Show source-provided references
1. Chattopadhyay, A. (2011). Machining and Machine Tools (With CD), John Wiley & Sons.
2. A review on conventional and advanced minimum quantity lubrication approaches on performance measures of grinding process
10.1007/s00170-021-07785-x ↗3. Malkin, S., and Guo, C. (2008). Grinding Technology: Theory and Application of Machining with Abrasives, Industrial Press Inc.
5. Determination of the mechanical and thermal influences on machined surfaces by microhardness and residual stress analysis
10.1016/S0007-8506(16)30036-1 ↗10. Sharma, C., Ghosh, S., and Talukdar, P. (2014, January 12–14). Finite element analysis of workpiece temperature during surface grinding of inconel 718 alloy. Proceedings of the 5th International & 26th All India Manufacturing Technology, Design and Research Conference, IIT Guwahati, Assam, India.
14. Design strategies for response surface models for the study of supersonic combustion
10.1002/qre.983 ↗15. Optimization of cutting parameters for minimizing power consumption and maximizing tool life during machining of Al alloy SiC particle composites
10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.008 ↗17. Multi-objective optimization of cutting parameters for surface roughness and metal removal rate in surface grinding using response surface methodology
19. Investigation of machinability characteristics and comparative analysis under different machining conditions for sustainable manufacturing
10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107425 ↗20. Application of desirability-function and RSM to optimise the multi-objectives while turning Inconel 718 using coated carbide tools
10.1504/IJMTM.2013.058899 ↗22. Buranská, E., and Buranský, I. (2018, January 21–28). Cutting Environment Impact on the Aluminium Alloy Machining (DFA). Proceedings of the 29th DAAAM International Symposium, Zadar, Croatia.
10.2507/29th.daaam.proceedings.166 ↗23. Borchers, F., Clausen, B., Eckert, S., Ehle, L., Epp, J., Harst, S., Hettig, M., Klink, A., Kohls, E., and Meyer, H. (2020). Comparison of Different Manufacturing Processes of AISI 4140 Steel with Regard to Surface Modification and Its Influencing Depth. Metals, 10.
10.3390/met10070895 ↗26. Selection of optimal conditions in the surface grinding process using the quantum based optimisation method
10.1007/s10845-017-1326-2 ↗27. Multi-objective optimization for surface grinding process using a hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm
10.1007/s00170-013-5571-z ↗29. Optimization of time, cost and surface roughness in grinding process using a robust multi-objective dragonfly algorithm
10.1007/s00521-018-3872-8 ↗30. Modeling and optimization of machining parameters during grinding of flat glass using response surface methodology and probabilistic uncertainty analysis based on Monte Carlo simulation
10.1016/j.measurement.2019.05.098 ↗31. A comparative study of PSO, GSA and SCA in parameters optimization of surface grinding process
10.11591/eei.v8i3.1586 ↗32. Bardhan, P.K., Bhunia, B., Goswami, S., and Chandra, P. (2019, January 13–14). Optimization of Process Parameters of Surface Grinding of AISI 304 Steel with Al2O3 Abrasive Wheel. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industry Interactive Innovations in Science, Engineering and Technology (I3SET2K19), Kalyani, India.
34. Comparative study on the performance of the MQL nanolubricant and conventional flood lubrication techniques during grinding of Si3N4 ceramic
10.1007/s00170-018-1689-3 ↗37. Sattler, K.-U., Nguyen, D.C., Vu, N.P., Long, B.T., and Puta, H. (2020). A study on optimization of surface roughness in surface grinding 9CrSi tool steel by using Taguchi method. Advances in Engineering Research and Application, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Research and Applications, ICERA 2019, Thai Nguyen, Vietnam, 1–2 December 2019, Springer.
39. Analysis of process parameters in surface grinding using single objective Taguchi and multi-objective grey relational grade
10.1016/j.pisc.2016.04.077 ↗40. Performance improvement of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) technique in surface grinding by modeling and optimization
10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.045 ↗41. Performance improvement of eco-friendly MQL technique by using hybrid nanofluid and ultrasonic-assisted grinding
10.1007/s00170-017-0521-9 ↗42. Multiple-response optimisation of electrochemical grinding characteristics through response surface methodology
10.1007/s00170-012-4065-8 ↗43. Khan, A.M., Jamil, M., Mia, M., Pimenov, D.Y., Gasiyarov, V.R., Gupta, M.K., and He, N. (2018). Multi-objective optimization for grinding of AISI D2 steel with Al2O3 wheel under MQL. Materials, 11.
10.3390/ma11112269 ↗44. Modeling and analysis for surface roughness in machining glass fibre reinforced plastics using response surface methodology
10.1016/j.matdes.2006.10.001 ↗47. Pradhan, M.K., and Biswas, C.K. (2008, January 3–4). Modeling of residual stresses of EDMed AISI 4140 Steel. Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Materials, Processing and Characterization, VRS Engineering College, Vijayawada, India.
49. The desirability function
53. An investigation on surface grinding of AISI 4140 hardened steel using minimum quantity lubrication-MQL technique
10.1007/s12289-009-0678-3 ↗