Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Recruiting Nanofiber Bandages Promote Multifunctional Skin Regeneration via Improved Angiogenesis and Immunomodulation
Source abstract
Abstract
Tissue injury leads to gradients of chemoattractants, which drive multiple processes for tissue repair, including the inflammatory response as well as endogenous cell recruitment. However, a limited time window for the gradients of chemoattractants as well as their poor stability at the injury site may not translate into healthy tissue repair. Consequently, intelligent multifunctional scaffolds with the capability to stabilize injury-induced cytokines and chemokines hold great promise for tissue repair. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a significant role in wound healing by promoting angiogenesis. The overarching objective of this research was to develop intelligent multifunctional scaffolds with the capability to endogenously recruit VEGF and promote wound healing via angiogenic and immunomodulatory dual functions. Prominin-1-derived peptide (PR1P) was encapsulated into electrospun poly(L-lactide-coglycolide)/gelatin (P/G)-based bandages. The sustained release of PR1P recruited VEGF in situ, thereby stabilizing the protein concentration peak in vivo and affording a reparative microenvironment with an adequate angiogenic ability at the wound site. Meanwhile, PR1P-recruited VEGF-induced macrophage reprogramming towards M2-like phenotypes further conferred immunomodulatory functions to the bandages. These dual functions of proangiogenesis and immunomodulation formed a cascade amplification, which regulated matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-9) as well as inflammatory factors (nuclear factor (NF)-κb, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α) in the wound microenvironment via the VEGF/macrophages/microenvironment axis. Consequently, the bandages realized multifunctional regeneration in splinted excisional wounds in rats, with or without diabetes, affording a higher skin appendage neogenesis, sensory function, and collagen remodeling. Conclusively, our approach encompassing in situ recruitment of VEGF at the injury site with the capability to promote immunomodulation-mediated tissue repair affords a promising avenue for scarless wound regeneration, which may also have implications for other tissue engineering disciplines.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wound Healing and Treatments · Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments · Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Eming SA, Martin P, Tomic-Canic M. Wound repair and regeneration: mechanisms, signaling, and translation. Sci Transl Med 2014;6(265):265sr6.10.1126/scitranslmed.3009337 ↗
2. Singer AJ, Clark RAF. Cutaneous wound healing. New Engl J Med 1999;341:738–46.10.1056/NEJM199909023411006 ↗
3. Sen CK, et al. Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy. Wound Repair Regen 2009;17:763–71.10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00543.x ↗
4. Lou D, Luo Y, Pang Q, Tan W, Ma L. Gene-activated dermal equivalents to accelerate healing of diabetic chronic wounds by regulating inflammation and promoting angiogenesis. Bioact Mater 2020;5:667–79.
5. Matoori S, Veves A, Mooney DJ. Advanced bandages for diabetic wound healing. Sci Transl Med 2021. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abe4839 .10.1126/scitranslmed.abe4839 ↗
6. Brown LF, et al. Expression of vascular permeability factor (vascular endothelial growth factor) by epidermal keratinocytes during wound Healing. J Exp Med 1992;176:1375–9.10.1084/jem.176.5.1375 ↗
7. Nissen NN, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor mediates angiogenic activity during the proliferative phase of wound healing. Am J Pathol 1998;152:1445–52.
8. Certelli A, et al. Robust angiogenesis and arteriogenesis in the skin of diabetic mice by transient delivery of engineered VEGF and PDGF-BB proteins in fibrin hydrogels. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.688467 .10.3389/fbioe.2021.688467 ↗
9. Wu J, et al. Mussel-inspired surface immobilization of heparin on magnetic nanoparticles for enhanced wound repair via sustained release of a growth factor and M2 macrophage polarization. Acs Appl Mater Inter 2021;13:2230–44.10.1021/acsami.0c18388 ↗
10. Wang P, et al. In situ formed anti-inflammatory hydrogel loading plasmid DNA encoding VEGF for burn wound healing. Acta Biomater 2019;100:191–201.10.1016/j.actbio.2019.10.004 ↗
11. Masters KS. Covalent growth factor immobilization strategies for tissue repair and regeneration. Macromol Biosci 2011;11:1149–63.10.1002/mabi.201000505 ↗
12. Sheng L, et al. A novel “hot spring”-mimetic hydrogel with excellent angiogenic properties for chronic wound healing. Biomaterials 2021;264:120414.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120414 ↗
13. Hu S, et al. A mussel-inspired film for adhesion to wet buccal tissue and efficient buccal drug delivery. Nat Commun 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21989-5 .10.1038/s41467-021-21989-5 ↗
14. Ahn S, et al. Biomimetic and estrogenic fibers promote tissue repair in mice and human skin via estrogen receptor β. Biomaterials 2020;255:120149.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120149 ↗
15. Srifa W, et al. Cas9-AAV6-engineered human mesenchymal stromal cells improved cutaneous wound healing in diabetic mice. Nat Commun 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16065-3 .10.1038/s41467-020-16065-3 ↗
16. Flora T, de Torre IG, Alonso M, Rodríguez-Cabello JC. Tethering QK peptide to enhance angiogenesis in elastin-like recombinamer (ELR) hydrogels. J Mater Sci - Mater Med 2019;30:30.10.1007/s10856-019-6232-z ↗
17. Zisch AH, Schenk U, Schense JC, Sakiyama-Elbert SE, Hubbell JA. Covalently conjugated VEGF–fibrin matrices for endothelialization. J Control Release 2001;72:101–13.10.1016/S0168-3659(01)00266-8 ↗
18. Zhao W, McCallum SA, Xiao Z, Zhang F, Linhardt RJ. Binding affinities of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for heparin-derived oligosaccharides. Biosci Rep 2011;32:71–81.10.1042/BSR20110077 ↗
19. Adini A, et al. A novel strategy to enhance angiogenesis in vivo using the small VEGF-binding peptide PR1P. Angiogenesis 2017;20:399–408.10.1007/s10456-017-9556-7 ↗
20. Yuan Z, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor-capturing aligned electrospun polycaprolactone/gelatin nanofibers promote patellar ligament regeneration. Acta Biomater 2022;140:233–46.10.1016/j.actbio.2021.11.040 ↗
21. Zhang X, et al. Electroactive electrospun nanofibers for tissue engineering. Nano Today 2021;39:101196.10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101196 ↗
22. Chen L, et al. Programmable immune activating electrospun fibers for skin regeneration. Bioact Mater 2021;6:3218–30.
23. Abbas Shafiee ASCN, Friedrich AREJ. Convergence of 3D printed biomimetic wound dressings and adult stem cell therapy. Biomaterials 2020;268:120558.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120558 ↗
24. Griffin DR, et al. Activating an adaptive immune response from a hydrogel scaffold imparts regenerative wound healing. Nat Mater 2021;20:560–9.10.1038/s41563-020-00844-w ↗
25. Peng LH, et al. Self-adaptive all-in-one delivery chip for rapid skin nerves regeneration by endogenous mesenchymal stem cells. Adv Funct Mater 2020;30:2001751.10.1002/adfm.202001751 ↗
26. Shen Y, et al. Sequential release of small extracellular vesicles from bilayered thiolated alginate/polyethylene glycol diacrylate hydrogels for scarless wound healing. ACS Nano 2021;15:6352–68.10.1021/acsnano.0c07714 ↗
27. Yuan Z, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor-capturing aligned electrospun polycaprolactone/gelatin nanofibers promote patellar ligament regeneration. Acta Biomater 2021;140:233–46.10.1016/j.actbio.2021.11.040 ↗
28. Monika P, Waiker PV, Chandraprabha MN, Rangarajan A, Murthy KNC. Myofibroblast progeny in wound biology and wound healing studies. Wound Repair Regen 2021;29:531–47.10.1111/wrr.12937 ↗
29. Puthia M, et al. A dual-action peptide-containing hydrogel targets wound infection and inflammation. Sci Transl Med 2020. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aax6601 .10.1126/scitranslmed.aax6601 ↗
30. Ishihara J, et al. Laminin heparin-binding peptides bind to several growth factors and enhance diabetic wound healing. Nat Commun 2018;9(1):1–4.10.1038/s41467-018-04525-w ↗
31. Yamakawa S, Hayashida K. Advances in surgical applications of growth factors for wound healing. Burns Trauma 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41038-019-0148-1 .10.1186/s41038-019-0148-1 ↗
32. Sorg H, Tilkorn DJ, Hager S, Hauser J, Mirastschijski U. Skin wound healing: an update on the current knowledge and concepts. Eur Surg Res 2017;58:81–94.10.1159/000454919 ↗
33. Goonoo N, Bhaw-Luximon A. Mimicking growth factors: role of small molecule scaffold additives in promoting tissue regeneration and repair. Rsc Adv 2019;9:18124–46.10.1039/C9RA02765C ↗
34. Xia Y, et al. ZnO/nanocarbons-modified fibrous scaffolds for stem cell-based osteogenic differentiation. Small 2020;16:2003010.10.1002/smll.202003010 ↗
35. Xie L, et al. Ti-MOF-based biosafety materials for efficient and long-life disinfection via synergistic photodynamic and photothermal effects. Biosaf Health 2022;4:135–46.10.1016/j.bsheal.2022.02.001 ↗
36. Li Z, et al. Photothermally tunable biodegradation of implantable triboelectric nanogenerators for tissue repairing. Nano Energy 2018;54:390–9.10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.020 ↗
37. Wang A, et al. Piezoelectric nanofibrous scaffolds as in vivo energy harvesters for modifying fibroblast alignment and proliferation in wound healing. Nano Energy 2018;43:63–71.10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.023 ↗
38. Xia Y, et al. Multivalent polyanionic 2D nanosheets functionalized nanofibrous stem cell-based neural scaffolds. Adv Funct Mater 2021;31:2010145.10.1002/adfm.202010145 ↗
39. Qian Y, Lin H, Yan Z, Shi J, Fan C. Functional nanomaterials in peripheral nerve regeneration: scaffold design, chemical principles and microenvironmental remodeling. Mater Today 2021;51:165–87.10.1016/j.mattod.2021.09.014 ↗
40. Zhao Z, et al. Chimeric peptides quickly modify the surface of personalized 3D printing titanium implants to promote osseointegration. Acs Appl Mater Inter 2021;13:33981–94.10.1021/acsami.1c11207 ↗
41. Luo R, Dai J, Zhang J, Li Z. Accelerated skin wound healing by electrical stimulation. Adv Healthc Mater 2021;10:2100557.10.1002/adhm.202100557 ↗
42. Zhan L, et al. Grooved fibers: preparation principles through electrospinning and potential applications. Adv Fiber Mater 2022;4:203–13.10.1007/s42765-021-00116-5 ↗
43. Long Y, et al. Effective wound healing enabled by discrete alternative electric fields from wearable nanogenerators. ACS Nano 2018;12:12533–40.10.1021/acsnano.8b07038 ↗
44. Adini A, et al. PR1P stabilizes VEGF and upregulates its signaling to reduce elastase-induced murine emphysema. Am J Resp Cell Mol 2020;63:452–63.10.1165/rcmb.2019-0434OC ↗
45. Schumacher M, Habibović P, van Rijt S. Peptide-modified nano-bioactive glass for targeted immobilization of native VEGF. Acs Appl Mater Inter 2022;14:4959–68.10.1021/acsami.1c21378 ↗
46. Li X, et al. Adventitial fibroblast-derived vascular endothelial growth factor promotes vasa vasorum-associated neointima formation and macrophage recruitment. Cardiovasc Res 2020;116:708–20.10.1093/cvr/cvz159 ↗
47. Witherel CE, Abebayehu D, Barker TH, Spiller KL. Macrophage and fibroblast interactions in biomaterial-mediated fibrosis. Adv Healthc Mater 2019;8(4):1801451.10.1002/adhm.201801451 ↗
48. Hadrian K, et al. Macrophage-mediated tissue vascularization: similarities and differences between cornea and skin. Front Immunol 2021;12:667830.10.3389/fimmu.2021.667830 ↗
49. Chu C, et al. Modulation of foreign body reaction and macrophage phenotypes concerning microenvironment. J Biomed Mater Res A 2019;108:127–35.10.1002/jbm.a.36798 ↗
50. Chen Y, et al. Interactions between immunomodulatory biomaterials and immune microenvironment: cues for immunomodulation strategies in tissue repair. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.820940 .10.3389/fbioe.2022.820940 ↗
51. Wise LM, Stuart GS, Real NC, Fleming SB, Mercer AA. VEGF receptor-2 activation mediated by VEGF-E limits scar tissue formation following cutaneous injury. Adv Wound Care 2018;7:283–97.10.1089/wound.2016.0721 ↗
52. Abaci HE, et al. Tissue engineering of human hair follicles using a biomimetic developmental approach. Nat Commun 2018;9(1):1–11.10.1038/s41467-018-07579-y ↗
53. Kim D, et al. Noncoding dsRNA induces retinoic acid synthesis to stimulate hair follicle regeneration via TLR3. Nat Commun 2019;10(1):1–3.10.1038/s41467-018-07882-8 ↗
54. Wang X, et al. Macrophages induce AKT/β-catenin-dependent Lgr5+ stem cell activation and hair follicle regeneration through TNF. Nat Commun 2017;8(1):1–4.10.1038/s41467-016-0009-6 ↗
55. Li M, et al. CCL5 deficiency promotes liver repair by improving inflammation resolution and liver regeneration through M2 macrophage polarization. Cell Mol Immunol 2020;17:753–64.10.1038/s41423-019-0279-0 ↗