journal article·2020-09-18Open access

Experimental Assessment of the Performance of Two Marine Coatings to Curb Biofilm Formation of Microfoulers

Sara I. Faria, Rita Teixeira-Santos, Luciana C. Gomes, Elisabete R. Silva, João Morais, Vítor Vasconcelos, Filipe J. M. Mergulhão

Coatings· Volume 10· Issue 9

Abstract

Biofilms formed on submerged marine surfaces play a critical role in the fouling process, causing increased fuel consumption, corrosion, and high maintenance costs. Thus, marine biofouling is a major issue and motivates the development of antifouling coatings. In this study, the performance of two commercial marine coatings, a foul-release silicone-based paint (SilRef) and an epoxy resin (EpoRef), was evaluated regarding their abilities to prevent biofilm formation by Cyanobium sp. and Pseudoalteromonas tunicata (common microfoulers). Biofilms were developed under defined hydrodynamic conditions to simulate marine settings, and the number of biofilm cells, wet weight, and thickness were monitored for 7 weeks. The biofilm structure was analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) at the end-point. Results demonstrated that EpoRef surfaces were effective in inhibiting biofilm formation at initial stages (until day 28), while SilRef surfaces showed high efficacy in decreasing biofilm formation during maturation (from day 35 onwards). Wet weight and thickness analysis, as well as CLSM data, indicate that SilRef surfaces were less prone to biofilm formation than EpoRef surfaces. Furthermore, the efficacy of SilRef surfaces may be dependent on the fouling microorganism, while the performance of EpoRef was strongly influenced by a combined effect of surface and microorganism.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution · Marine Ecology and Invasive Species

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

LEPABE—Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal

BioISI—Biosystems & Integrative Sciences Institute, Departmento de Química e Bioquímica, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal

CERENA—Centro de Recursos Naturais e Ambiente, Departamento de Engenharia Civil, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal

CIIMAR—Interdisciplinar Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto de Leixões, Avenida General Norton de Matos, S/N, 4450-208 Matosinhos, Portugal

FCUP—Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, 4069-007 Porto, Portugal

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia · Interreg

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Novel marine antifouling coatings inspired by corals10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100294 ↗
2. Eco-friendly non-biocide-release coatings for marine biofouling prevention10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.010 ↗
3. Engineered Chemical Nanotopographies: Reversible Addition–Fragmentation Chain-Transfer Mediated Grafting of Anisotropic Poly (acrylamide) Patterns on Poly (dimethylsiloxane) To Modulate Marine Biofouling10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b03117 ↗
4. Hull fouling on commercial ships as a vector of macroalgal introduction10.1007/s00227-006-0567-y ↗
5. Modeling biofouling from boat and source characteristics: A comparative study between Canada and New Zealand10.1007/s10530-012-0230-0 ↗
6. Overcoming environmental problems of biocides: Synthetic bile acid derivatives as a sustainable alternative10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109812 ↗
7. Gu, J.-D. (2018). Microbial Biofilms, Fouling, Corrosion, and Biodeterioration of Materials. Handbook of Environmental Degradation of Materials, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-323-52472-8.00014-9 ↗
8. Recent progress in marine foul-release polymeric nanocomposite coatings10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.02.001 ↗
9. Biofilm formation and its influences on the properties of microplastics as affected by exposure time and depth in the seawater10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139237 ↗
10. Hempel (2016). Product Data HEMPASIL X3+ 87500, Hempel.
11. Antifouling coatings: Recent developments in the design of surfaces that prevent fouling by proteins, bacteria, and marine organisms10.1002/adma.201001215 ↗
12. Silicone-based fouling-release coatings for marine antifouling10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b03926 ↗
13. Advances in polymers for anti-biofouling surfaces10.1039/b801491d ↗
14. Strong adhesion of poly (vinyl alcohol)-glycerol hydrogels onto metal substrates for marine antifouling applications10.1039/C9SM01413F ↗
15. Murosaki, T., Ahmed, N., and Gong, J.P. (2012). Antifouling properties of hydrogels. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater.10.1088/1468-6996/12/6/064706 ↗
16. Modern approaches to marine antifouling coatings10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.08.129 ↗
17. Bacterial cell attachment, the beginning of a biofilm10.1007/s10295-007-0234-4 ↗
18. Preparation and characterization of a novel conducting nanocomposite blended with epoxy coating for antifouling and antibacterial applications10.1007/s11998-013-9487-1 ↗
19. Epoxy resin infused boat hulls10.1016/j.repl.2016.01.002 ↗
20. Competitive interactions in mixed-species biofilms containing the marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas tunicata10.1128/AEM.71.4.1729-1736.2005 ↗
21. Abouelkheir, S.S., Ghozlan, E.A.A.H.A., and Sabry, S.A. (2020). Characterization of Biofilm Forming Marine Pseudoalteromonas spp.. J. Mar. Sci., 2.10.30564/jms.v2i1.1412 ↗
22. Komárek, J., and Anagnostidis, K. (1998). Cyanoprokaryota, Part 1: Chroococcales, Gustav Fischer Verlag.
23. Faria, S.I., Teixeira-Santos, R., Romeu, M.J., Morais, J., Vasconcelos, V., and Mergulhão, F.J. (2020). The Relative Importance of Shear Forces and Surface Hydrophobicity on Biofilm Formation by Coccoid Cyanobacteria. Polymers, 12.10.5194/biofilms9-33 ↗
24. WSXM: A software for scanning probe microscopy and a tool for nanotechnology10.1063/1.2432410 ↗
25. van Oss, C. (1994). Interfacial Forces in Aqueous Media, Marcel Dekker.
26. Escherichia coli adhesion, biofilm development and antibiotic susceptibility on biomedical materials10.1002/jbm.a.35277 ↗
27. Bacterial communities in the initial stage of marine biofilm formation on artificial surfaces10.1007/s12275-008-0032-3 ↗
28. Sekar, R., Venugopalan, V., Satpathy, K., Nair, K., and Rao, V. (2004). Laboratory studies on adhesion of microalgae to hard substrates. Asian Pacific Phycology in the 21st Century: Prospects and Challenges, Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-0944-7_14 ↗
29. Pseudoalteromonas tunicata sp. nov., a bacterium that produces antifouling agents
30. Cyanobacterial diversity held in microbial biological resource centers as a biotechnological asset: The case study of the newly established LEGE culture collection10.1007/s10811-017-1369-y ↗
31. Kotai, J. (1972). Instructions for Preparation of Modified Nutrient Solution Z8 for AlgaeNorwegian, Institute for Water Research.
32. Biofilm formation behaviour of marine filamentous cyanobacterial strains in controlled hydrodynamic conditions10.1111/1462-2920.14807 ↗
33. Comparison of velocity profiles for different flow chamber designs used in studies of microbial adhesion to surfaces10.1128/AEM.69.10.6280-6287.2003 ↗
34. Telegdi, J., Trif, L., and Románszki, L. (2016). Smart anti-biofouling composite coatings for naval applications. Smart Composite Coatings and Membranes, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-1-78242-283-9.00005-1 ↗
35. Characterization of planktonic and biofilm cells from two filamentous cyanobacteria using a shotgun proteomic approach10.1080/08927014.2020.1795141 ↗
36. Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program COMSTAT10.1099/00221287-146-10-2395 ↗
37. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis10.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗
38. Fang, H., Huang, L., Zhao, H., Cheng, W., Chen, Y., Fazeli, M., and Shang, Q. (2020). Biofilm Growth and the Impacts on Hydrodynamics. Mechanics of Bio-Sediment Transport, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-61158-6 ↗
39. An overview of controlled-biocide-release coating based on polymer resin for marine antifouling applications10.1007/s10965-020-02054-z ↗
40. Effect of biomaterials hydrophobicity and roughness on biofilm development10.1007/s10856-019-6281-3 ↗
41. Cell to substratum and cell to cell interactions of microalgae10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.08.007 ↗
42. Effect of surface conditioning with cellular extracts on Escherichia coli adhesion and initial biofilm formation10.1016/j.fbp.2017.03.008 ↗
43. Role of hydrophobicity in bacterial adherence to carbon nanostructures and biofilm formation10.1080/08927010903531491 ↗
44. Thomen, P., Robert, J., Monmeyran, A., Bitbol, A.-F., Douarche, C., and Henry, N. (2017). Bacterial biofilm under flow: First a physical struggle to stay, then a matter of breathing. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0175197 ↗
45. Extracellular polymeric substances, a key element in understanding biofilm phenotype10.3934/microbiol.2018.2.274 ↗
46. Dynamic biofilm architecture confers individual and collective mechanisms of viral protection10.1038/s41564-017-0050-1 ↗
47. Serra, D.O., Richter, A.M., Klauck, G., Mika, F., and Hengge, R. (2013). Microanatomy at cellular resolution and spatial order of physiological differentiation in a bacterial biofilm. MBio, 4.10.1128/mBio.00103-13 ↗
48. Current and emerging environmentally-friendly systems for fouling control in the marine environment10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.09.002 ↗