journal article·2022-01-17Open access

Multi-Response Optimization of Surface Grinding Process Parameters of AISI 4140 Alloy Steel Using Response Surface Methodology and Desirability Function under Dry and Wet Conditions

Rakesh Roy, Sourav Kumar Ghosh, Tanvir Ibna Kaisar, Tazim Ahmed, Shakhawat Hossain, Muhammad Aslam, Mosab Kaseem, Md Mahfuzur Rahman

Coatings· Volume 12· Issue 1

Abstract

The effect of four controllable input process parameters of AISI 4140 steel, cross-feed, workpiece velocity, wheel velocity, and the depth of cut were experimentally investigated under dry and wet conditions. Three responses, contact temperature, material removal rate (MRR), and machining cost during surface grinding of AISI 4140 steel, were considered. The process was optimized using a recently developed combined methodology based on response surface methodology (RSM) and desirability functional approach (DFA). RSM generated the models of the responses for prediction while DFA solved these multi-response optimization problems. The DFA approach employed an objective function known as the desirability function, which converts an estimated response into a scale-free value known as desirability. The optimum parameter was attained at the maximum overall desirability. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to confirm the model adequacy. From the results of the study, for equal weights of responses, the corresponding optimal values of the input parameters cross-feed, workpiece velocity, the wheel or cutting velocity and the depth of cut were found to be 6 mm/pass, 12 m/min, 15 m/s, and 0.095 mm respectively in wet conditions. The corresponding predicted output responses were: 134.55 °C for the temperature, and 7.366 BDT (Taka, Currency of Bangladesh) for the total cost with an overall desirability of 0.844. Confirmation testing of optimized parameters, i.e., checking the validity of optimal set of predicted responses with the real experimental run were conducted, and it was found that the experimental value for temperature and total cost were 140.854 °C and 8.36 BDT, respectively, with an overall desirability of 0.863. Errors of the predicted value from the experimental value for equal weightage scheme were 4.47% for the temperature and 7.37% for the total cost. It was also found that if the temperature was prioritized, then the wet condition dominated the overall desirability, which was expected. However, if the cost was given high weightage, dry condition achieved the highest overall desirability. This can be attributed to the cutting in the wet condition which was more expensive due to the application of cutting fluid. The proposed model was found to be new and highly flexible in the sense that there was always an option at hand to focus on a particular response if needed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore 7408, Bangladesh

Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, Bangladesh University of Textile, Dhaka 1208, Bangladesh

Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh

Department of Chemical Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore 54000, Pakistan

Department of Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Chattopadhyay, A. (2011). Machining and Machine Tools (With CD), John Wiley & Sons.
2. A review on conventional and advanced minimum quantity lubrication approaches on performance measures of grinding process10.1007/s00170-021-07785-x ↗
3. Malkin, S., and Guo, C. (2008). Grinding Technology: Theory and Application of Machining with Abrasives, Industrial Press Inc.
4. The metallurgical aspects of machining10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60199-2 ↗
5. Determination of the mechanical and thermal influences on machined surfaces by microhardness and residual stress analysis10.1016/S0007-8506(16)30036-1 ↗
6. Rowe, W.B. (2013). Principles of Modern Grinding Technology, William Andrew.10.1016/B978-0-323-24271-4.00016-6 ↗
7. Experimental investigation on conventional grinding of Ti-6Al-4V using SiC abrasive10.1007/s00170-011-3272-z ↗
8. Environmental aspects of grinding fluids10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61138-X ↗
9. Surface integrity in material removal processes: Recent advances10.1016/j.cirp.2011.05.002 ↗
10. Sharma, C., Ghosh, S., and Talukdar, P. (2014, January 12–14). Finite element analysis of workpiece temperature during surface grinding of inconel 718 alloy. Proceedings of the 5th International & 26th All India Manufacturing Technology, Design and Research Conference, IIT Guwahati, Assam, India.
11. Temperatures and energy partition for grinding with vitrified CBN wheels10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63176-X ↗
12. Thermal aspects of grinding with electroplated CBN wheels10.1115/1.1644547 ↗
13. Experimental study on grinding force and grinding temperature of Aermet 100 steel in surface grinding10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.04.013 ↗
14. Design strategies for response surface models for the study of supersonic combustion10.1002/qre.983 ↗
15. Optimization of cutting parameters for minimizing power consumption and maximizing tool life during machining of Al alloy SiC particle composites10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.008 ↗
16. Modeling and optimization of machining parameters in cylindrical grinding process10.1007/s00170-015-7500-9 ↗
17. Multi-objective optimization of cutting parameters for surface roughness and metal removal rate in surface grinding using response surface methodology
18. Optimization of Surface Grinding Process Parameters for Minimum Surface Roughness in AISI 1080 Using Response Surface Methodology10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.984-985.118 ↗
19. Investigation of machinability characteristics and comparative analysis under different machining conditions for sustainable manufacturing10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107425 ↗
20. Application of desirability-function and RSM to optimise the multi-objectives while turning Inconel 718 using coated carbide tools10.1504/IJMTM.2013.058899 ↗
21. Multi-response optimization for milling AISI 304 Stainless steel using GRA and DFA10.12989/amr.2016.5.2.067 ↗
22. Buranská, E., and Buranský, I. (2018, January 21–28). Cutting Environment Impact on the Aluminium Alloy Machining (DFA). Proceedings of the 29th DAAAM International Symposium, Zadar, Croatia.10.2507/29th.daaam.proceedings.166 ↗
23. Borchers, F., Clausen, B., Eckert, S., Ehle, L., Epp, J., Harst, S., Hettig, M., Klink, A., Kohls, E., and Meyer, H. (2020). Comparison of Different Manufacturing Processes of AISI 4140 Steel with Regard to Surface Modification and Its Influencing Depth. Metals, 10.10.3390/met10070895 ↗
24. A multi-objective genetic algorithm (GA) approach for optimization of surface grinding operations10.1016/S0890-6955(02)00074-3 ↗
25. Multiobjective optimization of grinding process parameters using particle swarm optimization algorithm10.1080/10426910903124860 ↗
26. Selection of optimal conditions in the surface grinding process using the quantum based optimisation method10.1007/s10845-017-1326-2 ↗
27. Multi-objective optimization for surface grinding process using a hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm10.1007/s00170-013-5571-z ↗
28. Constrained grinding optimization for time, cost, and surface roughness using NSGA-II10.1007/s00170-014-5884-6 ↗
29. Optimization of time, cost and surface roughness in grinding process using a robust multi-objective dragonfly algorithm10.1007/s00521-018-3872-8 ↗
30. Modeling and optimization of machining parameters during grinding of flat glass using response surface methodology and probabilistic uncertainty analysis based on Monte Carlo simulation10.1016/j.measurement.2019.05.098 ↗
31. A comparative study of PSO, GSA and SCA in parameters optimization of surface grinding process10.11591/eei.v8i3.1586 ↗
32. Bardhan, P.K., Bhunia, B., Goswami, S., and Chandra, P. (2019, January 13–14). Optimization of Process Parameters of Surface Grinding of AISI 304 Steel with Al2O3 Abrasive Wheel. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industry Interactive Innovations in Science, Engineering and Technology (I3SET2K19), Kalyani, India.
33. Optimization of machining parameters in plane surface grinding process by response surface methodology10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.075 ↗
34. Comparative study on the performance of the MQL nanolubricant and conventional flood lubrication techniques during grinding of Si3N4 ceramic10.1007/s00170-018-1689-3 ↗
35. Self-optimizing grinding machines using Gaussian process models and constrained Bayesian optimization10.1007/s00170-020-05369-9 ↗
36. Effects of cooling conditions and grinding depth on sustainable surface grinding of Ti-6Al-4V: Taguchi approach10.3934/matersci.2019.5.697 ↗
37. Sattler, K.-U., Nguyen, D.C., Vu, N.P., Long, B.T., and Puta, H. (2020). A study on optimization of surface roughness in surface grinding 9CrSi tool steel by using Taguchi method. Advances in Engineering Research and Application, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Research and Applications, ICERA 2019, Thai Nguyen, Vietnam, 1–2 December 2019, Springer.
38. Exploration of graphene assisted vegetables oil based minimum quantity lubrication for surface grinding of TI-6AL-4V-ELI10.1016/j.triboint.2019.106113 ↗
39. Analysis of process parameters in surface grinding using single objective Taguchi and multi-objective grey relational grade10.1016/j.pisc.2016.04.077 ↗
40. Performance improvement of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) technique in surface grinding by modeling and optimization10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.045 ↗
41. Performance improvement of eco-friendly MQL technique by using hybrid nanofluid and ultrasonic-assisted grinding10.1007/s00170-017-0521-9 ↗
42. Multiple-response optimisation of electrochemical grinding characteristics through response surface methodology10.1007/s00170-012-4065-8 ↗
43. Khan, A.M., Jamil, M., Mia, M., Pimenov, D.Y., Gasiyarov, V.R., Gupta, M.K., and He, N. (2018). Multi-objective optimization for grinding of AISI D2 steel with Al2O3 wheel under MQL. Materials, 11.10.3390/ma11112269 ↗
44. Modeling and analysis for surface roughness in machining glass fibre reinforced plastics using response surface methodology10.1016/j.matdes.2006.10.001 ↗
45. Optimization of some parameters of stirred mill for ultra-fine grinding of refractory Au/Ag ores10.1016/j.powtec.2010.12.009 ↗
46. Design of grinding factors based on response surface methodology10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.187 ↗
47. Pradhan, M.K., and Biswas, C.K. (2008, January 3–4). Modeling of residual stresses of EDMed AISI 4140 Steel. Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Materials, Processing and Characterization, VRS Engineering College, Vijayawada, India.
48. 12 Multiresponse surface methodology10.1016/S0169-7161(96)13014-5 ↗
49. The desirability function
50. Simultaneous optimization of several response variables10.1080/00224065.1980.11980968 ↗
51. Strategies for robust multiresponse quality engineering10.1080/07408179308964286 ↗
52. Modern experimental design10.1080/15598608.2007.10411855 ↗
53. An investigation on surface grinding of AISI 4140 hardened steel using minimum quantity lubrication-MQL technique10.1007/s12289-009-0678-3 ↗