Advanced Coating Strategies for Immunomodulatory Biomaterials for Reconstructive Osteogenesis: Mitigating Foreign Body Reaction and Promoting Tissue Regeneration
Source abstract
Abstract
Immune cells play a pivotal role in orchestrating tissue repair, executing functions such as debris clearance, extracellular matrix remodeling, and modulation of cytokine secretion profiles. However, when their activity is dysregulated or inadequately directed, these same processes can give rise to chronic inflammation and foreign body reactions (FBR), ultimately leading to fibrosis and compromised biomaterial performance. The immunological landscape following injury or biomaterial implantation is profoundly influenced by the physicochemical properties of material surfaces. By strategically tailoring these surface characteristics, it becomes possible to modulate immune cell responses—governing their adhesion, recruitment, proliferation, polarization, and cytokine expression patterns. This review elucidates the multifaceted roles of immune cells in tissue repair and their dynamic interactions with implanted biomaterials. It then explores how specific surface attributes—such as topography, chemistry, stiffness, and wettability—influence immune behavior. Particular emphasis is placed on recent advances in surface modification techniques aimed at engineering next-generation biomaterials that mitigate adverse immune responses while actively promoting regenerative healing. The review concludes by offering critical insights into the future of immunomodulatory biomaterial design, highlighting both emerging opportunities and persisting challenges in the field.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Pharmacy, University of Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV 7, 16132 Genoa, Italy
The Directorate of Research, Development and Innovation Management (DMCDI), The Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Constantin Daicoviciu St., no. 15, 400020 Cluj-Napoca, Cluj County, Romania
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Tissue engineering: The design and fabrication of living replacement devices for surgical reconstruction and transplantation10.1016/S0140-6736(99)90247-7 ↗
2. Materials Science and Design Principles of Growth Factor Delivery Systems in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine10.1002/adhm.201801000 ↗
3. Bioresorbable Electronic Implants: History, Materials, Fabrication, Devices, and Clinical Applications10.1002/adhm.201801660 ↗
4. Diamond in the Rough: Toward Improved Materials for the Bone−Implant Interface10.1002/adhm.202100007 ↗
5. Jemat, A., Ghazali, M.J., Razali, M., and Otsuka, Y. (2015). Surface Modifications and Their Effects on Titanium Dental Implants. Biomed Res. Int., 2015.10.1155/2015/791725 ↗
6. Wen, Q., Mithieux, S.M., and Weiss, A.S. (2020). Elastin Biomaterials in Dermal Repair. Trends Biotechnol., 38.10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.08.005 ↗
7. Engineering Immune Tolerance with Biomaterials10.1002/adhm.201801419 ↗
8. Ratner, B.D., Hoffman, A.S., Schoen, F.J., and Lemons, J.E. (1996). Chapter 4—Host Reactions to Biomaterials and Their Evaluation. Biomaterials Science, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012582460-6/50002-5 ↗
9. Controlling Protein Adsorption through Nanostructured Polymeric Surfaces10.1002/adhm.201700995 ↗
10. Immunomodulatory Biomaterials for Tissue Repair10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00895 ↗
11. Grainger, D.W. (2013). All charged up about implanted biomaterialse. Nat. Biotechnol., 31.10.1038/nbt.2600 ↗
12. Transition from inflammation to proliferation: A critical step during wound healing10.1007/s00018-016-2268-0 ↗
13. Klopfleisch, R., and Jung, F. (2017). The pathology of the foreign body reaction against biomaterials. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A, 105.10.1002/jbm.a.35958 ↗
14. Xia, Z., and Triffitt, J.T. (2006). T A review on macrophage responses to biomaterials. Biomed. Mater., 1.10.1088/1748-6041/1/1/R01 ↗
15. Solheim, E., Sudmann, B., Bang, G., and Sudmann, E. (2000). Biocompatibility and effect on osteogenesis of poly(ortho ester) compared to poly(DL-lactic acid). J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 49.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(200002)49:2<257::AID-JBM15>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
16. Kou, P.M., and Babensee, J.E. (2011). Macrophage and dendritic cell phenotypic diversity in the context of biomaterials. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A, 96.10.1002/jbm.a.32971 ↗
17. Zaveri, T.D., Dolgova, N.V., Chu, B.H., Lee, J., Wong, J., Lele, T.P., Ren, F., and Keselowsky, B.G. (2010). Contributions of surface topography and cytotoxicity to the macrophage response to zinc oxide nanorods. Biomaterials, 31.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.055 ↗
18. Constitutive immune mechanisms: Mediators of host defence and immune regulation10.1038/s41577-020-0391-5 ↗
19. Innate and Adaptive Immune Memory: An Evolutionary Continuum in the Host’s Response to Pathogens10.1016/j.chom.2018.12.006 ↗
20. Immunological memory: Lessons from the past and a look to the future10.1038/nri.2016.13 ↗
21. Harnessing Innate Immunity Using Biomaterials for Cancer Immunotherapy10.1002/adma.202007576 ↗
22. Jewell, C.M., and Collier, J.H. (2019). Biomaterial interactions with the immune system. Biomater. Sci., 7.10.1039/C8BM90063A ↗
23. Osteogenesis And Angiogenesis: The Potential For Engineering Bone10.22203/eCM.v015a08 ↗
24. Wound healing: A cellular perspective10.1152/physrev.00067.2017 ↗
25. Bioinorganics and Wound Healing10.1002/adhm.201900764 ↗
26. Lafuse, W.P., Wozniak, D.J., and Rajaram, M.V. (2020). Role of Cardiac Macrophages on Cardiac Inflammation, Fibrosis and Tissue Repair. Cells, 10.10.3390/cells10010051 ↗
27. Chasing the recipe for a pro-regenerative immune system10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.08.008 ↗
28. Disclosure of the Culprits: Macrophages-Versatile Regulators of Wound Healing10.1089/wound.2012.0407 ↗
29. Review of Integrin-Targeting Biomaterials in Tissue Engineering10.1002/adhm.202000795 ↗
30. Type H blood vessels in bone modeling and remodeling10.7150/thno.34126 ↗
31. Pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages promote Osteogenesis by mesenchymal stem cells via the COX-2-prostaglandin E2 pathway10.1002/jor.23553 ↗
32. Macrophage activation and polarization: Nomenclature and experimental guidelines10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.008 ↗
33. Arora, S., Dev, K., Agarwal, B., Das, P., and Syed, M.A. (2018). Macrophages: Their role, activation and polarization in pulmonary diseases. Immunobiology, 223.10.1016/j.imbio.2017.11.001 ↗
34. Macrophage M1/M2 polarization10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173090 ↗
35. Macrophage functions in wound healing
36. Neutrophil recruitment and function in health and inflammation10.1038/nri3399 ↗
37. Smigiel, K.S., and Parks, W.C. (2017). Matrix Metalloproteinases and Leukocyte Activation. Progress Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci., 147.10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.01.003 ↗
38. Corradetti, B. (2017). Targeted Modulation of Macrophage Functionality by Nanotheranostics in Inflammatory Liver Disease and Cancer. The Immune Response to Implanted Materials and Devices, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-45433-7 ↗
39. Selders, G.S., Fetz, A.E., Radic, M.Z., and Bowlin, G.L. (2017). An overview of the role of neutrophils in innate immunity, inflammation and host-biomaterial integration. Regener. Biomater., 4.10.1093/rb/rbw041 ↗
40. Rungelrath, V., Kobayashi, S.D., and DeLeo, F.R. (2020). Neutrophils in innate immunity and systems biology-level approaches. Wiley Interdiscipl. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med., 12.10.1002/wsbm.1458 ↗
41. Immunomodulation and cellular response to biomaterials: The overriding role of neutrophils in healing10.1039/C9MH00291J ↗
42. Neutrophil Reverse Migration and a Chemokinetic Resolution10.1016/j.devcel.2018.11.004 ↗
43. Visualizing the function and fate of neutrophils in sterile injury and repair10.1126/science.aam9690 ↗
44. Jhunjhunwala, S., Aresta-DaSilva, S., Tang, K., Alvarez, D., Webber, M.J., Tang, B.C., Lavin, D.M., Veiseh, O., Doloff, J.C., and Bose, S. (2015). Neutrophil Responses to Sterile Implant Materials. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0137550 ↗
45. Depletion Of Nk Cells In A Murine Polytrauma Model Is Associated with Improved Outcome And A Modulation Of The Inflammatory Response10.1097/SHK.0b013e31816e2cda ↗
46. Overview of the immune response10.1016/j.jaci.2009.12.980 ↗
47. Suppression of Natural Killer Cell Activity in Patients with Fracture/Soft Tissue Injury10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430360072013 ↗
48. NAP-2 Secreted by Human NK Cells Can Stimulate Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cell Recruitment10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.02.012 ↗
49. Nam, D., Mau, E., Wang, Y., Wright, D., Silkstone, D., Whetstone, H., Whyne, C., and Alman, B. (2012). T-Lymphocytes Enable Osteoblast Maturation via IL-17F during the Early Phase of Fracture Repair. PLoS ONE, 7.10.1371/journal.pone.0040044 ↗
50. T and B cells participate in bone repair by infiltrating the fracture callus in a two-wave fashion10.1016/j.bone.2014.03.052 ↗
51. El Khassawna, T., Serra, A., Bucher, C.H., Petersen, A., Schlundt, C., Könnecke, I., Malhan, D., Wendler, S., Schell, H., and Volk, H.-D. (2017). T Lymphocytes Influence the Mineralization Process of Bone. Front. Immunol., 8.10.3389/fimmu.2017.00562 ↗
52. Interleukin-17 enhances immunosuppression by mesenchymal stem cells10.1038/cdd.2014.85 ↗
53. IL-17 stimulates the proliferation and differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells: Implications for bone remodeling10.1038/cdd.2009.74 ↗
54. Regulatory B cell is critical in bone union process through suppressing proinflammatory cytokines and stimulating Foxp3 in Treg cells10.1111/1440-1681.12719 ↗
55. Osteoimmunology: Shared mechanisms and crosstalk between the immune and bone systems10.1038/nri2062 ↗
56. Shanley, L.C., Mahon, O.R., Kelly, D.J., and Dunne, A. (2021). Harnessing the innate and adaptive immune system for tissue repair and regeneration: Considering more than macrophages. Acta Biomater., 133.10.1016/j.actbio.2021.02.023 ↗
57. Zhou, G., and Groth, T. (2018). Host Responses to Biomaterials and Anti-Inflammatory Design—A Brief Review. Macromol. Biosci., 18.10.1002/mabi.201800112 ↗
58. Origin and physiological roles of inflammation10.1038/nature07201 ↗
59. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 ↗
60. Keselowsky, B.G., Bridges, A.W., Burns, K.L., Tate, C.C., Babensee, J.E., LaPlaca, M.C., and García, A.J. (2007). Role of plasma fibronectin in the foreign body response to biomaterials. Biomaterials, 28.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.035 ↗
61. Brown, B.N., and Badylak, S.F. (2013). Expanded applications, shifting paradigms and an improved understanding of host-biomaterial interactions. Acta Biomater., 9.10.1016/j.actbio.2012.10.025 ↗
62. Zhang, L., Cao, Z., Bai, T., Carr, L., Ella-Menye, J.-R., Irvin, C., Ratner, B.D., and Jiang, S. (2013). Zwitterionic hydrogels implanted in mice resist the foreign-body reaction. Nat. Biotechnol., 31.10.1038/nbt.2580 ↗
63. Adding Functions to Biomaterial Surfaces through Protein Incorporation10.1002/adma.201504310 ↗
64. Immune-Instructive Polymers Control Macrophage Phenotype and Modulate the Foreign Body Response In Vivo10.1016/j.matt.2020.03.018 ↗
65. Petersen, L.K., Ramer-Tait, A.E., Broderick, S.R., Kong, C.-S., Ulery, B.D., Rajan, K., Wannemuehler, M.J., and Narasimhan, B. (2011). Activation of innate immune responses in a pathogen-mimicking manner by amphiphilic polyanhydride nanoparticle adjuvants. Biomaterials, 32.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.063 ↗
66. Global Gene Expression Analysis Reveals Differences in Cellular Responses to Hydroxyl- and Superoxide Anion Radical–Induced Oxidative Stress in Caco-2 Cells10.1093/toxsci/kfp309 ↗
67. Sperling, C., Schweiss, R.B., Streller, U., and Werner, C. (2005). In vitro hemocompatibility of self-assembled monolayers displaying various functional groups. Biomaterials, 26.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.042 ↗
68. The immune reaction and degradation fate of scaffold in cartilage/bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.msec.2019.109927 ↗
69. Surface chemistry influences implant biocompatibility10.2174/156802608783790901 ↗
70. Modulation of Macrophage Phenotype by Biodegradable Polyurethane Nanoparticles: Possible Relation between Macrophage Polarization and Immune Response of Nanoparticles10.1021/acsami.8b04718 ↗
71. Kamath, S., Bhattacharyya, D., Padukudru, C., Timmons, R.B., and Tang, L. (2008). Surface chemistry influences implant-mediated host tissue responses. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A, 86.10.1002/jbm.a.31649 ↗
72. Lopez-Silva, T.L., Leach, D.G., Azares, A., Li, I.-C., Woodside, D.G., and Hartgerink, J.D. (2020). Chemical functionality of multidomain peptide hydrogels governs early host immune response. Biomaterials, 231.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119667 ↗
73. Surface Charge Regulation of Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cell on Polarized Ferroelectric Crystal Substrate10.1002/adhm.201500032 ↗
74. Glycosaminoglycan-based hydrogels capture inflammatory chemokines and rescue defective wound healing in mice10.1126/scitranslmed.aai9044 ↗
75. Boyan, B.D., Hummert, T.W., Dean, D.D., and Schwartz, Z. (1996). Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. Biomaterials, 17.10.1016/0142-9612(96)85758-9 ↗
76. Preferential binding of positive nanoparticles on cell membranes is due to electrostatic interactions: A too simplistic explanation that does not take into account the nanoparticle protein corona10.1016/j.msec.2016.09.016 ↗
77. The role of surface charge density in cationic liposome-promoted dendritic cell maturation and vaccine-induced immune responses10.1039/c1nr10166h ↗
78. Immunological properties of engineered nanomaterials10.1038/nnano.2007.223 ↗
79. New perspectives: In-situ tissue engineering for bone repair scaffold10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108445 ↗
80. Species and density of implant surface chemistry affect the extent of foreign body reactions10.1021/la7025973 ↗
81. Barbosa, J.N., Madureira, P., Barbosa, M.A., and Aguas, A.P. (2006). The influence of functional groups of self-assembled monolayers on fibrous capsule formation and cell recruitment. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A, 76.10.1002/jbm.a.30602 ↗
82. Barbosa, J.N., Barbosa, M.A., and Aguas, A.P. (2003). Adhesion of human leukocytes to biomaterials: An in vitro study using alkanethiolate monolayers with different chemically functionalized surfaces. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A, 65.10.1002/jbm.a.10488 ↗
83. Biomaterial surface chemistry dictates adherent monocyte/macrophage cytokine expression in vitro10.1006/cyto.2002.1048 ↗
84. Modulating macrophage polarization with divalent cations in nanostructured titanium implant surfaces10.1088/0957-4484/27/8/085101 ↗
85. 3D-Bioprinted Inflammation Modulating Polymer Scaffolds for Soft Tissue Repair10.1002/adma.202003778 ↗
86. Hotchkiss, K.M., Clark, N.M., and Olivares-Navarrete, R. (2018). Macrophage response to hydrophilic biomaterials regulates MSC recruitment and T-helper cell populations. Biomaterials, 182.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.08.029 ↗
87. Hotchkiss, K.M., Reddy, G.B., Hyzy, S.L., Schwartz, Z., Boyan, B.D., and Olivares-Navarrete, R. (2016). Titanium surface characteristics, including topography and wettability, alter macrophage activation. Acta Biomater., 31.10.1016/j.actbio.2015.12.003 ↗
88. Yang, Y., Zhang, T., Jiang, M., Yin, X., Luo, X., and Sun, H. (2021). Effect of the immune responses induced by implants in a integrated three-dimensional micro-nano topography on osseointegration. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A, 109.10.1002/jbm.a.37134 ↗
89. Biomaterial Surface Hydrophobicity-Mediated Serum Protein Adsorption and Immune Responses10.1021/acsami.9b09900 ↗
90. Effect of surface hydrophobicity on the conformational changes of adsorbed fibrinogen10.1016/0021-9797(91)90258-A ↗
91. Unveiling the Mechanism of Surface Hydrophilicity-Modulated Macrophage Polarization10.1002/adhm.201800675 ↗
92. Surface characteristics on commercial dental implants differentially activate macrophages in vitro and in vivo10.1111/clr.13717 ↗
93. Abaricia, J.O., Farzad, N., Heath, T.J., Simmons, J., Morandini, L., and Olivares-Navarrete, R. (2021). Control of innate immune response by biomaterial surface topography, energy, and stiffness. Acta Biomater., 133.10.1016/j.actbio.2021.04.021 ↗
94. Designing implant surface topography for improved biocompatibility10.1586/erd.12.82 ↗
95. Tan, K.S., Qian, L., Rosado, R., Flood, P.M., and Cooper, L.F. (2006). The role of titanium surface topography on J774A.1 macrophage inflammatory cytokines and nitric oxide production. Biomaterials, 27.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.05.002 ↗
96. Regulation of macrophage subtype via injectable micro/nano-structured porous microsphere for reprogramming osteoimmune microenvironment10.1016/j.cej.2022.135692 ↗
97. Yu, D., Guo, S., Yu, M., Liu, W., Li, X., Chen, D., Li, B., Guo, Z., and Han, Y. (2022). Immunomodulation and osseointegration activities of Na2TiO3 nanorods-arrayed coatings doped with different Sr content. Bioact. Mater., 10.10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.08.033 ↗
98. Refai, A.K., Textor, M., Brunette, D.M., and Waterfield, J.D. (2004). Effect of titanium surface topography on macrophage activation and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A, 70.10.1002/jbm.a.30075 ↗
99. Takebe, J., Champagne, C., Offenbacher, S., Ishibashi, K., and Cooper, L. (2003). Titanium surface topography alters cell shape and modulates bone morphogenetic protein 2 expression in the J774A.1 macrophage cell line. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A, 64.10.1002/jbm.a.10275 ↗
100. Bota, P.C., Collie, A.M., Puolakkainen, P., Vernon, R.B., Sage, E.H., Ratner, B.D., and Stayton, P.S. (2010). Biomaterial topography alters healing in vivo and monocyte/macrophage activation in vitro. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A, 95.10.1002/jbm.a.32893 ↗