journal article·2020-11-20Open access

The Beneficial Mechanical and Biological Outcomes of Thin Copper-Gallium Doped Silica-Rich Bio-Active Glass Implant-Type Coatings

George E. Stan, Teddy Tite, Adrian-Claudiu Popa, Iuliana Maria Chirica, Catalin C. Negrila, Cristina Besleaga, Irina Zgura, Any Cristina Sergentu, Gianina Popescu-Pelin, Daniel Cristea, Lucia E. Ionescu, Marius Necsulescu, Hugo R. Fernandes, José M. F. Ferreira

Coatings· Volume 10· Issue 11

Abstract

Silica-based bioactive glasses (SBG) hold great promise as bio-functional coatings of metallic endo-osseous implants, due to their osteoproductive potential, and, in the case of designed formulations, suitable mechanical properties and antibacterial efficacy. In the framework of this study, the FastOs®BG alkali-free SBG system (mol%: SiO2—38.49, CaO—36.07, P2O5—5.61, MgO—19.24, CaF2—0.59), with CuO (2 mol%) and Ga2O3 (3 mol%) antimicrobial agents, partially substituting in the parent system CaO and MgO, respectively, was used as source material for the fabrication of intentionally silica-enriched implant-type thin coatings (~600 nm) onto titanium (Ti) substrates by radio-frequency magnetron sputtering. The physico-chemical and mechanical characteristics, as well as the in vitro preliminary cytocompatibility and antibacterial performance of an alkali-free silica-rich bio-active glass coating designs was further explored. The films were smooth (RRMS < 1 nm) and hydrophilic (water contact angle of ~65°). The SBG coatings deposited from alkali-free copper-gallium co-doped FastOs®BG-derived exhibited improved wear performance, with the coatings eliciting a bonding strength value of ~53 MPa, Lc3 critical load value of ~4.9 N, hardness of ~6.1 GPa and an elastic modulus of ~127 GPa. The Cu and Ga co-doped SBG layers had excellent cytocompatibility, while reducing after 24 h the Staphylococcus aureus bacterial development with 4 orders of magnitude with respect to the control situations (i.e., nutritive broth and Ti substrate). Thereby, such SBG constructs could pave the road towards high-performance bio-functional coatings with excellent mechanical properties and enhanced biological features (e.g., by coupling cytocompatibility with antimicrobial properties), which are in great demand nowadays.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Institute for Materials Physics, RO-077125 Magurele, Romania

National Institute for Lasers, Plasma and Radiation Physics, RO-077125 Magurele, Romania

Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Transilvania University of Brasov, 500068 Brasov, Romania

Army Centre for Medical Research, RO-020012 Bucharest, Romania

Department of Materials and Ceramics Engineering, CICECO, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal

Funding

Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii · Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

References (77)

Show source-provided references
1. Kawaguchi, K., Iijima, M., Endo, K., and Mizoguchi, I. (2017). Electrophoretic deposition as a new bioactive glass coating process for orthodontic stainless steel. Coatings, 7.10.3390/coatings7110199 ↗
2. Baino, F., Hamzehlou, S., and Kargozar, S. (2018). Bioactive glasses: Where are we and where are we going?. J. Funct. Biomater., 9.10.3390/jfb9010025 ↗
3. Brunello, G., Elsayed, H., and Biasetto, L. (2019). Bioactive glass and silicate-based ceramic coatings on metallic implants: Open challenge or outdated topic?. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12182929 ↗
4. Strontium-doped bioactive glass nanoparticles in osteogenic commitment10.1021/acsami.8b06154 ↗
5. Fernandes, H.R., Gaddam, A., Rebelo, A., Brazete, D., Stan, G.E., and Ferreira, J.M.F. (2018). Bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics for healthcare applications in bone regeneration and tissue engineering. Materials, 11.10.3390/ma11122530 ↗
6. Prefac, G.A., Milea, M.L., Vadureanu, A.M., Muraru, S., Dobrin, D.I., Isopencu, G.O., Jinga, S.I., Raileanu, M., Bacalum, M., and Busuioc, C. (2020). CeO2 containing thin films as bioactive coatings for orthopaedic implants. Coatings, 10.10.3390/coatings10070642 ↗
7. Sergi, R., Bellucci, D., and Cannillo, V. (2020). A comprehensive review of bioactive glass coatings: State of the art, challenges and future perspectives. Coatings, 10.10.3390/coatings10080757 ↗
8. The story of Bioglass®10.1007/s10856-006-0432-z ↗
9. Antibacterial efficiency of alkali-free bio-glasses incorporating ZnO and/or SrO as therapeutic agents10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.11.112 ↗
10. On the bioactivity of adherent bioglass thin films synthesized by magnetron sputtering techniques10.1016/j.tsf.2010.05.104 ↗
11. Tackling bioactive glass excessive in vitro bioreactivity: Preconditioning approaches for cell culture tests10.1016/j.actbio.2018.05.019 ↗
12. Cytotoxicity of 45S5 bioglass paste used for dentine hypersensitivity treatment10.1016/j.jdent.2011.06.003 ↗
13. The key Features expected from a perfect bioactive glass—How Far we still are from an ideal composition?
14. Bivalent cationic ions doped bioactive glasses: The influence of magnesium, zinc, strontium and copper on the physical and biological properties10.1007/s10853-017-1010-0 ↗
15. Mesoporous silica-based bioactive glasses for antibiotic-free antibacterial applications10.1016/j.msec.2017.11.003 ↗
16. Tite, T., Popa, A.C., Balescu, L.M., Bogdan, I.M., Pasuk, I., Ferreira, J.M.F., and Stan, G.E. (2018). Cationic substitutions in hydroxyapatite: Current status of the derived biofunctional effects and their in vitro interrogation methods. Materials, 11.10.3390/ma11112081 ↗
17. Drago, L., Toscano, M., and Bottagisio, M. (2018). Recent evidence on bioactive glass antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity: A mini-review. Materials, 11.10.3390/ma11020326 ↗
18. Review of bioactive glass: From Hench to hybrids10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.023 ↗
19. Antimicrobial gallium-doped phosphate-based glasses10.1002/adfm.200700931 ↗
20. Controlled delivery of antimicrobial gallium ions from phosphate-based glasses10.1016/j.actbio.2008.09.019 ↗
21. Copper-containing glass ceramic with high antimicrobial efficacy10.1038/s41467-019-09946-9 ↗
22. Gallium-containing mesoporous bioactive glass with potent hemostatic activity and antibacterial efficacy10.1039/C5TB02062J ↗
23. Sanchez-Salcedo, S., Malavasi, G., Salinas, A.J., Lusvardi, G., Rigamonti, L., Menabue, L., and Vallet-Regi, M. (2018). Highly-bioreactive silica-based mesoporous bioactive glasses enriched with gallium(III). Materials, 11.10.3390/ma11030367 ↗
24. Copper-containing mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds with multifunctional properties of angiogenesis capacity, osteostimulation and antibacterial activity10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.066 ↗
25. Copper-containing mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles as multifunctional agent for bone regeneration10.1016/j.actbio.2017.04.012 ↗
26. Unique properties of silver and copper silica-based nanocomposites as antimicrobial agents10.1039/C7RA00720E ↗
27. Collagen scaffolds functionalised with copper-eluting bioactive glass reduce infection and enhance osteogenesis and angiogenesis both in vitro and in vivo10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.01.031 ↗
28. Cu-releasing bioactive glass coatings and their in vitro properties10.1021/acsami.8b19082 ↗
29. Miola, M., and Verné, E. (2016). Bioactive and antibacterial glass powders doped with copper by ion-exchange in aqueous solutions. Materials, 9.10.3390/ma9060405 ↗
30. In vitro reactivity of Cu doped 45S5 Bioglass® derived scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1039/c3tb21007c ↗
31. Copper-containing mesoporous bioactive glass promotes angiogenesis in an in vivo zebrafish model10.1016/j.actbio.2017.12.032 ↗
32. Gallium ions promote osteoinduction of human and mouse osteoblasts via the TRPM7/Akt signaling pathway
33. Structural characterization and evaluation of antibacterial and angiogenic potential of gallium-containing melt-derived and gel-derived glasses from CaO-SiO2 system10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.051 ↗
34. Effect of annealing upon the structure and adhesion properties of sputtered bio-glass/titanium coatings10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.06.117 ↗
35. ISO—International Organization for Standardization (2018). ISO 13779-2:2018—Implants for Surgery—Hydroxyapatite—Part 2: Thermally Sprayed Coatings of Hydroxyapatite, ISO—International Organization for Standardization.
36. Callahan, T.J., Gatenberg, J.B., and Sands, B.E. (1994). STP1196—Calcium phosphate (Ca-P) coating draft guidance for preparation of food and drug administration (FDA) submissions for orthopedic and dental endosseous implants. Characterization and Performance of Calcium Phosphate Coatings for Implants, ASTM International.10.1520/STP25193S ↗
37. Alkali-free bioactive glasses for bone tissue engineering: A preliminary investigation10.1016/j.actbio.2011.08.026 ↗
38. Role of glass structure in defining the chemical dissolution behavior, bioactivity and antioxidant properties of zinc and strontium co-doped alkali-free phosphosilicate glasses10.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.033 ↗
39. Submicrometer hollow bioglass cones deposited by radio frequency magnetron sputtering: Formation mechanism, properties, and prospective biomedical applications10.1021/acsami.6b00606 ↗
40. Bioglass implant-coating interactions in synthetic physiological fluids with varying degrees of biomimicry10.2147/IJN.S123236 ↗
41. Sur la réfraction et la réflexion de la lumière
42. Structural and optical properties of c-axis oriented aluminum nitride thin films prepared at low temperature by reactive radio-frequency magnetron sputtering10.1016/j.tsf.2012.10.015 ↗
43. ISO—International Organization for Standardization (2011). ISO 22309:2011—Microbeam Analysis—Quantitative Analysis Using Energy-Dispersive Spectrometry (EDS) for Elements with an Atomic Number of 11 (Na) or Above, ISO—International Organization for Standardization.
44. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers10.1002/app.1969.070130815 ↗
45. Multi-layer haemocompatible diamond-like carbon coatings obtained by combined radio frequency plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition and magnetron sputtering10.1007/s10856-013-5026-y ↗
46. Biomimetic nanocrystalline apatite coatings synthesized by matrix assisted pulsed laser evaporation for medical applications10.1016/j.mseb.2013.11.007 ↗
47. ISO—International Organization for Standardization (2016). ISO 4624:2016—Paints and Varnishes—Pull-off Test for Adhesion, ISO—International Organization for Standardization.
48. ASTM International (2017). ASTM D4541-17 Standard Test Method for Pull-Off Strength of Coatings Using Portable Adhesion, ASTM International.
49. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments10.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
50. A certified reference material for the scratch test10.1016/S0257-8972(03)00470-5 ↗
51. Ingelbrecht, C., Jennett, N., Jacobs, R., and Meneve, J. (1994). The Certification of Critical Coating Failure Loads: A Reference Material for Scratch Testing According to ENV 1071-3, European Commission.
52. European Standards—CEN (2005). EN1071-3/2005—Advanced Technical Ceramics—Methods of Test for Ceramic Coatings—Part 3: Determination of Adhesion and Other Mechanical Failure Modes by a Scratch Test, European Standards—CEN.
53. Meneve, J., Havermans, D., von Stebut, J., Jennett, N., Banks, J., Saunders, S., Camino, D., Teer, D., Andersson, P., and Varjus, S. (1997). The Scratch Test: Atlas of Failure Modes. World Tribology Congress: Abstracts of Papers, Institution of Mechanical Engineers.
54. (2020, November 03). CDC, Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/pdf/guidelines/disinfection-guidelines-H.pdf.
55. (2020, November 03). WHO. Available online: https://apps.who.int/phint/pdf/b/7.5.9.5.8-Methods-of-sterilization.pdf.
56. ISO (2011). ISO 22196:2011—Measurement of Antibacterial Activity on Plastics and Other Non-Porous Surfaces, ISO—International Organization for Standardization.
57. ISO (2009). ISO 10993-5:2009—Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part 5: Tests for In Vitro Cytotoxicity, ISO—International Organization for Standardization.
58. Nanomechanical characterization of bioglass films synthesized by magnetron sputtering10.1016/j.tsf.2013.10.104 ↗
59. Besleaga, C., Dumitru, V., Trinca, L.M., Popa, A.C., Negrila, C.C., Kołodziejczyk, Ł., Luculescu, C.R., Ionescu, G.C., Ripeanu, R.G., and Vladescu, A. (2017). Mechanical, corrosion and biological properties of room-temperature sputtered aluminum nitride films with dissimilar nanostructure. Nanomaterials, 7.10.3390/nano7110394 ↗
60. (2020, November 19). Chemical Books Phosphorus Pentoxide. Available online: https://www.chemicalbook.com/ProductChemicalPropertiesCB9245033_EN.htm.
61. Wagner, C.D., Riggs, W.M., Davis, L.E., Moulder, J.F., and Muilenberg, G.E. (1992). Handbook of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy: A Reference Book of Standard Spectra for Identification and Interpretation of XPS Data, Physical Electronics Division, Perkin-Elmer Corporation.
62. XPS analysis of gallium oxides10.1016/0169-4332(94)90104-X ↗
63. Reed, T.B. (1972). Free Energy of Formation of Binary Compounds: An Atlas of Charts for High-Temperature Chemical Calculations, MIT Press.10.1149/1.2404111 ↗
64. FTIR and XPS studies of bioactive silica based glasses10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2003.09.013 ↗
65. Direct and indirect evidence for free oxygen (O2–) in MO-silicate glasses and melts (M = Mg, Ca, Pb)10.2138/am-2015-5336 ↗
66. Raman and Infrared investigations of glass and glass-ceramics with composition 2Na2O·1CaO·3SiO210.1557/JMR.1994.0216 ↗
67. Formation of hydroxyapatite onto glasses of the CaO–MgO–SiO2 system with B2O3, Na2O, CaF2 and P2O5 additives10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.033 ↗
68. A study of glass structure in Li2OSiO2, Li2OAl2O3SiO2 and LiAlSiON systems10.1016/0022-3093(89)90498-5 ↗
69. Binary Liquid mixture contact-angle measurements for precise estimation of surface free energy10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b01252 ↗
70. Lotfi, M., Nejib, M., and Naceur, M. (2013). Cell Adhesion to Biomaterials: Concept of Biocompatibility. Advances in Biomaterials Science and Biomedical Applications, Intech.10.5772/53542 ↗
71. Physical-chemical characterization and biological assessment of simple and lithium-doped biological-derived hydroxyapatite thin films for a new generation of metallic implants10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.008 ↗
72. The role of surface free energy in osteoblast-biomaterial interactions10.1179/1743280414Y.0000000038 ↗
73. The influence of implant surface properties on cell adhesion and proliferation10.1007/s10856-007-2006-0 ↗
74. Relative importance of surface wettability and charged functional groups on NIH 3T3 fibroblast attachment, spreading, and cytoskeletal organization10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980905)41:3<422::AID-JBM12>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
75. Enhancing the cell proliferation performance of NiTi substrate by laser diffusion nitriding10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.11.008 ↗
76. Pulsed electron deposition of nanostructured bioactive glass coatings for biomedical applications10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.08.159 ↗
77. (2020, November 03). KYOCERA. Available online: https://kyocera-sgstool.co.uk/titanium-resources/titanium-information-everything-you-need-to-know/titaniumproperties/#:~:text=It’s%20Young’s%20modulus%20of%20elasticity,shear%20modulus%20of%2045%20GPA.