journal article·2020-03-12Open access

Materials for Orthopedic Bioimplants: Modulating Degradation and Surface Modification Using Integrated Nanomaterials

Harbhajan Ahirwar, Yubin Zhou, Chinmaya Mahapatra, Seeram Ramakrishna, Prasoon Kumar, Himansu Sekhar Nanda

Coatings· Volume 10· Issue 3

Abstract

Significant research and development in the field of biomedical implants has evoked the scope to treat a broad range of orthopedic ailments that include fracture fixation, total bone replacement, joint arthrodesis, dental screws, and others. Importantly, the success of a bioimplant depends not only upon its bulk properties, but also on its surface properties that influence its interaction with the host tissue. Various approaches of surface modification such as coating of nanomaterial have been employed to enhance antibacterial activities of a bioimplant. The modified surface facilitates directed modulation of the host cellular behavior and grafting of cell-binding peptides, extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, and growth factors to further improve host acceptance of a bioimplant. These strategies showed promising results in orthopedics, e.g., improved bone repair and regeneration. However, the choice of materials, especially considering their degradation behavior and surface properties, plays a key role in long-term reliability and performance of bioimplants. Metallic biomaterials have evolved largely in terms of their bulk and surface properties including nano-structuring with nanomaterials to meet the requirements of new generation orthopedic bioimplants. In this review, we have discussed metals and metal alloys commonly used for manufacturing different orthopedic bioimplants and the biotic as well as abiotic factors affecting the failure and degradation of those bioimplants. The review also highlights the currently available nanomaterial-based surface modification technologies to augment the function and performance of these metallic bioimplants in a clinical setting.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Biomedical Engineering and Technology (BET) Laboratory, Discipline of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology Design and Manufacturing (IIITDM), Jabalpur-482005, MP, India

School of Pharmacy, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan 523808, China

Marine Medical Research Institute of Guangdong Zhanjiang, Guangdong Zhanjiang Marine Biomedical Research Institute, Zhanjiang 524023, China

Institute of Biomaterial Science and Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, 14513 Teltow, Germany

Centre for Nanofibers and Nanotechnology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Engineering Drive 3, Singapore 117587, Singapore

Department of Medical Devices, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research–Ahmadabad, Near Air force Station, Palaj, Gandhinagar-382355, Gujarat, India

Funding

Faculty Initiation Grant, Indian Institute of Information Technology Design and Manufacturing (IIITDM) Jabalpur-482005, MP, India · Guangdong Medical Research Foundation

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. State of the art of bioimplants manufacturing: Part I10.1007/s40436-017-0207-4 ↗
2. On osseointegration in relation to implant surfaces10.1111/cid.12742 ↗
3. Collagen microgel-assisted dexamethasone release from PLLA-collagen hybrid scaffolds of controlled pore structure for osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells10.1080/09205063.2014.938980 ↗
4. Mahapatra, C., Kim, J.-J., Lee, J.-H., Jin, G.-Z., Knowles, J.C., and Kim, H.-W. (2019). Differential chondro- and osteo-stimulation in three-dimensional porous scaffolds with different topological surfaces provides a design strategy for biphasic osteochondral engineering. J. Tissue Eng., 10.10.1177/2041731419826433 ↗
5. Corrosion and surface modification on biocompatible metals: A review10.1016/j.msec.2017.04.102 ↗
6. Surface treatments for controlling corrosion rate of biodegradable Mg and Mg-based alloy implants10.1088/1468-6996/16/5/053501 ↗
7. Antibacterial surface treatment for orthopaedic implants10.3390/ijms150813849 ↗
8. Bioabsorbable implants: Review of clinical experience in orthopedic surgery10.1023/B:ABME.0000007802.59936.fc ↗
9. Complications of hip fractures: A review10.5312/wjo.v5.i4.402 ↗
10. Laser deposited coatings of Co-Cr-Mo onto Ti-6Al-4V and SS316L substrates for biomedical applications10.1002/jbm.b.32921 ↗
11. Finite Element Analysis of Human Fractured Femur Bone Implantation with PMMA Thermoplastic Prosthetic Plate10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.190 ↗
12. Mechanical Strength Evaluation Analysis of Stainless Steel and Titanium Locking Plate for Femur Bone Fracture
13. Problem of Stress Shielding and Improvement to the Hip Implant Designs: A Review10.3923/jms.2007.460.467 ↗
14. Development of new metallic alloys for biomedical applications10.1016/j.actbio.2012.06.037 ↗
15. Corrosion aspects of metallic implants—An overview10.1002/maco.200804173 ↗
16. Corrosion of bio implants10.1007/BF02706450 ↗
17. Wooley, P.H., Nasser, S., and Fitzgerald, R.H. (1996). The immune response to implant materials in humans. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 63–70.10.1097/00003086-199605000-00008 ↗
18. Chemistry of Biomaterials: Future Prospects10.1016/j.cobme.2019.07.003 ↗
19. Complications Associated with Immunosuppressive Therapy and Their Management10.1002/j.1875-9114.1991.tb02641.x ↗
20. Prakasam, M., Locs, J., Salma-Ancane, K., Loca, D., Largeteau, A., and Berzina-Cimdina, L. (2017). Biodegradable Materials and Metallic Implants-A Review. J. Funct. Biomater., 8.10.3390/jfb8040044 ↗
21. Opportunities for nanotechnology-enabled bioactive bone implants10.1039/b814334j ↗
22. “Amphotericin B” Loaded Natural Biodegradable Nanofibers as a Potential Drug Delivery System against Leishmaniasis10.2174/157341311798220628 ↗
23. Wen, C. (2015). Surface Coating and Modification of Metallic Biomaterials, Woodhead Publishing.
24. Functionalized nanoceria exhibit improved angiogenic properties10.1039/C7TB01957B ↗
25. Surface modification of metallic biomaterials for enhanced functionality: A review10.1080/10667857.2017.1377971 ↗
26. Nanotechnology-based biomaterials for orthopaedic applications: Recent advances and future prospects10.1016/j.msec.2019.110154 ↗
27. Material fundamentals and clinical performance of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings: A review10.1002/jbm.1056 ↗
28. Nanobiomaterial applications in orthopedics10.1002/jor.20305 ↗
29. The effect of a nanothickness coating on rough titanium substrate in the osteogenic properties of human bone cells10.1002/jbm.a.32661 ↗
30. Ramakrishna, S., Ramalingam, M., Kumar, T.S., and Soboyejo, W.O. (2016). Biomaterials: A Nano Approach, CRC Press.10.1201/b15739 ↗
31. Kiran, A., Kumar, T., Sanghavi, R., Doble, M., and Ramakrishna, S. (2018). Antibacterial and bioactive surface modifications of titanium implants by PCL/TiO2 nanocomposite coatings. Nanomaterials, 8.10.3390/nano8100860 ↗
32. Dual nanofibrous bioactive coating and antimicrobial surface treatment for infection resistant titanium implants10.1016/j.porgcoat.2018.04.028 ↗
33. Controlled release of drugs in electrosprayed nanoparticles for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.addr.2015.09.007 ↗
34. Drug loaded electrospun polymer/ceramic composite nanofibrous coatings on titanium for implant related infections10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.06.097 ↗
35. Bone growth enhancement in vivo on press-fit titanium alloy implants with acid etched microtexture10.1002/jbm.a.31748 ↗
36. Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: Materials, chemistry and topography10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.12.003 ↗
37. In vivo comparison between laser-treated and grit blasted/acid etched titanium10.1111/clr.12109 ↗
38. Influence of acid-etching after grit-blasted on osseointegration of titanium dental implants: In vitro and in vivo studies10.1007/s10856-013-4935-0 ↗
39. On the fatigue behavior of medical Ti6Al4V roughened by grit blasting and abrasiveless waterjet peening10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.07.011 ↗
40. Surface coating of implants—A review
41. Surface engineering for bone implants: A trend from passive to active surfaces10.3390/coatings2030095 ↗
42. Surface Modification of Ti Dental Implants by Grit-Blasting and Micro-Arc Oxidation10.1080/10426911003747915 ↗
43. Basic research methods and current trends of dental implant surfaces10.1002/jbm.b.31264 ↗
44. Titanium-zirconium alloy narrow-diameter implants (Straumann Roxolid((R))) for the rehabilitation of horizontally deficient edentulous ridges: Prospective study on 18 consecutive patients10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02296.x ↗
45. Clinical evaluation of laser microtexturing for soft tissue and bone attachment to dental implants10.1097/ID.0b013e31818c5a6d ↗
46. Preliminary 3-dimensional surface texture measurement and early loading results with a microtextured implant surface
47. Surface characteristics and cell adhesion: A comparative study of four commercial dental implants10.1111/jopr.12063 ↗
48. A review on calcium phosphate coatings produced using a sputtering process—An alternative to plasma spraying10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.029 ↗
49. Biocompatibility studies on surgical-grade titanium-, cobalt-, and iron-base alloys10.1002/jbm.820100411 ↗
50. Surface modification of titanium, titanium alloys, and related materials for biomedical applications10.1016/j.mser.2004.11.001 ↗
51. Microstructure and mechanical properties of cold-rolled TiNbTaZr biomedical β titanium alloy10.1016/j.msea.2008.03.003 ↗
52. Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants—A review10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.004 ↗
53. Influence of oxygen content on microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti–Nb–Ta–Zr alloy10.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.049 ↗
54. The bone tissue compatibility of a new Ti35Nb2Ta3Zr alloy with a low Young’s modulus10.3892/ijmm.2013.1249 ↗
55. New Developments of Ti-Based Alloys for Biomedical Applications10.3390/ma7031709 ↗
56. Development of Surface Nano-Crystallization in Alloys by Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment (SMAT)10.1080/10408436.2014.978446 ↗
57. Investigation of deformation mechanisms in β-type Ti-35Nb-2Ta-3Zr alloy via FSP leading to surface strengthening10.1007/s11661-015-3089-8 ↗
58. Microstructure evolution and superelastic behavior in Ti-35Nb-2Ta-3Zr alloy processed by friction stir processing10.1016/j.actamat.2017.03.079 ↗
59. Laves phase precipitation in Ti-Zr-Fe-Cr alloys with high strength and large plasticity10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.035 ↗
60. Study of the influence of Zr on the mechanical properties and functional response of Ti-Nb-Ta-Zr-O alloy for orthopedic applications10.1016/j.matdes.2018.107555 ↗
61. Deformation and strength characteristics of Laves phases in titanium alloys10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107891 ↗
62. The influence of passivation and electropolishing on the performance of medical grade stainless steels in static and fatigue loading10.1007/s10856-005-5922-x ↗
63. Corrosion resistance of EPD nanohydroxyapatite coated 316L stainless steel10.1179/1743294414Y.0000000330 ↗
64. Cobalt-base alloys used in bone surgery10.1016/S0020-1383(00)80018-2 ↗
65. Surface modification of a medical grade Co-Cr-Mo alloy by low-temperature plasma surface alloying with nitrogen and carbon10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.06.122 ↗
66. Magnesium as a biodegradable and bioabsorbable material for medical Implants10.1007/s11837-009-0129-0 ↗
67. A novel manufacturing route for fabrication of topologically-ordered porous magnesium scaffolds10.1002/adem.201100029 ↗
68. Novel Magnesium Alloys Developed for Biomedical Application: A Review10.1016/j.jmst.2013.02.005 ↗
69. Biodegradable Mg and Mg based alloys for biomedical implants10.1179/1743284713Y.0000000500 ↗
70. Porous magnesium-based scaffolds for tissue engineering10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.027 ↗
71. Advances in functionalized polymer coatings on biodegradable magnesium alloys—A review10.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.030 ↗
72. Design of biodegradable, implantable devices towards clinical translation10.1038/s41578-019-0150-z ↗
73. Properties and applications of titanium alloys: A brief review
74. Pawelec, K.M., and Planell, J.A. (2019). 15—Long-term performance and failure of orthopedic devices. Bone Repair Biomaterials, Woodhead Publishing. [2nd ed.].
75. Short term exposure to titanium, aluminum and vanadium (Ti 6Al 4V) alloy powder drastically affects behavior and antioxidant metabolites in vital organs of male albino mice10.1016/j.toxrep.2018.06.006 ↗
76. Ti-6Al-4V ion solution inhibition of osteogenic cell phenotype as a function of differentiation timecourse in vitro10.1016/0142-9612(96)00009-9 ↗
77. Effect of replacement of V by Nb and Fe on the electrochemical and corrosion behavior of Ti–6Al–4V in simulated physiological environment10.1016/j.jallcom.2004.03.096 ↗
78. Surface Modification of Titanium and Titanium Alloys: Technologies, Developments and Future Interests10.1002/adem.201901258 ↗
79. The in vitro and in vivo performance of a strontium-containing coating on the low-modulus Ti35Nb2Ta3Zr alloy formed by micro-arc oxidation10.1007/s10856-015-5533-0 ↗
80. Randomized-controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for single-tooth implants in canine and posterior regions: 3-year results10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01717.x ↗
81. Titanium in biomedical applications—properties and fabrication: A review10.1166/jbt.2015.1361 ↗
82. In vivo evaluation of a high-strength, high-ductility stainless steel for use in surgical implants10.1002/jbm.820130403 ↗
83. Enhancement of antimicrobial and long-term biostability of the zinc-incorporated hydroxyapatite coated 316L stainless steel implant for biomedical application10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.12.019 ↗
84. Surface modification of stainless steel for biomedical applications: Revisiting a century-old material10.1016/j.msec.2018.08.049 ↗
85. Mechanical properties and clinical applications of orthodontic wires10.1016/0889-5406(89)90251-5 ↗
86. Development of appropriate thickness ceramic coatings on 316 L stainless steel for biomedical applications10.1016/S0257-8972(02)00380-8 ↗
87. Recent metallic materials for biomedical applications10.1007/s11661-002-0109-2 ↗
88. Preparation of alginic acid layers on stainless-steel substrates for biomedical applications10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00127-3 ↗
89. The use of titanium and stainless steel in fracture fixation10.1586/erd.10.53 ↗
90. Characterization of sol–gel coated 316L stainless steel for biomedical applications10.1016/j.porgcoat.2010.01.002 ↗
91. Biomaterials in total joint replacement10.1016/j.colsurfb.2003.12.002 ↗
92. Trace element risk assessment: Essentiality vs. toxicity10.1016/S0273-2300(02)00020-X ↗
93. Characterisation of strengthening precipitate phases in a Mg–Y–Nd alloy10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00013-6 ↗
94. The development of binary Mg–Ca alloys for use as biodegradable materials within bone10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.12.021 ↗
95. Powder-based 3D printing for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.03.009 ↗
96. Nanda, H.S., Chen, S., Zhang, Q., Kawazoe, N., and Chen, G. (2014). Collagen scaffolds with controlled insulin release and controlled pore structure for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomed. Res. Int.10.1155/2014/623805 ↗
97. Preparation of collagen porous scaffolds with controlled and sustained release of bioactive insulin10.1177/0883911514522724 ↗
98. Prasad, K., Bazaka, O., Chua, M., Rochford, M., Fedrick, L., Spoor, J., Symes, R., Tieppo, M., Collins, C., and Cao, A. (2017). Metallic Biomaterials: Current Challenges and Opportunities. Materials, 10.10.3390/ma10080884 ↗
99. Role of proteins in the degradation of relatively inert alloys in the human body10.1038/s41529-018-0049-y ↗
100. The Effects of Serum Proteins on Magnesium Alloy Degradation in Vitro10.1038/s41598-017-14479-6 ↗