Customized Therapeutic Surface Coatings for Dental Implants
Source abstract
Abstract
Dental implants are frequently used to support fixed or removable dental prostheses to replace missing teeth. The clinical success of titanium dental implants is owed to the exceptional biocompatibility and osseointegration with the bone. Therefore, the enhanced therapeutic effectiveness of dental implants had always been preferred. Several concepts for implant coating and local drug delivery had been developed during the last decades. A drug is generally released by diffusion-controlled, solvent-controlled, and chemical controlled methods. Although a range of surface modifications and coatings (antimicrobial, bioactive, therapeutic drugs) have been explored for dental implants, it is still a long way from designing sophisticated therapeutic implant surfaces to achieve the specific needs of dental patients. The present article reviews various interdisciplinary aspects of surface coatings on dental implants from the perspectives of biomaterials, coatings, drug release, and related therapeutic effects. Additionally, the various types of implant coatings, localized drug release from coatings, and how released agents influence the bone–implant surface interface characteristics are discussed. This paper also highlights several strategies for local drug delivery and their limitations in dental implant coatings as some of these concepts are yet to be applied in clinical settings due to the specific requirements of individual patients.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental materials and restorations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Al Madinah, Al Munawwarah 41311, Saudi Arabia
Department of Dental Materials, Islamic International Dental College, Riphah International University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
Adult Restorative Dentistry, Dental Biomaterials and Prosthodontics, Oman Dental College, Muscat 116, Oman
School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia Health Campus, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan 16150, Malaysia
Centre for Genetics and Inherited Diseases (CGID), Taibah University, Madinah AlMunawwarah 42318, Saudi Arabia
Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia
Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Implantology, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudia Arabia
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Implant diameter and length influence on survival: Interim results during the first 2 years of function of implants by a single manufacturer10.1097/ID.0b013e31829afac0 ↗
2. Implant dentistry and the concept of osseointegration: A historical perspective
3. Dental implant systems10.3390/ijms11041580 ↗
4. Current trends in dental implants10.5125/jkaoms.2014.40.2.50 ↗
5. Multidisciplinary approach to implants: A review
6. Misch, C.E. (2004). Dental Implant Prosthetics, Elsevier Health Sciences.
7. Babbush, C.A. (1991). Dental Implants: Principles and Practice, WB Saunders Company.
8. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success
9. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: Different types of dental implants
10. CAD-CAM implant-supported fixed complete dental prosthesis with titanium milled molars: A clinical report10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.029 ↗
11. Prospective evaluation of zirconia based tooth-and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: 3-year results10.1016/j.jdent.2014.10.011 ↗
12. Treatment with implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in patients with congenital and acquired neurologic disabilities: A prospective study10.11607/ijp.3511 ↗
13. Prosthodontic Maintenance of Fixed Implant Restorations vs. Implant Overdentures: A Systematic Review10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i45/90613 ↗
14. Osseointegrated titanium implants: Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man10.3109/17453678108991776 ↗
15. Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration10.1007/s005860100282 ↗
16. Nanostructured surfaces of dental implants10.3390/ijms14011918 ↗
17. Bioactivity and osseointegration of PEEK are inferior to those of titanium—A systematic review10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00072 ↗
18. Influence of implant geometry and surface characteristics on progressive osseointegration
19. A critical review of dental implant materials with an emphasis on titanium versus zirconia10.3390/ma8030932 ↗
20. Evaluation of Osseointegration around Tibial Implants in Rats by Ibandronate-Treated Nanotubular Ti-32Nb-5Zr Alloy10.4062/biomolther.2014.111 ↗
21. Osseointegration of titanium alloy and HA-coated implants in healthy and ovariectomized animals: A histomorphometric study10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01739.x ↗
22. An overview of the corrosion aspect of dental implants (titanium and its alloys)10.4103/0970-9290.49068 ↗
23. Dental implant materials: Commercially pure titanium and titanium alloys10.1111/j.1532-849X.1999.tb00006.x ↗
24. Processing and evaluation of bioactive coatings on polymeric implants10.1002/jbm.a.34557 ↗
25. Comparative soft and hard tissue responses to titanium and polymer healing abutments10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00102.1 ↗
26. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics10.1016/j.jpor.2015.10.001 ↗
27. Osseointegration of machined, injection moulded and oxygen plasma modified PEEK implants in a sheep model10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.12.056 ↗
28. PEEK dental implants: A review of the literature10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00002 ↗
29. A systematic review of the clinical survival of zirconia implants10.1007/s00784-016-1853-9 ↗
30. Zirconia dental implants: A literature review10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00079 ↗
31. Effect of Er: YAG, CO2 and diode laser irradiation on surface properties of zirconia endosseous dental implants10.1002/lsm.20614 ↗
32. Silicon Nitride (Si3N4) Implants: The Future of Dental Implantology?10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00146 ↗
33. Anti-infective and osteointegration properties of silicon nitride, poly (ether ether ketone), and titanium implants10.1016/j.actbio.2012.07.038 ↗
34. Mechanical properties, surface morphology and stability of a modified commercially pure high strength titanium alloy for dental implants10.1016/j.dental.2014.10.002 ↗
35. Mechanical and clinical properties of titanium and titanium-based alloys (Ti G2, Ti G4 cold worked nanostructured and Ti G5) for biomedical applications10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.07.016 ↗
36. Engineering biocompatible implant surfaces: Part I: Materials and surfaces10.1016/j.pmatsci.2012.09.001 ↗
37. Surface characteristics of dental implants: A review10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.007 ↗
38. Implant materials, design, and surface topographies: Their influence on osseointegration of dental implants
39. Implant materials, designs, and surface topographies: Their effect on osseointegration. A literature review
40. Biocompatibility of Ti-alloys for long-term implantation10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.11.014 ↗
41. Mechanical properties of biomedical titanium alloys10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00806-X ↗
42. Experiment study on fracture fixation with low rigidity titanium alloy10.1007/s10856-008-3372-y ↗
43. Titanium-Based Biomaterials for Preventing Stress Shielding between Implant Devices and Bone10.1155/2011/836587 ↗
44. Surface engineering for bone implants: A trend from passive to active surfaces10.3390/coatings2030095 ↗
45. Histomorphometric Evaluation of Alumina-Blasted/Acid-Etched and Thin Ion Beam-Deposited Bioceramic Surfaces: An Experimental Study in Dogs10.1016/j.joms.2008.08.021 ↗
46. The importance of surface roughness for implant incorporation10.1016/S0890-6955(97)00114-4 ↗
47. Improving osseointegration of dental implants10.1586/erd.09.74 ↗
48. Zafar, M.S., Farooq, I., Awais, M., Najeeb, S., Khurshid, Z., and Zohaib, S. (2019). Chapter 11-Bioactive Surface Coatings for Enhancing Osseointegration of Dental Implants. Biomed. Ther. Clin. Appl. Bioact. Glasses, 313–329.10.1016/B978-0-08-102196-5.00011-2 ↗
49. Kulkarni Aranya, A., Pushalkar, S., Zhao, M., LeGeros, R.Z., Zhang, Y., and Saxena, D. (2017). Antibacterial and bioactive coatings on titanium implant surfaces. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A.10.1002/jbm.a.36081 ↗
50. Bisphosphonate releasing dental implant surface coatings and osseointegration: A systematic review
51. Effect of implant design and bioactive glass coating on biomechanical properties of fiber-reinforced composite implants10.1111/eos.12133 ↗
52. Nano-hydroxyapatite-coated PEEK implants: A pilot study in rabbit bone10.1002/jbm.a.34358 ↗
53. Novel nanocomposite coating for dental implant applications in vitro and in vivo evaluation
54. Titanium oral implants: Surface characteristics, interface biology and clinical outcome10.1098/rsif.2010.0118.focus ↗
55. In vitro and in vivo investigation of bisphosphonate-loaded hydroxyapatite particles for peri-implant bone augmentation10.1002/term.2094 ↗
56. Synergistic effects of bisphosphonate and calcium phosphate nanoparticles on peri-implant bone responses in osteoporotic rats10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.069 ↗
57. A bisphosphonate-coating improves the fixation of metal implants in human bone. A randomized trial of dental implants10.1016/j.bone.2012.02.001 ↗
58. Chitosan coatings deliver antimicrobials from titanium implants: A preliminary study10.1097/ID.0b013e3182087ac4 ↗
59. Functionalisation of Ti6Al4V and hydroxyapatite surfaces with combined peptides based on KKLPDA and EEEEEEEE peptides10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.09.022 ↗
60. Antimicrobial dental implant functionalization strategies—A systematic review10.4012/dmj.2015-314 ↗
61. Mini-review: Antimicrobial peptides and enzymes as promising candidates to functionalize biomaterial surfaces10.1080/08927014.2014.889120 ↗
62. Stewart, S.A., Domínguez-Robles, J., Donnelly, R.F., and Larrañeta, E. (2018). Implantable polymeric drug delivery devices: Classification, manufacture, materials, and clinical applications. Polymers, 10.10.3390/polym10121379 ↗
63. Reservoir-based drug delivery systems utilizing microtechnology10.1016/j.addr.2012.02.005 ↗
64. Liang, J., Peng, X., Zhou, X., Zou, J., and Cheng, L. (2020). Emerging Applications of Drug Delivery Systems in Oral Infectious Diseases Prevention and Treatment. Molecules, 25.10.3390/molecules25030516 ↗
65. A comparative in vitro assessment of the drug release performance of pH-responsive polymers for ileo-colonic delivery10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.10.038 ↗
66. Coatings as the useful drug delivery system for the prevention of implant-related infections10.1186/s13018-018-0930-y ↗
67. New methods of drug delivery10.1126/science.2218494 ↗
68. Nanoporous inorganic membranes or coatings for sustained drug delivery in implantable devices10.1016/j.addr.2009.11.003 ↗
69. Mechanisms of drug release from advanced drug formulations such as polymeric-based drug-delivery systems and lipid nanoparticles10.1007/s40005-017-0320-1 ↗
70. Modeling of drug release from delivery systems based on hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC)10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.028 ↗
71. Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers10.1016/0378-5173(83)90064-9 ↗
72. Modeling of diffusion controlled drug delivery10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.10.006 ↗
73. Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles10.1016/S0928-0987(01)00095-1 ↗
74. Mathematical models in drug delivery: How modeling has shaped the way we design new drug delivery systems10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.06.041 ↗
75. Siepmann, J., Siegel, R.A., and Rathbone, M.J. (2012). Fundamentals and Applications of Controlled Release Drug Delivery, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-0881-9 ↗
76. Drug-eluting polymer implants in cancer therapy10.1517/17425247.5.7.775 ↗
77. Local drug delivery strategies for cancer treatment: Gels, nanoparticles, polymeric films, rods, and wafers10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.11.031 ↗
78. Tunable drug delivery using chemoselective functionalization of hydrogels10.1016/j.msec.2016.01.022 ↗
79. The role of drug–drug interactions in hydrogel delivery systems: Experimental and model study10.1002/cphc.201600069 ↗
80. Supramolecular hydrogels as drug delivery systems10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.02.006 ↗
81. Controlling drug release from titania nanotube arrays using polymer nanocarriers and biopolymer coating10.4236/jbnb.2011.225058 ↗
82. Creation of nanoporous TiO2 surface onto polyetheretherketone for effective immobilization and delivery of bone morphogenetic protein10.1002/jbm.a.34748 ↗
83. Progress in material design for biomedical applications10.1073/pnas.1516247112 ↗
84. Surfactant-based drug delivery systems for treating drug-resistant lung cancer10.3109/10717544.2014.935530 ↗
85. Drug releasing polymer thin films: New era of surface-mediated drug delivery10.1021/nn100634r ↗
86. Arterial paclitaxel distribution and deposition10.1161/01.RES.86.8.879 ↗
87. Encapsulation-free controlled release: Electrostatic adsorption eliminates the need for protein encapsulation in PLGA nanoparticles10.1126/sciadv.1600519 ↗
88. Smart linkers in polymer–drug conjugates for tumor-targeted delivery10.3109/1061186X.2015.1108324 ↗
89. The Taxus™ drug-eluting stent: A new paradigm in controlled drug delivery10.1016/j.addr.2006.01.023 ↗
90. Tunable growth factor delivery from injectable hydrogels for tissue engineering10.1021/ja210638x ↗
91. Orthogonal chemoselective assembly of hyaluronic acid networks and nanogels for drug delivery10.1021/ma400543u ↗
92. Polymer functionalization as a powerful tool to improve scaffold performances10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0367 ↗
93. Release profiles in drug-eluting stents: Issues and uncertainties10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.04.022 ↗
94. Controlled release of sirolimus from a multilayered PLGA stent matrix10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.07.016 ↗
95. Styrenic block copolymers for biomaterial and drug delivery applications10.1016/j.actbio.2004.09.004 ↗
96. A short-term (accelerated release) approach to evaluate peptide release from PLGA depot formulations10.1208/ps010307 ↗
97. Mechanism of drug release from poly(l-lactic acid) matrix containing acidic or neutral drugs10.1016/S0168-3659(99)00083-8 ↗
98. A bioresorbable, polylactide reservoir for diffusional and osmotically controlled drug delivery10.1208/pt010429 ↗
99. Study of the initial stages of drug release from a degradable matrix of poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide)10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00597-0 ↗
100. The effect of initial polymer morphology on the degradation and drug release from polyglycolide10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00376-3 ↗