ROS-Scavenging Electroactive Polyphosphazene-Based Core–Shell Nanofibers for Bone Regeneration
Source abstract
Abstract
Bone defects are always accompanied by inflammation due to excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) in injured regions, which greatly impedes the regeneration of bone tissues. Although many conductive polymers have been developed to scavenge ROS, they are typically non-degradable under physiological conditions, making them unsuitable for in vivo applications. Biodegradable polyorganophosphazenes (POPPs) may serve as potent ROS-scavenging biomaterials owing to their versatile chemical structures and ease of functionalization. Herein, a PATGP-type electroactive polyphosphazene with side groups of aniline tetramer and glycine ethyl ester was compared to conventional poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) in regenerating bone tissues. To conduct in vitro and in vivo evaluations, three kinds of electrospun nanofibrous meshes were prepared: PLGA, PLGA/PATGP blend, and PLGA/PATGP core–shell nanofibers. Among them, PLGA/PATGP core–shell nanofibers outperform the blend and PLGA nanofibers in terms of scavenging ROS, promoting osteogenic differentiation, and accelerating neo-bone formation. The continuous PATGP shell on the PLGA/PATGP core–shell nanofiber surface could apparently provide more significant modulation effects on cellular behaviors than the PLGA/PATGP blend nanofibers with PATGP dispersed in the PLGA matrix. Therefore, the core–shell structured PLGA/PATGP nanofibers were envisioned as a promising candidate scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Additionally, the core–shell design paved the way for biomedical applications of functional POPPs in combination with other polymeric biomaterials, without phase separation or difficulty of increasing the molecular weights of POPPs.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Lai Y, Li Y, Cao H, Long J, Wang X, Li L, Li C, Jia Q, Teng B, Tang T, Peng J, Eglin D, Alini M, Grijpma DW, Richards G, Qin L. Osteogenic magnesium incorporated into PLGA/TCP porous scaffold by 3D printing for repairing challenging bone defect. Biomaterials 2019;197:207–19.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.01.013 ↗
2. Zhu C, Qiu J, Pongkitwitoon S, Thomopoulos S, Xia Y. Inverse opal scaffolds with gradations in mineral content for spatial control of osteogenesis. Adv Mater 2018;30:1706706.10.1002/adma.201706706 ↗
3. Du Y, Guo JL, Wang J, Mikos AG, Zhang S. Hierarchically designed bone scaffolds: from internal cues to external stimuli. Biomaterials 2019;218:119334.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119334 ↗
4. Mouthuy PA, Snelling SJB, Dakin SG, Milković L, Gašparović AČ, Carr AJ, Žarković N. Biocompatibility of implantable materials: an oxidative stress viewpoint. Biomaterials 2016;109:55–68.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.010 ↗
5. Sies H, Jones DP. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) as pleiotropic physiological signalling agents. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2020;21:363–83.10.1038/s41580-020-0230-3 ↗
6. Zhang C, Li Y, Hu Y, Peng Y, Ahmad Z, Li JS, Chang MW. Porous yolk-shell particle engineering via nonsolvent-assisted trineedle coaxial electrospraying for burn-related wound healing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2019;11:7823–35.10.1021/acsami.8b22112 ↗
7. Wu H, Li F, Wang S, Lu J, Li J, Du Y, Sun X, Chen X, Gao J, Ling D. Ceria nanocrystals decorated mesoporous silica nanoparticle based ROS-scavenging tissue adhesive for highly efficient regenerative wound healing. Biomaterials 2018;151:66–77.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.018 ↗
8. Ilyas A, Odatsu T, Shah A, Monte F, Kim HKW, Kramer P, Aswath PB, Varanasi VG. Amorphous silica: a new antioxidant role for rapid critical-sized bone defect healing. Adv Healthc Mater 2016;5:2199–213.10.1002/adhm.201600203 ↗
9. Chakraborty A, Jana NR. Vitamin C-conjugated nanoparticle protects cells from oxidative stress at low doses but induces oxidative stress and cell death at high doses. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2017;9:41807–17.10.1021/acsami.7b16055 ↗
10. Watanabe J, Yamada M, Niibe K, Zhang M, Kondo T, Ishibashi M, Egusa H. Preconditioning of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells with N-acetyl-l-cysteine enhances bone regeneration via reinforced resistance to oxidative stress. Biomaterials 2018;185:25–38.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.08.055 ↗
11. Zhou T, Yan L, Xie C, Li P, Jiang L, Fang J, Zhao C, Ren F, Wang K, Wang Y, Zhang H, Guo T, Lu X. A mussel-inspired persistent ROS-scavenging, electroactive, and osteoinductive scaffold based on electrochemical-driven in situ nanoassembly. Small 2019;15:1805440.10.1002/smll.201805440 ↗
12. Zhao X, Wu H, Guo B, Dong R, Qiu Y, Ma PX. Antibacterial anti-oxidant electroactive injectable hydrogel as self-healing wound dressing with hemostasis and adhesiveness for cutaneous wound healing. Biomaterials 2017;122:34–47.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.01.011 ↗
13. Guo B, Glavas L, Albertsson AC. Biodegradable and electrically conducting polymers for biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci 2013;38:1263–86.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.06.003 ↗
14. Balint R, Cassidy NJ, Cartmell SH. Conductive polymers: towards a smart biomaterial for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 2014;10:2341–53.10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.015 ↗
15. Rothemund S, Teasdale I. Preparation of polyphosphazenes: a tutorial review. Chem Soc Rev 2016;45:5200–15.10.1039/C6CS00340K ↗
16. Huang Y, Du Z, Wei P, Chen F, Guan B, Zhao Z, Zhang X, Cai Q, Mao J, Leng H, Yang X. Biodegradable microspheres made of conductive polyorganophosphazene showing antioxidant capacity for improved bone regeneration. Chem Eng J 2020;397:125352.10.1016/j.cej.2020.125352 ↗
17. Ogueri KS, Allcock HR, Laurencin CT. Generational biodegradable and regenerative polyphosphazene polymers and their blends with poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid). Prog Polym Sci 2019;98:101146.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101146 ↗
18. Deng M, Kumbar SG, Nair LS, Weikel AL, Allcock HR, Laurencin CT. Biomimetic structures: biological implications of dipeptide-substituted polyphosphazene-polyester blend nanofiber matrices for load-bearing bone regeneration. Adv Funct Mater 2011;21:2641–51.10.1002/adfm.201100275 ↗
19. Deng M, Nair LS, Nukavarapu SP, Kumbar SG, Jiang T, Weikel AL, Krogman NR, Allcock HR, Laurencin CT. In situ porous structures: a unique polymer erosion mechanism in biodegradable dipeptide-based polyphosphazene and polyester blends producing matrices for regenerative engineering. Adv Funct Mater 2010;20:2794–806.10.1002/adfm.201000968 ↗
20. Zhang Y, Liu X, Zeng L, Zhang J, Zuo J, Zou J, Ding J, Chen X. Polymer fiber scaffolds for bone and cartilage tissue engineering. Adv Funct Mater 2019;29:1903279.10.1002/adfm.201903279 ↗
21. Shan D, Kothapalli SR, Ravnic DJ, Gerhard E, Kim JP, Guo J, Ma C, Guo J, Gui L, Sun L, Lu D, Yang J. Development of citrate-based dual-imaging enabled biodegradable electroactive polymers. Adv Funct Mater 2018;28:1801787.10.1002/adfm.201801787 ↗
22. Guo B, Wistrand AF, Albertsson AC. Electroactive hydrophilic polylactide surface by covalent modification with tetraaniline. Macromolecules 2012;45:652–9.10.1021/ma202508h ↗
23. Zhao X, Li P, Guo B, Ma PX. Antibacterial and conductive injectable hydrogels based on quaternized chitosan-graft-polyaniline/oxidized dextran for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 2015;26:236–48.10.1016/j.actbio.2015.08.006 ↗
24. Cui L, Zhang J, Zou J, Yang X, Guo H, Tian H, Zhang P, Wang Y, Zhang N, Zhuang X, Li Z, Ding J, Chen X. Electroactive composite scaffold with locally expressed osteoinductive factor for synergistic bone repair upon electrical stimulation. Biomaterials 2020;230:119617.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119617 ↗
25. Ning C, Zhou Z, Tan G, Zhu Y, Mao C. Electroactive polymers for tissue regeneration: developments and perspectives. Prog Polym Sci 2018;81:144–62.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.01.001 ↗
26. Nezakati T, Seifalian A, Tan A, Seifalian AM. Conductive polymers: opportunities and challenges in biomedical applications. Chem Rev 2018;118:6766–843.10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00275 ↗
27. Teo JY, Seo Y, Ko E, Leong J, Hong YT, Yang YY, Kong H. Surface tethering of stem cells with H2O2-responsive anti-oxidizing colloidal particles for protection against oxidation-induced death. Biomaterials 2019;201:1–15.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.01.039 ↗
28. Boda SK, Almoshari Y, Wang H, Wang X, Reinhardt RA, Duan B, Wang D, Xie J. Mineralized nanofiber segments coupled with calcium-binding BMP-2 peptides for alveolar bone regeneration. Acta Biomater 2019;85:282–93.10.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.051 ↗
29. Zhang L, Fang J, Fu L, Chen L, Dai W, Huang H, Wang J, Zhang X, Cai Q, Yang X. Gradient fibrous aerogel conjugated with chemokine peptide for regulating cell differentiation and facilitating osteochondral regeneration. Chem Eng J 2021;422:130428.10.1016/j.cej.2021.130428 ↗
30. Rahmati M, Silva EA, Reseland JE, Heyward CA, Haugen HJ. Biological responses to physicochemical properties of biomaterial surface. Chem Soc Rev 2020;49:5178–224.10.1039/D0CS00103A ↗
31. Cerqueni G, Scalzone A, Licini C, Gentile P, Belmonte MM. Insights into oxidative stress in bone tissue and novel challenges for biomaterials. Mater Sci Eng C 2021;130:112433.10.1016/j.msec.2021.112433 ↗
32. Hameister R, Kaur C, Dheen ST, Lohmann CH, Singh G. Reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (ROS/RNS) and oxidative stress in arthroplasty. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 2020;108:2073–87.10.1002/jbm.b.34546 ↗
33. Zhao H, Huang J, Li Y, Lv X, Zhou H, Wang H, Xu Y, Wang C, Wang J, Liu Z. ROS-scavenging hydrogel to promote healing of bacteria infected diabetic wounds. Biomaterials 2020;258:120286.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120286 ↗
34. Crivelli B, Bari E, Perteghella S, Catenacci L, Sorrenti M, Mocchi M, Faragò S, Tripodo G, Mello AP, Torre ML. Silk fibroin nanoparticles for celecoxib and curcumin delivery: ROS-scavenging and anti-inflammatory activities in an in vitro model of osteoarthritis. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2019;137:37–45.10.1016/j.ejpb.2019.02.008 ↗
35. Xie J, Yao Y, Wang S, Fan L, Ding J, Gao Y, Li S, Shen L, Zhu Y, Gao C. Alleviating oxidative injury of myocardial infarction by a fibrous polyurethane patch with condensed ROS-scavenging backbone units. Adv Healthc Mater 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202101855 .10.1002/adhm.202101855 ↗
36. Ren S, Zhou Y, Fan R, Peng W, Xu X, Li L, Xu Y. Constructing biocompatible MSN@Ce@PEG nanoplatform for enhancing regenerative capability of stem cell via ROS-scavenging in periodontitis. Chem Eng J 2021;423:130207.10.1016/j.cej.2021.130207 ↗
37. Petty AJ, Keate RL, Jiang B, Ameer GA, Rivnay J. Conducting polymers for tissue regeneration in vivo. Chem Mater 2020;32:4095–115.10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c00767 ↗
38. Zheng T, Huang Y, Zhang X, Cai Q, Deng X, Yang X. Mimicking the electrophysiological microenvironment of bone tissue using electroactive materials to promote its regeneration. J Mater Chem B 2020;8:10221–56.10.1039/D0TB01601B ↗
39. Bai B, Gu C, Lu X, Ge X, Yang J, Wang C, Gu Y, Deng A, Guo Y, Feng X, Gu Z. Polydapamine functionalized mesoporous silica as ROS-sensitive drug delivery vehicles for periodontitis treatment by moduclating macrophage polarization. Nano Res 2021;14:4577–83.10.1007/s12274-021-3376-1 ↗
40. Huang Z, Yang L, Hu X, Huang Y, Cai Q, Ao Y, Yang X. Molecular mechanism study on effect of biodegradable amino acid ester-substituted polyphosphazenes in stimulating osteogenic differentiation. Macromol Biosci 2019;19:1800464.10.1002/mabi.201800464 ↗
41. Xu LC, Li Z, Tian Z, Chen C, Allcock HR, Siedlecki CA. A new textured polyphosphazene biomaterial with improved blood coagulation and microbial infection responses. Acta Biomater 2018;67:87–98.10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.056 ↗
42. Huang Y, Du Z, Zheng T, Jing W, Liu H, Liu X, Mao J, Zhang X, Cai Q, Chen D, Yang X. Antibacterial, conductive, and osteocompatible polyorganophosphazene microscaffolds for the repair of infectious calvarial defect. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2021;109:2580–96.10.1002/jbm.a.37252 ↗
43. Deng M, Nair LS, Nukavarapu SP, Jiang T, Kanner WA, Li X, Kumbar SG, Weikel AL, Krogman NR, Allcock HR, Laurencin CT. Dipeptide-based polyphosphazene and polyester blends for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2010;31:4898–908.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.058 ↗
44. Wang L, Qiu Y, Guo Y, Si Y, Liu L, Cao J, Yu J, Li X, Zhang Q, Ding B. Smart, elastic, and nanofiber-based 3D scaffolds with self-deploying capability for osteoporotic bone regeneration. Nano Lett 2019;19:9112–20.10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04313 ↗
45. Xi Y, Ge J, Guo Y, Lei B, Ma PX. Biomimetic elastomeric polypeptide-based nanofibrous matrix for overcoming multidrug-resistant bacteria and enhancing full-thickness wound healing/skin regeneration. ACS Nano 2018;12:10772–84.10.1021/acsnano.8b01152 ↗