Assessing of the Road Pavement Roughness by Means of LiDAR Technology
Source abstract
Abstract
The assessment of the road roughness conditions plays an important role to ensure the required performances related to road safety and ride comfort, furthermore providing a tool for pavement maintenance and rehabilitation planning. In this work, the authors compared the roughness index (International Roughness Index, IRI) derived from high speed inertial profilometer with two other roughness indices, one dynamic and one geometric computed on a digital elevation model (DEM) built by using mobile laser scanner (MLS) data. The MLS data were acquired on an extra-urban road section and interpolated on the nodes of a DEM with a curvilinear abscissa, coinciding with the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) track of the profilometer. To estimate the grid cell elevation, we applied two interpolation methods, ordinary kriging (OK) and inverse distance weighting (IDW), over the same data. The roughness values computed on the surface of the DEM showed a similar trend and a high correlation with those acquired by the profilometer, higher for the dynamic index than for the geometric index. The differences between the IRI values by profilometer and those computed on the DEM were small enough not to significantly affect the judgments on the analyzed sections. Moreover, the road sub-sections derived from profilometer measure that were classified as critical coincided with those derived from light detection and ranging (LiDAR) surveys. The proposed method can be used to perform a network-level analysis. In addition, to evaluate the effects of vibrations on human comfort, we input the DEMs into a dynamic simulation software in order to compute the vertical accelerations, as specified in the UNI ISO 2631 standard. The values obtained were in line and correlated with those inferred from the standard methodology for profilometer measures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Engineering, University of Roma TRE, 00146 Rome, Italy
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy
Sina Spa, 20135 Milano, Italy
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. Szénási, S., Kertész, G., Felde, I., and Nádai, L. (2020). Statistical accident analysis supporting the control of autonomous vehicles. J. Comput. Methods Sci. Eng., 1–13.10.3233/JCM-204186 ↗
2. Incorporating road safety into pavement management10.3141/1699-01 ↗
3. ISO (2002). Characterization of Pavement Texture by use of Surface Profiles—Part 2: Terminology and Basic Requirements Related to Pavement Texture Profile Analysis, International Organization for Standardization. ISO 13473-2.
4. ISO (2002). Characterization of Pavement Texture by Use of Surface Profiles—Part 3: Specification and Classification of Profilometers, International Organization for Standardization. ISO 13473-3.
5. ASTM (2020). Standard Terminology Relating to Vehicle-Pavement Systems, ASTM International. E867-06.
6. Gillespie, T.D.P., Queiroz, C.A.V., and Sayers, M.W. (1986). The Internationa Road Roughness Experiment: Establishing Correlation and a Calibration Standard for Measurements, World Bank.
7. Sayers, M.W. On the calculation of international roughness index from longitudinal road profile. Transp. Res. Rec., 1995.
8. Gillespie, T.D., Sayers, M.W., and Segal, L. (1980). Calibration of Response-Type Road Roughness Measuring Systems: NCHRP Rep. 228, Transportation Research Board.
9. Factors contributing to differences between profiler and the international roughness index10.1177/0361198106197400110 ↗
10. UNI EN (2019). Road and Airfield Surface Characteristics—Test Methods—Part 5: Determination of Longitudinal Unevenness Indices, European Committee for Standardization. EN 13036-5.
11. ASTM (2017). Standard Test Method for Measuring Road Roughness by Static Level Method, ASTM International. E1364-95.
12. UNI EN (2019). Road and Airfield Surface Characteristics—Test Methods—Part 7: Irregularity Measurement of Pavement Course: The Straightedge Test, European Committee for Standardization. EN 13036-7.
13. Correlations and analyses of longitudinal roughness indices10.1080/14680629.2009.9690202 ↗
14. Mubaraki, M., and Sallam, H. (2020). The most effective index for pavement management of urban major roads at a network level. Arab. J. Sci. Eng.10.1007/s13369-020-05122-0 ↗
15. Relationship between international roughness index and straightedge index10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000417 ↗
16. Laboratory method for inertial profiler verification10.1080/02533839.2010.9671649 ↗
17. An alternative approach to pavement roughness evaluation10.1080/10298430600949894 ↗
18. McGhee, K.K. (2000). Quality Assurance of Road Roughness Measurement, Virginia Transportation Research Council.
19. ASTM (2018). Standard Test Method for Measuring the Longitudinal Profile of Traveled Surfaces with an Accelerometer-Established Inertial Profiling Reference, ASTM International. E950/E950M-09.
20. International roughness index specifications around the world10.1080/14680629.2016.1197144 ↗
21. Sayers, W.M., and Karamihas, S.M. (1998). The Little Book of Profiling: Basic Information about Measuring and Interpreting Road Profiles, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
22. Terrestrial laser scanner for the analysis of airport pavement geometry10.1080/10298436.2017.1309194 ↗
23. Barbarella, M., D’Amico, F., De Blasiis, M., Di Benedetto, A., and Fiani, M. (2018). Use of terrestrial laser scanner for rigid airport pavement management. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18010044 ↗
24. De Blasiis, M.R., Di Benedetto, A., Fiani, M., and Garozzo, M. (2019, January 17–19). In Assessing the Effect of Pavement Distresses by Means of Lidar Technology. Proceedings of the ASCE International Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering 2019American Society of Civil Engineers, Atlanta, Georgia.10.1061/9780784482445.019 ↗
25. De Blasiis, M.R., Di Benedetto, A., and Fiani, M. (2020). Mobile laser scanning data for the evaluation of pavement surface distress. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12060942 ↗
26. Determination of pavement elevations by the 3d scanning system and its verification10.14311/gi.12.9 ↗
27. Chin, A. (2012). Paving the Way for Terrestrial Laser Scanning Assessment of Road Quality. [Master’s Thesis, Oregon State University].
28. Spatial pavement roughness from stationary laser scanning10.1080/10298436.2015.1065403 ↗
29. De Blasiis, M.R., Di Benedetto, A., Fiani, M., and Garozzo, M. (2017, January 12–16). Characterization of Road Surface by Means of Laser Scanner Technologies, Pavement and Asset Management. Proceedings of the World Conference on Pavement and Asset Management (WCPAM 2017), Baveno, Italy.
30. Chang, J., Chang, K., and Chen, D. (2006). Application of 3d laser scanning on measuring pavement roughness. J. Test. Eval., 34.10.1520/JTE13178 ↗
31. Use of mobile lidar in road information inventory: A review10.1080/19479832.2016.1188860 ↗
32. Lynx mobile mapper for surveying city centers and highways
33. Kinematic terrestrial light-detection and ranging system for scanning10.3141/2105-17 ↗
34. Olsen, M.J., Knodler, M.A., Squellati, A., Tuss, H., Williams, K., Hurwitz, D., Reedy, M., Persi, F., Glennie, C., and Roe, G.V. (2013). Guidelines for the Use of Mobile Lidar in Transportation Applications, TRB. TRB NCHRP Final Report 748.
35. Yen, K.S., Ravani, B., and Lasky, T.A. (2011). Lidar for Data Efficiency, AHMCT Research Center.
36. Mendenhall, S. (2011). Mobile Laser Scanning—Caltrans Evaluates the Technology’s Costs and Benefits, ZweigWhite. CE News.
37. Synthesis of Transportation Applications of Mobile Lidar10.3390/rs5094652 ↗
38. Alhasan, A., Younkin, K., and White, D. (2015). Comparison of Roadway Roughness Derived from Lidar and Sfm 3d Point Clouds, Iowa State University. Trans Project Report.
39. Alhasan, A. (2015). Quantifying Road Roughness: Multiresolution and Near Real-Time Analysis. [Ph.D. Thesis, Iowa State University].
40. An algorithm for automated estimation of road roughness from mobile laser scanning data10.1111/phor.12090 ↗
41. An automated road roughness detection from mobile laser scanning data10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-W1-91-2017 ↗
42. Automated extraction of expressway road surface from mobile laser scanning data10.1007/s11771-020-4420-0 ↗
43. Fernando, E.G., and Walker, R.S. (2013). Impact of Changes in Profile Measurement Technology on QA Testing of Pavement Smoothness: Project Summary, A & M Transportation Institute.
44. Comparative testing of lasers for ride quality measurement on hot-mix asphalt pavements10.3141/2457-03 ↗
45. Road profiles, vehicle dynamics, and human judgment of serviceability of roads: Spectral frequency domain analysis10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1998)124:2(106) ↗
46. Road profile, vehicle dynamics, and ride quality rating10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1999)125:2(123) ↗
47. Fuentes, L., Camargo, R., Martínez-Arguelles, G., Komba, J.J., Naik, B., and Walubita, L.F. (2019). Pavement serviceability evaluation using whole body vibration techniques: A case study for urban roads. Int. J. Pavement Eng., 1–12.10.1080/10298436.2019.1672872 ↗
48. Iri threshold values based on riding comfort10.1061/JPEODX.0000144 ↗
49. Varunjikar, T., Vemulapalli, P., and Brennan, S. Multi-Body Vehicle Dynamics Simulation based on Measured 3d Terrain Data. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Road Safety and Simulation, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 14–16 September 2011.
50. Suspension settings for optimal ride comfort of off-road vehicles travelling on roads with different roughness and speeds10.1016/j.jterra.2006.05.002 ↗
51. Eralta, A.O., de Oliveira, A.N., Campos, C.G., Neto, R.T.C., and Caldeira, A.B. (2017). Ride Comfort Analysis of an Awd Vehicle Travelling on Different Types of Pavements, SAE. SAE Technical Paper 2017-36-0384.10.4271/2017-36-0384 ↗
52. Chandramohan, N.K., Gunasekar, R., Sethubalan, B., Kumar, V., and Dineshkumar, V. (2018). Measurement of Vibration in Different Parts of the Two Wheeler and its Harmfulness to Human Body, International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering Research and Development (IJMPERD) Volume: ISSN(P): 2249-6890; ISSN(E): 2249-8001 Special Issue 7; TJPRC Pvt. Ltd.
53. Finding the right pixel size10.1016/j.cageo.2005.11.008 ↗
54. Wackernagel, H. (2003). Variogram cloud. Multivariate Geostatistics: An Introduction with Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-05294-5 ↗
55. Burrough, P.A., McDonnell, R., McDonnell, R.A., and Lloyd, C.D. (2015). Principles of Geographical Information Systems, Oxford University Press.
56. Pham, T., Huynh Van, C., Tran, P., Chau, T., and Đức, N. Impact of Power Value in Idw Interpolation Method on Accuracy of the Soil Organic Matter (Som) Mapping. Proceedings of the International Conference on GeoInformatics for Spatial-Infrastructure Development in Earth & Allied Sciences (GIS-IDEAS), Hanoi, Vietnam, 4–6 December 2008.
57. Investigating the effects of changing the idw power on the quality of the generated digital elevation models
58. GitHub Inc. (2020, January 10). CloudCompare 2.8.1 User Manual; Open Source Project. Available online: http://www.cloudcompare.org/doc/qCC/CloudCompare%20v2.6.1%20-%20User%20manual.pdf.
59. Karamihas, S.M., Institute, U.o.M.T.R., and Administration, U.S.F.H. (2005). Critical Profiler Accuracy Requirements, University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute.
60. ASTM (2015). Standard Practice for Computing International Roughness Index of Roads from Longitudinal Profile Measurements, ASTM International. E1926-08.
61. ISO (1997). Mechanical Vibration and Shock—Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole-Body Vibration—Part 1: General Requirements, International Standardization Organization. ISO 2631-1.
62. Comparative analysis of spatial interpolation methods: An experimental study
63. Real-time multi-gnss single-frequency precise point positioning10.1007/s10291-017-0653-2 ↗
64. Katu, U., Desavale, R., and Kanai, R. (2003, January 18–19). Effect of Vehicle Vibration on Human Body—Rit Experience. Proceedings of the 11th National Conference on Machines and Mechanisms, Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, India.