Nanoscale Correlations of Ice Adhesion Strength and Water Contact Angle
Source abstract
Abstract
Surfaces with low ice adhesion represent a promising strategy to achieve passive anti-icing performance. However, as a successful and robust low ice adhesion surface must be tested under realistic conditions at low temperatures and for several types of ice, the initial screening of potential low ice adhesion surfaces requires large resources. A theoretical relation between ice adhesion and water wettability in the form of water contact angle exists, but there is disagreement on whether this relation holds for experiments. In this study, we utilised molecular dynamics simulations to examine the fundamental relations between ice adhesion and water contact angle on an ideal graphene surface. The results show a significant correlation according to the theoretic predictions, indicating that the theoretical relation holds for the ice and water when discarding surface material deformations and other experimental factors. The reproduction of the thermodynamic theory at the nanoscale is important due to the gap between experimental observations and theoretical models. The results in this study represent a step forward towards understanding the fundamental mechanisms of water–solid and ice–solid interactions, and the relationship between them.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Icing and De-icing Technologies · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
NTNU Nanomechanical Lab, Department of Structural Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Richard Birkelandsvei 1A, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
Justervesenet—Norwegian Metrology Service, Fetveien 99, 2007 Kjeller, Norway
Funding
Norges Forskningsråd
References (73)
Show source-provided references
1. Bio-inspired strategies for anti-icing10.1021/nn406522n ↗
2. Brassard, J., Laforte, C., Guerin, F., and Blackburn, C. (2017). Icephobicity: Definition and Measurement Regarding Atmospheric Icing. Advances in Polymer Science, Springer.10.1007/12_2017_36 ↗
3. Design of anti-icing surfaces: Smooth, textured or slippery?10.1038/natrevmats.2015.3 ↗
4. Hejazi, V., Sobolev, K., and Nosonovsky, M. (2013). From superhydrophobicity to icephobicity: Forces and interaction analysis. Sci. Rep., 3.10.1038/srep02194 ↗
5. Durable and scalable icephobic surfaces: Similarities and distinctions from superhydrophobic surfaces10.1039/C5SM02295A ↗
6. Multiscale Crack Initiators Promoted Super-Low Ice Adhesion Surfaces10.1039/C7SM01511A ↗
7. Frost formation and ice adhesion on superhydrophobic surfaces10.1063/1.3524513 ↗
8. The Relationship between Water Wetting and Ice Adhesion10.1163/016942409X12510925843078 ↗
9. Chen, J., Liu, J., He, M., Li, K., Cui, D., Zhang, Q., Zeng, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., and Song, Y. (2012). Superhydrophobic surfaces cannot reduce ice adhesion. Appl. Phys. Lett., 101.10.1063/1.4752436 ↗
10. Phase transition enabled durable anti-icing surfaces and its DIY design10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.224 ↗
11. Durable gels with ultra-low adhesion to ice10.1039/C6TA07262C ↗
12. Stress-Localized Durable Icephobic Surfaces10.1039/C8MH01291A ↗
13. Low–interfacial toughness materials for effective large-scale deicing10.1126/science.aav1266 ↗
14. Design and Preparation of Sandwich-Like Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) Sponges with Super-Low Ice Adhesion10.1039/C8SM00820E ↗
15. A critical review of the measurement of ice adhesion to solid substrates10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.03.001 ↗
16. Rønneberg, S., He, J., and Zhang, Z. (2019). The need for standards in low ice adhesion surface research: A critical review. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., 1–29.
17. Thermodynamics of sustaining liquid water within rough icephobic surfaces to achieve ultra-low ice adhesion10.1038/s41598-018-36268-5 ↗
18. Room Temperature Characteristics of Polymer-Based Low Ice Adhesion Surfaces10.1038/srep42181 ↗
19. Reduction of ice adhesion to metal by using self-assembling monolayers (SAMs)10.1139/p03-014 ↗
20. Effects of contact angle hysteresis on ice adhesion and growth on superhydrophobic surfaces under dynamic flow conditions10.1007/s00396-012-2753-4 ↗
21. Icephobic Surfaces Induced by Interfacial Nonfrozen Water10.1021/acsami.6b13773 ↗
22. Relationships between Water Wettability and Ice Adhesion10.1021/am1006035 ↗
23. Design factors for reducing ice adhesion10.1080/01694243.2017.1297588 ↗
24. Performance and durability tests of smart icephobic coatings to reduce ice adhesion10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.206 ↗
25. How wetting hysteresis influences ice adhesion strength on superhydrophobic surfaces10.1021/la901439c ↗
26. Experimental Study on the Evolution of Contact Angles with Temperature Near the Freezing Point10.1021/jp911211m ↗
27. Ice adhesion to hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces10.1080/00218466908072188 ↗
28. Contact angles: From past mistakes to new developments through liquid-solid adhesion measurements10.1016/j.cis.2019.02.002 ↗
29. Koivuluoto, H., Stenroos, C., Ruohomaa, R., Bolelli, G., Lusvarghi, L., and Vuoristo, P. (July, January 28). Research on icing behavior and ice adhesion testing of icephobic surfaces. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Atmospheric Icing of Structures (IWAIS), Uppsala, Sweden.
30. Distinct ice patterns on solid surfaces with various wettabilities10.1073/pnas.1712829114 ↗
31. Contact angles and wettability: Towards common and accurate terminology10.1680/jsuin.17.00002 ↗
32. An essay on the cohesion of fluids
33. Resistance of Solid Surfaces to Wetting by Water10.1021/ie50320a024 ↗
34. Contact angles10.1039/df9480300011 ↗
35. Wettability of porous surfaces10.1039/tf9444000546 ↗
36. Ice Adhesion—Theory, Measurements and Countermeasures10.1163/016942411X574583 ↗
37. Surface Melting of Ice10.1021/jp963248c ↗
38. Golovin, K., Kobaku, S.P.R., Lee, D.H., DiLoreto, E.T., Mabry, J.M., and Tuteja, A. (2016). Designing durable icephobic surfaces. Sci. Adv., 2.10.1126/sciadv.1501496 ↗
39. Nanoscale deicing by molecular dynamics simulation10.1039/C6NR02398C ↗
40. A potential model for the study of ices and amorphous water: TIP4P/Ice10.1063/1.1931662 ↗
41. Interaction Models for Water in Relation to Protein Hydration
42. The missing term in effective pair potentials10.1021/j100308a038 ↗
43. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulation liquid water10.1063/1.445869 ↗
44. Surface tension of the most popular models of water by using the test-area simulation method10.1063/1.2715577 ↗
45. Ice–water interfacial free energy for the TIP4P, TIP4P/2005, TIP4P/Ice, and mW models as obtained from the Mold integration technique10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11221 ↗
46. The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin10.1021/ja00214a001 ↗
47. Development and Testing of the OPLS All-Atom Force Field on Conformational Energetics and Properties of Organic Liquids10.1021/ja9621760 ↗
48. Ice structures, patterns, and processes: A view across the ice-fields10.1103/RevModPhys.84.885 ↗
49. Dispersion-force effects in interfacial premelting of ice10.1103/PhysRevB.52.12426 ↗
50. Physical mechanisms responsible for ice adhesion10.1021/jp9632145 ↗
51. Dynamic Wetting Studied by Molecular Modeling Simulations of Droplet Spreading10.1021/la990171l ↗
52. Liquid-Ice Coexistence below the Melting Temperature for Water Confined in Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Nanopores10.1021/jp3012409 ↗
53. On the characterization of crystallization and ice adhesion on smooth and rough surfaces using molecular dynamics10.1063/1.4862257 ↗
54. Atomistic dewetting mechanics of Wenzel and monostable Cassie–Baxter states10.1039/C8CP03256D ↗
55. A molecular dynamics study on the wettability of graphene-based silicon dioxide (glass) surface10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.02.028 ↗
56. Water nanodroplet on a hydrocarbon “Carpet”—The mechanism of water contact angle stabilization by airborne contaminations on Graphene, Au, and PTFE surfaces10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03790 ↗
57. Abraham, M., van der Spoel, D., Lindahl, E., Hess, B., and GROMACS Development Team (2020, March 16). GROMACS User Manual Version 5.1.2. Available online: www.gromacs.org.
58. Particle mesh Ewald: An Nlog(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems10.1063/1.464397 ↗
59. LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199709)18:12<1463::AID-JCC4>3.0.CO;2-H ↗
60. A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble10.1080/00268978400101201 ↗
61. Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions10.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695 ↗
62. Liquid layer generators for excellent icephobicity at extremely low temperatures10.1039/C9MH00859D ↗
63. On the Water-Carbon Interaction for Use in Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Graphite and Carbon Nanotubes10.1021/jp0268112 ↗
64. Wetting at the nanoscale: A molecular dynamics study10.1063/1.4978497 ↗
65. What Is the Contact Angle of Water on Graphene?10.1021/la304645w ↗
66. Superhydrophobicity vs. ice adhesion: The quandary of robust icephobic surface design10.1002/admi.201500330 ↗
67. Adhesive properties of ice10.1016/0095-8522(59)90051-0 ↗
68. Contact angle, wetting, and adhesion: A critical review10.1163/156856192X00629 ↗
69. Ice and water droplets on graphite: A comparison of quantum and classical simulations10.1063/1.4901562 ↗
70. Wetting transition of water on graphite and boron-nitride surfaces: A molecular dynamics study10.1016/j.fluid.2010.07.006 ↗
71. Makkonen, L. (July, January 28). Back to the basics: Wettability, icing and ice adhesion. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Atmospheric Icing of Structures (IWAIS), Uppsala, Sweden.
72. Dry-Surface Simulation Method for the Determination of the Work of Adhesion of Solid-Liquid Interfaces10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b01394 ↗
73. Wetting transparency of graphene10.1038/nmat3228 ↗