journal article·2022-12-08Open access

Adhesion in Bitumen/Aggregate System: Adhesion Mechanism and Test Methods

Katarzyna Pstrowska, Volodymyr Gunka, Iurii Sidun, Yuriy Demchuk, Nataliya Vytrykush, Marek Kułażyński, Michael Bratychak

Coatings· Volume 12· Issue 12

Abstract

A literature review of the five main theories describing the interaction mechanisms in the bitumen/aggregate system was conducted: theory of weak boundary layers, mechanical theory, electrostatic theory, chemical bonding theory, and thermodynamic theory (adsorption theory). The adhesion assessment methods in the bitumen/aggregate system are described, which can be divided into three main groups: determination of adhesion forces for bitumen with different materials, determination of bitumen resistance to the exfoliating action of water with different materials, and determination of adhesion as a fundamental value (contact angle measurements, interfacial fracture energy, adsorption capacity and others). It is proposed to evaluate the quality of adhesive interaction in the bitumen/aggregate system in two stages. The authors recommend using the adhesion determination methods for these two stages from the second group of methods the determination of bitumen resistance to the exfoliating action of water with different materials. In the first stage, the adhesion in the bitumen/aggregate system is determined by an accelerated technique in which the used bitumen binder and mineral material are considered as test materials. After the first stage, there are positive results in the second tests on compacted mixtures (indirect tensile strength test, Modified Lottman indirect tension test, immersion-compression test, and Hamburg wheel tracking test).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Advanced Materials Technologies, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 7/9 Gdańska Street, 50-344 Wroclaw, Poland

Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Lviv Polytechnic National University, 12 Bandera Street, 79013 Lviv, Ukraine

Institute of Building and Environmental Engineering, Lviv Polytechnic National University, 12 Bandera Street, 79013 Lviv, Ukraine

Viacheslav Chornovil Institute of Sustainable Development, Lviv Polytechnic National University, 12 Bandera Street, 79013 Lviv, Ukraine

Innovation and Implementation Company Ekomotor Ltd., 1A Wyścigowa Street, 53-011 Wroclaw, Poland

Funding

the National Research Foundation of Ukraine, Kyiv · the Ministry of Science and Higher Education Republic of Poland · the Faculty of Chemistry of Wrocław University of Science and Technology

References (93)

Show source-provided references
1. Comprehensive review on the transport and reaction of oxygen and moisture towards coupled oxidative ageing and moisture damage of bitumen10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122632 ↗
2. Oliviero Rossi, C., Teltayev, B., and Angelico, R. (2017). Adhesion promoters in bituminous road materials: A review. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7050524 ↗
3. Nanoscale evaluation of moisture damage in polymer modified asphalts10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000072 ↗
4. Use of adhesion promoters in asphalt mixtures10.2478/sjce-2018-0003 ↗
5. Effect of filler on the bitumen-aggregate adhesion in asphalt mix10.1080/10298436.2018.1549325 ↗
6. Adhesion Theories in Wood Adhesive Bonding10.1002/9781119162346.ch5 ↗
7. A synthesis of theories and mechanisms of bitumen-aggregate adhesion including recent advances in quantifying the effects of water
8. Effects of moisture damage on asphalt mixtures
9. and Schultz, J.M. (1994). Theories and mechanisms of adhesion. Handbook of Adhesive Technology, Marcel Dekker, Inc.
10. Interface Bonding Mechanism of Recycled Asphalt Mixture
11. Little, D.N., and Jones, D.R. (2003). Chemical and mechanical processes of moisture damage in hot-mix asphalt pavements. Moisture Sensitivity of Asphalt Pavements, The National Academies Press.
12. On adhesives and adhesive action10.1021/j150248a008 ↗
13. Plancher, H., Dorrence, S.M., and Petersen, J.C. (1977). Identification of Chemical Types in Asphalts Strongly Adsorbed at the Asphalt-Aggregate Interface and Their Relative Displacement by Water [Moisture Damage to Roads], Energy Research and Development Administration. No. CONF-770216-1.
14. Curtis, C.W., Ensley, K., and Epps, J. (1993). Fundamental Properties of Asphalt-Aggregate Interactions Including Adhesion and Absorption, Strategic Highway Research Program. No. SHRP-A-341.
15. Adsorption and thermal desorption behaviour of asphalt-like functionalities on silica10.1260/0263617001493729 ↗
16. Wistuba, M.P., Grothe, H., Grönniger, J., and Handle, F. (2012, January 13–15). Adhesion of bitumen: Screening and evaluating laboratory testing techniques. Proceedings of the 5th Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress, Istanbul, Turkey.
17. Taylor, M.A., and Khosla, N.P. (1983). Stripping of Asphalt Pavements: State of the Art (Discussion, Closure), Transportation Research Board. No. 911.
18. Comparative evaluation of the bitumen binders adhesion by the methods normalized by national standards of Ukraine10.30977/BUL.2219-5548.2019.86.1.202 ↗
19. State of the art of methods for assessing the adhesion of bitumen to mineral aggregates10.30977/BUL.2219-5548.2019.85.0.73 ↗
20. Examination of moisture sensitivity of aggregate-bitumen bonding strength using loose asphalt mixture and physico-chemical surface energy property tests10.1080/10298436.2013.855312 ↗
21. Aranowski, R., Wojewódka, P., and Błażejowski, K. (2014). Determination of binder-aggregate adhesion by contact angle measurement. Asphalt Pavements, CRC Press.
22. Development of a pressurized blister test for interface characterization of aggregate highly polymerized bituminous materials10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000222 ↗
23. State of the art report on moisture sensitivity test methods for bituminous pavement materials10.1080/14680629.2002.9689930 ↗
24. (2015). Standard Method of Test for Determining Asphalt Binder Bond Strength by Means of the Binder Bond Strength (BBS) Test (Standard No. AASHTO TP 91).
25. Using a modified asphalt bond strength test to investigate the properties of asphalt binders with poly ethylene wax-based warm mix asphalt additive10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.08.004 ↗
26. Adhesive and Cohesive Properties of Asphalt-Aggregate Systems Subjected to Moisture Damage10.1080/14680629.2010.9690325 ↗
27. The development of a novel test method to assess the durability of asphalt road–pavement materials10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.10.013 ↗
28. (2021). Surface Dressing—Test Methods—Part 3: Determination of Binder Aggregate Adhesivity by the Vialit Plate Shock Test Method (Standard No. EN 12272-3).
29. Adhesion of bituminous binders with aggregates in the context of surface dressing technology for road pavements treatment10.23939/jtbp2021.01.092 ↗
30. Zolotarev, V.A., Ageeva, E.N., and Zinchenko, V.N. (1997). Quantitative evaluation of bitumen’s adhesion by the method of its displacement by water. Mechanical Tests for Bituminous Materials–Recent Improvements and Future Prospects, A.A. Balkema.
31. Application of phenol-cresol-formaldehyde resin as an adhesion promoter for bitumen and asphalt concrete10.1080/14680629.2020.1808518 ↗
32. (1999). Viscous Petroleum Road Bitumens. Method for Determination of Adhesion to the Surface of the Glass and Stone Materials (Standard No. DSTU B V.2.7-81-98).
33. Effect of phenol-cresol-formaldehyde resin on adhesive and physico-mechanical properties of road bitumen10.23939/chcht12.04.456 ↗
34. Obtaining and use adhesive promoters to bitumen from the phenolic fraction of coal tar10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.103191 ↗
35. Demchuk, Y., Gunka, V., Sidun, I., and Solodkyy, S. (2020). Comparison of Bitumen Modified by Phenol Formaldehyde Resins Synthesized from Different Raw Materials. International Scientific Conference EcoComfort and Current Issues of Civil Engineering, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-57340-9_12 ↗
36. Polymer Modified Bitumen: Review10.23939/chcht10.04si.631 ↗
37. Oil and gas processing products to obtain polymers modified bitumen10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.05.001 ↗
38. Development of mathematical model and Identification of optimal conditions to obtain phenol-cresol-formaldehyde resin10.23939/chcht13.02.212 ↗
39. Chemical modification of road oil bitumens by formaldehyde
40. Wręczycki, J., Demchuk, Y., Bieliński, D.M., Bratychak, M., Gunka, V., Anyszka, R., and Gozdek, T. (2022). Bitumen Binders Modified with Sulfur/Organic Copolymers. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15051774 ↗
41. Pstrowska, K., Gunka, V., Prysiazhnyi, Y., Demchuk, Y., Hrynchuk, Y., Sidun, I., . Kułażyński, M., and Bratychak, M. (2022). Obtaining of Formaldehyde Modified Tars and Road Materials on Their Basis. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15165693 ↗
42. Production of Bitumen Modified with Low-Molecular Organic Compounds from Petroleum Residues. 1. Effect of Solvent Nature on the Properties of Petroleum Residues Modified with Folmaldehyde10.23939/chcht15.02.274 ↗
43. Production of Bitumen Modified with Low-Molecular Organic Compounds from Petroleum Residues. 2. Bitumen Modified with Maleic Anhydride10.23939/chcht15.03.443 ↗
44. Production of Bitumen Modified with Low-Molecular Organic Compounds from Petroleum Residues. 3. Tar Modified with Formaldehyde10.23939/chcht15.04.608 ↗
45. Production of Bitumen Modified with Low-Molecular Organic Compounds from Petroleum Residues.4. Determining the Optimal Condi-tions for Tar Modification with Formaldehyde and Properties of the Modified Products10.23939/chcht16.01.142 ↗
46. Production of Bitumen Modified with Low-Molecular Organic Compounds from Petroleum Residues. 5. Use of Maleic Anhydride for Foaming Bitumens10.23939/chcht16.02.295 ↗
47. Production of Bitumen Modified with Low-Molecular Organic Compounds from Petroleum Residues. 6. Temperature Effect on the Chemical Modification of Bitumen with Maleic Anhydride10.23939/chcht16.03.475 ↗
48. (2018). Bitumen and Bituminous Binders. Determination of Adhesion with Crushed Stone (Standard No. DSTU 8787:2018).
49. Solaimanian, M., Harvey, J., Tahmoressi, M., and Tandon, V. (2003). Test methods to predict moisture sensitivity of hot-mix asphalt pavements. Transportation Research Board National Seminar, Materials Science.
50. Williams, R.C., and Breakah, T.M. (2010). Evaluation of Hot Mix Asphalt Moisture Sensitivity Using the Nottingham Asphalt Test Equipment, Iowa. Dept. of Transportation. InTrans Project Reports.
51. Comparative study of moisture damage performance test10.1088/1757-899X/512/1/012008 ↗
52. (2020). Bituminous Mixtures—Test Methods—Part 11: Determination of the Affinity between Aggregate and Bitumen (Standard No. EN 12697-11).
53. (1984). Standard Specification for Coating and Stripping of Bitumen-Aggregate Mixtures (Standard No. AASHTO T182).
54. Kennedy, T.W., Roberts, F.L., and Anagnos, J.N. (1984). Texas Boiling Test for Evaluating Moisture Susceptibility of Asphalt Mixtures, Center for Transportation Research, Bureau of Engineering Research, University of Texas at Austin.
55. (2012). Standard Practice for Effect of Water on Bituminous-Coated Aggregate Using Boiling Water (Standard No. ASTM D3625).
56. Cuciniello, G., and Bahia, H.U. (2015, January 6–8). Using the boiling test to evaluate effects of mixing temperatures on quality of aggregate coating. Proceedings of the 3rd Middle East Society of Asphalt Technologists (MESAT), Conference American University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
57. (1986). The Determination of the Adhesion of Bituminous Binder to Stone Aggregate by Means of the Chemical Immersion Test (Riedel Weber) (Standard No. Method B11).
58. Solaimanian, M.C., Manke, P.G., and O’bannon, C.E. (1974, January 21–25). Quantitative evaluation of stripping by the surface reaction test. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Highway Research Board, Washington, DC, USA. Transportation Research Record; No. 517.
59. Use of image analysis for the evaluation of rolling bottle tests results10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.11.003 ↗
60. Isacsson, U., and Jörgensen, T. (1987). Laboratory Methods for Determination of the Water Susceptibility of Bituminous Pavements, Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI). Experience Gained in the Nordic Countries; VTI rapport 324 A.
61. Adhesion in bitumen-aggregate-systems: New technique for automated interpretation of rolling bottle tests10.1080/14680629.2010.9690311 ↗
62. Evaluation of different test methods for bitumen adhesion properties10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.339 ↗
63. (2014). Method of Test for Film Stripping (Standard No. California Test 302).
64. Evaluation of results of dynamic immersion test using digital image analysis10.7855/IJHE.2016.18.4.047 ↗
65. (2018). Bituminous Mixtures—Test Methods—Part 12: Determination of the Water Sensitivity of Bituminous Specimens (Standard No. EN 12697-12).
66. Lottman, R.P. (1982). Laboratory Test Methods for Predicting Moisture-Induced Damage to Asphalt Concrete, Transportation Research Record.
67. (2015). Standard Method of Test for Resistance of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures to Moisture-Induced Damage (Standard No. AASHTO T 283-14).
68. Tahmoressi, M. (1996). Prediction of moisture-induced damage to bituminous paving materials using molded specimens. Evaluation of Test Method TEX-531-C, Texas Department of Transportation. DHT-38.
69. Tunnicliff, D.G., and Root, R.E. (1984). Use of Antistripping Additives in Asphaltic Concrete Mixtures Laboratory Phase, Transportation Research Board, Laboratory Phase.
70. (2014). Standard Test Method for Effect of Moisture on Asphalt Concrete Paving Mixtures (Standard No. ASTM D4867/D4867M-09).
71. (2007). Standard Test Method for Effect of Water on Compressive Strength of Compacted Bituminous Mixtures (Standard No. ASTM D 1075).
72. (2002). Standard Method of Test for Effect of Water on Compressive Strength of Compacted Bituminous Mixtures (Standard No. AASHTO T165-02).
73. The experimental study on the resistance of asphalt concrete with Butonic bitumen against water saturation
74. Kennedy, T.W., Roberts, F.L., Lee, K.W., and Anagnos, J.N. (1982). Texas Freeze-Thaw Pedestal Test for Evaluating Moisture Susceptibility for Asphalt Mixtures, Center for Highway Research, University of Texas at Austin.
75. Plancher, H., Miyake, G., Venable, R.L., and Petersen, J.C. (1980). A Simple Laboratory Test to Indicate the Susceptibility of Asphalt-Aggregate Mixtures to Moisture Damage during Repeated Freeze-Thaw Cycling, Canadian Technical Asphalt Association.
76. Nicholls, J.C., Prime, J., Meitei, B., and Lowe, A. (2011). Review of Saturation Ageing Tensile Stiffness (SATS) test for use in Ireland, TRL. PPR 547.
77. (2020). Bituminous Mixtures—Test Methods for Hot Mix Asphalt—Part 45: Saturation Ageing Tensile Stiffness (SATS) Conditioning Test (Standard No. EN 12697-45).
78. Comparison of several moisture susceptibility tests to pavements of known field performance (with discussion and closure)
79. Investigation of the rutting performance of various modified asphalt mixtures using the Hamburg Wheel-Tracking Device test and Multiple Stress Creep Recovery test10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.015 ↗
80. Evaluation of Hamburg wheel-tracking device test with laboratory and field performance data10.1177/0361198106197000103 ↗
81. (2019). Standard Method of Test for Hamburg Wheel-Track Testing of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures (Standard No. AASHTO T324).
82. (2020). Bituminous Mixtures—Test Methods for Hot Mix Asphalt—Part 22: Wheel Tracking (Standard No. EN 12697-22).
83. Wetting and interfacial properties of bitumen at room temperature, and the role of naturally present ionic molecules10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125575 ↗
84. Interfacial processes in textile materials: Relevance to adhesion10.1163/016942409X12538865055917 ↗
85. Study of the stability of bitumen emulsions by application of DLVO theory10.1016/S0927-7757(98)00406-3 ↗
86. Surface free energy evaluation of well-ordered Langmuir–Blodgett surfaces: Comparison of different approaches10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.10.025 ↗
87. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers10.1002/app.1969.070130815 ↗
88. Study on the adhesion property between asphalt binder and aggregate: A state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119474 ↗
89. Low-bond axisymmetric drop shape analysis for surface tension and contact angle measurements of sessile drops10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.04.040 ↗
90. Computerised measurement of contact angles
91. Labib, M.E., Hefer, A.W., and Little, D.N. (2007, January 20–22). Surface chemistry at the bitumen-aggregate interface. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Characterisation of Pavement and Soil Engineering Material, Athens, Greece.
92. Nomlala, B., Mthembu, Z., Mturi, G., and Hefer, A. (2022, January 4–7). Bitumen-aggregate adhesion: A predictive study based on zeta potential analysis using the streaming potential technique. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Southern African Transport Conference, Pretoria, South Africa.
93. Walsh, G., Jamieson, I., Thornton, J., and O’Mahony, M. (1996, January 7–10). A modified SHRP net adsorption test. Proceedings of the Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress, Strasbourg, France.