Accumulation of CO and other fuel impurities in the anode recirculation loop of a fuel cell: A zero dimensional transient model
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The use of impure hydrogen in polymer electrolyte fuel cells could potentially improve the economics of their implementation. Here, a zero-dimensional transient model is formulated to simulate the operational effects of fuel impurities such as CH4 and CO within an anode recirculation loop with a continuous small bleed. Inert impurities are observed to accumulate until a steady state concentration is reached where entry and exit rates are balanced, for instance resulting in a 20-fold increase in concentration with a 5% bleed rate. With CO, electro-oxidation of adsorbed CO also contributes to CO removal in addition to that lost by bleed. The overall energy conversion efficiency is found to be limited to ~60% of the pure hydrogen value without further mitigation for CO impurity levels of 10–80 ppm. If pulsed oxidation is used as a mitigation method, the efficiency can be improved to ~90% of the pure hydrogen value. When air bleed is used as a mitigation method, accumulation of nitrogen limits the efficiency to about 80% of pure hydrogen. While oxygen cross-over from the cathode can prevent CO accumulation when the fuel contains low levels of CO (~1 ppm), it has minimal effect at higher CO concentrations (>10 ppm).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Meyers · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2006 · 15310.1149/1.2203811 ↗
2. Tang · J. Power Sources · 2006 · 158 · 130610.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.10.059 ↗
3. Anderson · J. Power Sources · 2010 · 195 · 453110.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.12.123 ↗
4. Lee · Electrochim. Acta · 1999 · 44 · 328310.1016/S0013-4686(99)00052-3 ↗
5. Karimäki · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2011 · 3610.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.04.230 ↗
6. Nikiforow · J. Power Sources · 2013 · 238 · 33610.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.11.153 ↗
7. Chen · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2013 · 38 · 509210.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.02.022 ↗
8. Matsuura · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2013 · 3810.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.06.096 ↗
9. Ahluwalia · J. Power Sources · 2007 · 171 · 6310.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.01.032 ↗
10. Promislow · J. Power Sources · 2011 · 19610.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.08.070 ↗
11. Papadias · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2009 · 34 · 602110.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.06.026 ↗
12. Bender · J. Power Sources · 2013 · 228 · 15910.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.11.062 ↗
13. Matsuda · J. Power Sources · 2016 · 318 · 110.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.104 ↗
14. “HyCoRA – review on the impact of impurities on PEMFC and analytical methods for hydrogen
15. El Hannach · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2019 · 44 · 857510.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.027 ↗
16. Miller
17. Sarma · 2020
18. Pérez · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 258 · 12210.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.016 ↗
19. Koski · Fuel Cell. · 2015 · 15 · 49410.1002/fuce.201400102 ↗
20. Matsuda · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 16710.1149/1945-7111/ab732c ↗
21. Bhatia · Electrochim. Acta · 2004 · 49 · 233310.1016/j.electacta.2004.01.014 ↗
22. Zhang · 2004
23. Zhang · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2002 · 149 · A142310.1149/1.1511752 ↗
24. Zhang · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2004 · 151 · A68910.1149/1.1688795 ↗
25. Farrell · J. Power Sources · 2007 · 171 · 28210.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.07.006 ↗
26. Hanke-Rauschenbach · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2009 · 156 · B126710.1149/1.3196244 ↗
27. Gardner · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · F312310.1149/2.0191907jes ↗
28. Reshetenko · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 269 · 34410.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.146 ↗
29. Springer · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2001 · 148 · A1110.1149/1.1344516 ↗
30. Gasteiger · J. Phys. Chem. · 1995 · 99 · 829010.1021/j100020a063 ↗
31. Gasteiger · J. Phys. Chem. · 1995 · 99 · 1675710.1021/j100045a042 ↗
32. Fuel Cell Thermodynamics
33. Sarma · J. Power Sources · 2020 · 46810.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228352 ↗
34. Gottesfeld · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1988 · 135 · 265110.1149/1.2095401 ↗
35. Gottesfeld S., (1990) US Patent 4,910,099.
36. Carrette · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2000 · 3 · 32010.1039/b005843m ↗
37. Sung · J. Power Sources · 2010 · 195 · 163010.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.09.062 ↗
38. Lim · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164
39. Bender · J. Power Sources · 2013 · 228 · 15910.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.11.062 ↗