Predictability of Microbial Adhesion to Dental Materials by Roughness Parameters
Source abstract
Abstract
Microbial adhesion to intraoral biomaterials is associated with surface roughness. For the prevention of oral pathologies, smooth surfaces with little biofilm formation are required. Ideally, appropriate roughness parameters make microbial adhesion predictable. Although a multitude of parameters are available, surface roughness is commonly described by the arithmetical mean roughness value (Ra). The present study investigates whether Ra is the most appropriate roughness parameter in terms of prediction for microbial adhesion to dental biomaterials. After four surface roughness modifications using standardized polishing protocols, zirconia, polymethylmethacrylate, polyetheretherketone, and titanium alloy specimens were characterized by Ra as well as 17 other parameters using confocal microscopy. Specimens of the tested materials were colonized by C. albicans or S. sanguinis for 2 h; the adhesion was measured via luminescence assays and correlated with the roughness parameters. The adhesion of C. albicans showed a tendency to increase with increasing the surface roughness—the adhesion of S. sanguinis showed no such tendency. Although Sa, that is, the arithmetical mean deviation of surface roughness, and Rdc, that is, the profile section height between two material ratios, showed higher correlations with the microbial adhesion than Ra, these differences were not significant. Within the limitations of this in-vitro study, we conclude that Ra is a sufficient roughness parameter in terms of prediction for initial microbial adhesion to dental biomaterials with polished surfaces.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Prosthodontics, University Medical Center Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Goettingen, Germany
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Oral candidiasis: An overview
2. Dental caries10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60031-2 ↗
3. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01353.x ↗
4. Microbiome and microbial biofilm profiles of peri-implantitis: A systematic review10.1902/jop.2017.170123 ↗
5. Dental plaque biofilms: communities, conflict and control10.1111/j.1600-0757.2009.00339.x ↗
6. Identification of early microbial colonizers in human dental biofilm10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02420.x ↗
7. Communication among oral bacteria10.1128/MMBR.66.3.486-505.2002 ↗
8. Early adhesion of candida albicans onto dental acrylic surfaces10.1177/0022034517706354 ↗
9. Comparison of candida albicans adherence to conventional acrylic denture base materials and injection molding acrylic materials
10. The significance of Candida albicans in denture stomatitis
11. Adhesion of Candida albicans to various dental implant surfaces and the influence of salivary pellicle proteins10.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.003 ↗
12. In vitro evaluation of artificial ageing on surface properties and early Candida albicans adhesion to prosthetic resins10.1007/s10856-008-3570-7 ↗
13. Epidemiology and etiology of denture stomatitis10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00698.x ↗
14. Denture stomatitis: Causes, cures and prevention10.1308/205016817822230175 ↗
15. The surface charge of anti-bacterial coatings alters motility and biofilm architecture10.1039/c3bm00197k ↗
16. The effect of surface charge property on Escherichia coli initial adhesion and subsequent biofilm formation10.1002/bit.24429 ↗
17. The clinical meaning of the surface roughness and the surface free energy of intra-oral hard substrata on the microbiology of the supra- and subgingival plaque: Results of in vitro and in vivo experiments10.1016/0300-5712(94)90165-1 ↗
18. Detailed surface roughness characterization of engineering surfaces undergoing tribological testing leading to scuffing10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00224-2 ↗
19. Roughness of pigment coatings and its influence on gloss10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.03.043 ↗
20. Useful surface parameters for biomaterial discrimination10.1002/sca.21232 ↗
21. The parameter rash—Is there a cure?10.1016/0043-1648(82)90341-6 ↗
22. Comparison of different polishing methods on the surface roughness of microhybrid, microfill, and nanofill composite resins
23. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-3 ↗
24. Evaluation of surface roughness characteristics using atomic force microscopy and inspection of microhardness following resin infiltration with icon®10.1111/jerd.12279 ↗
25. Influence of parameters on root surface roughness following treatment with a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler: An in vitro study10.1902/jop.2004.75.9.1221 ↗
26. The bacterial adhesion on and the cytotoxicity of various dental cements used for implant-supported fixed restorations10.3109/00016357.2013.828320 ↗
27. Effects of aging on surface properties and adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on various fissure sealants10.1007/s00784-009-0256-6 ↗
28. (2019, July 19). DIN-Deutsches Institut für Normung, DIN EN ISO 4287. Available online: https://www.din.de/de/mitwirken/normenausschuesse/natg/normen/wdc-beuth:din21:129356592.
29. DIN-Deutsches Institut für Normung (2019, July 19). DIN EN ISO 25178-600. Available online: https://www.din.de/de/mitwirken/normenausschuesse/natg/entwuerfe/wdc-beuth:din21:269554610.
30. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers10.1002/app.1969.070130815 ↗
31. Roughness and wettability of surfaces in boundary lubricated scuffing wear10.1016/j.triboint.2015.04.013 ↗
32. Surface topographical factors influencing bacterial attachment10.1016/j.cis.2012.06.015 ↗
33. A critical review of dental implant materials with an emphasis on titanium versus zirconia10.3390/ma8030932 ↗
34. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws
35. A 5-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants
36. Polyamide as a denture base material: A literature review
37. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics10.1016/j.jpor.2015.10.001 ↗
38. A systematic review of the clinical survival of zirconia implants10.1007/s00784-016-1853-9 ↗
39. Ceramic abutments and ceramic oral implants. An update10.1111/j.1600-0757.2007.00243.x ↗
40. Bone tissue responses to surface-modified zirconia implants: A histomorphometric and removal torque study in the rabbit10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00070.x ↗
41. The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: short-term observations
42. The influence of surface free energy and surface roughness on early plaque formation. An in vivo study in man10.1111/j.1600-051X.1990.tb01077.x ↗
43. Adherence of Candida albicans to denture-base materials with different surface finishes10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00034-1 ↗
44. Factors involved in microbial colonization of oral prostheses
45. The effect of various topical peri-implantitis antiseptics on Staphylococcus epidermidis, Candida albicans, and Streptococcus sanguinis10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.01.015 ↗
46. Adhesion of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis on Er:YAG laser-irradiated dental enamel: Effect of surface roughness10.1089/pho.2018.4471 ↗
47. In vitro adhesion of Streptococcus sanguinis to dentine root surface after treatment with Er:YAG laser, ultrasonic system, or manual curette10.1089/pho.2008.2324 ↗
48. Streptococcus sanguinis adhesion on titanium rough surfaces: Effect of shot-blasting particles10.1007/s10856-011-4366-8 ↗
49. The effect of surface roughening of polymers on measured contact angle of liquids10.1016/0166-6622(84)80175-4 ↗