journal article·2020-10-24Open access

The Effect of the Laser Incidence Angle in the Surface of L-PBF Processed Parts

Sara Sendino, Marc Gardon, Fernando Lartategui, Silvia Martinez, Aitzol Lamikiz

Coatings· Volume 10· Issue 11

Abstract

The manufacture of multiple parts on the same platform is a common procedure in the Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) process. The main advantage is that the entire working volume of the machine is used and a greater number of parts are obtained, thus reducing inert gas volume, raw powder consumption, and manufacturing time. However, one of the main disadvantages of this method is the possible differences in quality and surface finish of the different parts manufactured on the same platform depending on their orientation and location, even if they are manufactured with the same process parameters and raw powder material. Throughout this study, these surface quality differences were studied, focusing on the variation of the surface roughness with the angle of incidence of the laser with respect to the platform. First, a characterization test was carried out to understand the behavior of the laser in the different areas of the platform. Then, the surface roughness, microstructure, and minimum thickness of vertical walls were analyzed in the different areas of the platform. These results were related to the angle of incidence of the laser. As it was observed, the laser is completely perpendicular only in the center of the platform, whilst at the border of the platform, due to the incidence angle, it melts an elliptical area, which affects the roughness and thickness of the manufactured part. The roughness increases from values of Sa = 5.489 μm in the central part of the platform to 27.473 μm at the outer borders while the thickness of the manufactured thin walls increases around 40 μm.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Aerospace Advance Manufacturing Research Center-CFAA, P. Tecnológico de Bizkaia 202, 48170 Zamudio, Spain

EMEA AM Applications Manager, Renishaw Ibérica, Carrer de la Recerca 7, 08850 Barcelona, Spain

UO Structures & Statics, ITP Aero, P. Tecnológico de Bizkaia 300, 48170 Zamudio, Spain

Funding

Spanish Ministry of Industry and Competitiveness

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Kik, T. (2020). Heat source models in numerical simulations of laser welding. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13112653 ↗
2. Landowski, M., Świerczyńska, A., Rogalski, G., and Fydrych, D. (2020). Autogenous fiber laser welding of 316L austenitic and 2304 lean duplex stainless steels. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13132930 ↗
3. Sahul, M., Tomčíková, E., Sahul, M., Pašák, M., Ludrovcová, B., and Hodúlová, E. (2020). Effect of disk laser beam offset on the microstructure and mechanical properties of copper—AISI 304 stainless steel dissimilar metals joints. Metals, 10.10.3390/met10101294 ↗
4. Fast laser cutting of thin metal10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.150 ↗
5. Guarino, S., Ponticelli, G.S., and Venettacci, S. (2020). Environmental assessment of selective laser melting compared with laser cutting of 316L stainless steel: A case study for flat washers’ production. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol.10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.08.004 ↗
6. Investigation on the mechanism of surface structure formation during laser remelting with modulated laser power on tool steel H1110.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146393 ↗
7. Effect of laser remelting on microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of Ti-35Nb-2Ta-3Zr alloy10.1016/j.matlet.2019.06.105 ↗
8. Laser-arc hybrid additive manufacturing of stainless steel with beam oscillation
9. Microstructure and mechanical properties of TA15-Ti2AlNb bimetallic structures by laser additive manufacturing10.1016/j.msea.2020.140019 ↗
10. Surface roughness analysis, modelling and prediction in selective laser melting10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.11.011 ↗
11. Li, B.-Q., Li, Z., Bai, P., Liu, B., and Kuai, Z. (2018). Research on surface roughness of AlSi10Mg parts fabricated by laser powder bed fusion. Metals, 8.10.3390/met8070524 ↗
12. Top surface and side roughness of Inconel 625 parts processed using selective laser melting10.1108/13552540910943397 ↗
13. Effect of surface roughness on corrosion fatigue performance of AlSi10Mg alloy produced by Selective Laser Melting (SLM)10.1016/j.matchar.2017.06.029 ↗
14. A time-saving and cost-effective method to process alloys by Laser Powder Bed Fusion
15. Spierings, A.B. (2018). Powder Spreadability and Characterization of Sc- and Zr-Modified Aluminium Alloys Processed by Selective Laser Melting, Quality Management System for Additive Manufacturing, in Institute of Machine Tools and Manufacturing, ETH Zurich.
16. Recent developments and opportunities in additive manufacturing of titanium-based matrix composites: A review10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2018.06.003 ↗
17. Cost-affordable, high-performance Ti–TiB composite for selective laser melting additive manufacturing10.1557/jmr.2019.389 ↗
18. Additive manufacturing of Cu–10Sn bronze10.1016/j.matlet.2015.05.076 ↗
19. Production of high strength Al85Nd8Ni5Co2 alloy by selective laser melting
20. Selective laser melting of carbon/AlSi10Mg composites: Microstructure, mechanical and electronical properties10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.12.126 ↗
21. The influence of heat accumulation on the surface roughness in powder-bed additive manufacturing10.1088/2051-672X/3/1/014003 ↗
22. Effect of process parameters on the surface roughness of overhanging structures in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.347 ↗
23. Jacobsmühlen, J., Kleszczynski, S., Ladewig, A., Witt, G., and Merhof, D. (2016, January 16–17). In-situ surface roughness measurement of laser beam melted parts—A feasibility study of layer image analysis. Proceedings of the Fraunhofer Direct Digital Manufacturing Conference (DDMC), Berlin, Germany.
24. Ansari, J., Nguyen, D.-S., and Park, H.S. (2019). Investigation of SLM process in terms of temperature distribution and melting pool size: Modeling and experimental approaches. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12081272 ↗
25. The influence of process parameters on vertical surface roughness of the AlSi10Mg parts fabricated by selective laser melting10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.10.015 ↗
26. Charles, A., Elkaseer, A., Thijs, L., Hagenmeyer, V., and Scholz, S. (2019). Effect of process parameters on the generated surface roughness of down-facing surfaces in selective laser melting. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9061256 ↗
27. The role of powder layer thickness on the quality of SLM printed parts10.1016/j.acme.2018.01.015 ↗
28. Kleszczynski, S., Ladewig, A., Friedberger, K., Jacobsmühlen, J.Z., Merhof, D., and Witt, G. (2018, January 13–15). Position dependency of surface roughness in parts from laser beam melting systems. Proceedings of the 26th Internation Solid Free Form Fabrication (SFF) Symposium, Austin, TX, USA.
29. Influence of the shielding gas flow on the removal of process by-products in the selective laser melting process
30. A study of the microstructural evolution during selective laser melting of Ti–6Al–4V10.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.004 ↗
31. Influence of particle morphology and size distribution on the powder flowability and laser powder bed fusion manufacturability of Ti–6Al–4V alloy
32. Influence of particle size distribution and morphology on the properties of the powder feedstock as well as of AlSi10Mg parts produced by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF)
33. Surface roughness in laser powder bed fusion—Interdependency of surface orientation and laser incidence
34. Impact of build envelope on the properties of additive manufactured parts from AlSi10Mg10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.08.050 ↗
35. (2016). ISO 25178 (2016) Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—Surface Texture: Areal, ISO Standard.
36. (2015). ASTM E407-07(2015) e1, Standard Practice for Microetching Metals and Alloys, ASTM International.
37. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis10.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗