings on aluminum substrates. Initially, Al-6061 samples are exposed to multiple passes of air plasma treatment at very short jet-to-substrate distances to create a microporous alumina-based surface structure. These surfaces are then used for plasma deposition of superhydrophobic coatings in the same jet with hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO) as the precursor and nitrogen as the plasma gas. Several samples are created with varying plasma precursor flow rates and number of deposition passes. All samples are exposed to three cycles of icing/de-icing to estimate coatings’ stability in aggressive natural conditions. The effects of multiple icing/de-icing cycles on surface chemistry, surface morphology, and wetting behavior is studied. It is shown that the most remarkable mechanism through which icing affects surface properties is coating removal during aggressive de-icing procedure. Finally, the icephobic properties of the most efficient coating (referred to as PT5x3) is further studied through 10 cycles of icing/de-icing, and it is shown that this coating can reduce ice adhesion strength by a factor of at least two for up to nine cycles of icing/de-icing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Plasma Applications and Diagnostics · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Canada Research Chair on Engineering of Power Network Atmospheric Icing (INGIVRE), Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Saguenay, QC G7H 2B1, Canada

Département de Physique, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada

Funding

Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. (2008). The 1998 Ice Storm: 10-Year Retrospective—RMS Special Report, Risk Management Solutions, Inc.
2. Farzaneh, M. (2008). Atmospheric icing of power networks. Atmospheric Icing of Power Networks, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-8531-4 ↗
3. Eliasson, A.J., Farzaneh, M., Fikke, S.M., Haldar, A., Isozaki, M., Jakl, F., Lake, R., Leblond, A., Minchin, M., and Mito, M. (2010). CIGRE Working Group B2.29: Systems for Prediction and Monitoring of Ice Shedding, Anti-Icing and De-Icing for Power Line Conductors and Ground Wires, University of Huddersfield.
4. How wetting hysteresis influences ice adhesion strength on superhydrophobic surfaces10.1021/la901439c ↗
5. Anti-icing performance of superhydrophobic surfaces10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.02.057 ↗
6. Relationships between water wettability and ice adhesion10.1021/am1006035 ↗
7. Ice adhesion on lubricant-impregnated textured surfaces10.1021/la402456c ↗
8. Frost formation and ice adhesion on superhydrophobic surfaces10.1063/1.3524513 ↗
9. Ice adhesion—Theory, measurements and countermeasures10.1163/016942411X574583 ↗
10. Development of sol–gel icephobic coatings: Effect of surface roughness and surface energy10.1021/am504348x ↗
11. Superhydrophobic coatings with reduced ice adhesion10.1163/156856109X433964 ↗
12. Verification of icephobic/anti-icing properties of a superhydrophobic surface10.1021/am400429q ↗
13. Delayed freezing on water repellent materials10.1021/la900929u ↗
14. Anti-icing superhydrophobic coatings10.1021/la902882b ↗
15. Ice-phobic coatings based on silicon-oil-infused polydimethylsiloxane10.1021/am400704z ↗
16. Deicing strains and stresses of iced substrates10.1163/016942411X574790 ↗
17. Evaluation of icephobic coatings—Screening of different coatings and influence of roughness10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.06.073 ↗
18. Investigation of ice shedding properties of superhydrophobic coatings on helicopter blades10.1016/j.coldregions.2013.12.009 ↗
19. Ice adhesion on super-hydrophobic surfaces10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.05.033 ↗
20. The superhydrophobicity of polymer surfaces: Recent developments10.1002/polb.22286 ↗
21. Nanostructured superhydrophobic coatings
22. Dynamics of ice nucleation on water repellent surfaces10.1021/la2045256 ↗
23. Superhydrophobic and icephobic surfaces prepared by RF-sputtered polytetrafluoroethylene coatings10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.08.092 ↗
24. Superhydrophobic surface elaboration using plasma polymerization of hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO)10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.409.783 ↗
25. Do self-cleaning surfaces repel ice?10.1163/016942411X575933 ↗
26. Effects of nano-fluorocarbon coating on icing10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.04.043 ↗
27. Adhesion measurement of thin films10.1155/APEC.3.21 ↗
28. Wetting 101?10.1021/la902206c ↗
29. The relationship between water wetting and ice adhesion10.1163/016942409X12510925843078 ↗
30. Exploiting topographical texture to impart icephobicity10.1021/nn103214q ↗
31. Superhydrophobic surfaces cannot reduce ice adhesion10.1063/1.4752436 ↗
32. Why superhydrophobic surfaces are not always icephobic10.1021/nn302138r ↗
33. Condensation and freezing of droplets on superhydrophobic surfaces10.1016/j.cis.2013.10.018 ↗
34. Predictive model for ice formation on superhydrophobic surfaces10.1021/la200816f ↗
35. Icephobic/anti-icing properties of micro/nanostructured surfaces10.1002/adma.201104412 ↗
36. Ice accretion on superhydrophobic aluminum surfaces under low-temperature conditions10.1016/j.coldregions.2010.02.005 ↗
37. Understanding the effect of superhydrophobic coatings on energy reduction in anti-icing systems10.1016/j.coldregions.2011.02.006 ↗
38. Facile fabrication of superhydrophobic nanostructures on aluminum foils with controlled-condensation and delayed-icing effects10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.05.032 ↗
39. Enhanced corrosion resistance and hemocompatibility of biomedical NiTi alloy by atmospheric-pressure plasma polymerized fluorine-rich coating10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.01.092 ↗
40. Effects of contact angle hysteresis on ice adhesion and growth on superhydrophobic surfaces under dynamic flow conditions10.1007/s00396-012-2753-4 ↗
41. Superhydrophobic surfaces: Are they really ice-repellent?10.1021/la104277q ↗
42. Durable and scalable icephobic surfaces: Similarities and distinctions from superhydrophobic surfaces10.1039/C5SM02295A ↗
43. A review of icing prevention in photovoltaic devices by surface engineering10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.015 ↗
44. Design of ice-free nanostructured surfaces based on repulsion of impacting water droplets10.1021/nn102557p ↗
45. Erosion resistant anti-ice surfaces generated by ultra short laser pulses10.1016/j.phpro.2010.08.141 ↗
46. Are superhydrophobic surfaces best for icephobicity?10.1021/la104762g ↗
47. Physics of icing and rational design of surfaces with extraordinary icephobicity10.1021/la502586a ↗
48. Liquid-infused nanostructured surfaces with extreme anti-ice and anti-frost performance10.1021/nn302310q ↗
49. Research on the icephobic properties of fluoropolymer-based materials10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.01.003 ↗
50. Multi-level micro-/nanostructures of butterfly wings adapt at low temperature to water repellency10.1039/c1sm06347b ↗
51. Superhydrophobic surface at low surface temperature10.1063/1.3558911 ↗
52. Wettability of porous surfaces10.1039/tf9444000546 ↗
53. Superhydrophobic and Superhydrophilic polycarbonate by tailoring chemistry and nano-texture with plasma processing10.1002/ppap.201000098 ↗
54. Deposition of organosilicon coatings by a non-equilibrium atmospheric pressure plasma jet: Design, analysis and macroscopic scaling law of the process10.1002/ppap.201000121 ↗
55. Plasma polymerization of HMDSO with an atmospheric pressure plasma jet for corrosion protection of aluminum and low-adhesion surfaces10.1002/ppap.200900032 ↗
56. Atmospheric pressure plasma discharge for polysiloxane thin films deposition and comparison with low pressure process10.1007/s11090-011-9286-3 ↗
57. High-rate HMDSO-based coatings in open air using atmospheric-pressure plasma jet10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.12.081 ↗
58. Properties of films of adsorbed fluorinated acids10.1021/j150513a011 ↗
59. Robust icephobic, and anticorrosive plasma polymer coating10.1016/j.coldregions.2018.03.009 ↗
60. Asadollahi, S., Profili, J., Farzaneh, M., and Stafford, L. (2019). Development of organosilicon-based superhydrophobic coatings through atmospheric pressure plasma polymerization of HMDSO in nitrogen plasma. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12020219 ↗
61. Highly porous micro-roughened structures developed on aluminum surface using the jet of rotating arc discharges at atmospheric pressure10.1063/1.5003831 ↗
62. Comments on “an essay on contact angle measurements”—An illustration of the respective influence of droplet deposition and measurement parameters10.1002/ppap.201100114 ↗
63. Comments on “an essay on contact angle measurements” by Strobel and Lyons10.1002/ppap.201000115 ↗
64. Asadollahi, S., Profili, J., Farzaneh, M., and Stafford, L. (2019). Multi-pass deposition of organosilicon-based superhydrophobic coatings in atmospheric pressure plasma deposition of HMDSO. Plasma Process. Polym., submitted.10.1016/j.tsf.2020.138369 ↗
65. Reducing the contact time of a bouncing drop10.1038/nature12740 ↗
66. Thickness dependence of ice removal stress for a polydimethylsiloxane nanocomposite: Sylgard 18410.1021/la5030444 ↗