Subdivision-Based Isogeometric BEM with Deep Neural Network Acceleration for Acoustic Uncertainty Quantification under Ground Reflection Effects
Source abstract
Abstract
Accurate simulation of acoustic wave propagation in complex structures is of great importance in engineering design, noise control, and related research areas. Although traditional numerical simulation methods can provide precise results, they often face high computational costs when applied to complex models or problems involving parameter uncertainties, particularly in the presence of multiple coupled parameters or intricate geometries. To address these challenges, this study proposes an efficient algorithm for simulating the acoustic field of structures with adhered sound-absorbing materials while accounting for ground reflection effects. The proposed method integrates Catmull-Clark subdivision surfaces with the boundary element method (BEM). Subdivision surfaces generate smooth, high-quality meshes that accurately represent complex geometries, thereby enhancing the accuracy of acoustic analysis while avoiding excessive mesh refinement. To further reduce the computational burden associated with generating high-quality meshes and performing uncertainty quantification, a deep neural network (DNN) surrogate model is developed to accelerate calculations. Trained on BEM simulation data, the DNN can rapidly predict sound pressure responses under varying input parameters, significantly speeding up the overall simulation process and reducing computation time. Numerical examples demonstrate that the DNN surrogate model achieves high predictive accuracy while enabling fast and precise analysis of uncertainties in acoustic problems. These results indicate that the proposed approach provides a practical and efficient tool for engineering applications, facilitating rapid evaluations and design optimization in complex acoustic environments.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques · Geophysical Methods and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Dimensional decomposition-aided metamodels for uncertainty quantification and optimization in engineering: a review10.1016/j.cma.2024.117098 ↗
2. Generalized isogeometric boundary element method for uncertainty analysis of time-harmonic wave propagation in infinite domains10.1016/j.apm.2022.09.030 ↗
3. Uncertainty quantification for noisy inputs-outputs in physics-informed neural networks and neural operators10.1016/j.cma.2024.117479 ↗
4. Chen · Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng · 2025 · 433 · 11746410.1016/j.cma.2024.117464 ↗
5. Novel numerical method for uncertainty analysis of coupled vibro-acoustic problem considering thermal stress10.1016/j.cma.2023.116727 ↗
6. Multilevel Monte Carlo method for topology optimization of flexoelectric composites with uncertain material properties10.1016/j.enganabound.2021.10.008 ↗
7. A fully parallelized and budgeted multilevel monte carlo method and the application to acoustic waves10.1137/23M1588354 ↗
8. Enhanced soft Monte Carlo simulation coupled with support vector regression for structural reliability analysis
9. Sensitivity analysis of transverse electric polarized electromagnetic scattering with isogeometric boundary elements accelerated by a fast multipole method10.1016/j.apm.2025.115956 ↗
10. Polynomial chaos expansion-based stochastic phase field model for hydrogen-assisted cracking10.1016/j.tafmec.2025.105000 ↗
11. Deep-neural-network-based framework for the accelerating uncertainty quantification of a structural-acoustic fully coupled system in a shallow sea10.1016/j.enganabound.2024.106112 ↗
12. Multivariate uncertainty analysis of fracture problems through model order reduction accelerated SBFEM10.1016/j.apm.2023.08.040 ↗
13. Stochastic fracture analysis using scaled boundary finite element methods accelerated by proper orthogonal decomposition and radial basis functions10.1155/2021/9181415 ↗
14. A time-domain FEM-BEM iterative coupling algorithm with dual-independent discretizations in both time and space domains10.1016/j.enganabound.2024.01.005 ↗
15. FEM-BEM analysis of acoustic interaction with submerged thin-shell structures under seabed reflection conditions10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118554 ↗
16. Uncertainty quantification for the 3D half-space sound scattering problem of IGABEM based on the Catmull-Clark subdivision surfaces10.1016/j.enganabound.2025.106222 ↗
17. Uncertainty quantification of vibroacoustics with deep neural networks and Catmull-Clark subdivision surfaces10.1155/2024/7926619 ↗
18. Sensitivity analysis of underwater structural-acoustic problems based on coupled finite element method/fast multipole boundary element method with non-uniform rational B-splines10.3390/jmse12010098 ↗
19. Implementation of regularized isogeometric boundary element methods for gradient-based shape optimization in two-dimensional linear elasticity10.1002/nme.5149 ↗
20. A gradient-based shape optimisation for time-domain acoustic problems regarding the 3D dissipative wave equation with using the boundary element method
21. T-splines-based panel method for aerodynamic topology optimization of engineering shell structures using isogeometric analysis10.1016/j.cma.2025.118154 ↗
22. Sensitivity analysis of non-uniform rational B-splines-based finite element/boundary element coupling in structural-acoustic design10.3389/fphy.2024.1428875 ↗
23. A high-order isogeometric collocation method with adaptive refinement and multi-patch geometric modeling10.1007/s42417-024-01687-4 ↗
24. Adaptive shape optimization with NURBS designs and PHT-splines for solution approximation in time-harmonic acoustics10.1016/j.compstruc.2023.107192 ↗
25. Uncertainty evaluation in density and viscosity of nanofluids at different temperatures using Gaussian process regression-based Monte-Carlo simulations10.1016/j.molliq.2024.125794 ↗
26. Geoacoustic inversion using Bayesian optimization with a Gaussian process surrogate model10.1121/10.0028177 ↗
27. Predicting the coefficient of friction in a sliding contact by applying machine learning to acoustic emission data10.1007/s40544-023-0834-7 ↗
28. Uncertainty quantification and robust shape optimization of acoustic structures based on IGA BEM and polynomial chaos expansion10.1016/j.enganabound.2024.105770 ↗
29. Uncertainty analysis in airfoil-turbulence interaction noise using polynomial chaos expansion10.2514/1.J062941 ↗
30. Uncertainty quantification of acoustic metamaterial bandgaps with stochastic material properties and geometric defects10.1016/j.compstruc.2024.107511 ↗
31. The direct interpolation boundary element method for solving acoustic wave problems in the time domain10.1007/s40314-024-03023-8 ↗
32. Application of multi-algorithm mixed feature extraction model in underwater acoustic signal10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.116959 ↗
33. Uncertainty quantification of vibro-acoustic coupling problems for robotic manta ray models based on deep learning10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117388 ↗
34. A sample-efficient deep learning method for multivariate uncertainty qualification of acoustic-vibration interaction problems10.1016/j.cma.2022.114784 ↗
35. Deep UQ: learning deep neural network surrogate models for high dimensional uncertainty quantification10.1016/j.jcp.2018.08.036 ↗
36. Deep learning of plausible bandgaps in dispersion curves of phononic crystals10.1088/1402-4896/ad6941 ↗
37. Prediction and inverse design of bandgaps in acoustic metamaterials using deep learning and metaheuristic optimization techniques10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-06114-5 ↗
38. Ostrometzky J, Berestizshevsky K, Bernstein A, Zussman G. Physics-informed deep neural network method for limited observability state estimation. arXiv:1910.06401. 2019.
39. Reconstruction of hydrofoil cavitation flow based on the chain-style physics-informed neural network10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105724 ↗
40. Predicting micro-bubble dynamics with semi-physics-informed deep learning10.1063/5.0079602 ↗
41. Shape optimization directly from CAD: an isogeometric boundary element approach using T-splines10.1016/j.cma.2016.11.012 ↗
42. Isogeometric analysis: cAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement10.1016/j.cma.2004.10.008 ↗
43. Heat transfer in material having random thermal conductivity using Monte Carlo simulation and deep neural network10.1007/s41939-024-00388-5 ↗
44. Stam · Seminal graphics papers: pushing the boundaries · 2023 · 2 · 139
45. Seamless integration of computer-aided geometric modeling and acoustic simulation: isogeometric boundary element methods based on Catmull-Clark subdivision surfaces10.1016/j.advengsoft.2020.102879 ↗
46. Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics10.1029/94JC00572 ↗
47. Numerical impact of variable volumes of Monte Carlo simulations of heterogeneous conductivity fields in groundwater flow models10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131072 ↗
48. Deep learned finite elements10.1016/j.cma.2020.113401 ↗
49. Computational mechanics enhanced by deep learning10.1016/j.cma.2017.08.040 ↗
50. Feature noise boosts DNN generalization under label noise10.1109/TNNLS.2024.3394511 ↗