journal article·2023-09-09Open access

A Comparison of Cellulose Nanocrystals and Nanofibers as Reinforcements to Amylose-Based Composite Bioplastics

Marwa Faisal, Marija Žmirić, Ngoc Kim, Sander Bruun, Loredana Mariniello, Michela Famiglietti, Heloisa Bordallo, Jacob Kirkensgaard, Bodil Jørgensen, Peter Ulvskov, Kim Hebelstrup, Andreas Blennow

Coatings· Volume 13· Issue 9

Abstract

Starch-based bioplastics offer a promising alternative to conventional plastics. However, they exhibit certain limitations, notably in terms of mechanical strength and barrier properties. These challenges could potentially be addressed through the incorporation of nanocellulose as a reinforcing agent. In this study, we fabricated bioplastic films using a casting and blending approach, employing highly linear pure amylose (AM) in combination with cellulose nanofibers (CNF) or cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) at various ratios. This allowed for a direct comparison of CNF and CNC functionality within the AM matrix. We systematically assessed mechanical properties and water barrier characteristics, encompassing parameters such as water permeability, moisture content, swelling, solubility, crystallinity, thermal stability, transmittance, and opacity. Additionally, we investigated water vapor and oxygen permeability. Furthermore, we delved into distinctions between CNC and CNF biocomposites. Incorporation of either type of nanocellulose yielded enhancements in film properties, with CNF exerting a more pronounced positive influence compared to CNC. Particularly noteworthy were the mechanical properties, wherein CNF composite films demonstrated markedly higher tensile strength and Young’s modulus compared to their CNC counterparts. For instance, the inclusion of 1% CNF led to a substantial increase in AM tensile strength from 66.1 MPa to 144.8 MPa. Conversely, water vapor permeability exhibited a converse behavior, as the addition of 1% CNF resulted in a significant reduction of water barrier properties from 8.7 to 1.32 g mm m−2 24 h−1kPa−1. Intriguingly, CNC films displayed greater elongation at the point of rupture in comparison to CNF films. This can be attributed to the larger surface area of the CNC and the favorable interfacial interaction between AM and CNC. Notably, the introduction of nanocellulose led to reduced film opacity and improved thermal stability. In summary, nanocellulose interacted synergistically with the AM matrix, establishing a robust hydrogen-bonded network that greatly enhanced the performance of the biocomposite films.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, 1871 København, Denmark

Department of Chemical Sciences, Monte Sant’Angelo Campus, University of Naples “Federico II”, Via Cinthia 4, 80126 Naples, Italy

Niels Bohr Institute, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, 2100 København, Denmark

Department of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, 1871 København, Denmark

Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, 4200 Slagelse, Denmark

Funding

Danish Council for Independent Research · Innomission 4 Program of Innovation Fund Denmark · Carlsberg Fondet · University of Copenhagen · Food and Health Open Innovation Laboratory, Danish Roadmap for Research Infrastructure · Plant Carb ApS

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Recent advances in bionanocomposites Preparation, Properties, and Applications10.1080/00914037.2015.1103240 ↗
2. Nanocomposite and Bio-Nanocomposite Polymeric Materials/Membranes Development in Energy and Medical Sector: A Review10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.11.044 ↗
3. Noreen, A., Sultana, S., Sultana, T., Tabasum, S., Zia, K.M., Muzammil, Z., and Sultana, S. (2020). Chapter 3-Natural polymers as constituents of bionanocomposites. Bionanocomposites, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-816751-9.00003-9 ↗
4. Plant-Crafted Starches for Bioplastics Production10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.039 ↗
5. Tetlow, I.J., and Bertoft, E. (2020). A Review of Starch Biosynthesis in Relation to the Building Block-Backbone Model. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 21.10.3390/ijms21197011 ↗
6. Abe, M.M., Martins, J.R., Sanvezzo, P.B., Macedo, J.V., Branciforti, M.C., Halley, P., Botaro, V.R., and Brienzo, M. (2021). Advantages and Disadvantages of Bioplastics Production from Starch and Lignocellulosic Components. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13152484 ↗
7. Barley Callus: A Model System for Bioengineering of Starch in Cereals10.1186/1746-4811-8-36 ↗
8. Isolation of Thermally Stable Cellulose Nanocrystals from Spent Coffee Grounds via Phosphoric Acid Hydrolysis10.32604/jrm.2020.07940 ↗
9. Acid Hydrolysis of Cellulose as the Entry Point into Biorefinery Schemes10.1002/cssc.200900188 ↗
10. Changes in the Degree of Polymerization of Wood Celluloses during Dilute Acid Hydrolysis and TEMPO-Mediated Oxidation: Formation Mechanism of Disordered Regions along Each Cellulose Microfibril10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.078 ↗
11. Degradation and Crystallization of Cellulose in Hydrogen Chloride Vapor for High-Yield Isolation of Cellulose Nanocrystals10.1002/anie.201606626 ↗
12. Visualizing Degradation of Cellulose Nanofibers by Acid Hydrolysis10.1021/acs.biomac.0c01625 ↗
13. TEMPO-Oxidized Cellulose Nanofibers10.1039/C0NR00583E ↗
14. Simultaneous Preparation of Cellulose Nanocrystals and Micron-Sized Porous Colloidal Particles of Cellulose by TEMPO-Mediated Oxidation10.1039/C4GC02001D ↗
15. Han, X., Wang, J., Wang, X., Tian, W., Dong, Y., and Jiang, S. (2022). Finite Element Analysis of Strengthening Mechanism of Ultrastrong and Tough Cellulosic Materials. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14214490 ↗
16. Micro- and Nano-Fibrils of Manau Rattan and Solvent-Exchange-Induced High-Haze Transparent Holocellulose Nanofibril Film10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120075 ↗
17. Biodegradability and Mechanical Properties of Reinforced Starch Nanocomposites Using Cellulose Nanofibers10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.06.043 ↗
18. Recent Advances on Edible Films Based on Fruits and Vegetables—A Review10.1111/1541-4337.12281 ↗
19. Amylose/Cellulose Nanofiber Composites for All-Natural, Fully Biodegradable and Flexible Bioplastics10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117277 ↗
20. Sustainable Production of Cellulose Nanofiber Gels and Paper from Sugar Beet Waste Using Enzymatic Pre-Treatment10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115581 ↗
21. Influence of Physicochemical Properties of Starch on Crispness of Tempura Fried Batter10.1094/CCHEM.2003.80.3.339 ↗
22. Nanofibers Produced from Agro-Industrial Plant Waste Using Entirely Enzymatic Pretreatments10.1021/acs.biomac.8b01435 ↗
23. Digital Micrometer Used in Thickness Measurement of Plastic Film Compared to Standardized Instrument
24. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules Colorimetric PH Indicators Based on Well-Defined Amylose and Amylopectin Matrices Enriched with Anthocyanins from Red Cabbage10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.126250 ↗
25. Preparation of On-Package Halochromic Freshness/Spoilage Nanocellulose Label for the Visual Shelf Life Estimation of Meat10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.177 ↗
26. (2002). Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Thin Plastic Sheeting (Standard No. ASTM D 882-02).
27. Preparation and Characterization of Active and Intelligent Packaging Films Based on Cassava Starch and Anthocyanins from Lycium Ruthenicum Murr10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.05.029 ↗
28. (2013). Standard Test Method for Water Vapor Transmission Rate Through Plastic Film and Sheeting Using a Modulated Infrared Sensor (Standard No. ASTM F1249-13).
29. (2010). Standard Test Method for Oxygen Gas Transmission Rate through Plastic Film and Sheeting Using a Colorimetric Sensor (Standard No. ASTM D3985-05).
30. Biodegradability Standards for Carrier Bags and Plastic Films in Aquatic Environments: A Critical Review10.1098/rsos.171792 ↗
31. Synthesis & Characterization of Cotton Fiber Reinforced Starch/PVA Biodegradable Composite Films
32. de Almeida, V.S., Barretti, B.R.V., Ito, V.C., Malucelli, L., da Silva Carvalho Filho, M.A., Demiate, I.M., Pinheiro, L.A., and Lacerda, L.G. (2020). Thermal, Morphological, and Mechanical Properties of Regular and Waxy Maize Starch Films Reinforced with Cellulose Nanofibers (CNF). Mater. Res., 23.10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2019-0576 ↗
33. Preparation and Characterization of Cellulose Nanofiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Starch Composites10.1007/s12221-014-0347-0 ↗
34. Resistant Starch/Pectin Free-Standing Films Reinforced with Nanocellulose Intended for Colonic Methotrexate Release10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.062 ↗
35. Nano-Cellulose Reinforced Starch Bio Composite Films—A Review on Green Composites10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.017 ↗
36. Fabrication and Characterization of Native and Oxidized Potato Starch Biodegradable Films10.1007/s11483-018-9522-y ↗
37. Csiszár, E., Kun, D., and Fekete, E. (2021). The Role of Structure and Interactions in Thermoplastic Starch–Nanocellulose Composites. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13183186 ↗
38. Synergistic Reinforcing Effect of TiO2 and Montmorillonite on Potato Starch Nanocomposite Films: Thermal, Mechanical and Barrier Properties10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.040 ↗
39. Comparison of Mechanical Reinforcement Effects of Cellulose Nanocrystal, Cellulose Nanofiber, and Microfibrillated Cellulose in Starch Composites10.1002/pc.24685 ↗
40. Famiglietti, M., Zannini, D., Turco, R., and Mariniello, L. (2023). Mechanical, Barrier and Thermal Properties of Amylose-Argan Proteins-Based Bioplastics in the Presence of Transglutaminase. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 24.10.3390/ijms24043405 ↗
41. Improved Properties of Corn Starch-Based Bio-Nanocomposite Film with Different Types of Plasticizers Reinforced by Nanocrystalline Cellulose10.1080/10942912.2022.2052085 ↗
42. Nanocellulose in Packaging: Advances in Barrier Layer Technologies10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.11.012 ↗
43. Mirpoor, S.F., Giosafatto, C.V.L., Mariniello, L., D’Agostino, A., D’Agostino, M., Cammarota, M., Schiraldi, C., and Porta, R. (2022). Argan (Argania spinosa L.) Seed Oil Cake as a Potential Source of Protein-Based Film Matrix for Pharmaco-Cosmetic Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23.10.3390/ijms23158478 ↗
44. Nanocellulose as a Natural Source for Groundbreaking Applications in Materials Science: Today’s State10.1016/j.mattod.2018.02.001 ↗
45. The Effects of Cellulose Nanocrystal and Cellulose Nanofiber on the Properties of Pumpkin Starch-Based Composite Films10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.09.187 ↗
46. Tan, Z., Yi, Y., Wang, H., Zhou, W., Yang, Y., and Wang, C. (2016). Physical and Degradable Properties of Mulching Films Prepared from Natural Fibers and Biodegradable Polymers. Appl. Sci., 6.10.3390/app6050147 ↗
47. Assessment of Aliphatic-Aromatic Copolyester Biodegradable Mulch Films. Part I: Field Study10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.10.074 ↗