journal article·2021-03-05Open access

Finite Element Analysis of Composite Repair for Damaged Steel Pipeline

Jiaqi Chen, Hao Wang, Milad Salemi, Perumalsamy N. Balaguru

Coatings· Volume 11· Issue 3

Abstract

Carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) matrix composite overwrap repair systems have been introduced and accepted as an alternative repair system for steel pipeline. This paper aimed to evaluate the mechanical behavior of damaged steel pipeline with CFRP repair using finite element (FE) analysis. Two different repair strategies, namely wrap repair and patch repair, were considered. The mechanical responses of pipeline with the composite repair system under the maximum allowable operating pressure (MAOP) was analyzed using the validated FE models. The design parameters of the CFRP repair system were analyzed, including patch/wrap size and thickness, defect size, interface bonding, and the material properties of the infill material. The results show that both the stress in the pipe wall and CFRP could be reduced by using a thicker CFRP. With the increase in patch size in the hoop direction, the maximum von Mises stress in the pipe wall generally decreased as the maximum hoop stress in the CFRP increased. The reinforcement of the CFRP repair system could be enhanced by using infill material with a higher elastic modulus. The CFRP patch tended to cause higher interface shear stress than CFRP wrap, but the shear stress could be reduced by using a thicker CFRP. Compared with the fully bonded condition, the frictional interface causes a decrease in hoop stress in the CFRP but an increase in von Mises stress in the steel. The study results indicate the feasibility of composite repair for damaged steel pipeline.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA

Funding

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. The effect of dents in pipelines—guidance in the pipeline defect assessment manual10.1016/j.ijpvp.2003.11.004 ↗
2. Dependence of Burst Strength on Crack Length of a Pipe with a Dent-Crack Defect10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000259 ↗
3. Probabilistic Model for Marine Corrosion of Steel for Structural Reliability Assessment10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:11(1484) ↗
4. Finite element implementation of a peridynamic pitting corrosion damage model10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.03.002 ↗
5. An advanced technique to predict time-dependent corrosion damage of onshore, offshore, nearshore and ship structures: Part I = generalisation10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2020.06.007 ↗
6. A time-variant corrosion wastage model for subsea gas pipelines
7. On the burst strength capacity of an aging subsea gas pipeline10.1115/1.4028041 ↗
8. Residual strength of corroded subsea pipelines subject to combined internal pressure and bending moment10.1080/17445302.2015.1037678 ↗
9. The effect of the width to length ratios of corrosion defects on the burst pressures of transmission pipe-lines10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.12.002 ↗
10. Pipeline failures in corrosive environments—A conceptual analysis of trends and effects10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.03.004 ↗
11. An extended engineering critical assessment for corrosion fatigue of subsea pipeline steels10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.11.012 ↗
12. Field experiments and FEM analysis of third-party damaged oil transmission pipe-line10.1016/j.engfailanal.2009.08.001 ↗
13. Full scale experimental analysis of stress states in sleeve repairs of gas pipelines10.1016/S0308-0161(00)00063-6 ↗
14. Weld failures in sleeve reinforcements of pipelines10.1016/S1350-6307(99)00049-7 ↗
15. 3D finite element modeling of in-service sleeve repair welding of gas pipelines10.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.09.002 ↗
16. Numerical analysis of the burn-through at in-service welding of 316 stainless steel pipeline10.1016/j.ijpvp.2013.03.002 ↗
17. Gas Pipeline Failure Caused by In-Service Welding10.1115/1.4031443 ↗
18. Analysis of a carbon composite overwrap pipeline repair system10.1016/j.ijpvp.2008.08.001 ↗
19. Finite-Element Modeling of a Damaged Pipeline Repaired Using the Wrap of a Composite Material10.1007/s11029-015-9504-9 ↗
20. Polymer-based composite repair system for severely corroded circumferential welds in steel pipes10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.08.001 ↗
21. Failure analysis of corroded pipe-lines reinforced with composite repair systems10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.10.007 ↗
22. Burst capacity of pipe under corrosion defects and repaired with thermosetting liner
23. Rehabilitation of corroded circular hollow sectional steel beam by CFRP patch
24. FRP materials for the rehabilitation of tubular steel structures, for underwater applications10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.05.029 ↗
25. Experimental analysis of metal-composite repair of floating offshore units (FPSO)10.1080/00218464.2016.1177514 ↗
26. Development and qualification of a new polymeric matrix laminated composite for pipe repair10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.091 ↗
27. Extending onshore pipeline repair to offshore steel risers with carbon—Fiber reinforced compo-sites10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.08.034 ↗
28. Compressive strain limits of composite repaired pipelines under combined loading states10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.12.001 ↗
29. Moisture effects on the thermal and creep performance of carbon fiber/epoxy compo-sites for structural pipeline repair10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.046 ↗
30. Ex-perimental and numerical study of steel pipe with part-wall defect reinforced with fibre glass sleeve10.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.12.008 ↗
31. Composite repair of pipelines, considering the effect of live pressure-analytical and numeri-cal models with respect to ISO/TS 24817 and ASME PCC-210.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.035 ↗
32. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2006). Repair of Pressure Equipment and Piping, ASME. ASME PCC-2-2006.
33. Analytical solution for stress, strain and plastic instability of pressurized pipes with volumetric flaws10.1016/j.ijpvp.2011.11.002 ↗
34. Comparison of Patch and Fully Encircled Bonded Composite Repair
35. Repair of small damages in steel pipes with composite patches10.1002/mawe.201600526 ↗
36. ASTM (2018). Standard Specification for Seamless Carbon Steel Pipe for high-Temperature Service. ASTM C1754-12, ASTM.
37. Strengthening Steel Structures and Bridges with High-Modulus Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymers Resin Selection and Scaled Monopole Behavior10.3141/1892-25 ↗
38. ASTM (2019). Standard Test Method for Apparent Shear Strength of Single-Lap-Joint Adhesively Bonded Metal Specimens by Tension Loading (Metal-to-Metal). ASTM D1002-10, ASTM.
39. Balaguru, P.N., and Lee, K.W. (2001). Effectiveness of High Strength Composites as Structural and Protective Coating for Structural El-Ements, TRB. Final Report NETCR 28.
40. A systematic approach to pipe-in-pipe installation analysis10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.07.004 ↗