journal article·2020-10-12Open access

Osteoconductive and Osteoinductive Surface Modifications of Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration: A Concise Review

Paulina Kazimierczak, Agata Przekora

Coatings· Volume 10· Issue 10

Abstract

The main aim of bone tissue engineering is to fabricate highly biocompatible, osteoconductive and/or osteoinductive biomaterials for tissue regeneration. Bone implants should support bone growth at the implantation site via promotion of osteoblast adhesion, proliferation, and formation of bone extracellular matrix. Moreover, a very desired feature of biomaterials for clinical applications is their osteoinductivity, which means the ability of the material to induce osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells toward bone-building cells (osteoblasts). Nevertheless, the development of completely biocompatible biomaterials with appropriate physicochemical and mechanical properties poses a great challenge for the researchers. Thus, the current trend in the engineering of biomaterials focuses on the surface modifications to improve biological properties of bone implants. This review presents the most recent findings concerning surface modifications of biomaterials to improve their osteoconductivity and osteoinductivity. The article describes two types of surface modifications: (1) Additive and (2) subtractive, indicating biological effects of the resultant surfaces in vitro and/or in vivo. The review article summarizes known additive modifications, such as plasma treatment, magnetron sputtering, and preparation of inorganic, organic, and composite coatings on the implants. It also presents some common subtractive processes applied for surface modifications of the biomaterials (i.e., acid etching, sand blasting, grit blasting, sand-blasted large-grit acid etched (SLA), anodizing, and laser methods). In summary, the article is an excellent compendium on the surface modifications and development of advanced osteoconductive and/or osteoinductive coatings on biomaterials for bone regeneration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Chair and Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Medical University of Lublin, Chodzki 1 Street, 20-093 Lublin, Poland

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Bone regeneration and stem cells10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01224.x ↗
2. Zivic, F., Affatato, S., Trajanovic, M., Schnabelrauch, M., Grujovic, N., and Choy, K.L. (2018). Biomaterials in Clinical Practice. Advances in Clinical Research and Medical Devices, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-68025-5 ↗
3. Bone regenerative medicine: Classic options, novel strategies and future directions10.1186/1749-799X-9-18 ↗
4. Bone tissue engineering: Hope vs hype10.1006/bbrc.2002.6519 ↗
5. The summary of the most important cell-biomaterial interactions that need to be considered during in vitro biocompatibility testing of bone scaffolds for tissue engineering applications10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.061 ↗
6. Barbeck, M., Jung, O., Smeets, R., and Koržinskas, T. (2019). Biomaterial-Supported Tissue Reconstruction or Regeneration, IntechOpen.10.5772/intechopen.77756 ↗
7. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
8. Advances in porous biomaterials for dental and orthopaedic applications10.3390/ma3052947 ↗
9. Unraveling the mechanical strength of biomaterials used as a bone scaffold in oral and maxillofacial defects10.1016/S1348-8643(18)30005-3 ↗
10. The material and biological characteristics of osteoinductive calcium phosphate ceramics10.1093/rb/rbx024 ↗
11. Bone grafts and their substitues10.1302/0301-620X.98B.36350 ↗
12. Biomaterials/tissue interactions: Possible solutions to overcome foreign body response
13. Biomaterials for bone tissue engineering10.1016/S1369-7021(08)70086-5 ↗
14. Novel synthesis method combining a foaming agent with freeze-drying to obtain hybrid highly macroporous bone scaffolds10.1016/j.jmst.2020.01.006 ↗
15. Osteoimmunomodulatory effects of biomaterial modification strategies on macrophage polarization and bone regeneration10.1093/rb/rbaa006 ↗
16. Metallic scaffolds for bone regeneration10.3390/ma2030790 ↗
17. Titanium-tissue interface reaction and its control with surface treatment10.3389/fbioe.2019.00170 ↗
18. Advances in the surface modification techniques of bone-related implants for last 10 years10.1093/rb/rbu007 ↗
19. Dehghanghadikolaei, A., and Fotovvati, B. (2019). Coating techniques for functional enhancement of metal implants for bone replacement: A review. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12111795 ↗
20. 3D printable biomaterials for orthopedic implants: Solution for sustainable and circular economy10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101767 ↗
21. Polysaccharide matrices used in 3D in vitro cell culture systems10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.06.020 ↗
22. Hybrid organic-inorganic scaffolding biomaterials for regenerative therapies10.2174/1385272819666140806200355 ↗
23. Fabrication, applications and challenges of natural biomaterials in tissue engineering10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100656 ↗
24. Chitosan/β-1,3-glucan/calcium phosphate ceramics composites—Novel cell scaffolds for bone tissue engineering application10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.04.022 ↗
25. Przekora, A. (2019). Current trends in fabrication of biomaterials for bone and cartilage regeneration: Materials modifications and biophysical stimulations. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 20.10.3390/ijms20020435 ↗
26. Natural origin biodegradable systems in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: Present status and some moving trends10.1098/rsif.2007.0220 ↗
27. Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: State of the art and new perspectives10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.017 ↗
28. Wen, C. (2015). Surface Coating and Modification of Metallic Biomaterials, Woodhead Publishing.
29. 3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.10.001 ↗
30. Multifunctional biomaterial coatings: Synthetic challenges and biological activity10.1515/hsz-2016-0204 ↗
31. Surface modification of biomaterials and biomedical devices using additive manufacturing10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.003 ↗
32. Mechanical performance of additively manufactured pure silver antibacterial bone scaffolds10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104090 ↗
33. Wen, C. (2015). Surface Coating and Modification of Metallic Biomaterials, Woodhead Publishing.
34. Sergi, R., Bellucci, D., and Cannillo, V. (2020). A comprehensive review of bioactive glass coatings: State of the art, challenges and future perspectives. Coatings, 10.10.3390/coatings10080757 ↗
35. Chun, H., Park, K., Kim, C., and Khang, G. (2018). Novel Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine, Springer.10.1007/978-981-13-0947-2 ↗
36. Significance of calcium phosphate coatings for the enhancement of new bone osteogenesis—A review10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.036 ↗
37. de Oliveira, P.G.F.P., de Melo Soares, M.S., Silveira e Souza, A.M.M., Taba, M., Palioto, D.B., Messora, M.R., Ghiraldini, B., Nunes, F.A.D.S., and de Souza, S.L.S. (2020). Influence of nano-hydroxyapatite coating implants on gene expression of osteogenic markers and micro-CT parameters. An in vivo study in diabetic rats. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A.10.1002/jbm.a.37052 ↗
38. Bioactivity and osteointegration of hydroxyapatite-coated stainless steel and titanium wires used for intramedullary osteosynthesis10.1007/s11751-017-0282-x ↗
39. Effects of nanotopography regulation and silicon doping on angiogenic and osteogenic activities of hydroxyapatite coating on titanium implant10.2147/IJN.S252936 ↗
40. Mumith, A., Cheong, V.S., Fromme, P., Coathup, M.J., and Blunn, G.W. (2020). The effect of strontium and silicon substituted hydroxyapatite electrochemical coatings on bone ingrowth and osseointegration of selective laser sintered porous metal implants. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0227232 ↗
41. Antimicrobial electrodeposited silver-containing calcium phosphate coatings10.1021/acsami.9b20158 ↗
42. Nanostructured akermanite glass-ceramic coating on Ti6Al4V for orthopedic applications
43. Micro/nanostructured TiO2/ZnO coating enhances osteogenic activity of SaOS-2 cells10.1080/21691401.2018.1546187 ↗
44. Schitea, R.I., Nitu, A., Ciobota, A.A., Munteanu, A.L., David, I.M., Miu, D., Raileanu, M., Bacalum, M., and Busuioc, C. (2020). Pulsed laser deposition derived bioactive glass-ceramic coatings for enhancing the biocompatibility of scaffolding materials. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13112615 ↗
45. A magnetic iron oxide/polydopamine coating can improve osteogenesis of 3D-printed porous titanium scaffolds with a static magnetic field by upregulating the TGF β -Smads pathway10.1002/adhm.202000318 ↗
46. Electroactive barium titanate coated titanium scaffold improves osteogenesis and osseointegration with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for large segmental bone defects10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.07.001 ↗
47. Aligned porous barium titanate/hydroxyapatite composites with high piezoelectric coefficients for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.msec.2014.02.022 ↗
48. Fabrication and characterization of highly porous barium titanate based scaffold coated by Gel/HA nanocomposite with high piezoelectric coefficient for bone tissue engineering applications10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.12.034 ↗
49. Lead-free piezoelectric (Ba,Ca)(Zr,Ti)O3 thin films for biocompatible and flexible devices10.1021/acsami.6b14774 ↗
50. Functionalized-ferroelectric-coating-driven enhanced biomineralization and protein-conformation on metallic implants10.1039/C8TB02777C ↗
51. Applications of zeolites in biotechnology and medicine-a review10.1039/C8BM00028J ↗
52. Antibacterial effects of silver incorporated zeolite coatings on 3D printed porous stainless steels10.1016/j.msec.2019.110430 ↗
53. Osteogenic activity and antibacterial effect of porous titanium modified with metal-organic framework films10.1002/jbm.a.35960 ↗
54. Amorphous carbon modification on implant surface: A general strategy to enhance osteogenic differentiation for diverse biomaterials via FAK/ERK1/2 signaling pathways10.1039/C8TB02850H ↗
55. Polycrystalline diamond coating of additively manufactured titanium for biomedical applications10.1021/acsami.7b18596 ↗
56. Long term: In vivo functional stability and encapsulation reliability of using ultra-nanocrystalline diamond as an insulating coating layer for implantable microchips10.1039/C7TB00867H ↗
57. Coating biopolymer nanofibers with carbon nanotubes accelerates tissue healing and bone regeneration through orchestrated cell- and tissue-regulatory responses10.1016/j.actbio.2020.03.012 ↗
58. Mori, H., Ogura, Y., Enomoto, K., Hara, M., Maurstad, G., Stokke, B.T., and Kitamura, S. (2020). Dense carbon-nanotube coating scaffolds stimulate osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0225589 ↗
59. Titanium coated with functionalized carbon nanotubes—A promising novel material for biomedical application as an implantable orthopaedic electronic device10.1016/j.msec.2014.09.025 ↗
60. Fabrication of multi-walled carbon nanotube layers with selected properties via electrophoretic deposition: Physicochemical and biological characterization10.1007/s00339-016-9984-z ↗
61. 3D printing of cytocompatible graphene/alginate scaffolds for mimetic tissue constructs10.3389/fbioe.2020.00001 ↗
62. Boron nitride nanotube-enhanced osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells10.1002/jbm.b.33391 ↗
63. Intramedullary implants coated with cubic boron nitride enhance bone fracture healing in a rat model10.1016/j.jtemb.2020.126599 ↗
64. Yu, L., Silva Santisteban, T., Liu, Q., Hu, C., Bi, J., and Wei, M. (2020). Effect of three-dimensional porosity gradients of biomimetic coatings on their bonding strength and cell behavior. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A.10.1002/jbm.a.37046 ↗
65. Assessing the bioactivity of gentamicin-preloaded hydroxyapatite/chitosan composite coating on titanium substrate10.1021/acsomega.0c01583 ↗
66. Hydroxyapatite/tannic acid composite coating formation based on Ti modified by TiO2 nanotubes10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111304 ↗
67. Gorgin Karaji, Z., Jahanmard, F., Mirzaei, A., van der Wal, B., and Amin Yavari, S. (2020). Multifunctional silk coating on additively manufactured porous titanium to prevent implant-associated infection and stimulate bone regeneration. Biomed. Mater.10.1088/1748-605X/aba40b ↗
68. PMMA-silica nanocomposite coating: Effective corrosion protection and biocompatibility for a Ti6Al4V alloy10.1016/j.msec.2020.110713 ↗
69. Amorphous calcium phosphate nanospheres/polylactide composite coated tantalum scaffold: Facile preparation, fast biomineralization and subchondral bone defect repair application10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.09.021 ↗
70. Laminin coating promotes calcium phosphate precipitation on titanium discs in vitro
71. Novel implant coating agent promotes gene expression of osteogenic markers in rats during early osseointegration10.1155/2012/579274 ↗
72. Rabe, R., Hempel, U., Martocq, L., Keppler, J.K., Aveyard, J., and Douglas, T.E.L. (2020). Dairy-inspired coatings for bone implants from whey protein isolate-derived self-assembled fibrils. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 21.10.3390/ijms21155544 ↗
73. Effect of microenvironment on adhesion and differentiation of murine C3H10T1/2 cells cultured on multilayers containing collagen I and glycosaminoglycans10.1177/2041731420940560 ↗
74. Liu, C., Wang, J., Gao, C., Wang, Z., Zhou, X., Tang, M., Yu, K., and Deng, Y. (2020). Enhanced osteoinductivity and corrosion resistance of dopamine/gelatin/rhBMP-2–coated β-TCP/Mg-Zn orthopedic implants: An in vitro and in vivo study. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0228247 ↗
75. Biocorrosion behavior and cell viability of adhesive polymer coated magnesium based alloys for medical implants10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.08.051 ↗
76. Biofunctionalization of titanium surfaces with alendronate and albumin modulates osteoblast performance10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04455 ↗
77. 3D-poly (lactic acid) scaffolds coated with gelatin and mucic acid for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.157 ↗
78. Development of PLGA-coated β-TCP scaffolds containing VEGF for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.msec.2016.07.011 ↗
79. Dual directions to address the problem of aseptic loosening via electrospun PLGA @ aspirin nanofiber coatings on titanium10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120237 ↗
80. Encapsulation of a nanoporous simvastatin-chitosan composite to enhance osteointegration of hydroxyapatite-coated polyethylene terephthalate ligaments10.2147/IJN.S210687 ↗
81. Argon-based atmospheric pressure plasma enhances early bone response to rough titanium surfaces10.1002/jbm.a.34127 ↗
82. Plasma surface modification of biomedical polymers: Influence on cell-material interaction10.1007/s11090-012-9394-8 ↗
83. Introduction to high-velocity suspension flame spraying (HVSFS)10.1007/s11666-008-9264-3 ↗
84. Bioactive coating on Ti alloy with high osseointegration and antibacterial Ag nanoparticles10.1021/acsami.9b13849 ↗
85. Hierarchical functionalized polymeric-ceramic coatings on Mg–Ca alloys for biodegradable implant applications
86. Functionalisation of a heat-derived and bio-inert albumin hydrogel with extracellular matrix by air plasma treatment10.1038/s41598-020-69301-7 ↗
87. Plasma deposited poly-oxazoline nanotextured surfaces dictate osteoimmunomodulation towards ameliorative osteogenesis10.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.058 ↗
88. Improving linking interface between collagen-based hydrogels and bone-like substrates10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.06.046 ↗
89. Surface modification of polymers by plasma treatments for the enhancement of biocompatibility and controlled drug release10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.02.042 ↗
90. Improved osteogenesis of selective-laser-melted titanium alloy by coating strontium-doped phosphate with high-efficiency air-plasma treatment10.3389/fbioe.2020.00367 ↗
91. The synergistic promotion of osseointegration by nanostructure design and silicon substitution of hydroxyapatite coatings in a diabetic model10.1039/C9TB02882J ↗
92. Tantalum-incorporated hydroxyapatite coating on titanium implants: Its mechanical and in vitro osteogenic properties10.1007/s10856-019-6308-9 ↗
93. Longo, G., Ioannidu, C.A., D’Abusco, A.S., Superti, F., Misiano, C., Zanoni, R., Politi, L., Mazzola, L., Iosi, F., and Mura, F. (2016). Improving osteoblast response in vitro by a nanostructured thin film with titanium carbide and titanium oxides clustered around graphitic carbon. PLoS ONE, 11.10.1371/journal.pone.0152566 ↗
94. Osseointegration is improved by coating titanium implants with a nanostructured thin film with titanium carbide and titanium oxides clustered around graphitic carbon10.1016/j.msec.2016.08.076 ↗
95. Plasma electrolytic oxidation as a feasible surface treatment for biomedical applications: An in vivo study10.1038/s41598-020-65289-2 ↗
96. In vivo effect of titanium implants with porous zinc-containing coatings prepared by plasma electrolytic oxidation method on osseointegration in rabbits10.11607/jomi.5764 ↗
97. Osteogenic activity and antibacterial ability on titanium surfaces modified with magnesium-doped titanium dioxide coating10.2217/nnm-2018-0413 ↗
98. Osteoimmunomodulation, osseointegration, and in vivo mechanical integrity of pure Mg coated with HA nanorod/pore-sealed MgO bilayer10.1039/C8BM00901E ↗
99. PEO coatings design for Mg–Ca alloy for cardiovascular stent and bone regeneration applications10.1016/j.msec.2019.110026 ↗
100. Incorporation of Ca ions into anodic oxide coatings on the Ti–13Nb–13Zr alloy by plasma electrolytic oxidation10.1016/j.msec.2019.109957 ↗