journal article·2022-11-19Open access

Assessing Consumers’ Preference and Loyalty towards Biopolymer Films for Food Active Packaging

Maria-Ioana Socaciu, Veronica Câmpian, Dan-Cristian Dabija, Melinda Fogarasi, Cristina Anamaria Semeniuc, Andersina Simina Podar, Dan Cristian Vodnar

Coatings· Volume 12· Issue 11

Abstract

Contemporary society faces numerous food-related challenges: on the one hand, it is becoming increasingly difficult to ensure that people have access to fresh, nutritious, and safe food products around the world, while on the other hand, consumers from ‘low income’ countries are starving, while food products are sometimes discarded because it is difficult to prolong shelf-life. To overcome such challenges, edible active films, called biopolymer films, were developed as materials to cover or wrap food products to extend their shelf-life, as they can offer additional protection. Therefore, this article aims to study consumers’ preference and loyalty towards the innovative, active, green, and sustainable characteristics of biopolymer films for the active packaging of food products. A quantitative empirical investigation was carried out among consumers in an emerging market, pinpointing their behavior toward such a novel food packaging material. The conceptual model designed was assessed using structural equation modelling. The results show that consumers tend to accept and prefer biopolymer-film packaging, as it maintains the characteristics of the product and thus extends its shelf-life. The results also revealed consumers’ openness to eco-sustainable consumption and willingness to pay more for the benefits of this packaging.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends · Sustainable Supply Chain Management · Color perception and design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Food Engineering, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, 3-5 Calea Mănăștur, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Centre for Technology Transfer-BioTech, 64 Calea Florești, 400509 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Department of Communication, Public Relations and Advertising, Babeș-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca, 71 General Traian Moșoiu Street, 400070 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Department of Marketing, Babeș-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca, 58-60 Teodor Mihali Street, 400591 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Department of Food Science, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, 3-5 Calea Mănăștur, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Funding

Romanian Ministry of Education and Research, CNCS—UEFISCDI

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Motelica, L., Ficai, D., Ficai, A., Oprea, O.C., Kaya, D.A., and Andronescu, E. (2020). Biodegradable antimicrobial food packaging: Trends and perspectives. Foods, 9.10.3390/foods9101438 ↗
2. Lăzăroiu, G., Valaskova, K., Nica, E., Durana, P., Kral, P., Bartoš, P., and Maroušková, A. (2020). Techno-economic assessment: Food emulsion waste management. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13184922 ↗
3. Underlying values that motivate behavioral intentions and purchase decisions: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic10.22381/AM2020218 ↗
4. Role of packaging in consumer buying behavior10.5267/j.msl.2019.11.040 ↗
5. Impact of product packaging on consumer buying decision10.26666/rmp.jesr.2020.2.4 ↗
6. Novel food packaging technologies: Innovations and future prospective
7. Sarkar, R., and Shaw, A. (2017). Have green, pay more: An empirical investigation of consumer’s attitude towards green packaging in an emerging economy. Essays on Sustainability and Management, Springer. India Studies in Business and Economics.10.1007/978-981-10-3123-6 ↗
8. The influence of green packaging on consumers’ green purchase intention in the context of online-to-offline commerce10.1108/JSIT-11-2019-0242 ↗
9. Implementation of harmonized Extended Producer Responsibility strategies to incentivize recovery of single-use plastic packaging waste in Canada10.1016/j.wasman.2020.05.013 ↗
10. Wandosell, G., Parra-Meroño, M.C., Alcayde, A., and Baños, R. (2021). Green packaging from consumer and business perspectives. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13031356 ↗
11. Food packaging: A comprehensive review and future trends10.1111/1541-4337.12343 ↗
12. Consumer engagement and the perception of packaging information10.31648/oej.3971 ↗
13. A systematic review of consumer perceptions of smart packaging technologies for food10.3389/fsufs.2020.00063 ↗
14. Recent developments in food packaging technologies
15. Trust management in organic agriculture: Sustainable consumption behavior, environmentally conscious purchase intention, and healthy food choices10.3389/fpubh.2019.00340 ↗
16. Socaciu, M.-I., Semeniuc, C.A., and Vodnar, D.C. (2018). Edible films and coatings for fresh fish packaging: Focus on quality changes and shelf-life extension. Coatings, 8.10.3390/coatings8100366 ↗
17. Majerova, J., Sroka, W., Krizanova, A., Gajanova, L., Lăzăroiu, G., and Nadanyiova, M. (2020). Sustainable brand management of alimentary goods. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12020556 ↗
18. Circular economy as assistance for sustainable development in OECD countries10.24136/oc.2021.001 ↗
19. Mehrabian, A., and Russell, J.A. (1974). An Approach to Environmental Psychology, M.I.T. Press.
20. Consumer attitudes, values, needs, and expectations due to COVID-1910.22381/AM20202114 ↗
21. The consumer awareness and behaviour towards food packaging in Poland10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-2/20 ↗
22. Valaskova, K., Durana, P., and Adamko, P. (2021). Changes in Consumers’ Purchase Patterns as a Consequence of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Mathematics, 9.10.3390/math9151788 ↗
23. A concise guide to active agents for active food packaging10.1016/j.tifs.2018.08.006 ↗
24. Robertson, G.L. (2019). History of food packaging. Reference Module in Food Science, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.22535-3 ↗
25. Galanakis, C.M. (2019). Innovative packaging that saves food. Saving Food: Production, Supply Chain, Food Waste and Food Consumption, Academic Press.
26. Milk protein based edible films and coatings–preparation, properties and food applications
27. Socaciu, M.-I., Fogarasi, M., Semeniuc, C.A., Socaci, S.A., Rotar, M.A., Mureşan, V., Pop, O.L., and Vodnar, D.C. (2020). Formulation and characterization of antimicrobial edible films based on whey protein isolate and tarragon essential oil. Polymers, 12.10.3390/polym12081748 ↗
28. Socaciu, M.-I., Fogarasi, M., Simon, E.L., Semeniuc, C.A., Socaci, S.A., Podar, A.S., and Vodnar, D.C. (2021). Effects of whey protein isolate-based film incorporated with tarragon essential oil on the quality and shelf-life of refrigerated brook trout. Foods, 10.10.3390/foods10020401 ↗
29. Hake proteins edible films incorporated with essential oils: Physical, mechanical, antioxidant and antibacterial properties10.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.05.019 ↗
30. Physical-chemical and antimicrobial properties of egg white protein powder films incorporated with orange essential oil on Kashar cheese10.1590/1678-457x.12516 ↗
31. Soy protein—Poly (lactic acid) bilayer films as biodegradable material for active food packaging10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.03.010 ↗
32. Gelatin-based composite films and their application in food packaging: A review10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2021.110762 ↗
33. Quince seed mucilage films incorporated with oregano essential oil: Physical, thermal, barrier, antioxidant and antibacterial properties10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.08.030 ↗
34. Influence of α-tocopherol on physicochemical properties of chitosan-based films10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.06.011 ↗
35. Effect of essential oils and homogenization conditions on properties of chitosan-based films10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.03.015 ↗
36. Characterization and antimicrobial analysis of chitosan-based films10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.01.022 ↗
37. Physical and antioxidant properties of edible chitosan ascorbate films10.1021/acs.jafc.8b04567 ↗
38. Gaba, A.B.M., Hassan, M.A., Abd EL-Tawab, A.A., Abdelmonem, M.A., and Morsy, M.K. (2022). Protective impact of chitosan film loaded oregano and thyme essential oil on the microbial profile and quality attributes of beef meat. Antibiotics, 11.10.3390/antibiotics11050583 ↗
39. Antimicrobial nanostructured starch-based films for packaging10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.04.021 ↗
40. Impact of the starch source on the physicochemical properties and biodegradability of different starch-based films10.1002/app.46564 ↗
41. Effect of green propolis extract on functional properties of active pectin-based films10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.107746 ↗
42. Effect of nopal mucilage addition on physical, barrier and mechanical properties of citric pectin-based films10.1007/s13197-018-3304-x ↗
43. Food applications of emulsion-based edible films and coatings10.1016/j.tifs.2015.07.011 ↗
44. Effect of re-crystallization on tensile, optical and water vapour barrier properties of corn starch films containing fatty acids10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.06.009 ↗
45. Effect of glycerol and corn oil on physicochemical properties of polysaccharide films—A comparative study10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.07.007 ↗
46. Edible polymers: Challenges and opportunities
47. Production, antioxidant characterization and application of active starch-based films containing essential oils for beef packaging10.33448/rsd-v10i8.16903 ↗
48. Edible and active films and coatings as carriers of natural antioxidants for lipid food10.1016/j.tifs.2017.08.009 ↗
49. The efficacy of edible film from Konjac glucomannan and saffron petal extract to improve shelf life of fresh-cut cucumber10.1002/fsn3.1544 ↗
50. Semeniuc, C.A., Socaciu, M.-I., Socaci, S.A., Mureșan, V., Fogarasi, M., and Rotar, A.M. (2018). Chemometric comparison and classification of some essential oils extracted from plants belonging to Apiaceae and Lamiaceae families based on their chemical composition and biological activities. Molecules, 23.10.3390/molecules23092261 ↗
51. Antibacterial activity and interactions of plant essential oil combinations against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria10.1016/j.jfda.2016.06.002 ↗
52. Nemes, S.A., Szabo, K., and Vodnar, D.C. (2020). Applicability of agro-industrial by-products in intelligent food packaging. Coatings, 10.10.3390/coatings10060550 ↗
53. Glogovețan, A.-I., Dabija, D.-C., Fiore, M., and Pocol, C.B. (2022). Consumer Perception and Understanding of European Union Quality Schemes: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14031667 ↗
54. Functional properties and applications of edible films made of milk proteins10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76885-0 ↗
55. Han, J.H. (2014). Edible films and coatings: A review. Innovations in Food Packaging, Academic Press. [2nd ed.].10.1016/B978-0-12-394601-0.00009-6 ↗
56. Effect of storage conditions on the physicochemical characteristics of edible films based on whey protein concentrate and liquid smoke10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.08.015 ↗
57. Smart edible films based on mucilage of lallemantia iberica seed incorporated with curcumin for freshness monitoring10.1002/fsn3.2114 ↗
58. Consumer tastes, sentiments, attitudes, and behaviors related to COVID-1910.22381/AM20202110 ↗
59. Han, J.H. (2005). Sensory quality of foods associated with edible film and coating systems and shelf-life extension. Innovations in Food Packaging, Academic Press. [1st ed.].
60. The role of smart packaging system in food supply chain10.1111/1750-3841.15046 ↗
61. Innovative food packaging solutions10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00933.x ↗
62. Chitosan−whey protein edible films produced in the absence or presence of transglutaminase: Analysis of their mechanical and barrier properties10.1021/bm050661u ↗
63. Active packaging films containing antioxidant extracts from green coffee oil by-products to prevent lipid oxidation10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2021.110744 ↗
64. Green packaging purchase behaviour: A study on Malaysian consumers10.1007/s10668-021-01302-6 ↗
65. How green is your packaging—A comparative international study of cues consumers use to recognize environmentally friendly packaging10.1111/ijcs.12560 ↗
66. The determinants of green packaging that influence buyers’ willingness to pay a price premium10.1016/j.ausmj.2018.06.001 ↗
67. Green Procurement through Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) Certification in the Private Sector. Perceptions and Willingness to Buy of Private Companies from Romania10.24818/EA/2020/53/42 ↗
68. Consumers’ decision-making process on social commerce platforms: Online trust, perceived risk, and purchase intentions10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00890 ↗
69. Consumers’ response to environmentally-friendly food packaging—A systematic review10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120123 ↗
70. Can neuroscience assist us in constructing better patterns of economic decision-making?10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00188 ↗
71. Galanakis, C.M. (2018). Sustainable packaging. Sustainable Food Systems from Agriculture to Industry: Improving Production and Processing, Academic Press.
72. Challenges and new opportunities on barrier performance of biodegradable polymers for sustainable packaging10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.101395 ↗
73. Kozik, N. (2019, January 9–10). Sustainable packaging as a tool for global sustainable development. Proceedings of the 19th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2019—Sustainability in the Global-Knowledge Economy, Rajecke Teplice, Slovakia.
74. Boz, Z., Korhonen, V., and Koelsch Sand, C. (2020). Consumer considerations for the implementation of sustainable packaging: A review. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12062192 ↗
75. Tiekstra, S., Dopico-Parada, A., Koivula, H., Lahti, J., and Buntinx, M. (2021). Holistic approach to a successful market implementation of active and intelligent food packaging. Foods, 10.10.3390/foods10020465 ↗
76. Orzan, G., Cruceru, A.F., Bălăceanu, C.T., and Chivu, R.-G. (2018). Consumers’ behavior concerning sustainable packaging: An exploratory study on Romanian consumers. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10061787 ↗
77. Kocetkovs, V., Muizniece-Brasava, S., and Kirse-Ozolina, A. (2019, January 2–3). Consumer awareness and attitudes towards active and intelligent packaging systems in the Latvian market. Proceedings of the 13th Baltic Conference on Food Science and Technology (FoodBalt 2019), Jelgava, Latvia.10.22616/FoodBalt.2019.025 ↗
78. Drago, E., Campardelli, R., Pettinato, M., and Perego, P. (2020). Innovations in smart packaging concepts for food: An extensive review. Foods, 9.10.3390/foods9111628 ↗
79. Popovic, I., Bossink, B.A.G., van der Sijde, P.C., and Fong, C.Y.M. (2020). Why are consumers willing to pay more for liquid foods in environmentally friendly packaging? A dual attitudes perspective. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12072812 ↗
80. Green Public Procurement in the Academic Literature10.24818/EA/2020/53/82 ↗
81. Kádeková, Z., Savov, R., Košičiarová, I., and Valaskova, K. (2020). CSR Activities and Their Impact on Brand Value in Food Enterprises in Slovakia Based on Foreign Participation. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12124856 ↗
82. Cammarelle, A., Viscecchia, R., and Bimbo, F. (2021). Intention to purchase milk packaged in biodegradable packaging: Evidence from Italian consumers. Foods, 10.10.3390/foods10092068 ↗
83. Poonia, A., and Dhewa, T. (2022). Recent trends in packaging. Edible Food Packaging, Springer.10.1007/978-981-16-2383-7 ↗
84. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on consumer satisfaction judgments, behavior patterns, and purchase intentions10.22381/AM20202112 ↗
85. Ratnapuri, C.I., Kurnianingrum, D., Yustian, O.R., and Alamsyah, D.P. (2021, January 14–16). Product packaging in support of consumer loyalty. Proceedings of the Second Asia Pacific International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Surakarta, Indonesia.
86. Kotler, P., and Keller, K.L. (2016). Marketing Management, Global Edition, Pearson Education.
87. The multi-faceted dimension of packaging: Marketing logistic or marketing tool?10.1108/00070700510615053 ↗
88. Smart packaging: Definitions, models and packaging as an intermediator between digital and physical product management
89. Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., and Becker, J.M. (2015). SmartPLS 3, SmartPLS GmbH. Available online: https://www.smartpls.com.
90. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., and Babin, B.J. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, Pearson Education.
91. Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling10.1007/s00180-012-0317-1 ↗
92. Marcoulides, G.A. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. Methodology for Business and Management, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
93. Light and pale colors in food packaging: When does this package cue signal superior healthiness or inferior tastiness?10.1016/j.jretai.2016.08.002 ↗
94. Effects of objective and evaluative front-of-package cues on food evaluation and choice: The moderating influence of comparative and noncomparative processing contexts10.1093/jcr/ucv050 ↗
95. Too exciting to fail, too sincere to succeed: The effects of brand personality on sensory disconfirmation10.1093/jcr/ucw003 ↗
96. Perception of naturalness of food packaging and its role in consumer product evaluation10.1080/10454446.2014.885868 ↗
97. Dabija, D.-C., and Băbuț, R. (2019). Enhancing apparel store patronage through retailers’ attributes and sustainability. A generational approach. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11174532 ↗
98. Nemat, B., Razzaghi, M., Bolton, K., and Rousta, K. (2020). The potential of food packaging attributes to influence consumers’ decisions to sort waste. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12062234 ↗
99. The Impact of consumer green behaviour on green loyalty among retail formats: A Romanian case study
100. Generating loyalty towards fast fashion stores: A cross-generational approach based on store attributes and socio-environmental responsibility10.24136/oc.2022.026 ↗