A Numerical Investigation on the Combined Effects of MoSe2 Interface Layer and Graded Bandgap Absorber in CIGS Thin Film Solar Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
The influence of Molybdenum diselenide (MoSe2) as an interfacial layer between Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) absorber layer and Molybdenum (Mo) back contact in a conventional CIGS thin-film solar cell was investigated numerically using SCAPS-1D (a Solar Cell Capacitance Simulator). Using graded bandgap profile of the absorber layer that consist of both back grading (BG) and front grading (FG), which is defined as double grading (DG), attribution to the variation in Ga content was studied. The key focus of this study is to explore the combinatorial effects of MoSe2 contact layer and Ga grading of the absorber to suppress carrier losses due to back contact recombination and resistance that usually occur in case of standard Mo thin films. Thickness, bandgap energy, electron affinity and carrier concentration of the MoSe2 layer were all varied to determine the best configuration for incorporating into the CIGS solar cell structure. A bandgap grading profile that offers optimum functionality in the proposed configuration with additional MoSe2 layer has also been investigated. From the overall results, CIGS solar cells with thin MoSe2 layer and high acceptor doping concentration have been found to outperform the devices without MoSe2 layer, with an increase in efficiency from 20.19% to 23.30%. The introduction of bandgap grading in the front and back interfaces of the absorber layer further improves both open-circuit voltage (VOC) and short-circuit current density (JSC), most likely due to the additional quasi-electric field beneficial for carrier collection and reduced back surface and bulk recombination. A maximum power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 28.06%, fill factor (FF) of 81.89%, JSC of 39.45 mA/cm2, and VOC of 0.868 V were achieved by optimizing the properties of MoSe2 layer and bandgap grading configuration of the absorber layer. This study provides an insight into the different possibilities for designing higher efficiency CIGS solar cell structure through the manipulation of naturally formed MoSe2 layer and absorber bandgap engineering that can be experimentally replicated.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
UNITEN R&D Sdn. Bhd., Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN), Kajang 43000, Selangor, Malaysia
Institute of Sustainable Energy, Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN), Kajang 43000, Selangor, Malaysia
College of Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN), Kajang 43000, Selangor, Malaysia
Solar Energy Research Institute (SERI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
Graphene & Advanced 2D Materials Research Group (GAMRG), School of Science and Technology (SST), Sunway University, No. 5, Jalan Universiti, Petaling Jaya 47500, Selangor, Malaysia
TNB Renewables Sdn. Bhd. (TRe), Level 31, PJX-HM Shah Tower, 16A Persiaran Barat, Petaling Jaya 46050, Selangor, Malaysia
Funding
Universiti Tenaga Nasional
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Solar cell efficiency tables (Version 55)10.1002/pip.3228 ↗
2. What limits the efficiency of chalcopyrite solar cells?10.1016/j.solmat.2010.12.014 ↗
3. Electrical properties of the Cu(In,Ga)Se2/ MoSe2/Mo structure10.1016/S0927-0248(00)00283-X ↗
4. Characterization of Cu(In,Ga)Se2/Mo Interface in CIGS Solar Cells10.1557/PROC-485-139 ↗
5. New insights into the Mo/Cu(In,Ga)Se2 interface in thin film solar cells: Formation and properties of the MoSe2 interfacial layer10.1063/1.4964677 ↗
6. Characterization of the Cu(In,Ga)Se2/Mo interface in CIGS solar cells10.1016/S0040-6090(00)01846-0 ↗
7. Analysis of the back contact properties of Cu(In,Ga)Se2solar cells employing the thermionic emission model10.1016/j.tsf.2014.10.073 ↗
8. Effects of Ga addition to CuInSe2 on its electronic, structural, and defect properties10.1063/1.121548 ↗
9. Interplay between potassium doping and bandgap profiling in selenized Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 solar cells: A functional CuGa: KF surface precursor layer10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.03.024 ↗
10. A simple model of graded band-gap CuInGaSe2 solar cells10.1016/j.egypro.2010.07.024 ↗
11. Band-gap grading in Cu(In,Ga)Se2solar cells10.1016/j.jpcs.2005.09.087 ↗
12. CIGS absorber layer with double grading Ga profile for highly efficient solar cells10.1016/j.spmi.2016.02.036 ↗
13. Efficiency enhancement of ultra-thin Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 solar cells: Optimizing the absorber bandgap profile by numerical device simulations10.1016/j.cap.2016.07.002 ↗
14. Numerical Modeling of Graded Band-Gap CIGS Solar Celle for High Efficiency
15. Device modeling and simulation of the performance of Cu(In1-x,Gax)Se2solar cells10.1016/S0038-1101(03)00289-2 ↗
16. Effects of Ga content on Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells studied by numerical modeling10.1016/j.jpcs.2007.07.093 ↗
17. Numerical modelling of ultra thin Cu(In,Ga)Se2solar cells10.1016/j.egypro.2012.02.034 ↗
18. Device Modeling of the Performance of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Solar Cells with V-Shaped Bandgap Profiles10.1155/2014/186579 ↗
19. The effect of Ga-grading in CIGS thin film solar cells10.1016/j.tsf.2004.11.080 ↗
20. Park, J., and Shin, M. (2018). Numerical Optimization of Gradient Bandgap Structure for CIGS Solar Cell with ZnS Buffer Layer Using Technology Computer-Aided Design Simulation. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11071785 ↗
21. Effect of the absorber layer band-gap on CIGS solar cell10.1016/j.cjph.2017.01.011 ↗
22. Analysis of absorber layer properties effect on CIGS solar cell performance using SCAPS10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.02.037 ↗
23. Burgelman, M., Verschraegen, J., Minnaert, B., and Marlein, J. (2007, January 28–30). Numerical simulation of thin film solar cells: Practical exercises with SCAPS. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Numerical Modelling of Thin Film Solar Cells (NUMOS), Gent, Belgium.
24. Properties of Cu(In,Ga)Se2solar cells with new record efficiencies up to 21.7%10.1002/pssr.201409520 ↗
25. Gloeckler, M., Fahrenbruch, A.L., and Sites, J.R. (2003, January 11–18). Numerical modeling of CIGS and CdTe solar cells: Setting the baseline. Proceedings of the 3rd World Conference onPhotovoltaic Energy Conversion, Osaka, Japan.
26. Theoretical analysis of the eff ect of conduction band of set of window/CIS layers on performance of CIS solar cells using device simulation10.1016/S0927-0248(00)00266-X ↗
27. Ikball Ahamed, E.M.K., Matin, M.A., and Amin, N. (2017, January 28–30). Modeling and simulation of highly efficient ultra-thin CIGS solar cell with MoSe2 tunnel. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Advances in Electrical Engineering, ICAEE 2017, Dhaka, Bangladesh.10.1109/ICAEE.2017.8255442 ↗
28. Burgelman, M., and Marlein, J. (2008, January 1–5). Analysis of graded band gap solar cells with SCAPS. Proceedings of the 23rd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Valencia, Spain.
29. Energy-gap variation in mixed III–V alloys10.1139/p67-026 ↗
30. Structural and optical properties of homogeneous Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin films prepared by thermal reaction of InSe/Cu/GaSe alloys with elemental Se vapour10.1088/0022-3727/38/1/005 ↗
31. Optical characterization of CuIn1-xGaxSe2 alloy thin films by spectroscopic ellipsometry10.1063/1.1581345 ↗
32. Graded carrier concentration absorber profile for high efficiency CIGS solar cells10.1155/2015/410549 ↗
33. Zarabar, F.I., Zuhdi, A.W.M., Bahrudin, M.S., Abdullah, S.F., and Hasani, A.H. (2019, January 13–15). Numerical modelling of graded bandgap CIGS solar cell for performance improvement. Proceedings of the 2019 Electron Devices Technology and Manufacturing Conference, EDTM 2019, Marina Bay Sands, Singapore.10.1109/EDTM.2019.8731329 ↗
34. Guidelines for Optimization of the Absorber Layer Energy Gap for High Efficiency Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 Solar Cells
35. Lorbada, R.V., Walter, T., Marrón, D.F., Muecke, D., Lavrenko, T., Salomon, O., and Schaeffler, R. (2020). Phototransistor behavior in CIGS solar cells and the effect of the back contact barrier. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13184753 ↗
36. Simulation analysis of functional MoSe2 layer for ultra-thin Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells architecture10.1142/S0217984920500657 ↗
37. Determining factor of MoSe2 formation in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar Cells10.1016/j.solmat.2012.02.015 ↗
38. Interfaces of high-efficiency kesterite Cu2 ZnSnS(e)4 thin film solar cells10.1088/1674-1056/27/1/018803 ↗
39. Review on Alkali Element Doping in Cu(In,Ga)Se2Thin Films and Solar Cells10.1016/J.ENG.2017.04.020 ↗
40. Phototransistor effects in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells10.1016/j.tsf.2012.11.084 ↗
41. Verification of phototransistor model for Cu(In,Ga)Se2solar cells10.1016/j.tsf.2014.09.025 ↗
42. Germanium-Gallium Arsenide Heterojunctions [Letter to the Editor]10.1147/rd.43.0283 ↗
43. Sze, S.M., and Ng, K.K. (2007). Physics of Semiconductor Devices, Wiley.10.1002/0470068329 ↗
44. Performance assessment of Cu2SnS3 (CTS) based thin film solar cells by AMPS-1D10.1016/j.cap.2017.10.009 ↗
45. Elucidating the role of interfacial MoS 2 layer in Cu 2 ZnSnS 4 thin film solar cells by numerical analysis10.1016/j.solener.2018.11.055 ↗
46. Photogeneration and carrier recombination in graded gap Cu(In, Ga)Se2 solar cells10.1109/16.887004 ↗
47. Correlation between carrier recombination and valence band offset effect of graded Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110070 ↗
48. Emitter/absorber interface of CdTe solar cells10.1063/1.4953820 ↗
49. Analysis of Back-Contact Interface Recombination in Thin-Film Solar Cells10.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.2819664 ↗
50. Paul, S., Lopez, R., Mia, M.D., Swartz, C.H., and Li, J.V. (2017, January 25–30). A Simulation Study on Radiative Recombination Analysis in CIGS Solar Cell. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC), Washington, DC, USA.10.1109/PVSC.2017.8521498 ↗
51. A recombination analysis of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with low and high Ga compositions10.1016/j.solmat.2014.01.047 ↗